Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-03
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Actions of G on X correspond exactly to homomorphisms G→Sym⁡(X)

Statement

For groups G and a set X, left actions of G on X are in bijection with group homomorphisms ρ:G→Sym⁡(X). The action attached to ρ is g⋅x:=ρ(g)(x); the homomorphism attached to an action sends g to the permutation x↦g⋅x.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Given an action, define ρ(g)(x)=g⋅x. The maps ρ(g) are bijective: ρ(g−1) is a two-sided inverse because the action laws give g−1⋅(g⋅x)=x=g⋅(g−1⋅x).

L1givenalgebra
1.2

Conversely, let ρ:G→Sym⁡(X) be a homomorphism and set g⋅x=ρ(g)(x). Then e⋅x=ρ(e)(x)=x, and (gh)⋅x=ρ(g)(ρ(h)(x))=g⋅(h⋅x).

L2L3given
2.1

The action law gives ρ(gh)(x)=g⋅(h⋅x)=(ρ(g)∘ρ(h))(x) for every x; thus ρ(gh)=ρ(g)∘ρ(h), so ρ is a homomorphism into Sym⁡(X).

step 1.1L1L2L3given
3.1

The two constructions recover their input pointwise, so they are mutually inverse correspondences.

step 2.1step 1.2∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources