Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 28 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 28 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

A group action turns the elements of a group into symmetries of a set. Groups, homomorphisms, kernels, quotient groups and isomorphisms supply the declared algebraic prerequisites, while symmetric groups turn actions into permutation representations. Subgroups and cosets provide stabilisers and orbit models; normal subgroups and the isomorphism theorems control action kernels. Finite cardinality, index, Lagrange's theorem and elementary counting support the finite results.

Equivariant maps, free actions and fixed-point sets lead to orbit–stabiliser, coset actions, cores and the classification of transitive actions. Conjugation then yields centralisers, normalisers, conjugacy-class counts, the non-covering theorem and the class equation. For finite p-groups, orbit decomposition gives the fixed-point congruence, index-p normality, nontrivial centres, the order-p2 theorem, central intersection for normal subgroups and Cauchy's theorem. Double-counting fixed pairs closes the page with Cauchy–Frobenius orbit counting and Jordan's derangement theorem, while Cayley's theorem remains the regular-action case.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-03Open item page →

Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions

Definition

Let G be a group with identity e and let X be a set. A left action of G on X is a function G×X→X, written (g,x)↦g⋅x, such that

e⋅x=x,(gh)⋅x=g⋅(h⋅x)

for all g,h∈G and x∈X. Then X is a G-set. The action is transitive when every x,y∈X satisfy g⋅x=y for some g∈G. It is faithful when g⋅x=x for every x∈X implies g=e.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03Open item page →

Actions of G on X correspond exactly to homomorphisms G→Sym⁡(X)

Statement

For groups G and a set X, left actions of G on X are in bijection with group homomorphisms ρ:G→Sym⁡(X). The action attached to ρ is g⋅x:=ρ(g)(x); the homomorphism attached to an action sends g to the permutation x↦g⋅x.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Given an action, define ρ(g)(x)=g⋅x. The maps ρ(g) are bijective: ρ(g−1) is a two-sided inverse because the action laws give g−1⋅(g⋅x)=x=g⋅(g−1⋅x).

L1givenalgebra
1.2

Conversely, let ρ:G→Sym⁡(X) be a homomorphism and set g⋅x=ρ(g)(x). Then e⋅x=ρ(e)(x)=x, and (gh)⋅x=ρ(g)(ρ(h)(x))=g⋅(h⋅x).

L2L3given
2.1

The action law gives ρ(gh)(x)=g⋅(h⋅x)=(ρ(g)∘ρ(h))(x) for every x; thus ρ(gh)=ρ(g)∘ρ(h), so ρ is a homomorphism into Sym⁡(X).

step 1.1L1L2L3given
3.1

The two constructions recover their input pointwise, so they are mutually inverse correspondences.

step 2.1step 1.2∎
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-03Open item page →

The orbit G⋅x and stabilizer Gx of a point in a group action

Definition

For a left action of G on X and x∈X, the orbit of x is

G⋅x:={g⋅x:g∈G},

and the stabilizer of x is

Gx:={g∈G:g⋅x=x}.

The subgroup claim implicit in the word “stabilizer” is proved in The stabilizer Gx is a subgroup of G ↗.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03Open item page →

The stabilizer Gx is a subgroup of G

Statement

For every left action of a group G on a set X and every x∈X, the stabilizer Gx is a subgroup of G.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A left action of G on X and x∈X.

[L2]

The action satisfies e⋅x=x and (gh)⋅x=g⋅(h⋅x) (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The identity lies in Gx, since e⋅x=x. Thus Gx is nonempty.

L1L2given
1.2

If a,b∈Gx, then (ab−1)⋅x=a⋅(b−1⋅x)=a⋅x=x: indeed b⋅x=x implies b−1⋅x=b−1⋅(b⋅x)=x. Therefore ab−1∈Gx.

L1L2givenalgebra
2.1

The subgroup criterion now gives Gx≤G.

step 1.1step 1.2L3∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03Open item page →

The orbits of a group action are the equivalence classes of x∼y iff y=g⋅x for some g, and hence partition the acted-on set

Statement

For a left action of G on X, define x∼y when y=g⋅x for some g∈G. This is an equivalence relation, its equivalence class at x is G⋅x, and the distinct orbits partition X.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A left action of a group G on a set X.

[L1]

The action laws are e⋅x=x and (gh)⋅x=g⋅(h⋅x) (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).

[L2]

The orbit at x is G⋅x={g⋅x:g∈G} (The orbit G⋅x and stabilizer Gx of a point in a group action).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The relation is reflexive: x=e⋅x, so x∼x.

L1given
1.2

If y=g⋅x, then x=g−1⋅y, so x∼y implies y∼x.

L1givenalgebra
1.3

If y=g⋅x and z=h⋅y, then z=(hg)⋅x, so x∼y and y∼z imply x∼z.

L1givenalgebra
2.1

Steps 1.1–1.3 show that ∼ is an equivalence relation. Its class at x is precisely the set of y=g⋅x, namely G⋅x.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3L2L3
3.1

Therefore the distinct orbits partition X.

step 2.1L3∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03Open item page →

Cayley's theorem: every group G is isomorphic to a subgroup of Sym⁡(G)

Statement

Every group G is isomorphic to the subgroup of Sym⁡(G) formed by its left translations λg:x↦gx.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A group G with identity e.

[L2]

The image of a group homomorphism is a subgroup, and a homomorphism is injective exactly when its kernel is trivial (The image of a group homomorphism is a subgroup and its kernel is a normal subgroup, A group homomorphism is injective if and only if its kernel is trivial).

[L3]

A bijective group homomorphism is an isomorphism (Group isomorphisms, automorphisms and the set Aut⁡(G)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Define g⋅x=gx on the set underlying G. Then e⋅x=x and (gh)⋅x=g⋅(h⋅x), so this is a left action.

L1givenalgebra
2.1

By [L1], the action yields a homomorphism λ:G→Sym⁡(G) with λ(g)(x)=gx.

step 1.1L1
3.1

If λ(g) is the identity permutation, then evaluating it at e gives g=λ(g)(e)=e. Hence ker⁡λ={e} and λ is injective.

step 2.1L2given
4.1

The image λ[G] is a subgroup of Sym⁡(G), and the injective homomorphism λ:G→λ[G] is bijective.

step 2.1step 3.1L2
5.1

Thus λ is an isomorphism from G to a subgroup of Sym⁡(G).

step 4.1L3∎
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Equivariant maps and isomorphisms of group actions

Definition

Let X and Y be G-sets (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions). A function f:X→Y (A function is a relation f with (a,b)∈f and (a,c)∈f implying b=c; f:A→B, the value f(a), domain and codomain) is G-equivariant when

f(g⋅x)=g⋅f(x)

for every g∈G and x∈X. An isomorphism of G-sets is an equivariant bijection (Injection, surjection, bijection). Two actions are equivariantly isomorphic when such a bijection exists between their G-sets.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

A free group action has no nonidentity element fixing a point

Definition

A left action of a group G on a set X (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions) is free when

g⋅x=x⟹g=e

for every g∈G and x∈X. Equivalently, no nonidentity element of G fixes any point of X.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The fixed-point sets Xg and XG of a group action

Definition

Let a group G act on a set X (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions). For g∈G, the fixed-point set of g is

Xg:={x∈X:g⋅x=x}.

The global fixed-point set is

XG:={x∈X:g⋅x=x for every g∈G}=⋂g∈GXg.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Orbit-stabiliser: G/Gx→G⋅x, gGx↦g⋅x, is a well-defined bijection

Statement

Let G act on X and let x∈X. The rule

Φ:G/Gx⟶G⋅x,Φ(gGx)=g⋅x,

is well-defined and bijective. Thus every orbit is naturally in bijection with the left cosets of its stabilizer.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A left action of a group G on a set X and a point x∈X.

[L1]

The orbit and stabilizer are G⋅x={g⋅x:g∈G} and Gx={g∈G:g⋅x=x} (The orbit G⋅x and stabilizer Gx of a point in a group action).

[L2]

The stabilizer Gx is a subgroup of G (The stabilizer Gx is a subgroup of G).

[L3]

For a subgroup H≤G, the left coset represented by g is gH={gh:h∈H} (Left and right cosets gH and Hg of a subgroup).

[L4]

For H≤G, one has gH=hH exactly when g−1h∈H (x∈aH iff a−1x∈H, and aH=bH iff a−1b∈H).

[L5]

A function is bijective exactly when it is injective and surjective (Injection, surjection, bijection).

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1

Define Φ(gGx)=g⋅x. If gGx=hGx, then g−1h∈Gx by [L4], so (g−1h)⋅x=x by [L1], and the action law gives h⋅x=g⋅((g−1h)⋅x)=g⋅x; hence Φ is well-defined.

L1L2L3L4L5construct
2.1

Every y∈G⋅x has the form y=g⋅x=Φ(gGx) by [L1], so Φ is surjective.

step 1.1L1
3.1

If Φ(gGx)=Φ(hGx), then g⋅x=h⋅x, so (g−1h)⋅x=x and g−1h∈Gx; [L4] gives gGx=hGx, so Φ is injective and therefore bijective.

step 1.1L1L4L5discharge-construct∎
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Orbit-stabiliser cardinality: ∣G⋅x∣=[G:Gx] whenever either side is finite, and ∣G∣=∣Gx∣ ∣G⋅x∣ for finite G

Statement

For an action of G on X and x∈X,

∣G⋅x∣=[G:Gx]

whenever either side is finite. In particular, if G is finite, then

∣G∣=∣Gx∣ ∣G⋅x∣.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A left action of G on X and a point x∈X.

[L1]

The map G/Gx→G⋅x, gGx↦g⋅x, is a bijection (Orbit-stabiliser: G/Gx→G⋅x, gGx↦g⋅x, is a well-defined bijection).

[L2]

The index is the finite cardinality [G:H]=∣G/H∣ when the coset set is finite (The coset set G/H and the index [G:H] of a subgroup).

[L3]

Finite cardinality is preserved by a bijection (The cardinality ∣A∣ of a finite set).

[L4]

If G is finite and H≤G, then ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣ (Lagrange's theorem: ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣ for every subgroup H of a finite group G).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], the sets G/Gx and G⋅x are bijective; [L2] and [L3] therefore give ∣G⋅x∣=∣G/Gx∣=[G:Gx] whenever they are finite.

L1L2L3
2.1

If G is finite, [L4] applied to Gx≤G gives ∣G∣=[G:Gx]∣Gx∣=∣G⋅x∣ ∣Gx∣.

step 1.1L4algebra∎
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

If y=g⋅x, then Gy=gGxg−1

Statement

Let G act on X. If y=g⋅x, then

Gy=gGxg−1.

In particular, stabilizers of points in the same orbit are conjugate and hence isomorphic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A left action of G on X, points x,y∈X, and g∈G with y=g⋅x.

[L1]

The stabilizer is Gx={h∈G:h⋅x=x} (The orbit G⋅x and stabilizer Gx of a point in a group action).

[L2]

A left action satisfies (ab)⋅z=a⋅(b⋅z) and e⋅z=z (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).

[L3]

Conjugation h↦ghg−1 is an automorphism of G (Conjugation x↦gxg−1 is an automorphism).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For h∈G, one has h∈Gy exactly when h⋅(g⋅x)=g⋅x, which by [L2] is equivalent, after applying g−1, to (g−1hg)⋅x=x, that is, to g−1hg∈Gx.

L1L2L3
2.1

The last condition is equivalent to h∈gGxg−1, so Gy=gGxg−1; [L3] also makes conjugation an isomorphism from Gx onto Gy.

step 1.1L3algebra∎
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The core Core⁡G(H)=⋂g∈GgHg−1 of a subgroup

Definition

Let H≤G be a subgroup (Subgroup). Its core in G is

Core⁡G(H):=⋂g∈GgHg−1.

Each gHg−1 is a subgroup because conjugation is an automorphism (Conjugation x↦gxg−1 is an automorphism). The facts that the displayed intersection is normal in G and is the largest normal subgroup of G contained in H are proved in Core⁡G(H) is the largest normal subgroup of G contained in H ↗.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Core⁡G(H) is the largest normal subgroup of G contained in H

Statement

For H≤G, the core K=Core⁡G(H) is a normal subgroup of G, satisfies K≤H, and contains every normal subgroup of G that is contained in H. Thus it is the largest normal subgroup of G contained in H.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A group G, a subgroup H≤G, and K:=Core⁡G(H).

[L1]
[L2]

A subgroup N is normal when gNg−1=N for every g∈G (Normal subgroup: invariance under conjugation).

[L3]

Normality is equivalent to gNg−1⊆N for every g∈G (Equivalent characterisations of a normal subgroup by conjugates and left and right cosets).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The identity belongs to every gHg−1, and if a,b belong to every such conjugate then ab−1 does too; [L4] makes K a subgroup. The factor for g=e is H, so K≤H.

L1L4
1.2

For t∈G, conjugation sends the family {gHg−1:g∈G} to {(tg)H(tg)−1:g∈G}, the same family because g↦tg is a bijection; hence tKt−1=K, and [L2] gives K⊴G.

L1L2L3
2.1

If N⊴G and N≤H, then N=gNg−1≤gHg−1 for every g∈G, so N≤⋂ggHg−1=K.

L1L2L3∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Left multiplication on G/H is transitive, has stabiliser H at H, and has kernel Core⁡G(H)

Statement

Let H≤G. Left multiplication defines a transitive action of G on the coset set G/H by

g⋅(aH):=(ga)H.

The stabilizer of the point H is H. The corresponding homomorphism ρ:G→Sym⁡(G/H) has

ker⁡ρ=Core⁡G(H).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A group G and a subgroup H≤G.

[L1]

A left action satisfies the identity and multiplication laws and is transitive when some group element carries any chosen point to any other (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).

[L2]

Every action yields a homomorphism into the symmetric group of the acted-on set (Actions of G on X correspond exactly to homomorphisms G→Sym⁡(X)).

[L4]

One has aH=bH exactly when a−1b∈H (x∈aH iff a−1x∈H, and aH=bH iff a−1b∈H).

[L5]

The kernel of a homomorphism consists of the elements mapped to the identity (The kernel and image of a group homomorphism).

[L6]

The core is Core⁡G(H)=⋂a∈GaHa−1 (The core Core⁡G(H)=⋂g∈GgHg−1 of a subgroup).

[L7]

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If aH=bH, then a−1b∈H by [L4], and (ga)−1(gb)=a−1b∈H, so (ga)H=(gb)H and the rule is well-defined. It satisfies e⋅(aH)=aH and g⋅(k⋅(aH))=(gk)aH=(gk)⋅(aH); moreover a⋅H=aH, so the action is transitive, and g⋅H=H exactly when g∈H.

L1L3L4
2.1

By [L2], the action defines ρ:G→Sym⁡(G/H). By [L5], an element k lies in ker⁡ρ exactly when k⋅(aH)=aH for every a∈G, that is, when (ka)H=aH for every a.

step 1.1L2L5
3.1

By [L4], (ka)H=aH is equivalent to a−1ka∈H, or to k∈aHa−1. Requiring this for every a gives k∈⋂aaHa−1=Core⁡G(H), so ker⁡ρ=Core⁡G(H), which is normal by [L7].

step 2.1L4L6L7∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

If [G:H]=n<∞, then Core⁡G(H)⊴G, [G:Core⁡G(H)]∣n!, and only finitely many subgroups contain H

Statement

Let H≤G have finite index [G:H]=n, and put N=Core⁡G(H). Then N⊴G, the index [G:N] divides n!, and there are only finitely many subgroups K with H≤K≤G.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A group G, a subgroup H≤G of finite index n, and N:=Core⁡G(H).

[L1]

The action on G/H gives a homomorphism ρ:G→Sym⁡(G/H) whose kernel is N (Left multiplication on G/H is transitive, has stabiliser H at H, and has kernel Core⁡G(H)).

[L2]

The core N is normal in G, lies in H, and contains every normal subgroup of G lying in H (Core⁡G(H) is the largest normal subgroup of G contained in H).

[L3]

First isomorphism gives G/ker⁡ρ≅im⁡ρ (First isomorphism theorem for groups: G/ker⁡f≅im⁡f).

[L6]

The order of a subgroup of a finite group divides the order of the group (Lagrange's theorem: ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣ for every subgroup H of a finite group G).

[L8]

The power set of a finite set is finite (∣P(A)∣=2∣A∣ for finite A).

[L10]

For a finite-index subgroup, the index is the cardinality of its coset set (The coset set G/H and the index [G:H] of a subgroup, The cardinality ∣A∣ of a finite set).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1] and [L2], the coset action has kernel N⊴G with N≤H, and its image is a subgroup of Sym⁡(G/H).

L1L2L4
2.1

By [L3], G/N≅im⁡ρ. The set G/H has n elements by [L10], so [L5] gives ∣Sym⁡(G/H)∣=n!; [L6] therefore gives ∣G/N∣=∣im⁡ρ∣∣n!, that is, [G:N]∣n! by [L10].

step 1.1L3L4L5L6L10
3.1

Every subgroup K containing H also contains N by [L2]. If π(x)∈π[K], then π(x)=π(k) for some k∈K, so k−1x∈N≤K and hence x∈K; thus K=π−1[π[K]]. Therefore K↦π[K] injects the set of such overgroups into the power set of the now known finite set G/N, which is finite by [L8] and [L9].

step 2.1L2L7L8L9
4.1

Thus the core is normal and finite-index, its index divides n!, and the collection of subgroups containing H is finite.

step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Every transitive G-set is equivariantly isomorphic to G/Gx for any chosen point x

Statement

Let X be a transitive G-set and choose x∈X. Then the orbit map

G/Gx⟶X,gGx⟼g⋅x,

is an equivariant isomorphism from the left-coset action on G/Gx to the given action on X.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A transitive action of a group G on a nonempty set X and a point x∈X.

[L1]

An isomorphism of G-sets is an equivariant bijection (Equivariant maps and isomorphisms of group actions).

[L2]

Transitivity means that for every y∈X there is g∈G with g⋅x=y (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).

[L3]

The map G/Gx→G⋅x, gGx↦g⋅x, is a bijection (Orbit-stabiliser: G/Gx→G⋅x, gGx↦g⋅x, is a well-defined bijection).

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1

Define Φ(gGx)=g⋅x. By [L3], this is a bijection from G/Gx onto G⋅x.

L1L3construct
2.1

For a,g∈G, one has Φ(a⋅(gGx))=Φ((ag)Gx)=(ag)⋅x=a⋅(g⋅x)=a⋅Φ(gGx), so Φ is equivariant.

step 1.1L1L4
3.1

By transitivity [L2], G⋅x=X. Thus Φ:G/Gx→X is an equivariant bijection and hence an isomorphism of G-sets.

step 1.1step 2.1L1L2discharge-construct∎
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

A transitive action is faithful exactly when a point stabiliser is core-free

Statement

Let G act transitively on a nonempty set X, and let x∈X. The action is faithful if and only if

Core⁡G(Gx)={e}.

Equivalently, faithful transitive G-sets are precisely the coset actions G/H for core-free subgroups H.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A transitive action of G on a nonempty set X and a point x∈X.

[L1]

An action is faithful when the only group element fixing every point is the identity (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).

[L2]

The action on X is equivariantly isomorphic to the left-coset action on G/Gx (Every transitive G-set is equivariantly isomorphic to G/Gx for any chosen point x).

[L4]

The core is the intersection of all conjugates of the subgroup (The core Core⁡G(H)=⋂g∈GgHg−1 of a subgroup).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L2], the equivariant isomorphism identifies the given action with the action on G/Gx.

L2
2.1

A group element fixes every point of X exactly when it fixes every point of the equivariantly isomorphic coset set; by [L3] and [L4], the set of such elements is Core⁡G(Gx).

step 1.1L3L4
3.1

By [L1], the action is faithful exactly when this kernel is {e}, proving both directions.

step 2.1L1∎
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The conjugacy class Cl⁡G(x) and centralizer CG(x) of an element

Definition

Let G be a group and x∈G (Group and abelian group). The conjugacy class of x is

Cl⁡G(x):={gxg−1:g∈G}.

The centralizer of x is

CG(x):={g∈G:gx=xg}={g∈G:gxg−1=x}.

The subgroup property implicit in the notation is proved in CG(x) and NG(H) are subgroups of G ↗.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The normalizer NG(H)={g∈G:gHg−1=H} of a subgroup

Definition

Let H≤G be a subgroup (Subgroup). The normalizer of H in G is

NG(H):={g∈G:gHg−1=H}.

Thus g∈NG(H) exactly when the conjugation automorphism cg preserves H setwise (Conjugation x↦gxg−1 is an automorphism). The subgroup property is proved in CG(x) and NG(H) are subgroups of G ↗.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

CG(x) and NG(H) are subgroups of G

Statement

For every group G, element x∈G, and subgroup H≤G, both the centralizer CG(x) and the normalizer NG(H) are subgroups of G.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A group G, an element x∈G, and a subgroup H≤G.

[L1]

The centralizer is CG(x)={g∈G:gx=xg} (The conjugacy class Cl⁡G(x) and centralizer CG(x) of an element).

[L2]

The normalizer is NG(H)={g∈G:gHg−1=H} (The normalizer NG(H)={g∈G:gHg−1=H} of a subgroup).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The identity commutes with x. If a,b∈CG(x), then b−1 commutes with x, and hence (ab−1)x=a(b−1x)=a(xb−1)=x(ab−1); [L3] gives CG(x)≤G.

L1L3
1.2

The identity normalizes H. If a,b∈NG(H), then b−1Hb=H, and therefore (ab−1)H(ab−1)−1=a(b−1Hb)a−1=aHa−1=H.

L2
2.1

Applying [L3] to step 1.2 gives NG(H)≤G, so both asserted sets are subgroups.

step 1.1step 1.2L3∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

G/CG(x)→Cl⁡G(x) is a bijection, so ∣Cl⁡G(x)∣=[G:CG(x)] whenever these cardinalities are finite

Statement

For a group G and x∈G, the map

G/CG(x)⟶Cl⁡G(x),gCG(x)⟼gxg−1,

is a well-defined bijection. Consequently

∣Cl⁡G(x)∣=[G:CG(x)]

whenever these cardinalities are finite, in particular when G is finite.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A group G and an element x∈G.

[L1]

Orbit-stabiliser gives a bijection from the cosets of a point stabilizer to its orbit (Orbit-stabiliser: G/Gx→G⋅x, gGx↦g⋅x, is a well-defined bijection).

[L3]

The conjugacy class is Cl⁡G(x)={gxg−1:g∈G} and the centralizer is CG(x)={g:gxg−1=x} (The conjugacy class Cl⁡G(x) and centralizer CG(x) of an element).

[L4]

The centralizer CG(x) is a subgroup of G (CG(x) and NG(H) are subgroups of G).

[L6]

A homomorphism into a symmetric group defines a group action (Actions of G on X correspond exactly to homomorphisms G→Sym⁡(X)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L5] and [L6], G acts on itself by conjugation. By [L3], the orbit of x is Cl⁡G(x) and its stabilizer is CG(x), which is a subgroup by [L4].

L3L4L5L6
2.1

Applying [L1] to this action gives the displayed well-defined bijection gCG(x)↦gxg−1.

step 1.1L1
3.1

Applying [L2] to the same orbit gives ∣Cl⁡G(x)∣=[G:CG(x)] whenever finite.

step 1.1step 2.1L2∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The conjugates of H are in bijection with G/NG(H) and, for finite G, number [G:NG(H)]

Statement

Let H≤G. The rule

G/NG(H)⟶{gHg−1:g∈G},gNG(H)⟼gHg−1,

is a well-defined bijection. If G is finite, the number of distinct conjugates of H is [G:NG(H)].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A group G and a subgroup H≤G.

[L1]

Orbit-stabiliser identifies an orbit with the cosets of its stabilizer (Orbit-stabiliser: G/Gx→G⋅x, gGx↦g⋅x, is a well-defined bijection).

[L3]

The normalizer is NG(H)={g:gHg−1=H} (The normalizer NG(H)={g∈G:gHg−1=H} of a subgroup).

[L4]

The normalizer is a subgroup of G (CG(x) and NG(H) are subgroups of G).

[L5]

Conjugation by each g∈G is an automorphism of G (Conjugation x↦gxg−1 is an automorphism).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let G act on the set of subgroups of G by g⋅K=gKg−1. By [L5], conjugation sends subgroups to subgroups, and the conjugation identities give the action laws.

L5
2.1

The orbit of H is its set of conjugates, while [L3] says that its stabilizer is NG(H), a subgroup by [L4].

step 1.1L3L4
3.1

Applying [L1] gives the displayed bijection, and [L2] gives the finite count [G:NG(H)].

step 2.1L1L2∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The conjugates of a proper subgroup do not cover a finite group

Statement

If H is a proper subgroup of a finite group G, then

⋃g∈GgHg−1≠G.

Thus some element of G lies in no conjugate of H.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite group G and a proper subgroup H<G.

[L2]

The normalizer is NG(H)={g∈G:gHg−1=H} (The normalizer NG(H)={g∈G:gHg−1=H} of a subgroup).

[L3]

The normalizer is a subgroup of G (CG(x) and NG(H) are subgroups of G).

[L4]

Conjugation is an automorphism, so every conjugate of H has cardinality ∣H∣ (Conjugation x↦gxg−1 is an automorphism).

[L6]

A subset of a finite set is finite, has no larger cardinality, and has equal cardinality only when it is the whole set (A subset of a finite set is finite, with ∣B∣≤∣A∣, and equality holds if and only if B=A).

[L8]

Finite sums over finite index sets are well-defined (The sum ∑i∈Sai over a finite index set, and its product form).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let K1,…,Km be the distinct conjugates of H, where m=[G:NG(H)] by [L1]. Each Ki has ∣H∣ elements by [L4] and contains e. For h∈H, subgroup closure gives hHh−1=H, so [L2] gives H≤NG(H).

L1L2L3L4
2.1

Add the sets successively after removing elements already counted. The common identity contributes once and each Ki∖{e} contributes at most ∣H∣−1, so [L6], [L7], and [L8] give ∣⋃iKi∣≤1+m(∣H∣−1).

step 1.1L6L7L8
2.2

Put n=[G:H]. Properness gives n≥2. Since H≤NG(H), [L5] gives m≤n, and [L5] also gives ∣G∣=n∣H∣.

step 1.1L2L3L5L6
3.1

Therefore ∣⋃iKi∣≤1+n(∣H∣−1)=∣G∣−n+1<∣G∣, so the union is a proper subset of G.

step 2.1step 2.2algebra∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The class equation ∣G∣=∣Z(G)∣+∑i[G:CG(xi)] for a finite group

Statement

Let G be finite, and let x1,…,xr contain one representative from each conjugacy class having more than one element. Then

∣G∣=∣Z(G)∣+∑i=1r[G:CG(xi)].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite group G and representatives x1,…,xr of its non-singleton conjugacy classes.

[L4]

The center is Z(G)={z∈G:zg=gz for every g∈G} (The center Z(G) of a group).

