Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Kernels and images of module homomorphisms are submodules, and injectivity is equivalent to trivial kernel

Statement

For an R-module homomorphism f:M→N, both ker⁡f and im⁡f are submodules. Moreover,

f is injective⟺ker⁡f={0M}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A homomorphism f:M→N of left R-modules.

[L1]

A module homomorphism preserves addition and scalar multiplication, and the displayed definitions give its kernel and image (Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel).

[L2]

A nonempty subset of a module is a submodule exactly when it is closed under ru+v (The one-step submodule criterion; intersections and sums of submodules are submodules).

[L4]

A group homomorphism is injective exactly when its kernel is trivial (A group homomorphism is injective if and only if its kernel is trivial).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The kernel contains 0M because f(0M)=0N. If u,v∈ker⁡f and r∈R, then f(ru+v)=rf(u)+f(v)=0N, so ru+v∈ker⁡f.

L1L3given
1.2

The image contains 0N=f(0M). If f(u),f(v)∈im⁡f and r∈R, then rf(u)+f(v)=f(ru+v) lies in the image.

L1L3given
1.3

The additive underlying function has the same kernel described in [L1], so the group-homomorphism theorem gives f injective exactly when ker⁡f={0M}.

L1L4given
2.1

The submodule criterion applied to steps 1.1 and 1.2 proves that ker⁡f and im⁡f are submodules.

step 1.1step 1.2L2
3.1

Together, steps 1.3 and 2.1 prove both assertions.

step 1.3step 2.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel.

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources