Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 21 results · all verified · 1 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 20 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

The Logarithm and General Powers

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The exponential function is a continuous increasing bijection onto the positive reals. Its inverse, the natural logarithm, therefore inherits order and continuity; the exponential addition law becomes the logarithm's product, quotient, and reciprocal laws. Positive-base real powers are then defined by ax=exp⁡(xlog⁡a), reconciled with rational powers and with a rational-supremum construction, and differentiated directly.

The page develops the logarithmic power series, a square-summable infinite-product criterion, logarithmic growth, real-exponent p-series, and a two-point exponential inequality. These yield weighted AM--GM, Young, Hölder, and Minkowski inequalities for finite real exponents. It concludes with hyperbolic functions, their identities and derivatives, and logarithm formulas for their inverse functions.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function

Definition

For x>0, define log⁡x to be the unique real y such that exp⁡(y)=x. This is well-defined because The exponential is a continuous bijection from R onto (0,∞) states that exp⁡:R→(0,∞) is a bijection.

Thus log⁡:(0,∞)→R is the inverse function of exp⁡. In particular, log⁡(exp⁡y)=y for every y∈R and exp⁡(log⁡x)=x for every x>0.

Remarks

The domain is exactly (0,∞). This definition assigns no real logarithm to 0 or to a negative number.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm

Statement

The function log⁡:(0,∞)→R is continuous and strictly increasing, is onto R, and satisfies, for x,y>0, log⁡(xy)=log⁡x+log⁡y,log⁡(x/y)=log⁡x−log⁡y,log⁡(1/x)=−log⁡x. Also log⁡1=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Positive reals x,y.

[L2]

For all reals u,v, exp⁡(u+v)=exp⁡(u)exp⁡(v) (The exponential addition formula exp⁡(x+y)=exp⁡(x)exp⁡(y)).

[L3]

exp⁡(−u)=1/exp⁡(u) and exp⁡(u)>0 for every real u (The exponential is positive and satisfies exp⁡(−x)=1/exp⁡(x)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Since it is the inverse of the continuous strictly increasing exponential, log⁡ is continuous, strictly increasing, and maps (0,∞) onto R.

L1
1.2

The equality exp⁡(log⁡x+log⁡y)=exp⁡(log⁡x)exp⁡(log⁡y)=xy=exp⁡(log⁡(xy)) and injectivity of exp⁡ give log⁡(xy)=log⁡x+log⁡y.

L1L2
2.1

Since x/y=x(1/y) and exp⁡(−log⁡y)=1/y by [L3], step 1.2 gives log⁡(x/y)=log⁡x−log⁡y and log⁡(1/x)=−log⁡x.

step 1.2L3
3.1

As exp⁡(0)=1, the inverse identity gives log⁡1=0.

L1∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t

Statement

For x>0, log⁡ is differentiable and log⁡′(x)=1x,log⁡x=∫1xdtt.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A positive real x.

[L2]

exp⁡′(u)=exp⁡(u) for every real u (The exponential function is smooth and (exp⁡)′=exp⁡).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

At u=log⁡x, exp⁡′(u)=exp⁡(u)=x≠0; hence the inverse rule gives log⁡′(x)=1/exp⁡(log⁡x)=1/x.

L1L2
1.2

The function t↦1/t is continuous on (0,∞), so I(x):=∫1xdt/t satisfies I′(x)=1/x and I(1)=0.

L3
2.1

The difference x↦log⁡x−I(x) has derivative zero on (0,∞), and is zero at 1, so it is identically zero.

step 1.1step 1.2L4∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-14Open item page →

The Euler–Mascheroni constant and the harmonic asymptotic

Statement

For n≥1, let

Hn=∑k=1n1k,γn=Hn−log⁡n.

The sequence (γn) is strictly decreasing and is bounded below by 1−log⁡2. It therefore converges to a constant γ satisfying 0<γ<1, and

Hn=log⁡n+γ+o(1).

Consequently, Hn/log⁡n→1 as n→∞, with the quotient considered for n≥2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The sequences (Hn) and (γn) displayed in the statement.

[A1]

For every n≥1, Hn=∑k=1n1/k and γn=Hn−log⁡n.

[L1]

For x>0, log⁡x=∫1xdt/t, and the derivative of log⁡ is 1/x (The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t).

[L2]

Let a<b and let f,g:[a,b]→R be integrable. If f(x)≥0 for every x∈[a,b], then ∫abf≥0; if f(x)≤g(x) for every x∈[a,b], then ∫abf≤∫abg; and if m≤f(x)≤M for every x∈[a,b], with m,M real, then m(b−a)≤∫abf≤M(b−a) (If f≤g on [a,b] and both are integrable then ∫abf≤∫abg; and m(b−a)≤∫abf≤M(b−a)).

[L3]

If a<c<b, then a bounded function on [a,b] is integrable there exactly when its restrictions to [a,c] and [c,b] are integrable, and in that case ∫abf=∫acf+∫cbf (For a<c<b: f is integrable on [a,b] if and only if it is integrable on [a,c] and on [c,b], and then ∫abf=∫acf+∫cbf; with the oriented form for arbitrary a,b,c).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For every n≥1, γn+1−γn=1/(n+1)−∫nn+1dt/t.

A1L1L3algebra
1.2

Splitting the integral at n+1/2 gives ∫nn+1dt/t≥(1/2)/(n+1/2)+(1/2)/(n+1)>1/(n+1).

L2L3algebra
1.3

If n≥2, additivity and 1/t≤1/k on [k,k+1] give log⁡n=log⁡2+∑k=2n−1∫kk+1dt/t≤log⁡2+∑k=2n−11/k, where the sum is empty when n=2; thus γn≥1−log⁡2+1/n>1−log⁡2.

A1L1L2L3algebra
1.4

Splitting [1,2] at 3/2 gives log⁡2=∫12dt/t≤1/2+1/3=5/6<1; in particular, γ1=1≥1−log⁡2>0.

A1L1L2L3algebra
1.5

For every integer m≥1, splitting [1,2m] into [2j,2j+1] gives log⁡(2m)=∑j=0m−1∫2j2j+1dt/t≥∑j=0m−11/2=m/2.

L1L2L3algebra
2.1

Hence γn+1<γn for every n≥1.

step 1.1step 1.2algebra
2.2

Therefore γn≥1−log⁡2 for every n≥1.

step 1.3step 1.4
2.3

It follows that log⁡n→∞. Let m≥1 and n≥2m. If n=2m then log⁡n=log⁡(2m). If n>2m then 1<2m<n, so log⁡n=∫1ndt/t=∫12mdt/t+∫2mndt/t=log⁡(2m)+∫2mndt/t, and 1/t≥0 on [2m,n] makes that last integral nonnegative. Either way log⁡n≥log⁡(2m)≥m/2.

L1L2L3step 1.5algebra
3.1

By monotone convergence, there is a real number γ such that γn→γ.

L4step 2.1step 2.2
3.2

The lower bound and strict decrease give 0<γn≤γ1=1 for every n≥1.

step 1.4step 2.1step 2.2
4.1

Since γ is the infimum of the γn, γ≥1−log⁡2>0; and since the sequence is strictly decreasing, γ≤γ2<γ1=1. Hence 0<γ<1.

step 1.4step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1algebra
4.2

The identity Hn=log⁡n+γn and the convergence γn→γ give Hn=log⁡n+γ+(γn−γ)=log⁡n+γ+o(1).

A1step 3.1algebra
4.3

Consequently, γn/log⁡n→0 as n→∞.

step 2.3step 3.2algebra
5.1

Finally, for n≥2, Hn/log⁡n=1+γn/log⁡n→1.

A1step 4.3algebra∎
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention

Definition

For a>0 and x∈R, define ax:=exp⁡(xlog⁡a). For the supplementary zero-base convention, define 0x:=0 when x>0.

The expressions 00 and 0x for x<0 are left undefined. Negative bases are not assigned arbitrary real powers.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

The exponential definition of real powers agrees with the existing rational powers

Statement

If a>0 and r∈Q, then the real power ar=exp⁡(rlog⁡a) agrees with the rational power of Rational powers ar of a positive base. For r>0, both conventions also give 0r=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A positive real a and a rational r=p/q with q≥1.

[L1]

Rational powers satisfy (ap/q)q=ap, are positive for positive base, and obey the rational power laws (Rational powers ar of a positive base, Laws of rational exponents).

[L2]

For positive reals, log⁡(xy)=log⁡x+log⁡y, log⁡(1/x)=−log⁡x, and log⁡ is injective (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).

[L3]

The real-power definition is au=exp⁡(ulog⁡a) (Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For q≥1, the product law for log⁡ gives log⁡((ap/q)q)=qlog⁡(ap/q)=plog⁡a=log⁡(ap).

L1L2
2.1

Injectivity of log⁡ gives log⁡(ap/q)=(p/q)log⁡a, and exponentiating gives ap/q=exp⁡((p/q)log⁡a).

step 1.1L2L3
3.1

This is the new real power at exponent p/q; negative rational exponents follow by reciprocals, and the stated 0r convention agrees with Rational powers ar of a positive base for r>0.

step 2.1L1L3∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

The exponent, product, quotient, and iterated-power laws for positive real bases and real exponents

Statement

For a,b>0 and r,s∈R, ar+s=aras,(ab)r=arbr,(a/b)r=ar/br,(ar)s=ars.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Positive reals a,b and real exponents r,s.

[L2]

log⁡(ab)=log⁡a+log⁡b, log⁡(a/b)=log⁡a−log⁡b, and log⁡(exp⁡u)=u (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Expanding ar+s by [L1] and applying [L3] gives ar+s=exp⁡(rlog⁡a)exp⁡(slog⁡a)=aras.

L1L3
1.2

Expanding (ab)r and using log⁡(ab)=log⁡a+log⁡b gives (ab)r=arbr.

L1L2L3
1.3

The same calculation with log⁡(a/b)=log⁡a−log⁡b and [L3] gives (a/b)r=ar/br.

L1L2L3
2.1

Since log⁡(ar)=log⁡(exp⁡(rlog⁡a))=rlog⁡a, expanding (ar)s gives ars.

L1L2∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers

Statement

For a>0, the function x↦ax is continuous on R and (ax)′=axlog⁡a. For α∈R, the function x↦xα is continuous and differentiable on (0,∞), with (xα)′=αxα−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The chain rule applied to ax=exp⁡(xlog⁡a) gives (ax)′=exp⁡(xlog⁡a)log⁡a=axlog⁡a.

L1L2L3
1.2

The chain rule applied to xα=exp⁡(αlog⁡x) gives (xα)′=exp⁡(αlog⁡x)α/x=αxα−1.

L1L2L3
2.1

Both functions are continuous on their stated domains because the displayed derivatives exist there.

step 1.1step 1.2L3∎
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

The logarithm to a positive base other than one

Definition

For b>0 with b≠1 and x>0, define log⁡bx:=log⁡xlog⁡b.

The denominator is nonzero: log⁡b=0 would imply b=exp⁡(0)=1 by the inverse identities of The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

Change of base and inversion of the positive-base real exponential

Statement

If b>0, b≠1, and x>0, then log⁡bx=log⁡xlog⁡b,blog⁡bx=x,log⁡b(bu)=u(u∈R). In particular, log⁡bx=log⁡cx/log⁡cb for every second base c>0, c≠1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: b,c>0 with b,c≠1, x>0, and u∈R.

[L1]

log⁡bx=log⁡x/log⁡b, with log⁡b≠0 (The logarithm to a positive base other than one).

[L3]

log⁡(exp⁡v)=v and exp⁡(log⁡x)=x for x>0 (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1] and [L2], blog⁡bx=exp⁡((log⁡x/log⁡b)log⁡b)=exp⁡(log⁡x)=x.

L1L2L3
1.2

Likewise log⁡b(bu)=log⁡(exp⁡(ulog⁡b))/log⁡b=u.

L1L2L3
2.1

Dividing log⁡x first by log⁡c and then by log⁡b/log⁡c gives log⁡bx=log⁡cx/log⁡cb.

L1algebra∎
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-08-04 (gpt-5.6-sol-codex-subscription)Open item page →

Real powers from suprema of rational powers, with the reciprocal convention below base one

Definition

For a>1 and x∈R, set Sa(x):={aq:q∈Q, q<x},a[x]:=sup⁡Sa(x). The set is nonempty because a rational lies below x (The rationals embed densely in the reals). It is bounded above: choose a natural m>x (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean), so every q<x satisfies q<m and aq≤am (Monotonicity of r↦ar and of a↦ar). The supremum therefore exists in R by the least-upper-bound property of a complete ordered field (Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Upper bound, least upper bound, and strict upper bound), and it is strictly positive, because it is at least the element aq of Sa(x) for any rational q<x and every rational power of a positive base is positive (Rational powers ar of a positive base).

For 0<a<1, define a[x]:=1/((a−1)[x]); for a=1, define 1[x]:=1. The notation a[x] distinguishes this rational-supremum construction from the exponential construction until their agreement is proved.

Remarks

The direct supremum formula is intentionally restricted to a>1. When 0<a<1, the set {aq:q<x} is unbounded above as q tends to negative infinity.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-08-04 (gpt-5.6-sol-codex-subscription)Open item page →

The rational-supremum construction of real powers agrees with the exponential construction

Statement

For every a>0 and x∈R, the rational-supremum value a[x] of Real powers from suprema of rational powers, with the reciprocal convention below base one equals the exponential real power ax of Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real x and a positive base a.

[L1]

For a>1, Sa(x):={aq:q∈Q, q<x} and a[x]:=sup⁡Sa(x); for 0<a<1, a[x]:=1/((a−1)[x]); and 1[x]:=1 (Real powers from suprema of rational powers, with the reciprocal convention below base one).

[L3]

Rational numbers are dense in R, and the epsilon characterisation identifies a supremum of a nonempty bounded-above set (The rationals embed densely in the reals, Epsilon characterisation of the supremum).

[L4]

For a,b>0 and r,s∈R: ar+s=aras, (ab)r=arbr, (a/b)r=ar/br, and (ar)s=ars (The exponent, product, quotient, and iterated-power laws for positive real bases and real exponents).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Assume a>1. For every rational q<x, strict increase of t↦at gives aq<ax, so ax is an upper bound of Sa(x).

L1L2
1.2

Given ε>0, continuity of t↦at at x supplies δ>0 such that ∣t−x∣<δ implies ∣at−ax∣<ε; density supplies rational q with x−δ<q<x, hence ax−ε<aq∈Sa(x).

L2L3choose
2.1

By the supremum characterisation, steps 1.1 and 1.2 give a[x]=ax when a>1.

step 1.1step 1.2L3
3.1

For a=1 both values are 1. For 0<a<1 the base a−1 exceeds 1, so step 2.1 applied to that base and the same exponent x gives (a−1)[x]=(a−1)x; the subunit clause of [L1] then gives a[x]=1/((a−1)x). By [L4] with r=−1 and s=x, (a−1)x=a−x; and by [L4] again, a−xax=a−x+x=a0=1, so 1/a−x=ax. Hence a[x]=ax.

step 2.1L1L2L4∎
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

Every rational approximation to a real exponent gives the same limiting real power

Statement

Let a>0, let x∈R, and let (qn) be a rational sequence converging to x. Then aqn→ax. Hence the limit is independent of the rational approximating sequence and equals the rational-supremum value a[x].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: a>0, x∈R, and rational qn→x.

[L1]

The rational-supremum and exponential constructions agree (The rational-supremum construction of real powers agrees with the exponential construction).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For every n, rational-exponent agreement gives aqn=exp⁡(qnlog⁡a).

L2
1.2

Continuity of t↦at gives aqn→ax.

L2
2.1

Since a[x]=ax, this limit is independent of the chosen rational sequence and has the asserted supremum value.

step 1.2L1∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

Landau's root limit: log x is the limit of 2^n times (x^(1/2^n) minus 1)

Statement

For every x>0, log⁡x=lim⁡n→∞2n(x1/2n−1).

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If x=1, every displayed summand is 0, so the limit is log⁡1=0.

L1algebra
1.2

Suppose x≠1 and put hn=(log⁡x)/2n. Then hn→0 and x1/2n=exp⁡(hn).

L1L3
2.1

We have 2n(x1/2n−1)=log⁡x (exp⁡(hn)−1)/hn.

step 1.2algebra
3.1

The derivative limit in [L2] makes the right-hand side tend to log⁡x, proving the claim together with step 1.1.

step 1.1step 2.1L2∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

The power series for log(1+x) on (-1,1], including the Abel endpoint

Statement

For −1<x≤1, log⁡(1+x)=∑n=1∞(−1)n+1xnn. The series converges at x=1 to log⁡2 and diverges at x=−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real x with −1<x<1.

[L1]

log⁡′(u)=1/u on (0,∞), so (log⁡(1+x))′=1/(1+x) and log⁡1=0 (The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t).

[L2]
[L3]

A real power series may be integrated term by term inside its radius of convergence (Inside its radius a real power series may be integrated term by term on every closed subinterval).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Integrating the series of [L2] from 0 to x gives ∑n≥1(−1)n+1xn/n.

L2L3
2.1

By [L1], the integral of 1/(1+t) from 0 to x is log⁡(1+x), so the displayed series formula holds for −1<x<1.

L1step 1.1
3.1

At x=1 the series is alternating harmonic and converges by [L4]; Abel's theorem and step 2.1 identify its sum with log⁡2.

step 2.1L4
4.1

At x=−1 every term is −1/n, so the series is the negative harmonic series and diverges.

L4algebra∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

Under square summability, the signed product of (1+p_n) converges iff the series of p_n converges

Statement

Let (pn) be a real sequence such that ∑npn2 converges. Then ∏n(1+pn) converges⟺∑npn converges. The product uses the tail convention of Infinite products: partial products, and convergence to a nonzero limit after finitely many vanishing factors, so finitely many zero factors are allowed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real sequence (pn) with ∑npn2 convergent.

[L1]

A convergent series has terms tending to zero (If a series converges then its terms tend to 0).

[L2]

log⁡(1+t)=t+∑k≥2(−1)k+1tk/k for ∣t∣<1 ([The power series for log(1+x) on (-1,1], including the Abel endpoint](/item/thm-log-one-plus-x-power-series)).

[L6]

An infinite product converges when a tail of nonzero factors has nonzero limiting tail products; initial factors may be arbitrary (Infinite products: partial products, and convergence to a nonzero limit after finitely many vanishing factors).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], choose N such that ∣pn∣≤1/2 for n≥N; then 1+pn≥1/2>0 on that tail.

L1choose
1.2

For ∣t∣≤1/2, the tail of the series in [L2] has absolute value at most ∑k≥2∣t∣k≤2t2, hence ∣log⁡(1+t)−t∣≤2t2.

L2algebra
1.3

Conversely, a nonzero limit of those positive tail products has a logarithm; continuity of log⁡ and the same finite-product identity make the tail logarithm partial sums converge.

L5L6
2.1

Applying step 1.2 to pn and using [L3] shows that ∑n≥N(log⁡(1+pn)−pn) converges absolutely.

step 1.1step 1.2L3
3.1

By [L4], ∑npn converges if and only if ∑n≥Nlog⁡(1+pn) converges.

step 2.1L4
4.1

The m-th tail product equals exp⁡(∑n=NN+m−1log⁡(1+pn)) by repeated use of [L5], so convergence of the logarithm series gives a nonzero tail-product limit.

step 3.1L5L6
5.1

Steps 3.1, 4.1, and 1.3 prove both directions, and [L6] makes finite initial zero factors harmless.

step 3.1step 4.1step 1.3L6∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

The logarithm grows more slowly than every positive real power

Statement

For every α>0, lim⁡x→+∞log⁡xxα=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real α>0.

[L1]

exp⁡(t) tends to +∞ as t→+∞, and its range is (0,∞) (The exponential tends to +∞ at +∞ and to 0 at −∞, The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function).

[L2]

For a>0, t/exp⁡(at)→0 as t→+∞ (The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at +∞).

[L3]

xα=exp⁡(αlog⁡x) for x>0, and algebra of limits permits substitution through the displayed identities (Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention, Algebra of limits: sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Put t=log⁡x. As x→+∞, the inverse relation and [L1] give t→+∞.

L1
1.2

By [L3], log⁡x/xα=t/exp⁡(αt).

L3
2.1

The right-hand side tends to 0 by [L2], which proves the claim.

step 1.1step 1.2L2∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

The p-series for a real exponent p converges exactly when p is greater than one

Statement

For every real p, ∑k≥11kp converges⟺p>1.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If p≤0, then 1/kp≥1 for k≥1, so the terms do not tend to zero and the series diverges.

L2L4
1.2

Suppose p>0 and set f(t)=(t+1)−p. By [L2] this is nonnegative and nonincreasing on [0,∞), and its sampled series is ∑k≥01/(k+1)p.

L1L2
2.1

If p=1, then ∫0Nf(t) dt=log⁡(N+1), which is unbounded by [L3].

step 1.2L3
2.2

If p≠1, the power derivative gives ∫0Nf(t) dt=((N+1)1−p−1)/(1−p); this is bounded exactly when p>1, using the exponential limits in [L3].

step 1.2L2L3
3.1

The integral test gives convergence exactly for p>1 when p>0, and step 1.1 handles p≤0.

step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2L1∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

The two-point convexity inequality for the exponential function

Statement

For all x,y∈R and 0≤t≤1, exp⁡((1−t)x+ty)≤(1−t)exp⁡x+texp⁡y. If 0<t<1, equality holds exactly when x=y.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Put d=y−x and g(s)=1−s+sexp⁡d−exp⁡(sd). Then g(0)=g(1)=0 and g′′(s)=−d2exp⁡(sd)≤0.

L1L3
2.1

If 0<s<1, apply the mean value theorem to g on [0,s] and [s,1]; since g′ is nonincreasing by the mean value theorem applied to g′, their slopes give g(s)/s≥−g(s)/(1−s), hence g(s)≥0.

step 1.1L1L2
3.1

Multiplying by exp⁡x>0 converts g(t)≥0 into the displayed inequality.

step 2.1L3
4.1

When 0<t<1 and d≠0, g′′<0, so the slope comparison is strict and g(t)>0; when d=0, equality is immediate.

step 1.1step 2.1L3∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

The weighted arithmetic-geometric mean inequality for real weights

Statement

Let n≥1, let x1,…,xn>0, and let w1,…,wn≥0 satisfy ∑i=1nwi=1. Then ∏i=1nxiwi≤∑i=1nwixi.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Positive reals xi and nonnegative real weights wi summing to 1.

[L1]

The two-point exponential inequality holds for every weight in [0,1] (The two-point convexity inequality for the exponential function).

[L3]

Mathematical induction is valid on natural numbers (The principle of mathematical induction).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

For n=1, w1=1 and both sides are x1.

basegiven
1.2

Assume the result for n positive entries. For weights w1,…,wn+1, if wn+1=1 the claim is immediate; otherwise put W=1−wn+1>0, vi=wi/W for i≤n, and P:=∏i=1nxivi.

ihgiven
1.3

Applying [L1] to log⁡P,log⁡xn+1 with weights W,wn+1 gives PWxn+1wn+1≤WP+wn+1xn+1.

L1L2
2.1

The vi are nonnegative and sum to one, so the induction hypothesis gives P≤A:=∑i=1nvixi.

step 1.2ih
3.1

The left side in step 1.3 is ∏i=1n+1xiwi, and step 2.1 makes its right side at most ∑i=1n+1wixi.

step 2.1step 1.3L2algebra
4.1

The base and induction steps prove the inequality for every n≥1.

step 1.1step 3.1L3discharge-induction∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

Young's inequality for conjugate real exponents

Statement

Let p,q>1 satisfy 1/p+1/q=1. For u,v≥0, uv≤upp+vqq.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Conjugate real exponents p,q>1 and nonnegative reals u,v.

[L1]

Weighted AM-GM applies to positive entries with nonnegative weights summing to one (The weighted arithmetic-geometric mean inequality for real weights).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If u=0 or v=0, the inequality is immediate from nonnegativity of the two terms on the right.

L2
1.2

For u,v>0, apply [L1] to up,vq with weights 1/p,1/q.

L1given
2.1

Its geometric side is (up)1/p(vq)1/q=uv, and its arithmetic side is up/p+vq/q.

step 1.2L2
3.1

Steps 1.1 and 2.1 cover all nonnegative u,v.

step 1.1step 2.1∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

Holder's inequality for finite sums and conjugate real exponents

Statement

Let p,q>1 with 1/p+1/q=1. For real families (ai)i<n and (bi)i<n, ∑i<n∣aibi∣≤(∑i<n∣ai∣p)1/p(∑i<n∣bi∣q)1/q.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural n, conjugate exponents p,q>1, and real families ai,bi for i<n.

[L1]

Young's inequality says uv≤up/p+vq/q for u,v≥0 (Young's inequality for conjugate real exponents).

[L2]

Finite sums obey termwise addition and scalar multiplication, including the empty-sum convention, and ∣ab∣=∣a∣∣b∣ (Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products, Basic properties of the absolute value).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Put A=(∑i<n∣ai∣p)1/p and B=(∑i<n∣bi∣q)1/q. If A=0 or B=0, the real-power laws and zero convention show that the corresponding nonnegative power sum is zero; finite-sum order then makes every corresponding term zero, so the claim follows.

L2L3
1.2

Suppose A,B>0, and set ui=∣ai∣/A, vi=∣bi∣/B. Then ∑uip=∑viq=1.

L2L3
2.1

Apply [L1] to ui,vi and sum over i<n to obtain ∑uivi≤1/p+1/q=1.

step 1.2L1L2
3.1

Multiplying by AB and using ∣aibi∣=∣ai∣∣bi∣ gives the asserted inequality.

step 1.2step 2.1L2∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

Minkowski's inequality for finite sums and real exponent p greater than one

Statement

Let p>1. For real families (ai)i<n and (bi)i<n, (∑i<n∣ai+bi∣p)1/p≤(∑i<n∣ai∣p)1/p+(∑i<n∣bi∣p)1/p.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural n, a real p>1, and real families ai,bi for i<n.

[L1]

Holder's inequality holds for finite sums and conjugate real exponents (Holder's inequality for finite sums and conjugate real exponents).

[L2]

Finite sums distribute over addition, and ∣u+v∣≤∣u∣+∣v∣ (Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products, Basic properties of the absolute value).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let q=p/(p−1) and put C=(∑i<n∣ai+bi∣p)1/p. If C=0, the claim is immediate.

L2L3
1.2

For C>0, multiply ∣ai+bi∣p−1 by ∣ai+bi∣≤∣ai∣+∣bi∣ and sum to get Cp≤∑∣ai∣∣ai+bi∣p−1+∑∣bi∣∣ai+bi∣p−1.

L2L3
2.1

Apply Holder to both sums in step 1.2. Since (p−1)q=p, their common second factor is Cp−1.

step 1.2L1L3
3.1

Thus Cp≤(A+B)Cp−1, where A,B are the two right-side norms; dividing by Cp−1>0 proves the claim.

step 1.1step 2.1L3∎
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

The six hyperbolic functions and their natural domains

Definition

For x∈R, define sinh⁡x:=exp⁡x−exp⁡(−x)2,cosh⁡x:=exp⁡x+exp⁡(−x)2, tanh⁡x:=sinh⁡xcosh⁡x,sech⁡x:=1cosh⁡x. For x≠0, define coth⁡x:=cosh⁡xsinh⁡x,csch⁡x:=1sinh⁡x.

The positivity of exp⁡ makes cosh⁡x>0 for every x. If x≠0, then x≠−x, so strict increase of exp⁡ makes exp⁡x≠exp⁡(−x); hence sinh⁡x≠0. Thus all four quotients above are defined on exactly their stated domains (The exponential is positive and satisfies exp⁡(−x)=1/exp⁡(x), The exponential function is strictly increasing).

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

Addition formulas, identities, parity, and derivatives of the hyperbolic functions

Statement

For all real x,y, sinh⁡(x+y)=sinh⁡xcosh⁡y+cosh⁡xsinh⁡y,cosh⁡(x+y)=cosh⁡xcosh⁡y+sinh⁡xsinh⁡y, cosh⁡2x−sinh⁡2x=1,(sinh⁡x)′=cosh⁡x,(cosh⁡x)′=sinh⁡x. Moreover sinh⁡:R→R is odd, strictly increasing, and onto; cosh⁡:R→[1,∞) is even and positive, and its restriction to [0,∞) is strictly increasing and onto [1,∞); and tanh⁡:R→(−1,1) is strictly increasing and onto. On their declared domains, (tanh⁡x)′=sech⁡2x,(coth⁡x)′=−csch⁡2x,(sech⁡x)′=−sech⁡xtanh⁡x,(csch⁡x)′=−csch⁡xcoth⁡x.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Real numbers x,y.

[L1]
[L3]

If a<b and f:[a,b]→R is continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b), then some c∈(a,b) satisfies f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a) (The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a)).

[L4]

exp⁡x→∞ as x→∞ and exp⁡x→0 as x→−∞ (The exponential tends to +∞ at +∞ and to 0 at −∞).

[L6]

For every real x, sinh⁡x=(exp⁡x−exp⁡(−x))/2 and cosh⁡x=(exp⁡x+exp⁡(−x))/2; tanh⁡x=sinh⁡x/cosh⁡x and sech⁡x=1/cosh⁡x; and, when x≠0, coth⁡x=cosh⁡x/sinh⁡x and csch⁡x=1/sinh⁡x. Moreover cosh⁡x>0 for every x, and sinh⁡x≠0 when x≠0 (The six hyperbolic functions and their natural domains).

[L7]

Differentiability implies continuity (A function differentiable at c is continuous at c).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Substitute the exponential definitions of [L6] and use [L1]; collecting terms gives both addition formulas, parity, and cosh⁡2x−sinh⁡2x=1.

L1L6algebra
2.1

Differentiating the exponential definitions of [L6] gives (sinh⁡x)′=cosh⁡x and (cosh⁡x)′=sinh⁡x; on the domains supplied by [L6], differentiating the quotients and using step 1.1 gives the four displayed reciprocal-function derivatives.

step 1.1L2L6algebra
2.2

The exponential formulas give sinh⁡x→∞, cosh⁡x→∞, and tanh⁡x→1 as x→∞; oddness gives the corresponding limits −∞ and −1 at −∞.

step 1.1L1L4algebra
3.1

By [L6], cosh⁡x>0 and sinh⁡x is nonzero away from 0; the defining formula gives sinh⁡0=0. Thus sinh⁡′=cosh⁡>0 everywhere. For a<b, step 2.1 and [L7] give the hypotheses of [L3] for sinh⁡ on [a,b], so for some c∈(a,b), sinh⁡b−sinh⁡a=cosh⁡c (b−a)>0. Hence sinh⁡ is strictly increasing.

step 2.1L3L6L7algebra
4.1

The oddness and strict increase of sinh⁡ make sinh⁡x>0 for x>0. Thus for 0≤a<b, step 2.1 and [L7] let [L3] give cosh⁡b−cosh⁡a=sinh⁡c (b−a)>0 for some c∈(a,b), so cosh⁡ is strictly increasing on [0,∞). Also sech⁡x>0, so for a<b the same argument gives tanh⁡b−tanh⁡a=sech⁡2c (b−a)>0 for some c∈(a,b); hence tanh⁡ is strictly increasing.

step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1L1L3L6L7
5.1

The functions are continuous by step 2.1 and [L7]. Their monotonicity, the values cosh⁡0=1, and the endpoint limits of step 2.2 let the intermediate value theorem give exactly the three stated ranges.

step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 2.2L5L7∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-02Open item page →

Logarithm formulas for inverse sinh, inverse cosh, and inverse tanh on their natural domains

Statement

The strictly increasing bijections sinh⁡:R→R, cosh⁡:[0,∞)→[1,∞), and tanh⁡:R→(−1,1) have inverse functions satisfying arsinh⁡u=log⁡(u+u2+1), arcosh⁡u=log⁡(u+u2−1)(u≥1), artanh⁡u=12log⁡1+u1−u(∣u∣<1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real u in the stated domain.

[L1]

The hyperbolic identities hold, and sinh⁡:R→R, cosh⁡:[0,∞)→[1,∞), and tanh⁡:R→(−1,1) are strictly increasing bijections (Addition formulas, identities, parity, and derivatives of the hyperbolic functions, The six hyperbolic functions and their natural domains).

[L2]

log⁡ is the inverse of exp⁡ and satisfies its product and reciprocal laws (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).

[L3]

Positive-base real powers are continuous, and every nonnegative real has its nonnegative square root (Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers, Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Solving sinh⁡z=u after putting v=exp⁡z>0 gives v2−2uv−1=0, hence v=u+u2+1>0 and z=log⁡(u+u2+1).

L1L2L3
1.2

Solving cosh⁡z=u with z≥0 gives v2−2uv+1=0 and the allowed root v=u+u2−1, hence the displayed arcosh formula.

L1L2L3
1.3

Solving tanh⁡z=u gives v2=(1+u)/(1−u)>0, so z=12log⁡((1+u)/(1−u)).

L1L2
2.1

The strict monotonicity and stated ranges in [L1] make each algebraic solution the unique inverse value on its declared domain.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3L1∎

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources