How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The holomorph acts faithfully on by affine permutations
Statement
For every group , the rule
defines a faithful action of on the underlying set of . Equivalently, embeds in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A group and its holomorph.
The holomorph multiplication is ( The holomorph ).
A group action is a rule satisfying the identity and compatibility laws, and it is faithful when only the identity acts trivially (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).
Group actions on a set correspond to homomorphisms into its symmetric group (Actions of on correspond exactly to homomorphisms , The symmetric group : the bijections of a set under composition).
Proof
Each map is a permutation, with inverse .
Composition gives , which equals by [L1]. Therefore is an action, equivalently a homomorphism to , by [L2] and [L3].
If is the identity permutation, evaluation at gives . Then for every , so . Thus the action is faithful by [L2], and the corresponding homomorphism is injective: equality of two images reduces, after multiplying by an inverse, to this identity case.
Depends on
- The holomorph $\operatorname{Hol}(G)=G\rtimes\operatorname{Aut}(G)$
- Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions
- Actions of $G$ on $X$ correspond exactly to homomorphisms $G\to\operatorname{Sym}(X)$
- The symmetric group $\operatorname{Sym}(X)$: the bijections of a set $X$ under composition
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 33 results over 15 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter J. Cameron, The Holomorph of a Group (standard reference, not scraped)