How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The symmetric group : the bijections of a set under composition
Definition
Let be a set. A permutation of is a bijection (Injection, surjection, bijection). The symmetric group of is the set of all permutations of ,
equipped with composition as its operation,
and with the identity map , given by , as distinguished element.
Composition of two bijections of is again a bijection of (Injection, surjection, bijection), so is closed under and is a binary operation on it (Binary operation on a set; associativity, commutativity, and a subset closed under the operation); and is a bijection of , so it is an element of , and it is a two-sided identity for composition (Left identity, right identity, and two-sided identity for a binary operation) because holds pointwise for every . That is a group is is a group under composition, and it is non-abelian whenever has at least three distinct elements.
Cycle notation for a finite list of distinct points. For distinct elements of with , the symbol denotes the permutation sending to for , sending to , and fixing every element of outside . It is a bijection, because the map described sends the set onto itself by a rule with an evident inverse (send each back to and back to ) and fixes the complement pointwise. A transposition is such a symbol with , that is with : it exchanges and and fixes everything else, and it satisfies .
A product of cycle symbols means their composite, so is .
Remarks
-
Order of composition. With the convention the right-hand factor acts first. Both conventions are in use in the literature; this one is the one already fixed for function composition in the library and is the one used in every computation on this page and its companion.
-
Why this is defined here rather than with the finite symmetric groups. for an arbitrary set is the ambient object needed as soon as one speaks of a group acting on a set, which is earlier in the reading order than the combinatorial study of ; homing it here keeps every citation of it backward-pointing.
-
The general cycle notation above is used on this page only for transpositions; cycles of length and , and products of two disjoint transpositions, appear on the companion examples page. The systematic theory, including the factorisation of an arbitrary permutation of a finite set into disjoint cycles, belongs to a later page.
Depends on
Used by
- Every nonzero integer n is u ∏_i<r pᵢ with u ∈ {1,-1} and every pᵢ prime; u and r are determined by n, and the list is determined up to a permutation Corollary
- (gh)ⁿ = gⁿhⁿ fails without commutativity: two transpositions in Sym({1,2,3}) with (gh)² ≠ g²h² Counterexample
- A left coset that is not the corresponding right coset in Sym({1,2,3}) Counterexample
- A nonnormal two-element subgroup of Sym({1,2,3}) makes coset multiplication depend on representatives Counterexample
- If 1 were admitted as a prime, uniqueness would fail: 6 = 2 · 3 = 1 · 2 · 3 = 1 · 1 · 2 · 3, lists of different lengths that no permutation matches Counterexample
- In the multiplicative monoid H = {1, 4, 7, 10, …} of positive integers one more than a multiple of 3, the element 100 has two genuinely different factorisations into irreducibles, 4 · 25 and 10 · 10 Counterexample
- Overlapping cycles need not commute Counterexample
- The natural action of S₃ on three points is faithful and transitive but not free Counterexample
- The product set HK of two subgroups need not be a subgroup Counterexample
- The subgroup ⟨(1 2 3),(1 2)(3 4)⟩≤ S₄ has order 12 but no subgroup of order 6, so Cauchy's theorem does not extend to composite divisors Counterexample
- Inversions, inversion number, the sign sgn(σ)=(-1)^inv(σ), and even and odd permutations Definition
- Support, fixed points, disjoint cycles, cycle length, disjoint-cycle decompositions, and cycle type Definition
- The finite symmetric group Sₙ, one-line notation, and cycle notation Definition
- Conjugation by (1 2) in Sym({1,2,3}) exchanges the transpositions (1 3) and (2 3) Example
- Dₙ≅⟨ r,s∣ rⁿ, s², srs⁻¹r⟩ for the dihedral group Dₙ=⟨{ρ,σ}⟩leqSym(ℤ/n), n≥ 3 Example
- From one-line notation to a disjoint-cycle decomposition, with the right-hand factor acting first Example
- Sym({0,1,2})≅⟨ s,t∣ s², t², (st)³⟩ Example
- Sym({1,2,3}) has exactly six elements, is non-abelian, and its elements have orders 1, 2 and 3 Example
- The class equation of S₃ is 6=1+2+3 Example
- The eight vertex permutations of a square form a non-abelian subgroup of Sym({1,2,3,4}) of order 8, generated by a 4-cycle and one diagonal swap Example
- The Klein four-group as the subgroup {id, (12)(34), (13)(24), (14)(23)} of Sym({1,2,3,4}): abelian of order 4, non-cyclic, every non-identity element of order 2 Example
- The square-symmetry group has class equation 8=2+2+2+2 Example
- The subgroup orders in Sym({1,2,3}) are 1,2,3 and 6 Example
- The three subgroups of order 2 in S₃ are conjugate and each is self-normalizing Example
- The three-cycle subgroup of Sym({1,2,3}) is normal and its quotient has two elements Example
- FALSE: every finite group is a direct product of cyclic prime-power groups False statement
- Composing with a transposition reverses (-1)^inv(σ) Lemma
- Cycles with disjoint supports commute Lemma
- Formal letters act by mutually inverse permutations on the set of reduced words Lemma
- Sym(X) is a group under composition, and it is non-abelian whenever X has at least three distinct elements Lemma
- Actions of G on X correspond exactly to homomorphisms GtoSym(X) Theorem
- Any two finite free bases of the same group have the same cardinality Theorem
- Cayley's theorem: every group G is isomorphic to a subgroup of Sym(G) Theorem
- Every finite permutation is a product of transpositions, so the transpositions generate Sₙ Theorem
- Generalised associativity: in a monoid the product of a finite list does not depend on the bracketing, and in a commutative monoid it does not depend on the order of the factors either Theorem
- If [G:H]=n<∞, then Core_G(H) is normal in G, [G:Core_G(H)]∣ n!, and only finitely many subgroups contain H Theorem
- The automorphisms of a group form a group under composition Theorem
- The fundamental theorem of arithmetic: every integer n ≥ 1 is a product of primes, and the factorisation is unique up to order — if ∏_i<r pᵢ = ∏_j<s qⱼ with every pᵢ and qⱼ prime, then r = s and qᵢ = p_π(i) for some π ∈ Sym(r) Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 15 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Symmetric group (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Permutation (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)