[L6]

Finite sums over finite index sets are well-defined (The sum ∑i∈Sai over a finite index set, and its product form).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let G act on itself by conjugation. By [L1] and [L3], its orbits are the conjugacy classes and they partition G.

L1L3
2.1

The class of x is a singleton exactly when gxg−1=x for every g, equivalently when x∈Z(G) by [L4]. Thus the singleton classes contribute ∣Z(G)∣.

step 1.1L3L4
3.1

Applying the finite partition sum rule to the singleton classes and to the classes represented by x1,…,xr gives ∣G∣=∣Z(G)∣+∑i=1r∣Cl⁡G(xi)∣.

step 1.1step 2.1L5L6
4.1

Replacing each remaining class size by [L2] yields ∣G∣=∣Z(G)∣+∑i=1r[G:CG(xi)].

step 3.1L2∎
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

A finite p-group has order pn for a prime p and some n∈N

Definition

Let p be a prime natural number (Prime and composite integers: p is prime when p>1 and its only positive divisors are 1 and p). A finite p-group is a finite group P (Group and abelian group, The cardinality ∣A∣ of a finite set) whose order has the form

∣P∣=pn

for some n∈N, with natural exponentiation as in Exponentiation of natural numbers, mn, and its agreement with the integer power in R. The case n=0 permits the trivial group. A finite p-group is nontrivial exactly when n≥1.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Every subgroup of a finite p-group has order a power of p

Statement

If P is a finite p-group and H≤P, then H is finite and

∣H∣=pk

for some k∈N. If ∣P∣=pn, then k≤n.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L2], the finite set H has positive order dividing pn.

L1L2
2.1

By uniqueness in [L3], no prime other than p can divide ∣H∣, so ∣H∣=pk for some natural k≤n.

step 1.1L3
3.1

This includes the trivial subgroup, whose order is 1=p0, and proves that every subgroup of P is a finite p-group.

step 2.1algebra∎
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Every subgroup of index p in a finite p-group is normal

Statement

Let P be a finite p-group and let H≤P. If [P:H]=p, then H⊴P.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite p-group P and a subgroup H≤P with [P:H]=p.

[L2]

Every subgroup of P has order a power of p (Every subgroup of a finite p-group has order a power of p).

[L3]

If K≤H≤P, then [P:K]=[P:H][H:K] (For K≤H≤G with G finite, [G:K]=[G:H][H:K]).

[L4]

The factorial is the product of the positive natural numbers at most p (The factorial n! and the falling factorial nk‾, defined by recursion in N).

[L7]

A prime p is greater than 1 and has no positive divisors other than 1 and p (Prime and composite integers: p is prime when p>1 and its only positive divisors are 1 and p).

[L8]

For a subgroup of a finite group, the subgroup order divides the group order and the quotient is the index (Lagrange's theorem: ∣G∣=[G:H]∣H∣ for every subgroup H of a finite group G).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Put K=Core⁡P(H). By [L1] and [L3], K⊴P, K≤H, [P:K]∣p!, and [P:K]=p[H:K].

L1L3
2.1

By [L2] and [L8], the orders of P and K are powers of p and their quotient is [P:K]; [L6] therefore makes [P:K] a positive power of p, and step 1.1 makes it divisible by p.

step 1.1L2L6L8
3.1

Among the factors 1,…,p in p!, only p is divisible by p by [L7]. If p2 divided p!, cancellation of the factor p and [L5] would make p divide one of 1,…,p−1, impossible. Thus the positive power of p in step 2.1 that divides p! is exactly p.

step 1.1step 2.1L4L5L7
4.1

Step 1.1 now gives p=p[H:K], so [H:K]=1 and H=K. Since K is normal in P, so is H.

step 1.1step 3.1algebra∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

If a finite p-group P acts on a finite set X, then ∣X∣≡∣XP∣(modp)

Statement

If a finite p-group P acts on a finite set X, then

∣X∣≡∣XP∣(modp).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite p-group P acting on a finite set X.

[L1]
[L2]

The global fixed-point set is XP={x:g⋅x=x for every g∈P} (The fixed-point sets Xg and XG of a group action).

[L5]

Every subgroup of P has prime-power order (Every subgroup of a finite p-group has order a power of p).

[L6]
[L8]

Finite sums over finite index sets are well-defined (The sum ∑i∈Sai over a finite index set, and its product form).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L3], X is the disjoint union of its P-orbits. An orbit is a singleton exactly when its point is fixed by every element of P, so the singleton orbits are indexed by XP.

L2L3
1.2

For a non-singleton orbit P⋅x, the stabilizer Px is proper. By [L1], [L4], and [L5], its index is a positive power of p, so p divides ∣P⋅x∣.

L1L4L5
2.1

Applying [L7] and [L8] to the orbit partition, every non-singleton orbit contributes a multiple of p and the singleton orbits contribute ∣XP∣. Thus p divides ∣X∣−∣XP∣, which is the asserted congruence by [L6].

step 1.1step 1.2L6L7L8∎
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

A finite p-group action on X has a global fixed point whenever p∤∣X∣

Statement

Let a finite p-group P act on a finite set X. If p∤∣X∣, then XP≠∅; equivalently, the action has a point fixed by every element of P.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite p-group P acting on a finite set X, with p∤∣X∣.

[L1]

The fixed-point congruence gives ∣X∣≡∣XP∣(modp) (If a finite p-group P acts on a finite set X, then ∣X∣≡∣XP∣(modp)).

[L2]

The set XP consists of the points fixed by every element of P (The fixed-point sets Xg and XG of a group action).

Proof

technique · contradiction
1.1

Suppose, for contradiction, that XP=∅. Then ∣XP∣=0.

assume-contraL2
2.1

By [L1] and [L3], p divides ∣X∣−∣XP∣=∣X∣, contradicting the hypothesis.

step 1.1L1L3
3.1

Therefore XP is nonempty, and any of its elements is a global fixed point by [L2].

step 2.1L2L4discharge-contradiction∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Every nontrivial finite p-group has nontrivial center, in fact p divides ∣Z(P)∣

Statement

If P is a nontrivial finite p-group, then

p∣∣Z(P)∣.

In particular, the center Z(P) contains a nonidentity element.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nontrivial finite p-group P.

[L1]

Nontriviality means ∣P∣=pn with n≥1 (A finite p-group has order pn for a prime p and some n∈N).

[L2]

For an action of P on a finite set X, ∣X∣≡∣XP∣(modp) (If a finite p-group P acts on a finite set X, then ∣X∣≡∣XP∣(modp)).

[L4]

A homomorphism into a symmetric group defines an action (Actions of G on X correspond exactly to homomorphisms G→Sym⁡(X)).

[L5]

The center is the set of elements commuting with every element of P (The center Z(G) of a group).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L3] and [L4], P acts on itself by conjugation. An element is fixed by all conjugations exactly when it lies in Z(P) by [L5].

L3L4L5
2.1

Applying [L2] to this action gives ∣P∣≡∣Z(P)∣(modp).

step 1.1L2
3.1

By [L1], p divides ∣P∣. Hence [L6] and step 2.1 show that p divides ∣Z(P)∣. Since Z(P) contains the identity and its cardinality is a positive multiple of p>1, it also contains a nonidentity element.

step 2.1L1L5L6algebra∎
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

If G/Z(G) is cyclic, then G is abelian

Statement

If the quotient group G/Z(G) is cyclic, then G is abelian.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A group G such that G/Z(G) is cyclic.

[L1]

The center Z(G) consists of the elements commuting with every element of G (The center Z(G) of a group).

[L2]

The center is a normal subgroup of G (The center of a group is a normal subgroup).

[L3]

Multiplication in G/Z(G) is (gZ(G))(hZ(G))=ghZ(G) (The quotient group G/N and coset product (gN)(hN)=ghN).

[L5]

The subgroup generated by an element is the set of its integer powers (⟨g⟩={ gn:n∈Z }, and every cyclic group is abelian).

[L7]

Equality of left cosets aH=bH is equivalent to a−1b∈H (x∈aH iff a−1x∈H, and aH=bH iff a−1b∈H).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose aZ(G) generating G/Z(G). By [L3]--[L6], arbitrary x,y∈G satisfy xZ(G)=amZ(G) and yZ(G)=anZ(G) for some integers m,n. By [L7], a−mx and a−ny lie in Z(G); setting z=a−mx and w=a−ny gives x=amz and y=anw.

L1L2L3L4L5L6L7choose
1.2

The elements z,w commute with every element by [L1], and am commutes with an by [L6].

L1L6
2.1

Therefore xy=amzanw=am+nzw=an+mwz=anwamz=yx. Since x,y were arbitrary, G is abelian.

step 1.1step 1.2L6algebra∎
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Every group of order p2, for prime p, is abelian

Statement

If p is prime and G is a group of order p2, then G is abelian.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A prime p and a finite group G with ∣G∣=p2.

[L2]

If G/Z(G) is cyclic, then G is abelian (If G/Z(G) is cyclic, then G is abelian).

[L3]

For finite G, ∣G/Z(G)∣=∣G∣/∣Z(G)∣ (If [G:N] is finite then ∣G/N∣=[G:N]; for finite G this equals ∣G∣/∣N∣).

[L5]

A group of order p2 is a finite p-group (A finite p-group has order pn for a prime p and some n∈N).

[L6]

Every subgroup of a finite p-group has prime-power order (Every subgroup of a finite p-group has order a power of p).

[L7]

The center Z(G) is a normal subgroup, hence in particular a subgroup, of G (The center of a group is a normal subgroup).

[L8]

A finite subset with the same cardinality as its ambient finite set is the whole set (A subset of a finite set is finite, with ∣B∣≤∣A∣, and equality holds if and only if B=A).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1] and [L7], Z(G) is a nontrivial subgroup of G; [L5] and [L6] therefore show that it has order p or p2.

L1L5L6L7
2.1

If ∣Z(G)∣=p2=∣G∣, then [L8] gives Z(G)=G, so G is abelian. If ∣Z(G)∣=p, then [L3] gives ∣G/Z(G)∣=p, so [L4] makes G/Z(G) cyclic.

step 1.1L3L4L8
3.1

In the second case [L2] makes G abelian, and the first case already did so. Hence every group of order p2 is abelian.

step 2.1L2∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Every nontrivial normal subgroup of a finite p-group meets the center nontrivially

Statement

Let P be a finite p-group and let N⊴P be nontrivial. Then

N∩Z(P)≠{e}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite p-group P and a nontrivial normal subgroup N⊴P.

[L1]
[L2]
[L4]

Conjugation by g is an automorphism (Conjugation x↦gxg−1 is an automorphism).

[L5]

The center consists of the elements fixed by every conjugation (The center Z(G) of a group).

[L6]

A nontrivial subgroup of a finite p-group has order pk for some k≥1 (Every subgroup of a finite p-group has order a power of p).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L3] and [L4], conjugation restricts to an action of P on the finite set N.

L3L4
2.1

A point of N is fixed by every element of P exactly when it lies in N∩Z(P) by [L5].

step 1.1L5
3.1

By [L6], p divides ∣N∣. Applying [L2] to the action in step 1.1 therefore shows that p divides ∣N∩Z(P)∣.

step 1.1step 2.1L1L2L6
4.1

The intersection contains e, and its cardinality is a positive multiple of the prime p>1; hence it contains a nonidentity element.

step 3.1L5algebra∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Cauchy's theorem: if a prime p divides ∣G∣, then G has an element of order p

Statement

Let G be a finite group and let p be prime. If p∣∣G∣, then G contains an element of order p.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite group G and a prime p dividing ∣G∣.

[L1]

A finite p-group acting on a finite set satisfies the fixed-point congruence (If a finite p-group P acts on a finite set X, then ∣X∣≡∣XP∣(modp)).

[L4]

A prime is greater than 1 and has only 1 and itself as positive divisors (Prime and composite integers: p is prime when p>1 and its only positive divisors are 1 and p).

[L5]

A congruence a≡b(modp) means that p divides a−b, and divisibility means existence of an integer factor (Congruence modulo an integer: a≡b(modn) when n∣(a−b), including the moduli 0 and 1, Divisibility in Z: d∣a when a=dq for some integer q).

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1

Let Ω be the set of p-tuples (g0,…,gp−1)∈Gp whose ordered product is e. The first p−1 coordinates determine the last uniquely as (g0⋯gp−2)−1, so [L3] gives ∣Ω∣=∣G∣p−1; since p∣∣G∣ and p−1≥1, one has p∣∣Ω∣.

L3L4L5construct
2.1

Let 1∈Z/p act on Ω by cyclic rotation. If g0⋯gp−1=e, then g1⋯gp−1g0=g0−1(g0⋯gp−1)g0=e, so rotation preserves Ω; p rotations are the identity, and [L2] therefore gives an action of the finite p-group Z/p.

step 1.1L2
3.1

A tuple is fixed by every rotation exactly when it is constant, say (g,…,g), and it lies in Ω exactly when gp=e.

step 2.1L6
3.2

By [L1], ∣Ω∣≡∣ΩZ/p∣(modp). Step 1.1 makes the left side divisible by p, so the number of fixed tuples is divisible by p. The constant identity tuple is fixed, and a positive multiple of p>1 cannot equal 1, so there is another fixed tuple.

step 1.1step 2.1L1L4L5
4.1

By step 3.1, this second tuple is (g,…,g) for some g≠e with gp=e. By [L6], the positive order of g divides the prime p and is not 1, so it is p.

step 3.1step 3.2L4L6discharge-construct∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Cauchy-Frobenius orbit counting: ∣G∣ ∣X/G∣=∑g∈G∣Xg∣ for a finite group action

Statement

Let a finite group G act on a finite set X, and let X/G denote the set of orbits. Then

∣G∣ ∣X/G∣=∑g∈G∣Xg∣.

Equivalently, the number of orbits is the average number of fixed points of an element of G.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let R={(g,x)∈G×X:g⋅x=x}. Counting its fibres over g and using [L1], [L4], and [L5] gives ∣R∣=∑g∈G∣Xg∣.

L1L4L5
1.2

Counting the same relation over x gives ∣R∣=∑x∈X∣Gx∣.

L4L5
2.1

Split the second sum along the orbit partition using [L2] and [L6]. On an orbit O=G⋅x, [L3] gives ∣Gy∣=∣G∣/∣O∣ for every y∈O, so that orbit contributes ∣O∣(∣G∣/∣O∣)=∣G∣.

step 1.2L2L3L5L6
3.1

There is one contribution for each orbit in X/G, hence ∣R∣=∣G∣ ∣X/G∣. Combining this with step 1.1 gives the stated identity.

step 1.1step 2.1L2L5∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Jordan's derangement theorem: every transitive action of a finite group on a finite set with more than one element has a nonidentity element with no fixed points

Statement

Let a finite group G act transitively on a finite set X with ∣X∣>1. Then some nonidentity g∈G is a derangement:

Xg=∅.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A transitive action of a finite group G on a finite set X with ∣X∣>1.

[L1]

A transitive action has exactly one orbit (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).

[L2]

The fixed-point set is Xg={x:g⋅x=x} (The fixed-point sets Xg and XG of a group action).

[L3]

Cauchy-Frobenius gives ∣G∣ ∣X/G∣=∑g∈G∣Xg∣ (Cauchy-Frobenius orbit counting: ∣G∣ ∣X/G∣=∑g∈G∣Xg∣ for a finite group action).

[L5]

Finite sums over finite index sets are well-defined (The sum ∑i∈Sai over a finite index set, and its product form).

Proof

technique · contradiction
1.1

By transitivity [L1], ∣X/G∣=1, so [L3] gives ∑g∈G∣Xg∣=∣G∣.

L1L3
1.2

The identity fixes every point, so ∣Xe∣=∣X∣; splitting its term from the finite sum gives ∑g∈G∣Xg∣=∣X∣+∑g≠e∣Xg∣.

L2L4L5
2.1

Suppose, for contradiction, that every nonidentity g fixes a point. Then every term in the remaining sum is at least 1, so step 1.2 gives ∑g∣Xg∣≥∣X∣+(∣G∣−1)>∣G∣, since ∣X∣>1.

assume-contrastep 1.2L2L4L5
3.1

This contradicts step 1.1. Therefore some g has Xg=∅; the identity fixes all of X, so this g is nonidentity.

step 1.1step 2.1L2discharge-contradiction∎

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources