Alphabeta Math
Session-authored (Fable 5 assisted)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

7 results · all verified · 4 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

The Real Gamma and Beta Functions: Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + claude-opus-5[1m])audited 2026-08-24Open item page →

Special values of the real Gamma and Beta functions

Example

The real Gamma and Beta functions have the values

Γ(1)=1,Γ(2)=1,Γ(3)=2,Γ(1/2)=π,Γ(3/2)=π2,B(1,1)=1,B(2,3)=112.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The displayed positive arguments.

[F1]

For every s>0, Γ(s+1)=sΓ(s), and Γ(1)=1 (The real Gamma functional equation Γ(s+1)=sΓ(s)).

[F3]

For p,q>0, B(p,q)=Γ(p)Γ(q)/Γ(p+q) (The real Beta--Gamma identity).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Repeated use of [F1] gives Γ(1)=1, Γ(2)=1, and Γ(3)=2.

F1algebra
1.2

Fact [F2] and [F1] give Γ(1/2)=π and Γ(3/2)=(1/2)π.

F1F2algebra
2.1

Substituting the integer values into [F3] gives B(1,1)=1 and B(2,3)=12/24=1/12.

step 1.1F3algebra
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-24Open item page →

The unit-ball volumes through dimension eight from the Gamma formula

Example

For dimensions 1 through 8, the unit-ball volumes are

2,π,4π3,π22,8π215,π36,16π3105,π424.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Positive integer dimensions 1n8.

[F1]

For every n1, Vn(1)=πn/2/Γ(n/2+1) (The closed form for the volume of the unit n-ball).

[F2]

For every s>0, Γ(s+1)=sΓ(s) (The real Gamma functional equation Γ(s+1)=sΓ(s)).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Substitute n=1,2,3,4 into [F1] and use [F2] and [F3]. This gives 2,π,4π/3,π2/2.

F1F2F3algebra
1.2

The same substitution with [F2] and [F3] for n=5,6,7,8 gives 8π2/15,π3/6,16π3/105,π4/24.

F1F2F3algebra
2.1

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 establish every value in the displayed list.

step 1.1step 1.2
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-24Open item page →

A positive convex function need not be log-convex

Example

The identity function f(x)=x on (0,) is positive and convex, but it is not log-convex.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The identity function on the positive real axis.

[F1]

A positive function is log-convex when its logarithm is convex (Log-convex positive functions).

[F2]

The natural logarithm is strictly increasing on (0,) (Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

For x,y>0 and 0λ1, f((1λ)x+λy)=(1λ)f(x)+λf(y), so f is affine and hence convex.

givenalgebra
1.2

The midpoint of 1 and 4 is 5/2>2. By [F2], log(5/2)>log2=(log1+log4)/2, so logf violates the midpoint convexity inequality and [F1] shows that f is not log-convex.

F1F2algebra
2.1

Thus this positive function is convex but not log-convex.

step 1.1step 1.2
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-24Open item page →

A positive non-log-convex solution of the Gamma functional equation

Example

Put D:=12(logΓ(1)+logΓ(3/2))logΓ(5/4), let A:=1+D, and define F(s):=Γ(s)eAsin(2πs) for s>0. The function F(s)=Γ(s)eAsin(2πs) is positive, satisfies F(1)=1 and F(s+1)=sF(s), differs from Gamma, and is not log-convex.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The constants D,A and the function F in the Example.

[F1]

For every s>0, Γ(s+1)=sΓ(s), and Γ(1)=1 (The real Gamma functional equation Γ(s+1)=sΓ(s)).

[F3]

A positive function is log-convex when its logarithm is convex (Log-convex positive functions).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

By [F2], eAsin(2π(s+1))=eAsin(2πs). Together with [F1], this gives F(s+1)=sF(s) and F(1)=1; positivity is immediate.

F1F2algebra
1.2

At s=1,5/4,3/2, the sine terms are respectively 0,1,0. Hence the midpoint value of logF exceeds the average of its endpoint values exactly when A>D, which holds because A=1+D. By [F3], F is not log-convex.

F3algebra
2.1

Since A>0, F(5/4)=eAΓ(5/4)Γ(5/4). Thus F is a different positive normalized solution of the recurrence.

step 1.1step 1.2algebra
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + claude-opus-5[1m])audited 2026-08-24Open item page →

FALSE: normalization and the functional equation determine the real Gamma function

Statement

False claim: Gamma is the only positive function f:(0,)(0,) satisfying f(1)=1 and f(s+1)=sf(s).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The periodic perturbation of Gamma from the preceding example.

[F1]

The function F(s)=Γ(s)eAsin(2πs) is positive, satisfies F(1)=1 and F(s+1)=sF(s), differs from Gamma, and is not log-convex (A positive non-log-convex solution of the Gamma functional equation).

[F2]

Gamma is the unique positive log-convex function with the normalization and recurrence (Bohr--Mollerup characterisation of the real Gamma function).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

By [F1], the function F is positive, normalized, recurrent, and differs from Gamma.

F1
2.1

Fact [F2] identifies the missing hypothesis: log-convexity excludes this F and restores uniqueness.

step 1.1F2
3.1

Therefore normalization and the functional equation alone do not determine Gamma.

step 1.1step 2.1
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + claude-opus-5[1m])audited 2026-08-24Open item page →

FALSE: Euler's real Gamma integral converges at the nonpositive integers

Statement

False claim: the Euler integral 0ts1etdt converges when s is a nonpositive integer and thereby defines a real Gamma value there.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonpositive integer s.

[F1]

The Euler integral converges if and only if s>0 (Euler's Gamma integral converges exactly for positive real parameters).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

Since s0, the reverse direction of [F1] says that the Euler integral diverges, already at its endpoint 0.

F1algebra
2.1

The real Gamma function defined by Euler's integral therefore has no value at this s; a different continuation would not be convergence of this integral.

step 1.1
3.1

As the argument applies to every nonpositive integer, the claim is false.

step 1.1step 2.1
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + claude-opus-5[1m])audited 2026-08-24Open item page →

FALSE: unit-ball volume increases with dimension

Statement

False claim: the volume Vn(1) of the unit ball increases with the positive integer dimension n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The sequence of positive-dimensional unit-ball volumes.

[F1]

Among positive integer dimensions, the unit-ball volume is uniquely maximal at n=5 (The unit-ball volume is maximal in dimension five).

[F2]

Vn(1)0 as n (The volume of the unit n-ball tends to zero with dimension).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

Fact [F1] gives the explicit strict decrease V6(1)<V5(1), contradicting monotone increase.

F1
1.2

Independently, [F2] says the positive volumes tend to zero, which is incompatible with an increasing positive sequence.

F2
2.1

Either step refutes the universal monotonicity claim.

step 1.1step 1.2

Sources