Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Sym⁡({1,2,3}) has exactly six elements, is non-abelian, and its elements have orders 1, 2 and 3

Example

Let X={1,2,3}, the three-element set of natural numbers 1=σ(0), 2=σ(1), 3=σ(2), and let G=Sym⁡(X) be its symmetric group (The symmetric group Sym⁡(X): the bijections of a set X under composition), a group under composition (Sym⁡(X) is a group under composition, and it is non-abelian whenever X has at least three distinct elements). Then:

  1. G has exactly six elements, namely

    id,(1 2),(1 3),(2 3),(1 2 3),(1 3 2),

    so G≈6 and ∣G∣=6 (The order ∣G∣ of a finite group and the order ord⁡(g) of an element, with ord⁡(g)=∞ when no positive power of g is the identity);

  2. G is not abelian: (1 2)∘(2 3)=(1 2 3) while (2 3)∘(1 2)=(1 3 2);

  3. the orders of its elements are ord⁡(id)=1, ord⁡=2 for each of the three transpositions, and ord⁡=3 for each of the two 3-cycles.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: X={1,2,3} and G=Sym⁡(X) with the operation f∘g, (f∘g)(x)=f(g(x)), and identity id (The symmetric group Sym⁡(X): the bijections of a set X under composition).

[L1]

1, 2 and 3 are pairwise distinct natural numbers: 2=σ(1)=1∪{1} and 3=σ(2)=2∪{2}={0,1,2}, so 1∈2, 2∈3 and 1∈3, while no natural number is a member of itself (The natural numbers N (von Neumann), Every natural number is a transitive set and is not a member of itself); so X has exactly three elements.

[L3]

Two functions X→X are equal exactly when they agree at every point; a function on X is determined by the triple (f(1),f(2),f(3)), and f is a bijection of X exactly when those three values are pairwise distinct, since three distinct values in a three-element set exhaust it (Injection, surjection, bijection).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Writing each element of G as the triple of its values at 1,2,3, the six listed permutations are id=(1,2,3), (2 3)=(1,3,2), (1 2)=(2,1,3), (1 2 3)=(2,3,1), (1 3 2)=(3,1,2) and (1 3)=(3,2,1). These six triples are pairwise different, so the six permutations are pairwise different.

L1L2L3
1.2

Each transposition τ∈{(1 2),(1 3),(2 3)} satisfies τ∘τ=id, since it exchanges two points and fixes the third, so applying it twice returns every point to itself; and τ≠id, since it moves two points.

L2L3
1.3

ord⁡(id)=1, since id1=id and 1 is the least natural that is ≥1.

L4L6
2.1

Every element of G is one of the six. Let f∈G; its triple has pairwise distinct entries by [L3]. There are three possible values for f(1); for each, two remaining values for f(2); and then f(3) is forced to be the one element of X left over. Running through those six combinations produces exactly the six triples listed in step 1.1.

step 1.1L1L3
2.2

Composites, computed pointwise. (1 2)∘(2 3) sends 1↦1↦2, 2↦3↦3, 3↦2↦1, giving the triple (2,3,1), which is (1 2 3). And (2 3)∘(1 2) sends 1↦2↦3, 2↦1↦1, 3↦3↦2, giving (3,1,2), which is (1 3 2).

step 1.1L2L3
2.3

Let c=(1 2 3), so c sends 1↦2↦3↦1. Then c∘c sends 1↦3, 2↦1, 3↦2, which is the triple (3,1,2), that is (1 3 2); and c∘c∘c sends 1↦c(3)=1, 2↦c(1)=2, 3↦c(2)=3, so it is id.

step 1.1L2L3
2.4

Each transposition τ has ord⁡(τ)=2: τ2=τ∘τ=id by step 1.2, while τ1=τ≠id, so 2 is the least k≥1 with τk=id.

step 1.2L4L6
3.1

By steps 1.1 and 2.1 the set G consists of exactly the six listed elements, so the map 6→G sending 0,1,2,3,4,5 to id,(1 2),(1 3),(2 3),(1 2 3),(1 3 2) respectively is a bijection; hence G≈6 and ∣G∣=6. This is claim 1.

step 1.1step 2.1L5
3.2

By step 2.2 the two composites differ, since the triples (2,3,1) and (3,1,2) differ at 1; so G is not abelian, which is claim 2.

step 2.2L3
3.3

Each of c=(1 2 3) and c2=(1 3 2) has order 3: by step 2.3, c3=id, c1=c≠id and c2=(1 3 2)≠id, so ord⁡(c)=3; and (c2)3=c6=id with c2≠id and (c2)2=c4=c≠id, so ord⁡(c2)=3 as well.

step 2.3L4L6
4.1

Claims 1, 2 and 3 are steps 3.1, 3.2 and steps 1.3, 2.4 and 3.3 taken together; the orders occurring are exactly 1, 2 and 3.

step 3.1step 3.2step 1.3step 2.4step 3.3∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources