Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-08-02 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A group homomorphism automatically satisfies f(e)=e′ and f(g−1)=f(g)−1, and f(gn)=f(g)n for every n∈Z; for monoid homomorphisms preservation of the identity must be assumed

Statement

Let G and G′ be groups with identities e and e′, and let f:G→G′ be a group homomorphism (Monoid homomorphism and group homomorphism), so f(xy)=f(x)f(y) for all x,y∈G. Then:

  1. f(e)=e′;
  2. f(g−1)=f(g)−1 for every g∈G;
  3. f(gn)=f(g)n for every g∈G and every n∈Z, powers being those of Powers gn: natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with g0=e.

For monoid homomorphisms the analogue of claim 1 is false, so preservation of the identity has to be part of the definition: the map u:Z→Z with u(x)=0 for every x satisfies u(xy)=u(x)u(y) for the multiplicative monoid (Z,⋅,1), yet u(1)=0≠1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Groups G, G′ with identities e, e′, and a function f:G→G′ with f(xy)=f(x)f(y) for all x,y∈G (Monoid homomorphism and group homomorphism).

[A1]

f(xy)=f(x)f(y) for all x,y∈G.

[L1]

The group laws in G and in G′ (Group and abelian group, Semigroup and monoid).

[L4]

Powers: g0=e, gσ(k)=gkg for k∈N, and gx=(gk)−1 when x<0 and −x=ι(k), where ι:N→Z is the embedding of The naturals embed in the integers with image the nonnegative integers (Powers gn: natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with g0=e).

[L7]

Z is a totally ordered commutative ring, so exactly one of 0≤x and x<0 holds, and x<0 gives 0<−x (The integers form a commutative ring, The integers form a totally ordered ring, Arithmetic on the integers, Order on the integers, The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals).

[L8]

(Z,⋅,1) is a commutative monoid: multiplication on Z is associative and commutative with x⋅1=x, and x⋅0=0 for every x (The integers form a commutative ring, Arithmetic on the integers).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Applying [A1] with x=y=e gives f(e)=f(e e)=f(e)f(e); and f(e)=e′f(e) because e′ is the identity of G′.

A1L1
1.2

Applying [A1] with y=g−1 gives f(g)f(g−1)=f(gg−1)=f(e).

A1L1
1.3

Base of claim 3 for natural exponents: f(g0)=f(e) and f(g)0=e′.

L4
1.4

The monoid statement. In the commutative monoid (Z,⋅,1) the constant map u(x)=0 satisfies u(xy)=0=0⋅0=u(x)u(y) for all x,y, so it obeys the product law; but u(1)=0 and the identity of the monoid is 1, and 0≠1 in Z. So a map obeying the product law between monoids need not send the identity to the identity, and (H2) is not redundant there.

L8given
2.1

From e′f(e)=f(e)f(e) and cancellation in G′ we get f(e)=e′, which is claim 1.

step 1.1L2
3.1

By steps 1.2 and 2.1, f(g)f(g−1)=e′, so f(g−1) is a right inverse of the invertible element f(g), and uniqueness of inverses gives f(g−1)=f(g)−1: claim 2.

step 1.2step 2.1L3
3.2

Claim 3 for natural exponents. The set of k∈N with f(gk)=f(g)k contains 0, by step 1.3 and step 2.1, which give f(g0)=f(e)=e′=f(g)0; and it is closed under σ, since f(gσ(k))=f(gkg)=f(gk)f(g)=f(g)kf(g)=f(g)σ(k). By induction it is all of N.

step 1.3step 2.1A1L4L6
4.1

Claim 3 for negative exponents. Let x<0 and write −x=ι(k) with k∈N, possible since 0<−x. Then gx=(gk)−1, so f(gx)=f((gk)−1)=f(gk)−1=(f(g)k)−1=f(g)x, the last equality being the definition of the negative power of f(g).

step 3.1step 3.2L4L5L7
5.1

Every integer is either nonnegative, hence of the form ι(k) and covered by step 3.2, or negative and covered by step 4.1; so claim 3 holds for every n∈Z.

step 3.2step 4.1L4L7
6.1

Claims 1, 2 and 3 are steps 2.1, 3.1 and 5.1, and step 1.4 shows the corresponding automatic identity preservation fails for monoids.

step 2.1step 3.1step 5.1step 1.4∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources