Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cauchy's integral formula for a null-homologous cycle

Statement

Let Ω⊆C be open, let f:Ω→C be holomorphic, and let Γ be a complex chain which is a cycle, with trace in Ω and null-homologous in Ω. Then for every z∈Ω∖Γ∗

n(Γ,z) f(z)=12πi∫Γf(ζ)ζ−z dζ.

No connectedness of Ω is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open Ω, a holomorphic f:Ω→C, and a cycle Γ with Γ∗⊆Ω which is null-homologous in Ω.

[L1]

With g the filled difference quotient of f, the function h equal to (2πi)−1∫Γg(ζ,z) dζ on Ω and to (2πi)−1∫Γf(ζ)(ζ−z)−1 dζ on Ω0={z∉Γ∗:n(Γ,z)=0} is a well-defined entire function; it is bounded, and for every ε>0 there is R>0 with ∣h(z)∣<ε whenever ∣z∣>R (Dixon's glued function is entire and vanishes at infinity).

[L2]

Every bounded entire function is constant (Liouville's theorem: every bounded entire function is constant).

[L3]

If f is continuous on the trace of a complex chain, then ∫Γf dz=∑k<r, mk≠0mk∫γkf dz; and for z∉Γ∗ one has n(Γ,z)=(2πi)−1∫Γdζ/(ζ−z) (Integration over a complex chain and the index of a chain). A chain is a finite list of integer-weighted contours with trace the union of the γk∗ having mk≠0 (Complex chains, their traces, and cycles).

[L4]

A cycle Γ with trace in Ω is null-homologous in Ω when n(Γ,p)=0 for every p∈C∖Ω (Null-homologous cycles and homologous cycles in an open set).

[L5]

Complex line integrals are linear in the integrand (Complex line integrals are linear in the integrand); finite sums in the additive commutative monoid of C are additive, and complex-field distributivity permits scaling term by term (A finite sum in a commutative monoid indexed by an arbitrary finite set, C=R[x]/(x2+1) is a field, every element is uniquely a+bi, and every nonzero element has inverse (a−bi)/(a2+b2)).

[L6]

The filled difference quotient g of a holomorphic f on Ω equals (f(ζ)−f(z))/(ζ−z) off the diagonal and f′(z) on it (The filled difference quotient of a holomorphic function is jointly continuous).

[L8]

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L2L7

By [L1] the glued function h is entire and bounded, so [L2] makes it a constant c.

1.2givenL1

By [L1], for every ε>0 there is R>0 with ∣h(z)∣<ε for ∣z∣>R; such z exist, so ∣c∣<ε for every ε>0 and therefore c=0.

1.3givenL3L5L6L8

Let z∈Ω∖Γ∗. Since f is holomorphic on Ω, [L8] makes it continuous on Ω, hence on the trace of Γ. Then ζ≠z for every ζ∈Γ∗, so [L6] gives g(ζ,z)=(f(ζ)−f(z))/(ζ−z) on the trace, and [L3] with [L5] splits the defining integral into h(z)=(2πi)−1∫Γf(ζ)(ζ−z)−1dζ−f(z) n(Γ,z).

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3L1L4∎

Steps 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 give 0=(2πi)−1∫Γf(ζ)(ζ−z)−1dζ−n(Γ,z)f(z), which is the stated formula; nothing in the argument used connectedness of Ω, and the hypothesis that Γ is null-homologous entered only through [L1] and [L4].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

66 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources