Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Holomorphic spectral mapping and composition

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let A be a unital complex Banach algebra and let a∈A. Let f be holomorphic on an open set U⊇σA(a), so that f(a) is defined (Holomorphic functional calculus). Then:

  1. spectral mapping: σA(f(a))=f(σA(a))={f(λ):λ∈σA(a)};
  2. composition: if V is an open set with f[U]⊆V and g:V→C is holomorphic, then g(f(a))=(g∘f)(a), where (g∘f)(a) is computed from the holomorphic function g∘f:U→C by the calculus on A.

Clause 1 includes locally constant functions: if f is constant on a component of σA(a) its image there is a single point, and no connectedness of U or of σA(a) is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An assumed Axiom of Choice, a unital complex Banach algebra A, an element a∈A, an open U⊇σA(a), a holomorphic f:U→C, and for clause 2 an open V⊇f[U] with a holomorphic g:V→C.

[L1]

The calculus h↦h(a) is linear, multiplicative, unital, sends the coordinate function to a and satisfies h(a)−1=(1/h)(a) for nowhere vanishing holomorphic h (Holomorphic functional calculus homomorphism, Holomorphic functional calculus).

[L2]

For holomorphic f and fixed z the filled difference quotient ζ↦g(ζ,z):=(f(ζ)−f(z))/(ζ−z) for ζ≠z, extended by f′(z) at ζ=z, is holomorphic in each variable on U; in particular hλ(ζ):=g(ζ,λ) is holomorphic on U with f(ζ)−f(λ)=(ζ−λ)hλ(ζ) (The filled difference quotient is holomorphic in each variable separately).

[L3]

If u,v commute in A and uv is invertible then so are u and v: with w:=(uv)−1 one has u(vw)=1=(vw)u, and symmetrically for v (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra).

[L4]

Nested and encircling cycles exist as in Admissible cycle around a compact plane set: for compact K inside open W there is a cycle with index 1 on K and 0 outside W, and two such with disjoint traces and nesting. For a cycle Γ of this kind the set KΓ:=Γ∗∪{w∈C:n(Γ,w)≠0} is compact: it is closed and bounded because the index vanishes far from the trace (The index of a cycle is locally constant off its trace and vanishes far from it).

[L5]

Cauchy formula on a cycle: for holomorphic h on open Ω and a cycle Γ with trace in Ω null-homologous in Ω, n(Γ,p)h(p)=12πi∫Γh(ζ)/(ζ−p)dζ for p∈Ω∖Γ∗, and the double integral of a continuous integrand over two such cycles may be iterated in either order (Cauchy's integral formula for a null-homologous cycle, Resolvent identity, the mesh estimate of Banach algebra valued contour integral).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L2L1algebra

Factorization at a spectral point: for λ∈σA(a) the function hλ of [L2] is holomorphic on U and f(z)−f(λ)=(z−λ)hλ(z) on U; applying the calculus and its multiplicative and affine laws [L1] gives f(a)−f(λ)1=(a−λ1) hλ(a), a product of two commuting elements.

1.2L1algebra

Reverse inclusion: if μ∉f(σA(a)) then f(z)−μ≠0 for every z∈σA(a), so 1/(f−μ) is holomorphic on some neighbourhood of σA(a); by [L1] applied to the two functions f−μ and 1/(f−μ), whose product is the constant function 1, one has (f(a)−μ1)⋅(1/(f−μ))(a)=1=(1/(f−μ))(a)(f(a)−μ1), so μ∉σA(f(a)).

2.1step 1.1L3

Forward inclusion: let λ∈σA(a). If f(a)−f(λ)1 were invertible, then by [step 1.1] the commuting product (a−λ1)hλ(a) would be invertible, so [L3] would make a−λ1 invertible, contradicting λ∈σA(a); hence f(λ)∈σA(f(a)).

3.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra

Clause 1 follows from [step 1.2] and [step 2.1]: f(σA(a))⊆σA(f(a))⊆f(σA(a)).

4.1step 3.1L4L1algebra

Setup for clause 2: choose a cycle β with trace in U∖σA(a) and index 1 on σA(a), 0 outside U, by [L4]; then K:=Kβ is a compact subset of U containing σA(a), and f[K]⊆V is compact. Since σA(f(a))=f(σA(a))⊆f[K] by [step 3.1], the calculus applies to g at f(a).

5.1step 4.1L1L2algebra

The resolvent identity in integral form: for every z∉f[K] the function w↦1z−f(w) is holomorphic on a neighbourhood of σA(a) (namely on U∖f−1({z}), which contains K and hence σA(a)), and z−f(w)≠0 there; by [L1] applied to w↦1z−f(w) and the affine function z−f, one has (z1−f(a))−1=12πi∫βR(w,a)z−f(w) dw: both sides are the calculus of reciprocal functions whose product with z−f is 1.

5.2step 4.1L5algebra

Choice of the outer cycle and Cauchy evaluation: apply [L4] to the compact set f[K] inside V, obtaining a cycle γ with index 1 on f[K] and 0 outside V; then for every w∈β∗ (so f(w)∈f[K]) the Cauchy formula [L5] applied to g on V along γ gives 12πi∫γg(z)z−f(w) dz=n(γ,f(w))g(f(w))=g(f(w)).

6.1step 5.1step 5.2L5L1

Composition: using the definition of the calculus, [step 5.1] inside the outer integral, and the iterated-integral identity of [L5], g(f(a))=12πi∫γg(z)(z1−f(a))−1dz=(12πi)2∫γ∫βg(z)R(w,a)z−f(w) dw dz=12πi∫β(12πi∫γg(z)z−f(w) dz)R(w,a) dw=12πi∫βg(f(w))R(w,a) dw=(g∘f)(a), where the second-to-last equality is [step 5.2] and the last is the calculus of g∘f along β.

7.1step 3.1step 6.1∎

Both clauses are proved: clause 1 by [step 3.1] and clause 2 by [step 6.1].

Remarks

  • The composition clause is the coverage's inline obligation. The composition law g(f(a))=(g∘f)(a) is the second half of Bühler–Salamon Theorem 5.25(v) and of Shirbisheh Theorem 2.5.5; it is proved here, after the spectral mapping statement it needs, and not merely cited. The proof requires cycles around the compact image f[K] of a bounded spectral neighbourhood, not the whole preimage of an outer contour.

  • Local constancy of f on spectral components is allowed. Nothing in the argument uses that f separates points of σA(a): the factorization of [step 1.1] is carried out at the single spectral point λ, and the reverse inclusion tests values of f on the spectrum pointwise.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

67 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources