Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A finite sum in a commutative monoid indexed by an arbitrary finite set

Definition

Let (M,+,0) be a commutative monoid (Semigroup and monoid), let S be a finite set with n:=∣S∣ (The cardinality ∣A∣ of a finite set), and let a:S→M. Choose a bijection ϕ:n→S and define

∑s∈Sas:=aϕ(0)+aϕ(1)+⋯+aϕ(n−1),

where the right side is the finite monoid product of The product g0g1⋯gn−1 of a finite list in a monoid, by recursion, with the empty product (n=0) equal to the identity written additively. In particular, the sum over the empty set is 0.

This value is independent of the enumeration. If ψ:n→S is another bijection, then ϕ−1∘ψ is a permutation of n (Injection, surjection, bijection), and generalised commutativity gives

∑k<naψ(k)=∑k<naϕ(k)

(Generalised associativity: in a monoid the product of a finite list does not depend on the bracketing, and in a commutative monoid it does not depend on the order of the factors either). Thus the displayed notation names one element of M and does not select a preferred enumeration.

When M is the additive monoid of R or of N, this definition agrees with The sum ∑i∈Sai over a finite index set, and its product form: both enumerate S, apply the same finite recursion with identity 0, and are independent of the enumeration.

Remarks

The coefficient object is an arbitrary commutative monoid. This is stronger than the published real- and natural-valued definition and is the form needed for sums in a commutative ring.

Depends on

Used by

…and 3 more results.

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources