How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Banach Algebras Spectrum and Holomorphic Functional Calculus
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Analyticity of Holomorphic Functions; Liouville and Morera
- Approximation and Compactness in C(K)
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Banach Valued Integration and the Radon Nikodym Property
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Compact Operators and Riesz Schauder Theory
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Power Series and Analytic Functions
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Contour Integration
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces Adjoint Operators and Annihilators
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Dimensional Normed Spaces and Riesz Lemma
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Geometric Hahn Banach and Convex Separation
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- pi: the Equivalent Characterizations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Analytic Hahn Banach Theorem
- The Baire Principles of Functional Analysis
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Identity Theorem, the Maximum Principle and the Open Mapping Theorem
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The Winding Number and the Global Cauchy Theorem
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
This page develops the spectral theory of a single element of a unital complex Banach algebra, from the Neumann series to the holomorphic functional calculus. The opening definitions fix the conventions — a nonzero associative algebra with a complete submultiplicative norm and a unit of norm one, invertibility by two-sided inverses, and the spectrum as the set of scalars at which the shifted element fails to be invertible in the stated algebra. The Neumann series makes the open unit ball around each invertible element consist of invertible elements and gives the quantitative bound , from which openness of the general linear group and continuity of inversion follow.
The spectrum itself is then shown to be a nonempty compact subset of the disc of radius : boundedness and closedness come from the Neumann expansion and from openness of the invertibles, while nonemptiness is proved by applying bounded functionals to the resolvent, invoking Liouville's theorem for the scalar case and separating points in the dual. The spectral radius is defined as the maximal modulus on this compact nonempty set, and the spectral radius formula is proved by resolving the resolvent into a power series on each disc properly inside the disc of radius and applying Cauchy's coefficient estimate together with the dual unit-ball formula for the norm. Polynomial spectral mapping is proved separately, and the real-operator spectrum is defined through the canonical rotation-supremum complexification, with the bounded comparison between compatible models recorded so that the definition is model-independent.
The second half builds the holomorphic functional calculus. Banach-algebra-valued contour integrals are constructed from tagged Riemann sums and identified with the Bochner integral; the vector-valued version of the homology form of Cauchy's theorem is proved by scalarisation and dual separation. A finite polygonal cycle with index one on a compact set and zero outside a prescribed open neighbourhood is constructed from a grid, together with a nested pair with separated traces. These are the cycles along which the Dunford integral is defined; contour and germ independence are proved before the notation is used, and the calculus is shown to be a unital algebra homomorphism that reproduces polynomials and reciprocals of nonvanishing functions, to satisfy the holomorphic spectral mapping theorem and the composition law , and to produce Riesz projections for clopen spectral subsets, with the invariant splitting and the restriction spectra and on the corresponding nonzero summands; an empty spectral part gives the zero summand, to which the page's nonzero-algebra convention assigns no spectrum.
The page closes with the Calkin algebra and Atkinson's theorem in quotient language, and with the five spectral parts: the disjoint point, continuous and residual spectra, the approximate point and compression spectra, the identity , the covering relation under Dependent Choice, and the theorem that the boundary of the spectrum lies in the approximate point spectrum. Full choice strength is stated wherever it is used: the nonemptiness of the spectrum, the spectral radius formula and the calculus spend the Axiom of Choice through Hahn–Banach separation and compact spectrum nonemptiness, the quotient completeness of the Calkin algebra uses Countable Choice, and the bounded-inverse and approximate-pointer arguments use Dependent Choice and Countable Choice respectively.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Unital Banach algebra
Definition
A unital complex Banach algebra is a nonzero complex vector space equipped with
- an associative bilinear multiplication , , and
- a norm under which is a Banach space (Banach space),
such that
- the norm is submultiplicative: for all , and
- there is a unit with for every , normalized by .
The phrase nonzero is part of the definition: the identity is required to exist, and the zero algebra has no element satisfying . In every unital Banach algebra the unit is unique, because if is a second element acting as an identity then ; from now on denotes that element. The norm condition is a normalization rather than a consequence of submultiplicativity, which would give only for a nonzero unit; the two conventions and agree on every nonzero unital algebra, since submultiplicativity turns the latter into an equality.
Remarks
-
The scalar field is complex and fixed. Every spectrum, resolvent and holomorphic-calculus statement on this page is about complex unital Banach algebras. Real Banach algebras are not silently complexified: the one place where a real structure enters, the spectrum of a real operator, is defined through a specified complexification in Complexification and spectrum of a real operator.
-
Multiplication is bilinear and associative, and nothing more. No commutativity, involution, or approximate unit is assumed. The algebra of bounded operators on a nonzero complex Banach space (
ex-bounded-operators-form-a-noncommutative-banach-algebra) is the motivating noncommutative example, and for compact Hausdorff (ex-continuous-functions-form-a-commutative-banach-algebra) the motivating commutative one. -
Completeness is with respect to the submultiplicative norm. A complete normed algebra whose norm is merely equivalent to a submultiplicative one is not thereby a unital Banach algebra in this sense; rescaling a norm to with preserves completeness and submultiplicativity but destroys the normalization .
-
The unit is not a separate structure. It is determined by the multiplication, so an algebra homomorphism between unital Banach algebras that preserves multiplication and the unit is exactly a multiplicative linear map sending to ; this is the convention used for characters on the following page of this track.
-
Reading order. The example items named by ID above are homed on later pages of the plan, so they are named rather than hyperlinked: a body link to later material must be declared as a forward reference, and Step-5b closure removes every such declaration. Rehoming those items to an earlier page (an owner-only reading-order change) would make the citations backward and restore the links.
Invertible element and general linear group of a Banach algebra
Definition
Let be a unital complex Banach algebra (Unital Banach algebra). An element is invertible when there is with
Such an element is then unique: if and both satisfy the two equations, then
using associativity and the unit law. The unique is called the inverse of and is written . The set of all invertible elements of is denoted
and is called the general linear group of . It is a group under multiplication:
- with ;
- if then with , since and symmetrically;
- by symmetry of the defining equations.
The map is the inversion map of .
Remarks
-
Two-sided inverses are required, and one-sided inverses do not suffice. If and , then is not invertible by definition, and this situation really occurs in a unital complex Banach algebra: on the right shift for , , and the left shift satisfy while , where is the orthogonal projection onto , so has a right inverse and is not invertible (
ex-spectrum-of-the-unilateral-shift). Thus alone does not force in a general unital Banach algebra; both inverses are always verified explicitly below. -
The group need not be dense or connected, but it is open. In a Banach algebra is an open subset of and inversion is continuous there; this is Invertible group is open and inversion is continuous. Openness is what makes the resolvent set of an element open and hence makes the spectrum closed Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra.
-
Nonunital algebras are not covered here. In a Banach algebra without a unit there is no element to compare with, so invertibility is not defined by this definition. The companion examples introduce the unitization and declare that spectra of elements of a nonunital algebra are always computed in that named unitization (
ex-unitization-of-a-nonunital-banach-algebra). -
Reading order. The example items named by ID above are homed on later pages of the plan, so they are named rather than hyperlinked: a body link to later material must be declared as a forward reference, and Step-5b closure removes every such declaration. Rehoming those items to an earlier page (an owner-only reading-order change) would make the citations backward and restore the links.
Neumann series
Statement
Let be a unital complex Banach algebra, let with , and for write , a finite sum with (Unital Banach algebra). Then
- the series converges in , and its sum satisfies ; in particular is invertible with (Invertible element and general linear group of a Banach algebra);
- for every the tail estimate holds. The hypothesis is not symmetric: the estimate is in terms of , and is invertible whenever lies in the open unit ball.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A unital complex Banach algebra , an element with , the partial sums , and the number .
is complete under its norm, , and for all ; multiplication is associative and bilinear (Unital Banach algebra).
An element is invertible exactly when there is with , and that is then unique, written (Invertible element and general linear group of a Banach algebra).
A normed space is a Banach space if and only if every absolutely convergent series in converges (Series criterion for Banach spaces).
Proof
For every one has : this holds at because , and inductively .
For every the telescoping identities and hold, by distributivity and summed over .
Multiplication is jointly continuous in the norm: for one has by [L1], so and force .
Since , the geometric series satisfies and its tails satisfy ; with [step 1.1] this gives .
The series is absolutely convergent, so it converges to an element by [L3] and completeness of .
Since in by [step 1.1] and , letting in the identities of [step 1.2] is legitimate: and by [step 1.3] and [step 3.1], while the right hand sides tend to ; hence and .
By [L2] the element is invertible with , which proves claim 1; moreover for every the difference of the sum and the partial sum is the tail , whose norm is at most by [step 1.1] and [step 2.1], which is claim 2.
Invertible group is open and inversion is continuous
Statement
Let be a unital complex Banach algebra (Unital Banach algebra) and let be invertible with inverse (Invertible element and general linear group of a Banach algebra). Then:
- every with is invertible, with
- is an open subset of ;
- inversion , , is continuous at every point of (with the relative topology on ).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A unital complex Banach algebra , an invertible , and an element with . Put , so that .
The norm on is submultiplicative, , multiplication is associative and bilinear, and the norm is continuous with respect to itself: and (Unital Banach algebra).
An element is invertible exactly when it has a two-sided inverse, which is then unique; inverses satisfy for invertible , and (Invertible element and general linear group of a Banach algebra).
If then is invertible with and every tail bound ; in particular (Neumann series).
Proof
The element satisfies by [L1], and , where the middle step uses from [L2].
For the difference of inverses one has the algebraic identity whenever both inverses exist, because , using [L2].
By [L3] applied to with , the element is invertible with and .
Since with both factors invertible, [L2] gives that is invertible with , and taking norms with [L1] and [step 2.1] gives ; this is claim 1.
Claim 2 follows: given , every with satisfies the hypothesis verified in [step 3.1] and hence lies in , so contains the open ball of that radius about .
In particular, whenever the bound of [step 3.1] gives .
Combining [step 1.2] with [step 4.2] and [L1], for one has , which tends to as ; this is claim 3.
Claims 1, 2 and 3 are exactly the three assertions of the statement, so the theorem is proved.
Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra
Definition
Let be a unital complex Banach algebra (Unital Banach algebra) and let . The spectrum of in is the set
where is the group of invertible elements (Invertible element and general linear group of a Banach algebra). The complement
is the resolvent set of , and for the element
is the resolvent of at . Thus is characterized by the two equations
and it is the unique element with these properties. The subscript in and records the ambient algebra: if is a closed unital subalgebra containing and having the same unit, then is itself a unital complex Banach algebra in the inherited norm, so both spectra are defined. They can differ, and the spectrum in the smaller algebra contains the spectrum in the larger one: .
The zero algebra is excluded by the unital-algebra convention. For , : has inverse for , whereas cannot have a two-sided inverse since .
Remarks
-
The ambient algebra is always part of the data. Every use of a spectrum below states the algebra in which it is computed. For and a closed unital subalgebra with and the same unit, containment of the invertible groups gives , and the companion page exhibits a case where the inclusion is strict (
cex-spectrum-can-shrink-in-a-larger-banach-algebra). The complex spectrum of an element of a nonunital Banach algebra is not defined by this formula; it is taken in the unitization, as recorded inex-unitization-of-a-nonunital-banach-algebra. -
Operator spectra are the special case . For a nonzero complex Banach space and one has and agrees with the spectrum of computed in any unital Banach subalgebra of that contains and the identity and is closed under inverses of its elements. The closed unital algebra generated by need not be inverse-closed, so no agreement with that algebra is asserted (
ex-bounded-operators-form-a-noncommutative-banach-algebra). -
The spectrum is closed and bounded; under AC it is nonempty. The map is continuous and is open (Invertible group is open and inversion is continuous), so is open and is closed. The Neumann series gives and hence bounds the spectrum by ; under the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), the nonempty-spectrum conclusion is the substance of Spectrum is nonempty compact and norm bounded. Nothing in the present definition assumes either conclusion.
-
The resolvent convention fixed here is . With this order of the factors the resolvent identity reads and the derivative of the resolvent map is (Resolvent identity, Resolvent is Banach-valued holomorphic). For the opposite convention , the identity has factor and the derivative is .
-
Reading order. The example items named by ID above are homed on later pages of the plan, so they are named rather than hyperlinked: a body link to later material must be declared as a forward reference, and Step-5b closure removes every such declaration. Rehoming those items to an earlier page (an owner-only reading-order change) would make the citations backward and restore the links.
Resolvent identity
Statement
Let be a unital complex Banach algebra and let . With the resolvent of Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra:
- for all , in particular and commute;
- for all ,
Both identities are equalities of two-sided products; no commutativity of is assumed, and the factor order shown is the one that is used later.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A unital complex Banach algebra , elements , complex numbers with and .
The norm is submultiplicative, , and multiplication is associative, bilinear, and satisfies for all (Unital Banach algebra).
For the resolvent is the unique element of with , and similarly for ; if are invertible then (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra, Invertible element and general linear group of a Banach algebra).
Proof
Each resolvent is a two-sided inverse of its own argument: , and by [L2]; and the scalar identities and are immediate. No commutativity between and , and no commutativity between and , is claimed or needed: the two computations below multiply each resolvent against its own argument only.
Multiplying the identity on the left by and on the right by yields ; the two terms on the left equal and respectively, so , which is claim 1.
Multiplying the identity on the left by and on the right by yields ; the two terms on the left equal and respectively, so , which is claim 2 in the stated form after moving the term and reversing the sign: .
Claim 1 and claim 2 are exactly the two displayed identities of the statement, so the lemma is proved.
Resolvent is Banach-valued holomorphic
Statement
Let be a unital complex Banach algebra and let with resolvent set and resolvent (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra). Then:
- is an open subset of , so is closed;
- for every and every with the Neumann expansion converges in and exhibits ;
- the map is holomorphic on in the norm sense, with derivative and in particular it is norm continuous there, with the local estimate for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A unital complex Banach algebra , an element , a point with , and with .
is complete, the norm is submultiplicative with , and multiplication is associative and bilinear (Unital Banach algebra).
is the unique two-sided inverse of , so , and exists exactly when is invertible (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra).
If then is invertible with and (Neumann series).
Inversion is continuous on the invertible group, and is therefore open: it is the preimage of the open set under the continuous map (Invertible group is open and inversion is continuous).
Proof
Put , so that by [L1], and : indeed , using from [L2].
By [L3] applied to , the element is invertible with and .
By [step 1.1] and [step 2.1], is a product of two invertible elements, hence invertible, with ; combined with [L4] this shows that is open, which is claim 1.
The map is norm continuous at : from [step 3.1], , whose norm is at most , and this tends to with ; independently, continuity of inversion [L4] applied to the continuous map gives the same conclusion.
For nonzero with , divide the expansion of [step 3.1] by after subtracting : . The right-hand side converges in and has norm at most , which tends to as .
Thus the norm difference quotient of at converges to . Since was arbitrary in the open set , the resolvent is Banach-valued holomorphic there and .
The three claims are established: claim 1 by [step 3.1], claim 3 together with its continuity and estimate by [step 4.1] and [step 5.1], and claim 2 is exactly the expansion of [step 3.1].
Spectrum is nonempty compact and norm bounded
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a nonzero unital complex Banach algebra and let , with spectrum and resolvent as in Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra. Then
- is a compact subset of the closed disc ;
- .
The Axiom of Choice is used exactly once, in the form of the Hahn–Banach separation supplied by The dual space separates points of a normed space; the closedness, boundedness and nonemptiness arguments are otherwise choice-free.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An assumed Axiom of Choice, a nonzero unital complex Banach algebra , an element , and the spectrum, resolvent set and resolvent of (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra).
is complete, , and , and because is nonzero; in particular is not invertible, since for every (Unital Banach algebra, Invertible element and general linear group of a Banach algebra).
exactly when is invertible, and then satisfies (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra).
If then is invertible with (Neumann series).
The resolvent set is open, and is norm holomorphic there and hence norm continuous (Resolvent is Banach-valued holomorphic, Invertible group is open and inversion is continuous).
Every bounded entire function is constant (Liouville's theorem: every bounded entire function is constant).
If in a complex normed space then there is a bounded linear functional with (The dual space separates points of a normed space).
The standing hypothesis is the Axiom of Choice, used here through [L6] and nowhere else (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
If then , so by [L3] the element is invertible and hence is invertible with The Neumann-series norm estimate gives . Therefore and .
The set is open by [L4], so its complement is closed; combined with the boundedness of [step 1.1] this makes a closed bounded subset of , hence compact, which is claim 1.
Suppose, for contradiction, that , so that and is defined for every .
The element is nonzero: if then , contradicting [L1]; here is invertible because .
By [L6], applied to the distinct points and in , there is a bounded linear functional with .
Define by . Then is holomorphic on : at each the resolvent is complex differentiable with by [L4], and a bounded linear functional is complex differentiable with for , so the chain rule gives ; thus is entire.
The function is bounded: on the compact set the norm is bounded by some because is norm continuous by [L4], and for the estimate in [step 1.1] gives ; hence for every .
By [L5] the bounded entire function is constant; since the estimate in [step 1.1] gives as and is continuous, along , so the constant value is and .
But by the choice of in [step 5.1], contradicting ; hence , which is claim 2.
Claim 1 was proved in [step 2.1] and claim 2 in [step 9.1], so the spectrum of is a nonempty compact subset of the disc of radius .
Spectral radius
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a nonzero unital complex Banach algebra and let . By Spectrum is nonempty compact and norm bounded the spectrum (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra) is a nonempty compact subset of contained in the closed disc of radius . The real-valued function is continuous, so its image is a nonempty compact subset of and has a maximum. The spectral radius of is the real number
It satisfies . When the ambient algebra must be recorded, the notation is ; for a bounded operator on a nonzero complex Banach space the convention is that is computed in the algebra of bounded operators, whose spectrum convention is fixed by the spectrum definition above.
Remarks
-
The maximum is a maximum because the spectrum is compact and nonempty. This is the only place where the Axiom of Choice enters the definition: it is inherited from Spectrum is nonempty compact and norm bounded, whose nonemptiness proof uses Hahn–Banach separation. Selecting the maximum of the compact set of moduli uses no further choice, since a nonempty compact subset of contains its supremum.
-
Monotonicity under containment. If is a closed unital subalgebra of containing and the same unit, then is a unital Banach algebra in the inherited norm and : invertibility in implies invertibility in . Consequently .
-
Constancy on scalar multiples. For one has and hence : the element is the unit rescaled, and is invertible exactly when . This computation is used in the counterexample
cex-norm-need-not-equal-spectral-radius. -
The radius is not the norm in general. The inequality is strict for many elements; the definitive relation is the theorem Spectral radius formula. In particular is possible for nonzero , and then .
-
Reading order. The example items named by ID above are homed on later pages of the plan, so they are named rather than hyperlinked: a body link to later material must be declared as a forward reference, and Step-5b closure removes every such declaration. Rehoming those items to an earlier page (an owner-only reading-order change) would make the citations backward and restore the links.
Polynomial spectral mapping
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a unital complex Banach algebra, let , and let be a complex polynomial with constant term and degree at most . Form , with . Then
where spectra are taken in the ambient algebra (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra). The identity holds for constant polynomials as well: if then and both sides equal .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a unital complex Banach algebra , an element , and a complex polynomial ; write , a finite sum of scalar multiples of powers of .
The algebra is associative, the multiplication is bilinear and ; every polynomial in commutes with , and powers of satisfy the usual index laws (Unital Banach algebra).
For the element is invertible exactly when , and invertibility is a two-sided condition; commuting invertible elements have commuting inverses (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra, Invertible element and general linear group of a Banach algebra).
If commute and is invertible, then and are invertible: with one has and , so ; symmetrically . [L1, L2, algebra]
Every nonconstant complex polynomial of degree has a factorisation with and the roots of (Fundamental theorem of algebra by Liouville's theorem).
Under the Axiom of Choice, the spectrum of every element of a nonzero unital complex Banach algebra is nonempty (Spectrum is nonempty compact and norm bounded).
Proof
Constant case: if then and, for , the element is invertible exactly when — its inverse is then — while at it is , which is not invertible in a nonzero algebra. Hence ; and is nonempty by [L5], so as well.
Nonconstant case, factor step: for the polynomial vanishes at , so for a polynomial of degree ; evaluating at gives .
Root factorisation of the translated polynomial: for the polynomial has degree and a leading coefficient , so by [L4] there are with ; evaluating at gives , a product of commuting elements.
Forward inclusion: if then . Indeed, suppose has no zero in ; by [step 1.3] the roots of satisfy , so and each is invertible; the product of commuting invertible elements is invertible, so .
Reverse inclusion: if then . For if were invertible, then by [step 1.2] the commuting product would be invertible, so [L3] would make invertible, contradicting .
Combining [step 2.1] and [step 2.2] with [step 1.1] gives in the nonconstant case and in the constant case, which is the assertion.
Remarks
-
Where the fundamental theorem of algebra is used. The forward inclusion [step 2.1] needs the existence of all roots of , which is Fundamental theorem of algebra by Liouville's theorem. The reverse inclusion needs only polynomial division by the known linear factor .
-
The statement is about the ambient algebra. Both spectra in the theorem are computed in the same unital Banach algebra ; the identity can fail for spectra taken in different algebras, since spectra may shrink in a larger algebra (
cex-spectrum-can-shrink-in-a-larger-banach-algebra). -
Reading order. The example items named by ID above are homed on later pages of the plan, so they are named rather than hyperlinked: a body link to later material must be declared as a forward reference, and Step-5b closure removes every such declaration. Rehoming those items to an earlier page (an owner-only reading-order change) would make the citations backward and restore the links.
Submultiplicative root limit
Statement
Let be a positive-indexed family of nonnegative real numbers satisfying the submultiplicative inequality
Then the -indexed sequence () converges in . Writing the limit of the positive-indexed root family for this sequence limit,
The case of a vanishing term is included: if for some , then for all and both sides equal .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A positive-indexed family of reals with and for all ; put and extend the inequality by this convention, so that . Define for ; no zeroth root is defined.
For every and there is a unique with ; moreover and when (Existence and uniqueness of -th roots: a unique with ).
For and : if and only if , and if and only if . Consequently and implies , since both sides are nonnegative and have the same -th power (Monotonicity of and of , Existence and uniqueness of -th roots: a unique with ).
For a sequence of reals the limit superior and limit inferior are elements of with , and converges to exactly when (Limit superior and limit inferior of a real sequence as and in , A real sequence converges to iff , and diverges to iff both equal ).
If eventually, then and (If eventually then and ).
For every real , the -indexed sequence converges to (For every , ).
Proof
Put , a real number in because is finite and every term is ; by definition of the infimum, for every .
If for some then for every : writing with , the hypothesis and the convention give , while by assumption.
Now suppose for every . Fix , put and ; then for every , writing with and , iterated submultiplicativity gives .
Suppose for some . Then for all by [step 1.2] and [L1], and because the term occurs in the set whose infimum is ; hence for and .
With as in [step 1.3] the bound holds for and the constant : indeed by the integer index laws, and the correction factor satisfies when (then makes ) and when , so in both cases .
On the other hand every term satisfies by [step 1.1], so the liminf clause of [L4] applied to the constant sequence gives , that is .
Define the positive constant . Combining [step 1.3] and [step 2.2] gives , hence for every , taking -th roots by [L2].
Apply [L5] to . Substituting in step 3.1 gives whenever . Since , for every real the inequality holds eventually; hence eventually, and [L4] gives .
Since was arbitrary in [step 4.1] and , one has for every , hence .
In the positive case, [step 5.1] and [step 2.3] yield , so all three (for the sequence ) are equal to and by [L3]; in the vanishing case [step 2.1] gives the same conclusion. Hence in all cases .
Spectral radius formula
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a unital complex Banach algebra and let , with spectral radius (Spectral radius). Then
Here the root sequence means for ; , and no zeroth root is used. The Axiom of Choice is used only through the spectrum nonemptiness and Hahn–Banach content of Spectral radius, The norm of a vector is the supremum of |f(x)| over the dual unit ball and the declared polynomial spectral-mapping supplier; the analytic estimate itself is choice-free.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A unital complex Banach algebra , an element , and the spectrum, resolvent set, resolvent and spectral radius of (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra, Spectral radius).
is complete with , and for all (Unital Banach algebra).
If then is invertible with and (Neumann series).
on , and for (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra, Resolvent identity).
is open and is holomorphic there with continuous norm, with (Resolvent is Banach-valued holomorphic).
If is holomorphic on a disc containing the closed disc of radius around , then for every (All higher complex derivatives exist and satisfy Cauchy's integral formula on an interior circle).
For every integer and every , equals when and otherwise (On a positively oriented circle about a, the integral of (z-a)^m is zero for every integer m except -1, and is 2 pi i for m=-1).
For every in a complex normed space, (The norm of a vector is the supremum of |f(x)| over the dual unit ball).
With roots interpreted as the zero-based sequence , if and for all , then (Submultiplicative root limit).
For every polynomial , , so in particular for (Polynomial spectral mapping).
and for every (Spectral radius).
For every the sequence , , converges to (For every , ).
For a rectifiable contour, the modulus of the integral is at most its length times an upper bound for the integrand modulus (ML estimate: a contour integral is bounded by a supremum bound times path length).
The standing hypothesis is the Axiom of Choice, used through [L10], [L7] and the declared [L9] interface (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
First, if , then by in [L10], and every positive power and root norm is zero, proving the formula. In the remainder assume , so and divisions by this number are legitimate. For one has ; hence is invertible exactly when is, that is exactly when .
For every one has for all , so the positive-indexed family is submultiplicative and nonnegative, and its root sequence is for .
For every , [L9] gives , hence by [L10] applied to and the multiplicativity of the modulus, ; and by the last clause of [L10], so .
For one has , so [L2] applies to and gives ; comparing with the identity of [step 1.1] this is a power series in whose value at is and whose linear coefficient is .
Fix a real and put . For with one has , so because every spectral point has modulus at most ; by [step 1.1] the element is invertible. Hence the function for , , is a well-defined map .
is complex differentiable at every , : by [step 1.1] one has for , so with , the difference is , the identity following from the resolvent identity [L3] in the form together with the rearrangement of ; since , the difference quotient is , which converges to as by continuity of the resolvent [L4] and of .
At the map is complex differentiable with : by [step 2.1], for , and the remainder is bounded by . Combined with [step 3.1] this shows that is holomorphic on .
Let be a bounded linear functional and let . Since is holomorphic by [step 4.1] and is continuous linear, is holomorphic on with .
Fix with and put . The argument of steps 2.2-4.1 with in place of shows that is holomorphic on ; since , the disc contains the closed disc of radius around , the same inverse formula extends consistently, and extends by that formula as well. Thus [L5] applies to this extended with and gives for every .
For the series of [step 2.1] converges uniformly on the circle , so uniformly there, and [L5] also applies on this smaller circle. For fixed , the uniform remainder after multiplying by is bounded by , which tends to zero. By [L12] its integral tends to zero. Integrating the finite sums and using [L6] therefore gives for every .
Norm estimate for the coefficients, using [L12] on the circle of length : for , by [step 7.1] and the integral formula of [step 6.1], ; the supremum is finite because [step 6.1] places the circle as a compact subset of the larger disc , on which the argument of [step 4.1] makes holomorphic and hence continuous.
Put . This constant is positive because is invertible and therefore nonzero. Taking the supremum in [step 8.1] over all with and using [L7] gives for every ; hence for every . By [L8] and step 1.2, has a real limit equal to the stated infimum. By [L11], , and passing to these real limits gives . (If , convergence of both sequences would contradict their termwise inequality.) Since this holds for every , : otherwise choose .
By [L8] applied to the submultiplicative family of [step 1.2], the limit exists; [step 9.1] gives , while [step 1.3] gives for every , hence . Therefore and the formula holds for ; step 1.1 already proved the zero case.
Canonical Banach complexification of a real Banach space
Statement
Let be a real Banach space (Banach space) and let carry
- the complex scalar multiplication , making it a complex vector space, and
- the rotation-supremum norm the supremum of a bounded set of reals, so that .
Then:
- is a norm on the complex vector space (the complex norm axioms of Real and complex scalar conventions for normed spaces), and is complete for it, hence a complex Banach space;
- , , is a real-linear isometry, and for every bounded real-linear the map is complex-linear and bounded with ;
- (canonical comparison) Let be a complex Banach space and let be a real-linear isometry such that every has a unique representation with , and let be a conjugation: real-linear with , , and for all . Then is a complex-linear bijection with and , and , where is the extension of defined by . If in addition carries the rotation-supremum norm relative to , that is , then is an isometry.
The comparison is bounded, not isometric, in general; isometry holds precisely when the comparison model has the same rotation-supremum norm under its unique coordinates.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real Banach space with norm ; the set with complex scalar multiplication ; the function .
is a real normed space that is complete: with equality only for , for real , and ; the closed unit ball and all bounded sets are as in A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms, and completeness is Banach space. For complex spaces we use the modulus-homogeneity convention of Real and complex scalar conventions for normed spaces.
is a field with the specified real subfield, vanishes exactly at , and ( is a field, every element is uniquely , and every nonzero element has inverse , Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, , and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).
Every in has a representation with and (Every nonzero complex number has a unique polar form with and ).
For all real , and (The addition formulas for sine and cosine).
A real-linear is bounded when it has a finite bound (A bounded linear operator between normed spaces). Its operator norm is the least such bound, and for all (The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum).
The real field is a complete ordered field: every nonempty subset of that is bounded above has a least upper bound, and suprema are monotone, satisfy for bounded real functions on a common nonempty index set, and commute with multiplication by a positive scalar (The Cauchy-sequence reals have the least-upper-bound property, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)). Its order properties used below follow directly by comparing upper bounds.
For every real angle, (Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine); and (Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi).
Proof
For every the set is nonempty and bounded above by , because ; hence is a well-defined real number with , and choosing and gives and .
is real-linear, and because the value at is and bounds every other value by ; hence is an isometric real-linear embedding.
For a real-linear the map is complex-linear: by real-linearity of .
In the situation of claim 3, every is for unique by hypothesis; hence is a well-defined bijection , and it is complex-linear because is real-linear and .
The conjugation inverts the two components: , because is real-linear, fixes pointwise and satisfies ; consequently the formulas and hold for .
forces by the bound of step 1.1 and definiteness of the norm, so is definite.
satisfies the triangle inequality: for all , and every , , so the supremum over gives .
is absolutely homogeneous for complex scalars: writing , for one has ; if and by [L3], then and , so [L4] turns the two coefficients into and ; the norm of the resulting vector is with , and taking suprema over (equivalently over ) gives , while gives the zero vector.
If in addition is bounded, then by [L5], and the reverse inequality follows by evaluating at , where the supremum is : the operator norm of is exactly . If , both unit-ball suprema are zero by [L5], so this conclusion still holds.
The intertwining is a definitional identity: satisfies , so holds by construction.
If carries the rotation-supremum norm relative to , then , using real-linearity and isometry of ; so is an isometry in that case. Conversely, if is isometric, its defining formula gives exactly this norm equality for every , which is the stated rotation-supremum condition.
For the component estimates and hold, because by hypothesis and is isometric.
By steps 1.1, 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4, the function satisfies definiteness, the triangle inequality and absolute homogeneity, so it is a norm on the complex vector space with scalar multiplication , which is associative and distributive because is a field.
For one has by [step 3.1] and by [step 1.1]; hence and are bounded with norms at most . Thus , using its defining composition and step 2.5.
The norm is equivalent to the product maximum norm : indeed by [step 1.1]. Consequently a -Cauchy sequence in is Cauchy for , hence its two coordinate sequences are Cauchy in and converge by completeness of , and the coordinatewise limit is the -limit by the same two-sided estimate; so is complete for and is a complex Banach space.
Claims 1, 2 and 3 are established: [step 3.2] and [step 4.2] give the complex Banach space, [step 1.2] and [step 2.5] give the isometric embedding and the same-norm extension, and [step 4.1], [step 2.6] and [step 2.7] give the bounded canonical comparison, its intertwining property and its isometry in the equal-norm case.
Remarks
-
The comparison is not claimed to be isometric in general. Bühler–Salamon Exercise 5.4 and the surrounding discussion show that a real Banach space can carry different complexification norms agreeing on its real copy; the rotation-supremum model is one convenient choice, and the canonical map between two compatible models is bounded in both directions but isometric only when norms are the same rotation-supremum construction.
-
Why a real operator's spectrum is defined through the complexification. is complex-linear on a complex Banach space, and, when , the nonzero unital algebra applies to it and the whole spectrum theory of this page becomes available; the definition Complexification and spectrum of a real operator records that convention and uses the bounded comparison of claim 3 to show that the resulting spectrum does not depend on the model.
Complexification and spectrum of a real operator
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), inherited by the spectral-radius definition. Let be a nonzero real Banach space and let be a bounded real-linear operator (A bounded linear operator between normed spaces). Let be the canonical complexification with the rotation-supremum norm and let be the complex-linear extension, both from Canonical Banach complexification of a real Banach space; thus with . The spectrum, resolvent set, resolvent and spectral radius of the real operator are those of computed in the unital Banach algebra :
with the conventions of Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra and Spectral radius.
The operator algebra is complete by If (Y) is Banach then (\mathcal B(X,Y)) is Banach. Composition is bilinear and associative, and gives submultiplicativity by The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum. Its identity has norm one: it is bounded by one, and a nonzero vector, normalized to norm one, gives equality. Thus it is nonzero and satisfies Unital Banach algebra. The same argument applies to each comparison model below, since its embedded real copy is nonzero.
Well-definedness (independence of the complexification model). Let be another compatible complexification of in the sense of claim 3 of Canonical Banach complexification of a real Banach space: a complex Banach space with a real-linear isometric embedding such that , an isometric conjugation , and let be the corresponding extension of . By that lemma the map , , is a bounded complex-linear bijection with bounded inverse , and . Hence for every
so is invertible in exactly when is invertible in , with . Taking spectra,
because the bijection matches the two spectral sets and preserves moduli. So the spectrum and the spectral radius of a real operator do not depend on which compatible complexification computes them, and all of them are computed below in the canonical model.
Remarks
-
Why not "real with not invertible". Restricting the discussion to real scalars would discard the genuinely complex part of the spectrum. For example the quarter-turn on Euclidean has complexified spectrum exactly : , so for the inverse of is ; at the respective nonzero complex vectors and are in the kernel. Its real-scalar resolvent is all of , whereas its complex spectrum is nonempty. More precisely the real-scalar noninvertibility set equals . Indeed, a bounded real inverse extends componentwise to a bounded complex inverse. Conversely, for real the operator commutes with the canonical conjugation , which is isometric by replacing with in the norm formula. Its bounded inverse therefore also commutes with and restricts to a bounded inverse on its fixed real copy . This gives both directions without conflating real and complex spectra.
-
The operator is bounded by hypothesis. The same-norm extension statement of the complexification lemma is used only for bounded real-linear ; it is what makes an element of the Banach algebra , to which the spectral theory of this page applies. For unbounded real operators no spectrum in this sense is defined here.
-
is a holomorphic -valued map on by Resolvent is Banach-valued holomorphic, applied in whichever model is used; the comparison isomorphism above conjugates one resolvent map into the other. In particular the resolvent of a real operator is well defined at a point exactly when .
Gelfand-Mazur
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a unital complex Banach algebra (Unital Banach algebra) which is a division algebra: every nonzero element of is invertible (Invertible element and general linear group of a Banach algebra). Then the map
is an isomorphism of complex algebras and an isometry, and consequently and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An assumed Axiom of Choice, a unital complex Banach algebra in which every nonzero element is invertible, and the map , .
is a complex vector space with associative bilinear multiplication, for all , and ; in particular (Unital Banach algebra).
is invertible exactly when some satisfies ; the only non-invertible element of a division algebra is (Invertible element and general linear group of a Banach algebra).
exactly when is not invertible (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra).
Under the Axiom of Choice every element of a nonzero unital complex Banach algebra has nonempty spectrum (Spectrum is nonempty compact and norm bounded).
Proof
The map is complex-linear and multiplicative: and ; ; , using bilinearity and ; and is injective, because with would give , contradicting [L1].
For every the spectrum is nonempty by [L4].
Fix and pick by [step 1.2]; then is not invertible by [L3], so by the division-algebra hypothesis [L2]; hence lies in the image of .
The isomorphism is isometric: by [L1].
Since was arbitrary, is surjective, and by [step 1.1] it is an injective complex-algebra homomorphism; hence it is a complex-algebra isomorphism and .
The statements of the theorem are proved: is an algebra isomorphism by [step 3.1] and an isometry by [step 2.2], so a complex unital Banach division algebra is one-dimensional over .
Remarks
-
The Axiom of Choice enters only through the nonemptiness of the spectrum. If one is willing to assume that the spectrum of every element is nonempty, the argument above is choice-free; conversely the theorem is the standard quantitative form of the fact that one-point spectra force division algebras to be scalars.
-
"Division algebra" cannot be weakened to "no zero divisors". The disc algebra is a unital commutative complex Banach algebra without zero divisors: a product of two functions whose product vanishes on the connected disc vanishes identically by analytic continuation, so one factor is zero. It is nevertheless not a division algebra, because the coordinate function is nonzero while (
cex-spectrum-can-shrink-in-a-larger-banach-algebra,ex-maximal-ideal-space-of-the-disc-algebra). The boundary argument for the spectrum produces only a topological zero divisor, that is, an element admitting unit vectors with or ; topological zero divisors need not be algebraic ones, as in the disc algebra shows, so the two notions must not be conflated. The correct replacement of "no zero divisors" is "no nonzero topological zero divisors": every element of the boundary of the invertible group is a topological zero divisor, so a unital complex Banach algebra in which no nonzero element is a topological zero divisor is a division algebra. -
Use in the Gelfand theory. This is the step that identifies the quotient of a commutative unital Banach algebra by a maximal ideal with , making characters and maximal ideals correspond; the following page of this track uses the theorem in exactly that form.
-
Reading order. The example items named by ID above are homed on later pages of the plan, so they are named rather than hyperlinked: a body link to later material must be declared as a forward reference, and Step-5b closure removes every such declaration. Rehoming those items to an earlier page (an owner-only reading-order change) would make the citations backward and restore the links.
Banach algebra valued contour integral
Definition
Let be a complex Banach space (Banach space), let be a piecewise contour (Rectifiable complex contours, reversal, concatenation, closedness, and orientation), and let be continuous. The construction applies in particular to for a unital complex Banach algebra (Unital Banach algebra); no algebra multiplication or unit is used.
For fix a finite subdivision such that the restriction of on each piece has a continuous derivative extension to its closed interval. Given a tagged partition refining these nodes, define where lies in the -th piece. At a node, use the derivative extension from this piece; the two adjacent intervals may therefore use different values. The contour integral is the norm limit Existence and independence of all these choices are verified below. On a singleton parameter interval the integral is defined to be zero.
Equivalently it is the Bochner integral on the finite Lebesgue measure interval where the finitely many corner values may be assigned arbitrarily. It satisfies Concatenation adds the integrals and reversal negates them. An increasing piecewise- bijection of compact parameter intervals whose inverse is also piecewise leaves the integral unchanged.
For a finite complex chain whose nonzero terms are piecewise contours, and continuous , define Zero-coefficient terms are omitted; the empty chain integrates to zero.
Remarks
Existence and Bochner agreement. On the -th closed piece put . This is uniformly continuous and bounded. Subdivide each piece into equal intervals and use its left endpoint values to obtain finite-valued measurable step functions . Assign fixed values at the finitely many nodes. Uniform continuity on the finitely many pieces shows uniformly away from these nodes; here denotes with the chosen node values. In particular is strongly measurable, not merely scalar measurable. Each is integrable, and on this finite interval. Thus the definition of Bochner integration (Bochner-integrable function) supplies its integral, and Bochner integrability criterion gives independence of the approximants.
For arbitrary tagged refinements the corresponding step function differs from in norm by at most a common modulus off the nodes. Hence its difference from is at most . Comparing its simple integral with those of , the triangle inequality for finite sums bounds the difference of integrals by the difference. Passing to the limit proves convergence of all tagged sums to the same Bochner value. Different finite subdivisions have a common refinement and the same a.e. function ; changing finitely many endpoint values changes neither integral. This proves all independence claims without a choice of an infinite family of tags.
Norm estimate. The triangle inequality gives The scalar sums tend to the sum of the speed integrals on the pieces, which is by A continuous piecewise- path is rectifiable and its length is the sum of the speed integrals over its pieces. Taking the limit proves the bound. A constant contour and a zero integrand therefore have zero integral, as does a contour with singleton parameter interval.
Increment sums and parameter changes. The same value is the limit of To see this, apply the real mean-value theorem (The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with ) separately to the two coordinates of on an interval contained in one smooth piece. If is a common modulus of the derivative extensions, the difference between its complex increment and is at most . Therefore . This also holds for partitions not containing the original nodes: inserting the finitely many nodes changes only intervals of total length at most . The bounded derivative extensions bound the variation of there by a constant times this length, so both their old and subdivided contributions tend to zero.
Under an increasing reparametrization as specified above, tagged partitions and tags map to tagged partitions and tags with exactly the same increment sums. Uniform continuity of the parameter map makes the image mesh tend to zero. Both contours remain piecewise , so their integrals agree. Reversal reverses the order and the signs of the increments. For concatenation, split a partition at the joining parameter and use its two affine pieces; the increment sums split into the two sums. These facts prove the asserted reversal and concatenation identities. Finite linearity in chains follows from their definition. No claim is made here for a reparametrization taking a contour outside the piecewise- domain.
Scalar consistency. When , expansion into real and imaginary parts turns the increment sums into the four Riemann–Stieltjes sums in The complex line integral over a rectifiable path as a componentwise Riemann–Stieltjes integral. Thus the limits agree on the common piecewise- domain. Taking finite sums gives agreement with Integration over a complex chain and the index of a chain. The zero Banach space is allowed and all its integrals are zero. The construction uses completeness, uniform continuity and explicitly prescribed finite subdivisions; it makes no new choice assumption.
Contour integral commutes with bounded linear maps
Statement
Let be a unital complex Banach algebra, let be a complex Banach space, let be a bounded complex-linear map (A bounded linear operator between normed spaces), let be a piecewise complex contour, and let be continuous. Then
- is continuous on and the first integral being that of Banach algebra valued contour integral and the second computed in the Banach space ;
- where is the length of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A unital complex Banach algebra , a complex Banach space , a bounded linear , a piecewise contour with trace and length , a subdivision with derivative extensions on the closed pieces, and a continuous .
is the limit, over tagged partitions refining the subdivision, of , where the derivative extension belonging to the subinterval is used even when a tag is a corner; the chain version is the corresponding finite sum (Banach algebra valued contour integral).
is complex-linear and bounded, and its operator norm satisfies and for all and scalars (A bounded linear operator between normed spaces, The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum).
For a piecewise path the length is the sum of the speed integrals over a subdivision: ; on each such interval the speed is continuous, and the corresponding refined Riemann sums converge to this sum (A continuous piecewise- path is rectifiable and its length is the sum of the speed integrals over its pieces).
Proof
is continuous as a composition of continuous maps, and for every tagged partition refining the fixed subdivision, , because is linear and the scalars pull out of .
For every such tagged partition, .
Passing to the limit in [step 1.1] using continuity of and the convergence of the Riemann sums in [L1] gives , which is claim 1.
Passing to the limit in [step 1.2] and using that the speed sums converge to the length, as in [L3], gives the estimate , which is claim 2.
The two claims of the statement are exactly [step 2.1] and [step 2.2].
Banach-valued Cauchy integral vanishes
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a unital complex Banach algebra, let be open, and let be continuous and weakly holomorphic: for every bounded linear functional (The dual space X^* of a normed space and its dual norm) the scalar function is holomorphic. Let be a complex chain which is a cycle, with trace in (Complex chains, their traces, and cycles) and null-homologous in (Null-homologous cycles and homologous cycles in an open set). Then
the integral being that of Banach algebra valued contour integral over the chain . The Axiom of Choice is used exactly once, in the separation step supplied by The dual space separates points of a normed space.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An assumed Axiom of Choice, an open , a continuous weakly holomorphic , and a chain which is a cycle with trace and is null-homologous in .
For one has , and for every continuous on ; integrals over chains are additive (Banach algebra valued contour integral, Integration over a complex chain and the index of a chain).
For a bounded linear and a single contour , bounded linearity commutes with the contour integral (Contour integral commutes with bounded linear maps). Hence for the finite chain and every continuous on its trace, by the chain-integral definition in [F1]. Each retained contour has trace contained in , so its integral is defined; zero-coefficient contours are omitted even if their traces lie outside the domain of . For an empty retained list, both sides are zero by linearity.
If is open, is holomorphic, and is a complex chain which is a cycle with trace in and null-homologous in , then (Cauchy's theorem for a null-homologous cycle).
If in a complex normed space then there is a bounded linear functional on with (The dual space separates points of a normed space).
The standing hypothesis is the Axiom of Choice, used here through [F4] and nowhere else (The Axiom of Choice).
Proof
For every bounded linear functional the composition is holomorphic on by weak holomorphy, and it is continuous; moreover is a cycle with trace in that is null-homologous in by hypothesis, so [F3] applies to and gives .
For every bounded linear , : the first equality is [F2], and the second is [step 1.1].
Suppose . Then [F4] applied to the distinct points and produces a bounded linear functional with , contradicting [step 2.1]; hence .
Admissible cycle around a compact plane set
Statement
Let with compact and open. Then:
- there is a finite polygonal complex cycle in — a finite chain of directed line segments (Complex chains, their traces, and cycles, Filled complex triangles, their oriented three-edge boundary contours, diameter, and perimeter) — such that
- there are two such cycles , both with index on and outside , whose traces are disjoint, and which are nested:
All indices are those of Integration over a complex chain and the index of a chain. The construction is choice-free: the only selections are from the finitely many cells of a grid, and no supremum over an infinite family is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A compact and an open with .
There is a compact Jordan set , a finite union of closed rectangles of one axis-parallel grid with pairwise disjoint interiors, such that ; we write for its finitely many cells (A compact subset of an open Euclidean set has a compact Jordan neighborhood inside that open set).
A finite sum of closed complex contours with integer coefficients is a complex chain; the trace of a sum is the union of the traces, a closed contour is a cycle, and the concatenation of the four sides of an axis-parallel rectangle is a closed contour whose trace is its boundary (Complex chains, their traces, and cycles, Filled complex triangles, their oriented three-edge boundary contours, diameter, and perimeter, Goursat's theorem for rectangles: a holomorphic function integrates to zero around every rectangle contained in its domain).
For a chain and , the index is ; it is additive over sums of chains, and reversing a contour negates its index (Integration over a complex chain and the index of a chain, Chain integration and the index are additive in the chain, and reverse with it).
For a closed complex contour and , a continuous argument of exists along , and (Every contour missing a point admits a continuous logarithm, unique up to a constant in , The winding number is the increment of a continuous argument divided by ).
The index of a cycle is continuous, hence locally constant, on the complement of its trace, and is constant on every connected component of that complement (The index of a cycle is locally constant off its trace and vanishes far from it).
If is holomorphic on an open set containing a closed axis-parallel rectangle , then for the positively oriented boundary (Goursat's theorem for rectangles: a holomorphic function integrates to zero around every rectangle contained in its domain).
Proof
Cell index inside. Let be one of the closed grid rectangles, with its positively oriented boundary, and let . Along each of the four sides of the point has a continuous argument: by [L4] a continuous argument of exists, and along a side the perpendicular foot from to the side's supporting line lies in the relative interior of the side, because both coordinates of lie strictly between the corresponding coordinates of ; hence varies monotonically along each side by exactly the angle subtended at by that side, and the four such angles sum to because the four triangles from to the sides tile and their angles at cover one full turn. By [L4], .
Cell index outside. Let be one of the closed grid rectangles and let . Then is strictly to the left of the left side, to the right of the right side, below the bottom side, or above the top side of ; in each case the whole trace lies in an open half-plane bounded by a line through , so a continuous argument of takes values in an interval of length ; its increment is a multiple of by [L4], hence , and .
Cell index outside by Goursat. For and the function is holomorphic on an open set containing , so [L6] gives and hence again; the two computations agree and either may be used below.
Choose and its cells as in [L1]. For each cell , write its four positively oriented directed side contours separately. Form directly as the finite list of those directed side occurrences that are not shared with another cell; a shared grid side has exactly two occurrences, with opposite directions, and neither is put in . This is a chain under [L2], without identifying it with or deleting terms from the list . Its trace is exactly the exposed grid sides, hence . It is a cycle: the sum of the endpoint-boundary functions of all four sides of every cell is zero, while each omitted opposite pair also has zero endpoint-boundary function, so the remaining endpoint counts cancel at every grid vertex.
For lying on no grid line, if and if : the first equality holds because the omitted opposite pairs contribute zero to the index by [L3] and the index is additive, and the second because exactly one cell contains in its interior when , while no cell contains when .
The index is continuous on by [L5]; since the points on no grid line are dense in , [step 2.1] extends by continuity to for every and for every .
Claim 1 follows with this : and , so for ; and implies , so ; the trace of is .
For claim 2, choose a compact Jordan set , again a finite union of grid rectangles, with , and let be the cycle obtained from by the construction of [step 1.4]; then and are disjoint, and for every , in particular for every .
With and as in [step 4.2], also for every : indeed because , and [step 3.1] applied to the Jordan set gives for ; moreover for because .
Claims 1 and 2 are established by [step 4.1] and [step 5.1] together with [step 4.2]: the cycle , and the nested pair , have the stated index properties and traces.
Remarks
-
Why the index-one clause is the only one used to define . Both Holomorphic functional calculus and its homomorphism theorem need a cycle whose index is exactly one on the spectrum and zero outside the holomorphy domain; the nested pair of claim 2 is what makes the product rule for the calculus a single separated double integral rather than a limiting argument.
-
Two different cycles, two different constructions of the same index. The argument-increment computation [step 1.1] and the Goursat computation [step 1.3] are independent, and both are used: the first identifies the index of a cell as one, the second as zero outside.
Holomorphic functional calculus
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a unital complex Banach algebra, let , and let be a function holomorphic on an open set containing the spectrum (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra); the spectrum is a nonempty compact subset of the plane (Spectrum is nonempty compact and norm bounded). By Admissible cycle around a compact plane set applied to the compact set there is a finite polygonal complex cycle with trace in such that
such a cycle is called admissible for (or simply admissible). Define
where is the resolvent and the integral is that of Banach algebra valued contour integral over the chain (Complex chains, their traces, and cycles). The integrand is continuous on the trace of : is holomorphic on , and is norm continuous on the resolvent set Resolvent is Banach-valued holomorphic, which contains . So the integral exists, and .
The construction describes the value attached to the germ of near : two holomorphic functions on and on with the same germ at — that is, agreeing on some neighbourhood of — give the same . The value is also independent of which admissible cycle is used; that is Holomorphic functional calculus is contour independent, and until it is proved the notation refers to the value computed from any one chosen admissible cycle.
Remarks
-
The hypothesis is nonempty and the cycle exists without choice. The spectrum of is nonempty and compact, so the admissible cycle of Admissible cycle around a compact plane set always exists; the construction inside that lemma uses only finitely many grid cells.
-
Notation for operators. For a nonzero complex Banach space and the definition applies with and gives , the Dunford integral of the resolvent. The spectrum is taken in (
ex-bounded-operators-form-a-noncommutative-banach-algebra). -
What is not part of the definition. The definition does not assert that is multiplicative, that it preserves polynomials, or that ; those properties are proved from this definition in Holomorphic functional calculus homomorphism and Holomorphic spectral mapping and composition. In particular the contour independence of the value is a theorem, and the notation is provisional until then.
-
Wider or smaller domains of holomorphy. Only the germ at matters: enlarging beyond a neighbourhood of the spectrum does not change the value, and shrinking it is allowed as long as it still contains the spectrum and the cycle lies inside it. Both statements follow from Holomorphic functional calculus is contour independent.
-
Reading order. The example items named by ID above are homed on later pages of the plan, so they are named rather than hyperlinked: a body link to later material must be declared as a forward reference, and Step-5b closure removes every such declaration. Rehoming those items to an earlier page (an owner-only reading-order change) would make the citations backward and restore the links.
Holomorphic functional calculus is contour independent
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a unital complex Banach algebra, , and let be holomorphic on an open set containing . Then the value of Holomorphic functional calculus is independent of the admissible cycle used to compute it. Moreover, if is another open set containing and is holomorphic on with on a neighbourhood of , then with computed from .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An assumed Axiom of Choice, a unital complex Banach algebra , an element with nonempty compact spectrum , an open , a holomorphic , and two admissible cycles in .
The definition chooses an admissible cycle and sets ; for every admissible cycle the displayed integral is defined because the integrand is continuous on its trace (Holomorphic functional calculus).
A cycle is null-homologous in an open set exactly when for every ; equivalently vanishes at every point outside (Null-homologous cycles and homologous cycles in an open set).
If is continuous and weakly holomorphic on an open and is a cycle with trace in that is null-homologous in , then (Banach-valued Cauchy integral vanishes).
For fixed the map is holomorphic on and the product of a scalar holomorphic function with it is weakly holomorphic: for every bounded linear functional on the map is holomorphic on (Resolvent is Banach-valued holomorphic, Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra).
For every compact contained in an open set there is a finite polygonal cycle with index on and index outside (Admissible cycle around a compact plane set).
Proof
Put , an open set containing both traces ; the difference is a cycle with trace in whose index at is .
The map is continuous on and weakly holomorphic there: for a bounded linear functional the composition is a product of the holomorphic scalar function and the holomorphic scalar function , hence holomorphic on the open subset of .
Germ independence: let be open and let be holomorphic on with on a neighbourhood of . Apply [L6] to the compact set and the open set : this gives an admissible cycle for both and with trace in , hence lying in , where .
For both indices equal , and for both equal , by admissibility; hence for every , that is, is null-homologous in .
By [L3] applied to and the cycle , null-homologous in by [step 2.1], one has ; by additivity of the chain integral this gives , hence does not depend on the admissible cycle.
On the trace of the cycle of [step 1.3] the two integrands coincide, , so the two integrals agree; by [step 3.1] applied to each function separately, .
Both assertions of the statement are proved: cycle independence by [step 3.1] and germ independence by [step 4.1].
Holomorphic functional calculus homomorphism
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a unital complex Banach algebra and let . Write for the holomorphic functional calculus value of Holomorphic functional calculus, with the contour independence of Holomorphic functional calculus is contour independent in force. Let be holomorphic on open sets and let . Then:
- , computed on ;
- , computed on ;
- for the constant function , and for the coordinate function , computed on any open set containing ;
- for every polynomial one has , the sum in the Banach algebra ;
- if is holomorphic and nowhere zero on , then is invertible with , where is holomorphic on .
Thus is a unital algebra homomorphism from the algebra of germs of functions holomorphic near to , and it reproduces polynomials and reciprocals of nonvanishing functions.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An assumed Axiom of Choice, a unital complex Banach algebra , an element , an open set , a holomorphic , and an admissible cycle in with index on and index outside .
, independent of the admissible cycle, and the chain integral is additive over sums of contours with the norm bound for continuous (Holomorphic functional calculus, Holomorphic functional calculus is contour independent, Banach algebra valued contour integral, Contour integral commutes with bounded linear maps).
The spectrum is contained in the closed disc of radius (Spectrum is nonempty compact and norm bounded).
Resolvent identity: for distinct ; all resolvents and the element commute with one another (Resolvent identity, Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra).
Cauchy formula on a cycle: if is holomorphic on an open and is a cycle with trace in null-homologous in , then for every (Cauchy's integral formula for a null-homologous cycle).
Vanishing Cauchy theorem: if is holomorphic on an open and is a cycle with trace in null-homologous in , then (Cauchy's theorem for a null-homologous cycle).
Nested cycles: for compact with open there are cycles with traces in , disjoint, with on , for and for ; each is a finite chain of directed line segments whose boundary function vanishes, although its constituent contours need not be closed (Admissible cycle around a compact plane set).
For a cycle and , by the definition of index (Integration over a complex chain and the index of a chain). For , the function has the primitive on , so its integral over vanishes (The integral of a continuous derivative over a cycle is zero). Also for every constant , by summing endpoint increments over the cycle (The contour integral of a constant c is c times the endpoint displacement, Complex chains, their traces, and cycles).
implies with the series converging in norm, and every convergent series on a compact contour may be integrated termwise: if uniformly on the trace then by the norm bound of [L1] (Neumann series).
Proof
Linearity: for a common admissible cycle in one has , because the chain integral is -linear in the integrand.
Unit law, cycle choice: choose and apply [L5] to the compact closed disc inside . It gives a finite polygonal cycle whose trace lies outside and whose index is on . Since and the constant function is entire, is admissible for its calculus value; by contour independence [L1], may be computed on .
Coordinate identity: for every admissible cycle and the function one has the pointwise identity on , hence by [L6] and [L1].
Nested cycles: apply [L5] to the compact set and the open set ; this produces cycles with disjoint traces in , both admissible for and for , with for every and for every .
First Cauchy integral: for each fixed the scalar function is holomorphic on , and is a cycle with trace in that is null-homologous in because its index vanishes outside by admissibility; [L3] gives .
Second Cauchy integral: for each fixed the function is holomorphic on , a neighbourhood of ; and is null-homologous in , because for every by admissibility and by the nesting; hence [L4] gives .
Unit law, value: the compact trace of lies in the open set , so . Hence uniformly on the trace. Integrating termwise by [L7], [L6] gives and for . Thus and .
The double integral: the function is continuous on the compact product ; the two-dimensional tagged Riemann sums of over refined partitions of and converge in , by the uniform-continuity mesh estimate underlying the Banach-valued contour integral in [L1] applied in both variables, so the two iterated integrals and exist and agree.
Coordinate law, value: combining [step 1.3] with [step 2.3] gives .
Splitting the double integral: by the resolvent identity [L2], for , , so the double integral of [step 3.1] splits into the sum of the iterated integrals of and of ; the first inner integral over equals by [step 2.1], and the second inner integral over equals by [step 2.2].
Multiplicativity: using [step 4.1], ; here each resolvent factor commutes with the scalar coefficient in front of it. This is claim 2.
Inverse compatibility: for holomorphic and nowhere zero on the reciprocal is holomorphic on and there; by [step 5.1] and [step 2.3], and symmetrically , so is invertible with ; this is claim 5.
Polynomials and conclusion: a constant function is , so its calculus value is by [step 1.1] and [step 2.3]; the coordinate function has value by [step 3.2]; multiplicativity [step 5.1], linearity [step 1.1] and induction on the degree therefore assemble for every polynomial, which is claim 4. Claims 1, 2, 3 and 5 were proved in [step 1.1], [step 5.1], [step 2.3], [step 3.2] and [step 6.1].
Holomorphic spectral mapping and composition
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a unital complex Banach algebra and let . Let be holomorphic on an open set , so that is defined (Holomorphic functional calculus). Then:
- spectral mapping: ;
- composition: if is an open set with and is holomorphic, then where is computed from the holomorphic function by the calculus on .
Clause 1 includes locally constant functions: if is constant on a component of its image there is a single point, and no connectedness of or of is assumed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An assumed Axiom of Choice, a unital complex Banach algebra , an element , an open , a holomorphic , and for clause 2 an open with a holomorphic .
The calculus is linear, multiplicative, unital, sends the coordinate function to and satisfies for nowhere vanishing holomorphic (Holomorphic functional calculus homomorphism, Holomorphic functional calculus).
For holomorphic and fixed the filled difference quotient for , extended by at , is holomorphic in each variable on ; in particular is holomorphic on with (The filled difference quotient is holomorphic in each variable separately).
If commute in and is invertible then so are and : with one has , and symmetrically for (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra).
Nested and encircling cycles exist as in Admissible cycle around a compact plane set: for compact inside open there is a cycle with index on and outside , and two such with disjoint traces and nesting. For a cycle of this kind the set is compact: it is closed and bounded because the index vanishes far from the trace (The index of a cycle is locally constant off its trace and vanishes far from it).
Cauchy formula on a cycle: for holomorphic on open and a cycle with trace in null-homologous in , for , and the double integral of a continuous integrand over two such cycles may be iterated in either order (Cauchy's integral formula for a null-homologous cycle, Resolvent identity, the mesh estimate of Banach algebra valued contour integral).
Proof
Factorization at a spectral point: for the function of [L2] is holomorphic on and on ; applying the calculus and its multiplicative and affine laws [L1] gives , a product of two commuting elements.
Reverse inclusion: if then for every , so is holomorphic on some neighbourhood of ; by [L1] applied to the two functions and , whose product is the constant function , one has , so .
Forward inclusion: let . If were invertible, then by [step 1.1] the commuting product would be invertible, so [L3] would make invertible, contradicting ; hence .
Clause 1 follows from [step 1.2] and [step 2.1]: .
Setup for clause 2: choose a cycle with trace in and index on , outside , by [L4]; then is a compact subset of containing , and is compact. Since by [step 3.1], the calculus applies to at .
The resolvent identity in integral form: for every the function is holomorphic on a neighbourhood of (namely on , which contains and hence ), and there; by [L1] applied to and the affine function , one has : both sides are the calculus of reciprocal functions whose product with is .
Choice of the outer cycle and Cauchy evaluation: apply [L4] to the compact set inside , obtaining a cycle with index on and outside ; then for every (so ) the Cauchy formula [L5] applied to on along gives .
Composition: using the definition of the calculus, [step 5.1] inside the outer integral, and the iterated-integral identity of [L5], , where the second-to-last equality is [step 5.2] and the last is the calculus of along .
Both clauses are proved: clause 1 by [step 3.1] and clause 2 by [step 6.1].
Remarks
-
The composition clause is the coverage's inline obligation. The composition law is the second half of Bühler–Salamon Theorem 5.25(v) and of Shirbisheh Theorem 2.5.5; it is proved here, after the spectral mapping statement it needs, and not merely cited. The proof requires cycles around the compact image of a bounded spectral neighbourhood, not the whole preimage of an outer contour.
-
Local constancy of on spectral components is allowed. Nothing in the argument uses that separates points of : the factorization of [step 1.1] is carried out at the single spectral point , and the reverse inclusion tests values of on the spectrum pointwise.
Riesz spectral projection
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a unital complex Banach algebra, let , and let be clopen in the spectrum, that is, both and are relatively open in (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra). Equivalently is closed in — hence compact — and is compact as well, and the two are disjoint.
Choose disjoint open sets and ; such sets exist because and are disjoint compact subsets of the plane. Let
a locally constant function on the open neighbourhood of , hence holomorphic there. The Riesz spectral projection of associated with is the calculus value
where is any cycle with trace in whose index is at every point of , whose index is at every point of , and whose index is outside — for instance the difference , where is admissible for and is a cycle with index on the compact set and index outside (the zero cycle when ): the difference has index on , index on , and index outside , because has index there and has index outside . Such cycles exist by Admissible cycle around a compact plane set applied to the two compact sets and .
Here the equality with the displayed integral, and its independence of the separating cycle, do not use contour independence outside its admissible-cycle hypothesis. Indeed, put on . This is Banach-valued holomorphic: it is on and identically zero on , so in particular it extends holomorphically across . If is admissible and has the separating indices just specified, then has index zero on and outside , hence is null-homologous in . Therefore Banach-valued Cauchy integral vanishes gives The left side is the defining calculus integral for . Thus every such gives , while germ independence of the calculus makes the value independent of the chosen .
Remarks
-
The function is a germ, and that is all the definition needs. Its definition depends on the chosen neighbourhoods, but every two such locally constant functions agree on a neighbourhood of , and the calculus depends only on the germ (Holomorphic functional calculus is contour independent).
-
When or . If then on a neighbourhood of the spectrum and ; if then on a neighbourhood of the spectrum and . Both are consistent with the definition and with the multiplicativity of the calculus (Holomorphic functional calculus homomorphism).
-
No idempotence is assumed here. That and that commutes with are consequences of multiplicativity of the calculus, not part of the definition; they are proved for operators in Riesz spectral projection properties.
-
Why the contour has index one on and zero on the rest of the spectrum. This makes the integral a function of the spectral subset alone: replacing the cycle by another with the same indices does not change the value, as in the calculus at large. For a single isolated eigenvalue the projection is the classical residue (
ex-riesz-projection-for-a-matrix-with-separated-spectrum). -
Reading order. The example items named by ID above are homed on later pages of the plan, so they are named rather than hyperlinked: a body link to later material must be declared as a forward reference, and Step-5b closure removes every such declaration. Rehoming those items to an earlier page (an owner-only reading-order change) would make the citations backward and restore the links.
Riesz spectral projection properties
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a nonzero complex Banach space, let , and let be clopen in the spectrum, with Riesz projection (Riesz spectral projection). Then:
- and ; consequently the range and the kernel of are closed -invariant subspaces and
- if , then the restriction has spectrum ;
- if , then the restriction has spectrum ;
- if one of these spectral parts is empty, the corresponding summand is the zero subspace and no spectrum is assigned to the zero operator on it under the normalized nonzero-algebra convention of Unital Banach algebra.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An assumed Axiom of Choice, a nonzero complex Banach space , a bounded operator , a clopen subset of the spectrum , the locally constant germ , and .
The calculus is linear, multiplicative and unital: , , , and for nowhere vanishing , (Holomorphic functional calculus homomorphism, Holomorphic functional calculus).
and as germs near (Riesz spectral projection).
For a bounded idempotent on a normed space the range and kernel are closed and (A closed subspace is complemented exactly when it is the range of a bounded projection).
The spectrum consists exactly of those for which is not invertible in (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra, A bounded linear operator between normed spaces).
Proof
Idempotence and commutation: by [L1] and [L2]; by [L1] and [L2].
The splitting: by [step 1.1] the operator is a bounded projection, so [L3] gives that and are closed with ; since commutes with , both summands are -invariant.
Range spectrum, exclusion: assume , as in claim 2, so its operator spectrum is defined. Let . Choose the neighbourhoods , of the definition so that (possible since and is compact). Then the germ is holomorphic near : on it is with , and on it is . By [L1], . The operator commutes with , so it preserves ; on that nonzero summand its restriction is a two-sided inverse of . Hence .
Kernel spectrum, exclusion: assume , as in claim 3, so its operator spectrum is defined. Let , that is, or . Choose with when , and define on the complement part. Then , and the same computation with in place of shows that has the restriction of as a two-sided inverse on . Hence .
Range spectrum, inclusion: continue under . Let and suppose that were invertible on , with inverse . Put , a bounded operator because the germ is holomorphic near (its numerator vanishes on and ), and put on . Then and by the same multiplicativity computation, so would be invertible on , contradicting . Hence .
Kernel spectrum, inclusion: continue under . Symmetrically, if and were invertible with inverse , then the germ , read as on a neighbourhood of avoiding and as on a neighbourhood of , is holomorphic near . The operator would be a two-sided inverse of on , contradicting . Hence .
Claims 2 and 3 follow from [step 2.2], [step 3.1] and [step 2.3], [step 3.2] respectively; claim 1 was proved in [step 1.1] and [step 2.1]; claim 4 is the convention recorded in the statement, applied to an empty spectral part, and no spectrum is claimed for the zero operator.
Calkin algebra
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be an infinite-dimensional complex Banach space and let be the Banach algebra of bounded operators (If (Y) is Banach then (\mathcal B(X,Y)) is Banach, The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum). Let be the set of compact operators (Compact linear operator). Then:
- is a linear subspace of (Linear combinations of compact operators are compact);
- it is a two-sided ideal: if is compact and are bounded then and are compact (Compositions with a compact operator are compact);
- it is closed in the operator norm: a norm limit of compact operators is compact (Norm limit of compact operators is compact, which is stated under Countable Choice and requires the target to be Banach, as here). More explicitly, if lies in the norm closure, Countable Choice selects with for ; the theorem makes compact;
- and it is proper: the identity is not compact precisely because is infinite-dimensional (On an infinite-dimensional normed space, the identity operator is not compact).
The Calkin algebra of is the quotient algebra
with the quotient vector-space structure, the quotient norm , and the multiplication . Multiplication is well-defined because is a two-sided ideal, and it is submultiplicative: for and representatives , with the bracket in , so taking infima gives . The quotient is complete for the quotient norm by A quotient of a Banach space by a closed subspace is Banach. Its unit is .
Remarks
-
The unit has norm one and is nonzero. The quotient norm satisfies . The quotient norm is definite because is closed, and , so . The unit is idempotent and the quotient norm is submultiplicative, giving . Division by yields , hence .
-
Finite-dimensional is excluded, not normalized away. If then every bounded operator has finite-dimensional range and is compact (Bounded finite rank operators are compact), and the quotient is the zero algebra, which carries no unit in the sense of Unital Banach algebra. The definition therefore restricts to infinite-dimensional ; the finite-dimensional case is the zero quotient and is not called a Calkin algebra here.
-
Where Countable Choice is spent. It is used in the norm-limit compactness theorem, in selecting the approximating sequence above to turn sequential closure into norm closure, and in quotient completeness. The ideal formulas, identity noncompactness and the unit-norm argument introduce no further choice beyond those supplied closed-quotient facts.
-
The Calkin algebra forgets compact perturbations. Two operators have the same coset exactly when they differ by a compact operator, so records the "Fredholm part" of ; this is what makes the Atkinson theorem a statement about invertibility in (Atkinson in Calkin algebra language).
Atkinson in Calkin algebra language
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be an infinite-dimensional complex Banach space and let . Then the following are equivalent:
- is Fredholm;
- the coset is invertible in the Calkin algebra (Calkin algebra);
- there is a bounded with and both compact (Compact linear operator) — a bounded two-sided parametrix modulo compact operators.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An assumed Axiom of Choice, an infinite-dimensional complex Banach space , a bounded operator , and the Calkin algebra with unit .
is Fredholm if and only if there is a bounded linear with and compact (Atkinson).
In the quotient algebra one has invertible if and only if there is with and ; these equations are exactly and (Calkin algebra).
The Calkin algebra is built under Countable Choice, which is available here because the standing hypothesis is the stronger Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), whose standard consequences include Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
Equivalence of 2 and 3: the equation of [L2] holds exactly when , and the other product equation holds exactly when ; so is invertible precisely when admits a bounded two-sided parametrix modulo compact operators.
Equivalence of 1 and 3 is [L1]; combining it with [step 1.1] gives that 1, 2 and 3 are equivalent.
Remarks
-
No new Fredholm theory is hidden here. The corollary is a restatement of the Atkinson theorem in the quotient algebra: the only content beyond Atkinson is that quotient invertibility and the existence of a two-sided parametrix modulo compact operators are the same condition, which is the definition of the quotient multiplication.
-
Both products are required. One-sided quotient invertibility would only give one of the two compactness conditions; the theorem and the definition both ask for two-sided invertibility, and the remark here records that the order of the products is preserved: and appear in the two conditions separately.
Point continuous and residual spectrum
Definition
Let be a nonzero complex Banach space, let be a bounded operator (A bounded linear operator between normed spaces) and let . Write for , where is the identity, and recall that exactly when is not invertible (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra).
The spectral value is
- in the point spectrum when is not injective, that is, when is an eigenvalue;
- in the continuous spectrum when is injective, has dense range, and is not surjective;
- in the residual spectrum when is injective and its range is not dense in .
The three sets are pairwise disjoint by their injectivity and density conditions, and each is contained in : every listed condition precludes a two-sided inverse in .
Assume additionally Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain) for the partition assertion. If is injective and surjective, the bounded inverse theorem Bounded inverse theorem makes its inverse bounded. Consequently, for a spectral value with injective dense range, surjectivity is impossible. Splitting first by injectivity and then by density therefore gives The definitions themselves do not require DC. For on the nonzero space, and the other two parts are empty, since has inverse for .
Remarks
-
The residual spectrum is the injective case with non-dense range. No closedness is presupposed: simply means that is injective and its range is not dense in . The reader should not add the hypothesis that the range be closed; the point of the definition is to separate dense range from non-dense range, and a non-dense range may still fail to be closed.
-
Eigenvalues belong only to the point spectrum. If is not injective, then and, whatever the range is, is not in or by the disjoint classification above. Consequently : after compression values that are eigenvalues are removed, the remaining operators are exactly the injective ones with non-dense range. This identity is recorded and proved in Relations among the five spectral parts rather than identifying with the whole compression spectrum.
-
Individual parts need not be closed. The spectrum is closed, but the point spectrum need not be, and the closures of the three disjoint parts may meet at accumulation points of the whole spectrum; under DC their union is the closed spectrum by the partition argument above.
Approximate point and compression spectrum
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be a nonzero complex Banach space and let (A bounded linear operator between normed spaces). Write for . The approximate point spectrum of is
bounded below meaning for all and some real (A bounded operator that is bounded below), and the compression spectrum of is
the set of for which does not have dense range.
Sequential description of the approximate point spectrum. Under Countable Choice, if and only if there is a sequence of unit vectors in with Indeed, if is not bounded below then for each the set is nonempty, and Countable Choice selects one unit vector for each ; the resulting sequence witnesses the failure of the bound. Conversely a sequence of unit vectors with rules out every constant in the estimate.
Remarks
-
The two sets are not spectral parts in the disjoint sense. They may overlap each other and the classical parts: an eigenvalue is in but may also be a compression value. A value whose range is dense but not closed is not in and cannot be bounded below; indeed, under Countable Choice a convergent sequence of range points has Cauchy preimages under a lower bound, and completeness then puts its limit back in the range. Thus the value lies in . The exact relations are proved in Relations among the five spectral parts; no disjointness is claimed here.
-
The normalization of approximate eigenvectors matters. The definition above demands unit vectors, so a sequence with is not evidence: without the normalization every bounded operator would qualify. The unit vectors may be chosen adaptively; the single use of Countable Choice is recorded in the display above.
-
Bounded below is exactly injectivity with closed range in the Banach setting. That equivalence, proved under Dependent Choice in Under Dependent Choice, a bounded operator between Banach spaces is bounded below exactly when it is injective with closed range, is what makes and cover the spectrum (Relations among the five spectral parts); the definition here does not assume it.
Relations among the five spectral parts
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain). Let be a nonzero complex Banach space and let , with the point, continuous and residual spectra of Point continuous and residual spectrum and the approximate point and compression spectra of Approximate point and compression spectrum. Then
- , and are pairwise disjoint and ;
- and ;
- .
The three classical parts are a partition of the spectrum; the approximate point and compression spectra cover it as well, but may overlap it and each other.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An assumed Axiom of Dependent Choice, a nonzero complex Banach space , a bounded and ; abbreviate .
The three classical cases are exhaustive and exclusive for : fails to be injective, or is injective with dense non-surjective range, or is injective with non-dense range (Point continuous and residual spectrum).
when is not bounded below, and when has non-dense range (Approximate point and compression spectrum).
Under Dependent Choice, is bounded below if and only if it is injective with closed range (Under Dependent Choice, a bounded operator between Banach spaces is bounded below exactly when it is injective with closed range).
exactly when is not invertible in (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra).
The Axiom of Dependent Choice is the standing hypothesis of the statement (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain).
Proof
If is not injective then it is not bounded below: a bounded-below satisfies for , so forces . Hence , which is the second inclusion of claim 2.
If then, by definition, is injective with non-dense range. Hence and , so . Conversely, if , then has non-dense range and is injective, which is exactly . Thus .
If then is invertible, hence bounded below and of dense range; so .
Claim 3, other inclusion: let . If is not bounded below then . If it is bounded below, then by [L3] it is injective with closed range; were the range also dense, closedness would give range , so would be bijective with bounded inverse, hence invertible, contradicting [L4]; therefore the range is not dense and .
Claim 3, one inclusion: is the contrapositive of [step 1.3].
Claim 1: for the operator is not invertible by [L4]; by [L1] it falls into exactly one of the three classical cases, so the three sets are disjoint and their union is . The covering half of claim 3 is [step 1.4] and the reverse half is [step 2.1]; claim 2 consists of [step 1.1] and [step 1.2].
Boundary of spectrum lies in approximate point spectrum
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let be a nonzero complex Banach space and let . Then every boundary point of the spectrum lies in the approximate point spectrum:
(spectrum as in Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra, approximate point spectrum as in Approximate point and compression spectrum). The boundary is taken in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An assumed Axiom of Countable Choice, a nonzero complex Banach space , a bounded and a point .
is closed, so ; and every neighbourhood of meets the resolvent set (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra, Spectrum is nonempty compact and norm bounded).
For the resolvent is bounded, and (Spectrum and resolvent set in a Banach algebra).
The invertible group of is open: if is invertible and , then is invertible (Invertible group is open and inversion is continuous). Here one may take , whose inverse is by [L2], and , for which .
exactly when is not bounded below; a bounded-below operator satisfies for all and some (A bounded operator that is bounded below, Approximate point and compression spectrum).
The Axiom of Countable Choice is the standing hypothesis, used to select the unit vectors below (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Proof
Since is a boundary point, for each the disc meets ; Countable Choice selects with for every ; in particular .
First suppose that the resolvent norms are bounded along this sequence, say for all , and suppose . For with the operator is a product of invertible factors: the displayed identity holds because by [L2], and the second factor is invertible by the Neumann series since . Hence would be invertible and , contradicting .
Consequently the norms are unbounded; passing to a subsequence, which we relabel, we may assume .
For each the set of unit vectors with is nonempty, because the operator norm is the supremum of over the unit sphere; Countable Choice selects such a unit vector for every , and we set , a unit vector.
Then and , so along unit vectors.
By [L4] such a sequence rules out being bounded below with any constant ; hence . Since was arbitrary, .
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — §5.1.1 (Banach algebras), printed pp. 209–214
- Vahid Shirbisheh, Lectures on C-star Algebras, v2 — Chapter 2 §2.1, printed pp. 19–24
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — §5.1.1 (invertible elements and the Neumann series), printed pp. 209–214
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Corollary 1.51 and §5.1.1, printed pp. 34 and 209–214
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Theorem 1.49 and §5.1.1, printed pp. 33 and 209–214
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — §5.2.1, printed pp. 219–222
- Vahid Shirbisheh, Lectures on C-star Algebras, v2 — Definition 2.3.1 and §2.3, printed pp. 30–33
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Lemma 5.19, printed p. 221
- Vahid Shirbisheh, Lectures on C-star Algebras, v2 — Chapter 2 §2.3, printed pp. 30–33
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Lemma 5.19, printed pp. 221–222
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Theorem 5.20, printed pp. 222–223
- Vahid Shirbisheh, Lectures on C-star Algebras, v2 — §2.3, printed pp. 30–33
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Definition 1.50 and §5.2.2, printed pp. 34 and 222
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — §5.2.1 and the Jordan-form computation of spectra, printed pp. 219–222
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — the root-test step of Theorem 5.20, printed p. 222
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Exercise 5.4 and §5.1.1, printed pp. 209–213
- Vahid Shirbisheh, Lectures on C-star Algebras, v2 — §2.1, printed pp. 19–24
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Exercise 5.4 and §5.2.1, printed pp. 209–213 and 219–222
- Vahid Shirbisheh, Lectures on C-star Algebras, v2 — §2.1 and §2.3, printed pp. 19–24 and 30–33
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Theorem 5.20 and §5.1.1, printed pp. 209–214 and 222–223
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Lemmas 5.7–5.9 and Definition 5.8, printed pp. 213–216
- Vahid Shirbisheh, Lectures on C-star Algebras, v2 — §2.5, printed pp. 43–47
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Lemma 5.9 and §5.1.2, printed pp. 213–216
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Lemma 5.11 and Theorem 5.25(i), printed pp. 217–219 and 228
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Definition 5.24 and its cycle-existence remark, printed pp. 227–228
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Definition 5.24, printed pp. 227–228
- Vahid Shirbisheh, Lectures on C-star Algebras, v2 — Definition 2.5.1, printed pp. 46–47
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Theorem 5.25(i), printed pp. 228–229
- Vahid Shirbisheh, Lectures on C-star Algebras, v2 — the contour-independence discussion after Definition 2.5.1, printed p. 47
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Theorem 5.25(ii)–(iii), printed pp. 228–230
- Vahid Shirbisheh, Lectures on C-star Algebras, v2 — Theorem 2.5.2 and Exercise 2.5.3, printed pp. 47–48
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Theorem 5.25(iv)–(v), printed pp. 228 and 230–232
- Vahid Shirbisheh, Lectures on C-star Algebras, v2 — Theorem 2.5.5, printed pp. 49–50
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Theorem 5.25(vi) and equation (5.26), printed pp. 226–228
- Vahid Shirbisheh, Lectures on C-star Algebras, v2 — Exercise 2.5.3 and §2.5, printed pp. 48–50
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — Theorem 5.25(vi), printed p. 228
- Vahid Shirbisheh, Lectures on C-star Algebras, v2 — §2.5, printed pp. 48–50
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — §5.1 (Banach algebras) used only for the quotient algebra conventions of this definition
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — §5.1 (quotient algebra language; the Fredholm statement is the library's thm-atkinson, restated algebraically here)
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — §5.2.1 (point, residual and continuous spectra), printed pp. 219–221
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — §5.2.1 and Exercise 5.19-style presentation of the approximate point spectrum, printed pp. 219–221
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar A. Salamon, Functional Analysis — §5.2.1, printed pp. 219–221