How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Inclusion–Exclusion, the Pigeonhole Principle and Double Counting
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Summary
A group action turns the elements of a group into symmetries of a set. Groups, homomorphisms, kernels, quotient groups and isomorphisms supply the declared algebraic prerequisites, while symmetric groups turn actions into permutation representations. Subgroups and cosets provide stabilisers and orbit models; normal subgroups and the isomorphism theorems control action kernels. Finite cardinality, index, Lagrange's theorem and elementary counting support the finite results.
Equivariant maps, free actions and fixed-point sets lead to orbit–stabiliser, coset actions, cores and the classification of transitive actions. Conjugation then yields centralisers, normalisers, conjugacy-class counts, the non-covering theorem and the class equation. For finite -groups, orbit decomposition gives the fixed-point congruence, index- normality, nontrivial centres, the order- theorem, central intersection for normal subgroups and Cauchy's theorem. Double-counting fixed pairs closes the page with Cauchy–Frobenius orbit counting and Jordan's derangement theorem, while Cayley's theorem remains the regular-action case.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions
Definition
Let be a group with identity and let be a set. A left action of on is a function , written , such that
for all and . Then is a -set. The action is transitive when every satisfy for some . It is faithful when for every implies .
Actions of on correspond exactly to homomorphisms
Statement
For groups and a set , left actions of on are in bijection with group homomorphisms . The action attached to is ; the homomorphism attached to an action sends to the permutation .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group with identity and a set .
A left action satisfies and (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).
is the group of bijections under composition (The symmetric group : the bijections of a set under composition, is a group under composition, and it is non-abelian whenever has at least three distinct elements).
A group homomorphism preserves multiplication and sends the identity to the identity (Monoid homomorphism and group homomorphism, A group homomorphism automatically satisfies and , and for every ; for monoid homomorphisms preservation of the identity must be assumed).
Proof
Given an action, define . The maps are bijective: is a two-sided inverse because the action laws give .
Conversely, let be a homomorphism and set . Then , and .
The action law gives for every ; thus , so is a homomorphism into .
The two constructions recover their input pointwise, so they are mutually inverse correspondences.
The orbit and stabilizer of a point in a group action
Definition
For a left action of on and , the orbit of is
and the stabilizer of is
The subgroup claim implicit in the word “stabilizer” is proved in The stabilizer is a subgroup of ↗.
The stabilizer is a subgroup of
Statement
For every left action of a group on a set and every , the stabilizer is a subgroup of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A left action of on and .
The action satisfies and (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).
A nonempty subset of a group is a subgroup exactly when for all (One-step subgroup test: a nonempty is a subgroup iff for all ; the identity and the inverses of are then those of , Subgroup).
Proof
The identity lies in , since . Thus is nonempty.
If , then : indeed implies . Therefore .
The subgroup criterion now gives .
The orbits of a group action are the equivalence classes of iff for some , and hence partition the acted-on set
Statement
For a left action of on , define when for some . This is an equivalence relation, its equivalence class at is , and the distinct orbits partition .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A left action of a group on a set .
The action laws are and (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).
The orbit at is (The orbit and stabilizer of a point in a group action).
Equivalence classes of an equivalence relation partition the underlying set (Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set , The equivalence classes of an equivalence relation are nonempty, cover , and are pairwise equal or disjoint; conversely every such cover arises from exactly one equivalence relation).
Proof
The relation is reflexive: , so .
If , then , so implies .
If and , then , so and imply .
Steps 1.1–1.3 show that is an equivalence relation. Its class at is precisely the set of , namely .
Therefore the distinct orbits partition .
Cayley's theorem: every group is isomorphic to a subgroup of
Statement
Every group is isomorphic to the subgroup of formed by its left translations .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group with identity .
A left action of on a set gives a homomorphism into its symmetric group (Actions of on correspond exactly to homomorphisms , Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).
The image of a group homomorphism is a subgroup, and a homomorphism is injective exactly when its kernel is trivial (The image of a group homomorphism is a subgroup and its kernel is a normal subgroup, A group homomorphism is injective if and only if its kernel is trivial).
A bijective group homomorphism is an isomorphism (Group isomorphisms, automorphisms and the set ).
Proof
Define on the set underlying . Then and , so this is a left action.
By [L1], the action yields a homomorphism with .
If is the identity permutation, then evaluating it at gives . Hence and is injective.
The image is a subgroup of , and the injective homomorphism is bijective.
Thus is an isomorphism from to a subgroup of .
Equivariant maps and isomorphisms of group actions
Definition
Let and be -sets (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions). A function (A function is a relation with and implying ; , the value , domain and codomain) is -equivariant when
for every and . An isomorphism of -sets is an equivariant bijection (Injection, surjection, bijection). Two actions are equivariantly isomorphic when such a bijection exists between their -sets.
A free group action has no nonidentity element fixing a point
Definition
A left action of a group on a set (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions) is free when
for every and . Equivalently, no nonidentity element of fixes any point of .
The fixed-point sets and of a group action
Definition
Let a group act on a set (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions). For , the fixed-point set of is
The global fixed-point set is
Orbit-stabiliser: , , is a well-defined bijection
Statement
Let act on and let . The rule
is well-defined and bijective. Thus every orbit is naturally in bijection with the left cosets of its stabilizer.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A left action of a group on a set and a point .
The orbit and stabilizer are and (The orbit and stabilizer of a point in a group action).
The stabilizer is a subgroup of (The stabilizer is a subgroup of ).
For a subgroup , the left coset represented by is (Left and right cosets and of a subgroup).
For , one has exactly when ( iff , and iff ).
A function is bijective exactly when it is injective and surjective (Injection, surjection, bijection).
Proof
Define . If , then by [L4], so by [L1], and the action law gives ; hence is well-defined.
Every has the form by [L1], so is surjective.
If , then , so and ; [L4] gives , so is injective and therefore bijective.
Orbit-stabiliser cardinality: whenever either side is finite, and for finite
Statement
For an action of on and ,
whenever either side is finite. In particular, if is finite, then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A left action of on and a point .
The map , , is a bijection (Orbit-stabiliser: , , is a well-defined bijection).
The index is the finite cardinality when the coset set is finite (The coset set and the index of a subgroup).
Finite cardinality is preserved by a bijection (The cardinality of a finite set).
If is finite and , then (Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group ).
Proof
By [L1], the sets and are bijective; [L2] and [L3] therefore give whenever they are finite.
If is finite, [L4] applied to gives .
If , then
Statement
Let act on . If , then
In particular, stabilizers of points in the same orbit are conjugate and hence isomorphic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A left action of on , points , and with .
The stabilizer is (The orbit and stabilizer of a point in a group action).
A left action satisfies and (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).
Conjugation is an automorphism of (Conjugation is an automorphism).
Proof
For , one has exactly when , which by [L2] is equivalent, after applying , to , that is, to .
The last condition is equivalent to , so ; [L3] also makes conjugation an isomorphism from onto .
The core of a subgroup
Definition
Let be a subgroup (Subgroup). Its core in is
Each is a subgroup because conjugation is an automorphism (Conjugation is an automorphism). The facts that the displayed intersection is normal in and is the largest normal subgroup of contained in are proved in is the largest normal subgroup of contained in ↗.
is the largest normal subgroup of contained in
Statement
For , the core is a normal subgroup of , satisfies , and contains every normal subgroup of that is contained in . Thus it is the largest normal subgroup of contained in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group , a subgroup , and .
The core is (The core of a subgroup).
A subgroup is normal when for every (Normal subgroup: invariance under conjugation).
Normality is equivalent to for every (Equivalent characterisations of a normal subgroup by conjugates and left and right cosets).
A nonempty subset of a group is a subgroup if for every (One-step subgroup test: a nonempty is a subgroup iff for all ; the identity and the inverses of are then those of ).
Proof
The identity belongs to every , and if belong to every such conjugate then does too; [L4] makes a subgroup. The factor for is , so .
For , conjugation sends the family to , the same family because is a bijection; hence , and [L2] gives .
If and , then for every , so .
Left multiplication on is transitive, has stabiliser at , and has kernel
Statement
Let . Left multiplication defines a transitive action of on the coset set by
The stabilizer of the point is . The corresponding homomorphism has
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group and a subgroup .
A left action satisfies the identity and multiplication laws and is transitive when some group element carries any chosen point to any other (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).
Every action yields a homomorphism into the symmetric group of the acted-on set (Actions of on correspond exactly to homomorphisms ).
The elements of are the left cosets (Left and right cosets and of a subgroup, The coset set and the index of a subgroup).
One has exactly when ( iff , and iff ).
The kernel of a homomorphism consists of the elements mapped to the identity (The kernel and image of a group homomorphism).
The core is (The core of a subgroup).
The core is a normal subgroup contained in ( is the largest normal subgroup of contained in ).
Proof
If , then by [L4], and , so and the rule is well-defined. It satisfies and ; moreover , so the action is transitive, and exactly when .
By [L2], the action defines . By [L5], an element lies in exactly when for every , that is, when for every .
By [L4], is equivalent to , or to . Requiring this for every gives , so , which is normal by [L7].
If , then , , and only finitely many subgroups contain
Statement
Let have finite index , and put . Then , the index divides , and there are only finitely many subgroups with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group , a subgroup of finite index , and .
The action on gives a homomorphism whose kernel is (Left multiplication on is transitive, has stabiliser at , and has kernel ).
The core is normal in , lies in , and contains every normal subgroup of lying in ( is the largest normal subgroup of contained in ).
First isomorphism gives (First isomorphism theorem for groups: ).
The symmetric group of a set is its group of bijections (The symmetric group : the bijections of a set under composition, is a group under composition, and it is non-abelian whenever has at least three distinct elements).
A set with elements has exactly bijections to itself (A finite set with has exactly bijections onto itself, and bijections onto any set of the same cardinality, The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in ).
The order of a subgroup of a finite group divides the order of the group (Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group ).
The canonical projection is a surjective homomorphism (The canonical projection , , is a surjective group homomorphism, The quotient group and coset product ).
The power set of a finite set is finite ( for finite ).
Every subset of a finite set is finite (A subset of a finite set is finite, with , and equality holds if and only if ).
For a finite-index subgroup, the index is the cardinality of its coset set (The coset set and the index of a subgroup, The cardinality of a finite set).
Proof
By [L1] and [L2], the coset action has kernel with , and its image is a subgroup of .
By [L3], . The set has elements by [L10], so [L5] gives ; [L6] therefore gives , that is, by [L10].
Every subgroup containing also contains by [L2]. If , then for some , so and hence ; thus . Therefore injects the set of such overgroups into the power set of the now known finite set , which is finite by [L8] and [L9].
Thus the core is normal and finite-index, its index divides , and the collection of subgroups containing is finite.
Every transitive -set is equivariantly isomorphic to for any chosen point
Statement
Let be a transitive -set and choose . Then the orbit map
is an equivariant isomorphism from the left-coset action on to the given action on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A transitive action of a group on a nonempty set and a point .
An isomorphism of -sets is an equivariant bijection (Equivariant maps and isomorphisms of group actions).
Transitivity means that for every there is with (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).
The map , , is a bijection (Orbit-stabiliser: , , is a well-defined bijection).
The left-coset action is (Left multiplication on is transitive, has stabiliser at , and has kernel ).
Proof
Define . By [L3], this is a bijection from onto .
For , one has , so is equivariant.
By transitivity [L2], . Thus is an equivariant bijection and hence an isomorphism of -sets.
A transitive action is faithful exactly when a point stabiliser is core-free
Statement
Let act transitively on a nonempty set , and let . The action is faithful if and only if
Equivalently, faithful transitive -sets are precisely the coset actions for core-free subgroups .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A transitive action of on a nonempty set and a point .
An action is faithful when the only group element fixing every point is the identity (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).
The action on is equivariantly isomorphic to the left-coset action on (Every transitive -set is equivariantly isomorphic to for any chosen point ).
The kernel of the action on is (Left multiplication on is transitive, has stabiliser at , and has kernel ).
The core is the intersection of all conjugates of the subgroup (The core of a subgroup).
Proof
By [L2], the equivariant isomorphism identifies the given action with the action on .
A group element fixes every point of exactly when it fixes every point of the equivariantly isomorphic coset set; by [L3] and [L4], the set of such elements is .
By [L1], the action is faithful exactly when this kernel is , proving both directions.
The conjugacy class and centralizer of an element
Definition
Let be a group and (Group and abelian group). The conjugacy class of is
The centralizer of is
The subgroup property implicit in the notation is proved in and are subgroups of ↗.
The normalizer of a subgroup
Definition
Let be a subgroup (Subgroup). The normalizer of in is
Thus exactly when the conjugation automorphism preserves setwise (Conjugation is an automorphism). The subgroup property is proved in and are subgroups of ↗.
and are subgroups of
Statement
For every group , element , and subgroup , both the centralizer and the normalizer are subgroups of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group , an element , and a subgroup .
The centralizer is (The conjugacy class and centralizer of an element).
The normalizer is (The normalizer of a subgroup).
A nonempty subset is a subgroup if whenever (One-step subgroup test: a nonempty is a subgroup iff for all ; the identity and the inverses of are then those of ).
Proof
The identity commutes with . If , then commutes with , and hence ; [L3] gives .
The identity normalizes . If , then , and therefore .
Applying [L3] to step 1.2 gives , so both asserted sets are subgroups.
is a bijection, so whenever these cardinalities are finite
Statement
For a group and , the map
is a well-defined bijection. Consequently
whenever these cardinalities are finite, in particular when is finite.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group and an element .
Orbit-stabiliser gives a bijection from the cosets of a point stabilizer to its orbit (Orbit-stabiliser: , , is a well-defined bijection).
The finite cardinality of an orbit is the index of its stabilizer (Orbit-stabiliser cardinality: whenever either side is finite, and for finite ).
The conjugacy class is and the centralizer is (The conjugacy class and centralizer of an element).
The centralizer is a subgroup of ( and are subgroups of ).
The maps form the conjugation homomorphism (The map is a homomorphism with kernel and image ).
A homomorphism into a symmetric group defines a group action (Actions of on correspond exactly to homomorphisms ).
Proof
By [L5] and [L6], acts on itself by conjugation. By [L3], the orbit of is and its stabilizer is , which is a subgroup by [L4].
Applying [L1] to this action gives the displayed well-defined bijection .
Applying [L2] to the same orbit gives whenever finite.
The conjugates of are in bijection with and, for finite , number
Statement
Let . The rule
is a well-defined bijection. If is finite, the number of distinct conjugates of is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group and a subgroup .
Orbit-stabiliser identifies an orbit with the cosets of its stabilizer (Orbit-stabiliser: , , is a well-defined bijection).
The cardinality of a finite orbit is the index of its stabilizer (Orbit-stabiliser cardinality: whenever either side is finite, and for finite ).
The normalizer is (The normalizer of a subgroup).
The normalizer is a subgroup of ( and are subgroups of ).
Conjugation by each is an automorphism of (Conjugation is an automorphism).
Proof
Let act on the set of subgroups of by . By [L5], conjugation sends subgroups to subgroups, and the conjugation identities give the action laws.
The orbit of is its set of conjugates, while [L3] says that its stabilizer is , a subgroup by [L4].
Applying [L1] gives the displayed bijection, and [L2] gives the finite count .
The conjugates of a proper subgroup do not cover a finite group
Statement
If is a proper subgroup of a finite group , then
Thus some element of lies in no conjugate of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group and a proper subgroup .
There are distinct conjugates of (The conjugates of are in bijection with and, for finite , number ).
The normalizer is (The normalizer of a subgroup).
The normalizer is a subgroup of ( and are subgroups of ).
Conjugation is an automorphism, so every conjugate of has cardinality (Conjugation is an automorphism).
For a finite group and subgroup, (Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group , The coset set and the index of a subgroup, The cardinality of a finite set).
A subset of a finite set is finite, has no larger cardinality, and has equal cardinality only when it is the whole set (A subset of a finite set is finite, with , and equality holds if and only if ).
The cardinality of a finite disjoint union is the sum of the cardinalities of its parts (The sum rule: a finite disjoint union is finite with and , and a sum over a finite index set splits along a partition).
Finite sums over finite index sets are well-defined (The sum over a finite index set, and its product form).
Proof
Let be the distinct conjugates of , where by [L1]. Each has elements by [L4] and contains . For , subgroup closure gives , so [L2] gives .
Add the sets successively after removing elements already counted. The common identity contributes once and each contributes at most , so [L6], [L7], and [L8] give .
Put . Properness gives . Since , [L5] gives , and [L5] also gives .
Therefore , so the union is a proper subset of .
The class equation for a finite group
Statement
Let be finite, and let contain one representative from each conjugacy class having more than one element. Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group and representatives of its non-singleton conjugacy classes.
The orbits of an action partition the acted-on set (The orbits of a group action are the equivalence classes of iff for some , and hence partition the acted-on set).
Under conjugation, ( is a bijection, so whenever these cardinalities are finite).
Conjugacy classes and centralizers are as in The conjugacy class and centralizer of an element.
The center is (The center of a group).
A finite partition has cardinality equal to the sum of its block cardinalities (The sum rule: a finite disjoint union is finite with and , and a sum over a finite index set splits along a partition).
Finite sums over finite index sets are well-defined (The sum over a finite index set, and its product form).
Proof
Let act on itself by conjugation. By [L1] and [L3], its orbits are the conjugacy classes and they partition .
The class of is a singleton exactly when for every , equivalently when by [L4]. Thus the singleton classes contribute .
Applying the finite partition sum rule to the singleton classes and to the classes represented by gives .
Replacing each remaining class size by [L2] yields .
A finite -group has order for a prime and some
Definition
Let be a prime natural number (Prime and composite integers: is prime when and its only positive divisors are and ). A finite -group is a finite group (Group and abelian group, The cardinality of a finite set) whose order has the form
for some , with natural exponentiation as in Exponentiation of natural numbers, , and its agreement with the integer power in . The case permits the trivial group. A finite -group is nontrivial exactly when .
Every subgroup of a finite -group has order a power of
Statement
If is a finite -group and , then is finite and
for some . If , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite -group with and a subgroup .
A finite -group has order for a prime and a natural (A finite -group has order for a prime and some ).
Lagrange gives (Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group ).
Positive integers have unique prime factorisations (For and any injective list of primes containing every prime divisor of , one has ; the exponents are determined by , and for every prime outside the list).
Proof
By [L2], the finite set has positive order dividing .
By uniqueness in [L3], no prime other than can divide , so for some natural .
This includes the trivial subgroup, whose order is , and proves that every subgroup of is a finite -group.
Every subgroup of index in a finite -group is normal
Statement
Let be a finite -group and let . If , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite -group and a subgroup with .
For , one has , , and (If , then , , and only finitely many subgroups contain , is the largest normal subgroup of contained in ).
Every subgroup of has order a power of (Every subgroup of a finite -group has order a power of ).
If , then (For with finite, ).
The factorial is the product of the positive natural numbers at most (The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in ).
If a prime divides a finite product, it divides one of the factors (If a prime divides a finite product of integers then for some ; at the product is and the hypothesis cannot hold).
A prime is greater than and has no positive divisors other than and (Prime and composite integers: is prime when and its only positive divisors are and ).
For a subgroup of a finite group, the subgroup order divides the group order and the quotient is the index (Lagrange's theorem: for every subgroup of a finite group ).
Proof
Put . By [L1] and [L3], , , , and .
By [L2] and [L8], the orders of and are powers of and their quotient is ; [L6] therefore makes a positive power of , and step 1.1 makes it divisible by .
Among the factors in , only is divisible by by [L7]. If divided , cancellation of the factor and [L5] would make divide one of , impossible. Thus the positive power of in step 2.1 that divides is exactly .
Step 1.1 now gives , so and . Since is normal in , so is .
If a finite -group acts on a finite set , then
Statement
If a finite -group acts on a finite set , then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite -group acting on a finite set .
A finite -group has prime-power order (A finite -group has order for a prime and some ).
The global fixed-point set is (The fixed-point sets and of a group action).
An orbit has size (Orbit-stabiliser cardinality: whenever either side is finite, and for finite ).
Every subgroup of has prime-power order (Every subgroup of a finite -group has order a power of ).
The congruence means that divides (Congruence modulo an integer: when , including the moduli and ).
A finite partition has total cardinality equal to the sum of its block cardinalities (The sum rule: a finite disjoint union is finite with and , and a sum over a finite index set splits along a partition).
Finite sums over finite index sets are well-defined (The sum over a finite index set, and its product form).
Proof
By [L3], is the disjoint union of its -orbits. An orbit is a singleton exactly when its point is fixed by every element of , so the singleton orbits are indexed by .
For a non-singleton orbit , the stabilizer is proper. By [L1], [L4], and [L5], its index is a positive power of , so divides .
Applying [L7] and [L8] to the orbit partition, every non-singleton orbit contributes a multiple of and the singleton orbits contribute . Thus divides , which is the asserted congruence by [L6].
A finite -group action on has a global fixed point whenever
Statement
Let a finite -group act on a finite set . If , then ; equivalently, the action has a point fixed by every element of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite -group acting on a finite set , with .
The fixed-point congruence gives (If a finite -group acts on a finite set , then ).
The set consists of the points fixed by every element of (The fixed-point sets and of a group action).
Congruence modulo means divisibility of the difference by (Congruence modulo an integer: when , including the moduli and ).
A prime is positive and greater than (Prime and composite integers: is prime when and its only positive divisors are and ).
Proof
Suppose, for contradiction, that . Then .
By [L1] and [L3], divides , contradicting the hypothesis.
Therefore is nonempty, and any of its elements is a global fixed point by [L2].
Every nontrivial finite -group has nontrivial center, in fact divides
Statement
If is a nontrivial finite -group, then
In particular, the center contains a nonidentity element.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nontrivial finite -group .
Nontriviality means with (A finite -group has order for a prime and some ).
For an action of on a finite set , (If a finite -group acts on a finite set , then ).
Conjugation gives a homomorphism (The map is a homomorphism with kernel and image ).
A homomorphism into a symmetric group defines an action (Actions of on correspond exactly to homomorphisms ).
The center is the set of elements commuting with every element of (The center of a group).
Congruence modulo means divisibility of the difference by (Congruence modulo an integer: when , including the moduli and ).
Proof
By [L3] and [L4], acts on itself by conjugation. An element is fixed by all conjugations exactly when it lies in by [L5].
Applying [L2] to this action gives .
By [L1], divides . Hence [L6] and step 2.1 show that divides . Since contains the identity and its cardinality is a positive multiple of , it also contains a nonidentity element.
If is cyclic, then is abelian
Statement
If the quotient group is cyclic, then is abelian.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group such that is cyclic.
The center consists of the elements commuting with every element of (The center of a group).
The center is a normal subgroup of (The center of a group is a normal subgroup).
Multiplication in is (The quotient group and coset product ).
A cyclic group is generated by one element (The subgroup generated by a subset, the cyclic subgroup , and cyclic groups).
The subgroup generated by an element is the set of its integer powers (, and every cyclic group is abelian).
Powers of one group element commute with one another (Exponent laws in a group: and for all , and when and commute).
Equality of left cosets is equivalent to ( iff , and iff ).
Proof
Choose generating . By [L3]--[L6], arbitrary satisfy and for some integers . By [L7], and lie in ; setting and gives and .
The elements commute with every element by [L1], and commutes with by [L6].
Therefore . Since were arbitrary, is abelian.
Every group of order , for prime , is abelian
Statement
If is prime and is a group of order , then is abelian.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A prime and a finite group with .
A nontrivial finite -group has nontrivial center (Every nontrivial finite -group has nontrivial center, in fact divides ).
If is cyclic, then is abelian (If is cyclic, then is abelian).
For finite , (If is finite then ; for finite this equals ).
A group of prime order is cyclic (A finite group of prime order is cyclic and every nonidentity element generates it).
A group of order is a finite -group (A finite -group has order for a prime and some ).
Every subgroup of a finite -group has prime-power order (Every subgroup of a finite -group has order a power of ).
The center is a normal subgroup, hence in particular a subgroup, of (The center of a group is a normal subgroup).
A finite subset with the same cardinality as its ambient finite set is the whole set (A subset of a finite set is finite, with , and equality holds if and only if ).
Proof
By [L1] and [L7], is a nontrivial subgroup of ; [L5] and [L6] therefore show that it has order or .
If , then [L8] gives , so is abelian. If , then [L3] gives , so [L4] makes cyclic.
In the second case [L2] makes abelian, and the first case already did so. Hence every group of order is abelian.
Every nontrivial normal subgroup of a finite -group meets the center nontrivially
Statement
Let be a finite -group and let be nontrivial. Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite -group and a nontrivial normal subgroup .
A finite -group has prime-power order (A finite -group has order for a prime and some ).
A finite -group action satisfies the fixed-point congruence (If a finite -group acts on a finite set , then ).
Conjugation by is an automorphism (Conjugation is an automorphism).
The center consists of the elements fixed by every conjugation (The center of a group).
A nontrivial subgroup of a finite -group has order for some (Every subgroup of a finite -group has order a power of ).
Proof
By [L3] and [L4], conjugation restricts to an action of on the finite set .
A point of is fixed by every element of exactly when it lies in by [L5].
By [L6], divides . Applying [L2] to the action in step 1.1 therefore shows that divides .
The intersection contains , and its cardinality is a positive multiple of the prime ; hence it contains a nonidentity element.
Cauchy's theorem: if a prime divides , then has an element of order
Statement
Let be a finite group and let be prime. If , then contains an element of order .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group and a prime dividing .
A finite -group acting on a finite set satisfies the fixed-point congruence (If a finite -group acts on a finite set , then ).
The additive group is a group with elements and hence is a finite -group (For every natural , is an abelian group, multiplication is a commutative monoid operation, and both distributive laws hold, The congruence class and the quotient set , For , every class in has one representative with , so ; while is in bijection with , A finite -group has order for a prime and some ).
If and are finite, the set of functions has cardinality (The set of functions between finite sets is finite, with , Exponentiation of natural numbers, , and its agreement with the integer power in ).
A prime is greater than and has only and itself as positive divisors (Prime and composite integers: is prime when and its only positive divisors are and ).
A congruence means that divides , and divisibility means existence of an integer factor (Congruence modulo an integer: when , including the moduli and , Divisibility in : when for some integer ).
The order of an element is the least positive exponent giving the identity (The order of a finite group and the order of an element, with when no positive power of is the identity, If then iff is an integer multiple of , the powers are distinct, and has exactly elements; if has infinite order then only for ).
Proof
Let be the set of -tuples whose ordered product is . The first coordinates determine the last uniquely as , so [L3] gives ; since and , one has .
Let act on by cyclic rotation. If , then , so rotation preserves ; rotations are the identity, and [L2] therefore gives an action of the finite -group .
A tuple is fixed by every rotation exactly when it is constant, say , and it lies in exactly when .
By [L1], . Step 1.1 makes the left side divisible by , so the number of fixed tuples is divisible by . The constant identity tuple is fixed, and a positive multiple of cannot equal , so there is another fixed tuple.
By step 3.1, this second tuple is for some with . By [L6], the positive order of divides the prime and is not , so it is .
Cauchy-Frobenius orbit counting: for a finite group action
Statement
Let a finite group act on a finite set , and let denote the set of orbits. Then
Equivalently, the number of orbits is the average number of fixed points of an element of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group acting on a finite set .
The fixed-point set of is (The fixed-point sets and of a group action).
A finite incidence relation can be counted by either family of fibres (Double counting: for a relation between finite sets).
Finite sums over finite index sets are well-defined (The sum over a finite index set, and its product form).
A finite sum splits along a finite partition of its index set (The sum rule: a finite disjoint union is finite with and , and a sum over a finite index set splits along a partition).
Proof
Let . Counting its fibres over and using [L1], [L4], and [L5] gives .
Counting the same relation over gives .
Split the second sum along the orbit partition using [L2] and [L6]. On an orbit , [L3] gives for every , so that orbit contributes .
There is one contribution for each orbit in , hence . Combining this with step 1.1 gives the stated identity.
Jordan's derangement theorem: every transitive action of a finite group on a finite set with more than one element has a nonidentity element with no fixed points
Statement
Let a finite group act transitively on a finite set with . Then some nonidentity is a derangement:
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A transitive action of a finite group on a finite set with .
A transitive action has exactly one orbit (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).
The fixed-point set is (The fixed-point sets and of a group action).
Cauchy-Frobenius gives (Cauchy-Frobenius orbit counting: for a finite group action).
Finite cardinalities add over disjoint unions (The sum rule: a finite disjoint union is finite with and , and a sum over a finite index set splits along a partition, The cardinality of a finite set).
Finite sums over finite index sets are well-defined (The sum over a finite index set, and its product form).
Proof
By transitivity [L1], , so [L3] gives .
The identity fixes every point, so ; splitting its term from the finite sum gives .
Suppose, for contradiction, that every nonidentity fixes a point. Then every term in the remaining sum is at least , so step 1.2 gives , since .
This contradicts step 1.1. Therefore some has ; the identity fixes all of , so this is nonidentity.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
Standard references
Recommended treatments; not extraction sources.
- Brosnan, Group actions
- Brosnan, Orbits and stabilizers
- Brosnan, Cayley's theorem
- P. Brosnan, Undergraduate Algebra Notes, 3.14: G-Sets
- T. W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, 14.1
- T. W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, 14.3
- P. Brosnan, Undergraduate Algebra Notes, 3.14: G-Sets, Theorem 3.107
- T. W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, 14.1, Theorem 14.11
- K. Conrad, Group Actions, Theorem 6.8
- P. Brosnan, Undergraduate Algebra Notes, 3.14: G-Sets, Proposition 3.102 and Corollary 3.104
- P. Brosnan, Undergraduate Algebra Notes, 3.14: G-Sets, Lemma 3.105 and Theorem 3.107
- T. W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, 14.2
- P. Brosnan, Undergraduate Algebra Notes, 3.14: G-Sets, Corollary 3.109
- P. Brosnan, Undergraduate Algebra Notes, 3.14: G-Sets, Corollary 3.110
- K. Conrad, Group Actions, Theorem 6.10
- T. W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, 14.2, The Class Equation
- K. Conrad, Group Actions, Section 4
- K. Conrad, Group Actions, Corollary 6.4
- K. Conrad, Group Actions, Theorem 4.1
- K. Conrad, Group Actions, Corollary 4.2
- K. Conrad, Group Actions, Theorem 5.1
- T. W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, Corollary 14.16, proof
- K. Conrad, Group Actions, Corollary 5.2
- K. Conrad, Group Actions, Theorem 5.3
- K. Conrad, Group Actions, Theorem 5.4
- T. W. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, 14.3, Burnside's Counting Theorem
- K. Conrad, Group Actions, Theorem 3.29
- K. Conrad, Group Actions, Theorem 6.6