How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Injection, surjection, bijection
Definition
Let and be sets and let be a function (A function is a relation with and implying ; , the value , domain and codomain).
- is injective (one-to-one) if implies , for all .
- is surjective (onto) if for every there is some with ; equivalently, the image equals .
- is bijective if it is both injective and surjective.
For we write for the image of , and for we write for the preimage of ; these are the image and preimage of a set under read as a relation (The image and the preimage of a set under a relation).
Remarks
-
Composition. If and are both injective then so is , since forces and then ; if both are surjective then so is , since any is for some and that is for some . Hence a composition of bijections is a bijection. These verifications, together with the two partial converses, are For and : if both are injective so is ; if both are surjective so is ; if is injective so is ; and if is surjective so is .
-
Inverses. is bijective exactly when there is a function with for all and for all ; that two-sided inverse is unique, and it is itself a bijection. Injectivity alone gives a bijection from onto the image , and hence an inverse defined on only. No choice principle is involved: the value is the unique with , so it is determined rather than selected. The full statement, with the uniqueness of the two-sided inverse, is is a bijection if and only if there is a function with and ; such a is unique, equals the inverse relation , and is itself a bijection; the corresponding statement for an arbitrary surjection is not available at this point in the reading order, because a right inverse for every surjection is equivalent to the Axiom of Choice.
-
What this item does and does not do. A function is a set of ordered pairs, single valued and total on (A function is a relation with and implying ; , the value , domain and codomain); ordered pairs, Cartesian products, images and preimages are fixed by The Kuratowski ordered pair , The Cartesian product and The image and the preimage of a set under a relation. This item only fixes the three adjectives and the notation used for them. Nothing here is proved.
Depends on
Used by
- Absorption: for cardinals κ, λ with κ infinite and λ ≤ κ, κ ⊕ λ = κ, and κ ⊗ λ = κ when λ ≠ 0 Corollary
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice: κ < κ^cf(κ) for every infinite cardinal κ, and cf(2^κ) > κ; in particular cf(2^ℵ₀) > ℵ₀ Corollary
- Every linear subspace U of a vector space V has a complement: a linear subspace W with V = U ⊕ W Corollary
- For f : A → B with A ≠ ∅: f is injective if and only if there is g : B → A with g ∘ f = Δ_A; for A = ∅ the empty function is injective and has a left inverse if and only if B = ∅ Corollary
- For f : A → B: S ⊆ f⁻¹[f[S]] for every S ⊆ A, with equality for every such S if and only if f is injective; and f[f⁻¹[T]] = T ∩ f[A] for every T ⊆ B, so equality with T holds for every such T if and only if f is surjective Corollary
- If V has a spanning set with n elements, then every linearly independent subset of V is finite with at most n elements; in particular V has no linearly independent subset equinumerous with ℕ Corollary
- Infinite Ramsey holds for every set equipped with an injection from ℕ Corollary
- lvertP(A)| = 2^| A| for finite A Corollary
- ℚ is F_σ, meager and not G_δ, while the irrationals are G_δ, residual and not F_σ Corollary
- The irrationals are uncountable Corollary
- (gh)ⁿ = gⁿhⁿ fails without commutativity: two transpositions in Sym({1,2,3}) with (gh)² ≠ g²h² Counterexample
- {(1,0), (0,1), (1,1)} spans F² and is linearly dependent, so a spanning set need not be a basis; each of its three two-element subsets is a basis Counterexample
- 2ℤ has index 2 in ℤ and is nevertheless equinumerous with ℤ Counterexample
- A continuous injection on [0,1] ∪ [2,3] that is not monotone, so the interval hypothesis cannot be dropped from the strict-monotonicity theorem Counterexample
- A count that overcounts because the blocks are not disjoint, and exactly where the sum rule's hypothesis is spent Counterexample
- A function f and sets S, T with f[S ∩ T] ⊊ f[S] ∩ f[T] Counterexample
- A list of six distinct reals with no strictly increasing sublist of length four and no strictly decreasing sublist of length three Counterexample
- A relation whose row fibres all differ from the average size, so the averaging principle gives a bound that no fibre meets exactly Counterexample
- A three-set count that drops the triple intersection and returns the wrong answer Counterexample
- If 1 were admitted as a prime, uniqueness would fail: 6 = 2 · 3 = 1 · 2 · 3 = 1 · 1 · 2 · 3, lists of different lengths that no permutation matches Counterexample
- In the bounded real-valued functions on ℕ with the supremum metric, the closed unit ball is closed and bounded and is not compact: the indicator functions of the singletons are pairwise at distance 1 Counterexample
- In the indiscrete topology every sequence converges to every point, and in the cofinite topology on an infinite set an injective sequence converges to every point Counterexample
- Inside the space of eventually zero families, the linear subspace spanned by { eᵢ : i ≥ 1 } is proper and has a basis equinumerous with a basis of the whole space, so "equal dimension forces equality" fails without finite dimension Counterexample
- On (0,∞) the metrics |x-y| and |1/x - 1/y| have the same topology and are not uniformly equivalent Counterexample
- The antidiagonal {(x,-x)} is an uncountable discrete subspace of the Sorgenfrey plane, so having a countable dense subset is not a hereditary property Counterexample
- The doubling endomorphism of (ℤ,+) has trivial kernel but is not surjective Counterexample
- Two sets of the same finite cardinality between which the bijection is not unique Counterexample
- x ↦ √x is a uniformly continuous bijection of [0,∞) onto itself whose inverse x ↦ x² is not uniformly continuous Counterexample
- A finite list of reals, and its strictly increasing and strictly decreasing sublists Definition
- A finite sum in a commutative monoid indexed by an arbitrary finite set Definition
- A relation R ⊆ X × Y between finite sets, its row fibres Rₓ and its column fibres Rʸ Definition
- Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis Definition
- Bipartite neighbourhoods, Hall's condition and systems of distinct representatives Definition
- Cardinal sum κ ⊕ λ, product κ ⊗ λ and exponentiation κ^λ, and why they are written apart from the ordinal operations Definition
- Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally Definition
- Continuously differentiable maps, local inverses, and local diffeomorphisms Definition
- Equinumerous sets, A ≈ B and A ⪯ B Definition
- Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set A/∼ Definition
- Equivariant maps and isomorphisms of group actions Definition
- Faithful, full, fully faithful, essentially surjective, and split essentially surjective functors Definition
…and 194 more results.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 19 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. K. Hunter, An Introduction to Real Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis: Introduction to Real Analysis, basic set theory (standard reference, not scraped)
- Bijection, injection and surjection (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- T. Tao, Analysis I, 3rd ed., §3.3 (Functions) (standard reference, not scraped)