Alphabeta Math
Session-authored (Fable 5 assisted)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

20 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 20 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

The Riemann Integral in R^m and Jordan Content

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The one-dimensional Riemann integral supplies Darboux sums, tagged sums, refinement, and the Riemann criterion. The normed-space structure of Rm\mathbb R^m supplies Euclidean compactness, metric continuity, and norm comparisons. These prerequisites support coordinate grids and finite product volumes without invoking iterated integration.

Rectangles, grid partitions, multidimensional Darboux sums, and tagged sums lead to an intrinsic Riemann integral and its agreement with the one-dimensional theory. Cube-cover nullity and oscillation yield the multidimensional Lebesgue criterion. Jordan inner and outer content are then connected to indicator integrability and null boundaries, supporting integration over Jordan sets, finite additivity, Lipschitz-null preservation, and content-zero graph theorems.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Axis-parallel rectangles in Rm\mathbb{R}^m and their volume

Definition

Fix a natural number m1m\ge1. For a,bRma,b\in\mathbb R^m with ajbja_j\le b_j for j<mj<m, define [a,b]:={xRm:ajxjbj (j<m)},vol[a,b]:=j<m(bjaj).[a,b]:=\{x\in\mathbb R^m:a_j\le x_j\le b_j\ (j<m)\},\qquad \operatorname{vol}[a,b]:=\prod_{j<m}(b_j-a_j). The product is the recursively defined finite product of Finite sums and finite products, by recursion. The rectangle is nondegenerate when every aj<bja_j<b_j, and it is a cube when all side lengths are equal.

Every factor is nonnegative, so volume is nonnegative. For a coordinate index r<mr<m, cutting at c[ar,br]c\in[a_r,b_r] gives two rectangles whose volumes add to the original, by distributivity in that factor and Laws of finite sums and finite products. Under the standard identification R1R\mathbb R^1\cong\mathbb R (Rn\mathbb{R}^n as the set of functions nRn \to \mathbb{R}, and d1d_1, d2d_2, dd_\infty are metrics on it, The pp-norms xp\lVert x\rVert_p for rational p1p \ge 1, and x\lVert x\rVert_\infty), this is the interval [a0,b0][a_0,b_0] and its length.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Grid partitions of a rectangle in Rm\mathbb{R}^m, their cells, refinements and mesh

Definition

A grid partition PP of a nondegenerate rectangle Q=[a,b]RmQ=[a,b]\subseteq\mathbb R^m is a family, one for each j<mj<m, of one-dimensional partitions aj=tj,0<<tj,nj=bja_j=t_{j,0}<\cdots<t_{j,n_j}=b_j (Partition of [a,b][a,b] as a finite strictly increasing list a=t0<t1<<tn=ba = t_0 < t_1 < \dots < t_n = b, its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions). For a multi-index i=(i0,,im1)i=(i_0,\ldots,i_{m-1}) with ij<nji_j<n_j, its cell is Qi:=j<m[tj,ij,tj,ij+1].Q_i:=\prod_{j<m}[t_{j,i_j},t_{j,i_j+1}]. A sum over cells means the iterated recursive sum i0<n0im1<nm1\sum_{i_0<n_0}\cdots\sum_{i_{m-1}<n_{m-1}} of Finite sums and finite products, by recursion. The mesh is maxj<m,ij<nj(tj,ij+1tj,ij)\max_{j<m,i_j<n_j}(t_{j,i_j+1}-t_{j,i_j}), which exists by Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum and is the largest dd_\infty-diameter (The pp-norms xp\lVert x\rVert_p for rational p1p \ge 1, and x\lVert x\rVert_\infty, Each p\lVert\cdot\rVert_p is a norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and the induced metrics are exactly d1d_1, d2d_2 and dd_\infty of the published metric-spaces page).

Refinement is coordinatewise. Coordinatewise union gives a common refinement. The cells cover QQ and have pairwise disjoint interiors. Repeated splitting of finite sums and induction on mm give ivol(Qi)=vol(Q).\sum_i\operatorname{vol}(Q_i)=\operatorname{vol}(Q). These statements include boundary overlaps: boundaries may meet, but interiors do not, and volume splitting is algebraic.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Lower and upper Darboux sums over a grid partition in Rm\mathbb{R}^m

Definition

Let f:QRf:Q\to\mathbb R be bounded on a nondegenerate rectangle and let PP be a grid. For each cell QiQ_i, put mi:=inff[Qi],Mi:=supf[Qi],L(f,P):=imivol(Qi),U(f,P):=iMivol(Qi).m_i:=\inf f[Q_i],\quad M_i:=\sup f[Q_i],\quad L(f,P):=\sum_i m_i\operatorname{vol}(Q_i),\quad U(f,P):=\sum_i M_i\operatorname{vol}(Q_i). The extrema exist as finite reals because each nonempty image is bounded (Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Every nonempty set bounded below has an infimum, Greatest lower bound (infimum), Suprema and infima are unique), and the sums use the iterated convention of Grid partitions of a rectangle in Rm\mathbb{R}^m, their cells, refinements and mesh.

Since miMim_i\le M_i and cell volumes are nonnegative, L(f,P)U(f,P)L(f,P)\le U(f,P). Moreover U(f,P)L(f,P)=i(Mimi)vol(Qi),U(f,P)-L(f,P)=\sum_i(M_i-m_i)\operatorname{vol}(Q_i), the sum of cell oscillations weighted by volume (Laws of finite sums and finite products).

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Refinement raises multidimensional lower sums and lowers upper sums, with a quantitative boundary-slab estimate

Statement

If PP' refines a grid PP, then L(f,P)L(f,P)U(f,P)U(f,P)L(f,P)\le L(f,P')\le U(f,P')\le U(f,P). Moreover, for a fixed grid PP, there is a constant CPC_P such that refining any grid of mesh δ\delta by PP changes either Darboux sum by at most 2BCPδ2B C_P\delta, where fB|f|\le B.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

Insert one coordinate hyperplane. Every new cell lies in one old cell, so its infimum is no smaller and its supremum no larger. Splitting the affected coordinate sum proves the four inequalities.

baseL1L2
1.2

Only fine cells meeting an interior hyperplane of PP can cross a coarse-cell boundary. For a hyperplane perpendicular to coordinate jj, those cells lie in a slab of thickness at most 2δ2\delta; repeated product distributivity bounds their total volume by 2δrj(brar)2\delta\prod_{r\ne j}(b_r-a_r).

L1L2given
2.1

Iterating over the finitely many inserted hyperplanes and coordinates proves refinement monotonicity.

ihstep 1.1given
2.2

Sum this bound over the finitely many fixed interior hyperplanes to define CPC_P. On all other cells refinement changes no coarse bound, while on boundary cells each contribution changes by at most 2B2B times its volume.

step 1.2L2given
3.1

This yields the quantitative estimate and completes both assertions.

step 2.1step 2.2discharge-induction
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The lower and upper Darboux integrals over a nondegenerate rectangle in Rm\mathbb{R}^m

Definition

For a bounded function f:QRf:Q\to\mathbb R on a nondegenerate rectangle QRmQ\subseteq\mathbb R^m, define Qf:=supPL(f,P),Qf:=infPU(f,P),\underline{\int_Q}f:=\sup_P L(f,P),\qquad \overline{\int_Q}f:=\inf_P U(f,P), over all grid partitions PP of QQ. The grid family is nonempty, since the endpoints in each coordinate give a one-cell grid. Every lower sum is at most every upper sum by a common refinement and Refinement raises multidimensional lower sums and lowers upper sums, with a quantitative boundary-slab estimate, so the two sets of sums are nonempty and bounded and the extrema exist (Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Every nonempty set bounded below has an infimum, Greatest lower bound (infimum), Suprema and infima are unique).

The function is Riemann integrable over QQ when the two values agree. Their unique common real is Qf\int_Q f. No integral is defined here for a degenerate rectangle, because the grid definition requires every coordinate interval to have distinct endpoints. This is the multidimensional Darboux definition; its agreement with the published one-dimensional definition is proved separately.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Riemann's criterion on a nondegenerate rectangle in Rm\mathbb{R}^m: integrability is equivalent to arbitrarily small Darboux gaps

Statement

A bounded f:QRf:Q\to\mathbb R on a nondegenerate rectangle is Riemann integrable if and only if, for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, some grid PP satisfies U(f,P)L(f,P)<εU(f,P)-L(f,P)<\varepsilon.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If the two integrals equal II, choose PP_- with L(f,P)>Iε/2L(f,P_-)>I-\varepsilon/2 and P+P_+ with U(f,P+)<I+ε/2U(f,P_+)<I+\varepsilon/2. A common refinement PP has gap below ε\varepsilon.

L1L2L3
1.2

Conversely, a common refinement shows every lower sum is at most every upper sum, so for every PP, 0QfQfU(f,P)L(f,P)0\le\overline{\int_Q}f-\underline{\int_Q}f\le U(f,P)-L(f,P). Arbitrarily small gaps force the integral difference to be 00.

L1L3given
2.1

Thus the conditions are equivalent.

step 1.1step 1.2
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Tagged grid partitions and Riemann sums in Rm\mathbb{R}^m

Definition

A tagging of a grid PP assigns to every cell QiQ_i a point ξiQi\xi_i\in Q_i. The lower corner is a canonical tagging, so taggings exist without choice. The Riemann sum is S(f,P,ξ):=if(ξi)vol(Qi),S(f,P,\xi):=\sum_i f(\xi_i)\operatorname{vol}(Q_i), with the iterated sum convention of Grid partitions of a rectangle in Rm\mathbb{R}^m, their cells, refinements and mesh.

The tagged sums converge with mesh to II if for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 some δ>0\delta>0 makes S(f,P,ξ)I<ε|S(f,P,\xi)-I|<\varepsilon for every tagged grid with mesh below δ\delta. Finite cellwise selections used in proofs are licensed by Every natural-number-indexed list of nonempty sets has a choice function on its family of values and Choice function, not by countable choice.

For bounded ff, each tag lies in its cell, so termwise inequalities and nonnegative volumes give L(f,P)S(f,P,ξ)U(f,P)L(f,P)\le S(f,P,\xi)\le U(f,P) (Lower and upper Darboux sums over a grid partition in Rm\mathbb{R}^m, Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set).

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The multidimensional Darboux and tagged-mesh definitions of the Riemann integral agree

Statement

A bounded function on a nondegenerate rectangle is Darboux integrable with value II if and only if all tagged grid sums converge with mesh to II.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded f:QRf:Q\to\mathbb R, with fB|f|\le B, on a nondegenerate rectangle QQ.

[L1]

Every tagged sum lies between its grid's Darboux sums (Tagged grid partitions and Riemann sums in Rm\mathbb{R}^m).

[L3]

Refining by a fixed grid changes the bounds only by the boundary-slab estimate (Refinement raises multidimensional lower sums and lowers upper sums, with a quantitative boundary-slab estimate).

[L5]

Repeated equal subdivision and the Archimedean reciprocal property give grid partitions of a nondegenerate rectangle with arbitrarily small mesh (Grid partitions of a rectangle in Rm\mathbb{R}^m, their cells, refinements and mesh, For every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n1n \ge 1 with 1/n<ε1/n < \varepsilon).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If ff is Darboux integrable, choose a fixed grid P0P_0 with small gap by [L2]. For any sufficiently fine PP, refine it with P0P_0; [L3] makes the Darboux bounds of PP differ from those of the refinement by arbitrarily little. Since the refined lower and upper sums trap II, [L1] makes every tagged sum over PP close to II.

L1L2L3
1.2

Conversely, suppose every sufficiently fine tagged sum is close to II. By [L5], choose one grid below the convergence mesh threshold and, using [L4], tag each cell near its supremum and then near its infimum. The two tagged sums approximate U(f,P)U(f,P) and L(f,P)L(f,P), so their common closeness to II makes the Darboux gap arbitrarily small.

L4L5given
2.1

Apply [L2] in step 1.2. Since the near-upper and near-lower tagged sums are both arbitrarily close to II, the common lower/upper integral lies arbitrarily close to II and therefore equals II. Both directions give the same value.

step 1.1step 1.2L1L2
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

At m=1m=1, nondegenerate multidimensional rectangles, grid sums and the integral are exactly the published one-dimensional notions

Statement

Under R1R\mathbb R^1\cong\mathbb R, nondegenerate multidimensional rectangles, grids, Darboux sums, tagged sums, integrability, and integral values are exactly the published one-dimensional notions on intervals [a,b][a,b] with a<ba<b.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

With one coordinate, nondegeneracy says a<ba<b. A grid is one ordinary partition of [a,b][a,b], its cells are its subintervals, and their volumes are their lengths. The iterated cell sum has one index and is the ordinary finite sum.

givenL1L2
2.1

Therefore the lower, upper, and tagged sums agree term for term; taking extrema or mesh limits gives identical integrability classes and values.

step 1.1L1L2
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm\mathbb{R}^m

Statement

Let Q=j<m[aj,bj]Q=\prod_{j<m}[a_j,b_j] be nondegenerate. For integrable f,g:QRf,g:Q\to\mathbb R and scalars α,β\alpha,\beta, the function αf+βg\alpha f+\beta g is integrable and its integral is αQf+βQg\alpha\int_Qf+\beta\int_Qg. If fgf\le g, then QfQg\int_Qf\le\int_Qg. Also f|f| is integrable and QfQf|\int_Qf|\le\int_Q|f|. If ar<c<bra_r<c<b_r, cutting QQ at the coordinate hyperplane xr=cx_r=c gives two nondegenerate subrectangles; integrability on QQ is equivalent to integrability on both restrictions, and their integral values add to the integral over QQ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated integrable functions on the nondegenerate rectangle, and, for coordinate-slice additivity, a strictly interior cut ar<c<bra_r<c<b_r.

[L3]

uvuv\bigl||u|-|v|\bigr|\le|u-v|, the reverse triangle inequality on the real line (The reverse triangle inequality, Absolute value in an ordered field, Basic properties of the absolute value).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Refine grids good for ff and gg. Cellwise supremum and infimum estimates make the gap of αf+βg\alpha f+\beta g at most α|\alpha| times the gap of ff plus β|\beta| times that of gg; tagged-sum linearity identifies the value.

L1L2
1.2

Termwise fgf\le g gives monotonicity of every tagged sum and hence of integrals. By [L3], the oscillation of f|f| on a cell is no larger than that of ff, so f|f| is integrable; fff-|f|\le f\le|f| then gives the absolute-value estimate.

L1L3given
1.3

Insert the cut coordinate into the grid. [L2] splits every Darboux or tagged sum into the two subrectangle sums. Good grids splice conversely, proving integrability on QQ exactly when both restrictions are integrable, and proving additivity.

L1L2
2.1

These arguments establish all clauses with positively oriented rectangles.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm\mathbb{R}^m is Riemann integrable

Statement

Every continuous real function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle QRmQ\subseteq\mathbb R^m, m1m\ge1, is Riemann integrable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A continuous f:QRf:Q\to\mathbb R.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, use [L2] with oscillation target ε/(1+volQ)\varepsilon/(1+\operatorname{vol}Q) and choose a grid whose mesh is below the resulting sup-metric radius.

L1L2L3givenchoose
2.1

Every cell then has oscillation below that target. Since cell volumes sum to volQ\operatorname{vol}Q, the Darboux gap is below ε\varepsilon.

step 1.1given
3.1

The multidimensional Riemann criterion proves integrability.

step 2.1L4
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Measure zero and content zero in Rm\mathbb{R}^m by countable and finite cube covers

Definition

Fix m1m\ge1. A closed cube is a rectangle j<m[aj,aj+]\prod_{j<m}[a_j,a_j+\ell] with 0\ell\ge0; its volume is m\ell^m. A set ERmE\subseteq\mathbb R^m is null when, for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, it is covered by a sequence of closed cubes whose nonnegative volume series converges with sum at most ε\varepsilon. It has content zero when such a cover can be finite.

The series and finite sums are Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series and Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, and their nonnegative bounds use A series of nonnegative terms converges iff its partial sums are bounded, and then the sum is their supremum and Laws of finite sums and finite products. Both properties pass to subsets. Padding a finite cover with degenerate zero-volume cubes proves that content zero implies null. This terminology defines only cover-nullity; it does not define a measure on arbitrary sets.

CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

At m=1m=1, cube-nullity and cube-content-zero are exactly the published interval-cover notions

Statement

Under R1R\mathbb R^1\cong\mathbb R, nullity and content zero from cube covers are exactly the published interval-cover notions.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Under the identification, countable cube covers and their volume-series bounds are word for word the countable interval-cover conditions.

givenL1L2
1.2

The same is true for finite covers and finite sums.

givenL1L2
2.1

Hence both implications hold for nullity and for content zero.

step 1.1step 1.2
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Subsets and countable unions of null subsets of Rm\mathbb{R}^m are null

Statement

Every subset of a null subset of Rm\mathbb R^m is null. Assuming countable choice, every countable union of null subsets of Rm\mathbb R^m is null.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Null sets EjE_j, jNj\in\mathbb N.

[L2]

Countable choice selects one cover for each EjE_j (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω\mathrm{AC}_\omega)), and N2\mathbb N^2 is countable (N×NN\mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N} \approx \mathbb{N}).

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1

Subset closure follows because any cover of a set covers every subset.

L1
1.2

Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose for each jj a cube cover of EjE_j with total volume at most ε2j1\varepsilon2^{-j-1}. This simultaneous selection uses [L2].

L1L2L3construct
2.1

Enumerate the doubly indexed cubes through a bijection NN2\mathbb N\to\mathbb N^2. Every finite partial sum is contained in a finite rectangle of indices and is at most jε2j1ε\sum_j\varepsilon2^{-j-1}\le\varepsilon.

step 1.2L2L3given
3.1

By [L4], the enumerated nonnegative volume series converges with sum at most ε\varepsilon. The cubes cover jEj\bigcup_jE_j, proving nullity.

step 2.1L1L4discharge-construct
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

For compact subsets of Rm\mathbb{R}^m, measure zero and content zero coincide

Statement

A compact subset of Rm\mathbb R^m is null if and only if it has content zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

One implication is [L1]. For the other, fix ε>0\varepsilon>0 and choose a countable closed-cube cover of KK with total volume below ε/2\varepsilon/2.

L1given
2.1

Enlarge the jj-th cube to a larger closed cube whose interior contains it, choosing the added volume below ε2j2\varepsilon2^{-j-2}. The interiors form an open cover and the total volumes of their closed containing cubes are below ε\varepsilon.

step 1.1givenchoose
3.1

Compactness selects finitely many of those interiors. The corresponding finite family of closed enlarged cubes still covers KK, and its volume sum is at most the entire nonnegative series, hence below ε\varepsilon.

step 2.1L2given
4.1

Thus KK has content zero.

step 3.1
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Oscillation of a real function on subsets of Rm\mathbb{R}^m and at a point

Definition

Let f:ARf:A\to\mathbb R, ARmA\subseteq\mathbb R^m. For SAS\subseteq A, define ωf(S):=supR{f(x)f(y):x,yS},\omega_f(S):=\sup_{\overline{\mathbb R}}\{|f(x)-f(y)|:x,y\in S\}, with value 00 when S=S=\varnothing. For cAc\in A, define ωf(c):=infr>0ωf(AB(c,r)).\omega_f(c):=\inf_{r>0}\omega_f(A\cap B(c,r)). The extended supremum exists by The extended real line R=R{,+}\overline{\mathbb{R}} = \mathbb{R} \cup \{-\infty, +\infty\}, its order, and the arithmetic that is left undefined and Every subset of R\overline{\mathbb{R}} has a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound in R\overline{\mathbb{R}}, agreeing with the real supremum and infimum on nonempty sets bounded in R\mathbb{R}; for bounded ff all values are finite. Balls are Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space for the Euclidean metric (Rn\mathbb{R}^n as the set of functions nRn \to \mathbb{R}, and d1d_1, d2d_2, dd_\infty are metrics on it, Each p\lVert\cdot\rVert_p is a norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and the induced metrics are exactly d1d_1, d2d_2 and dd_\infty of the published metric-spaces page).

If STS\subseteq T, then ωf(S)ωf(T)\omega_f(S)\le\omega_f(T), directly from the supremum definition; hence the ball oscillations decrease as the radius shrinks and the infimum is well posed (Greatest lower bound (infimum), Basic properties of the absolute value). At m=1m=1 this agrees with The oscillation ωf(S)=sup{f(x)f(y):x,yS}\omega_f(S) = \sup\{\,|f(x) - f(y)| : x, y \in S\,\} of ff on a set and the oscillation ωf(c)=infδ>0ωf(ANδ(c))\omega_f(c) = \inf_{\delta > 0} \omega_f(A \cap N_\delta(c)) at a point, both taken in the extended reals on every nonempty set; only the empty-set convention differs, being 00 here and -\infty there.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

A function on a subset of Rm\mathbb{R}^m is continuous at xx iff its oscillation there is 00, and every oscillation superlevel set is closed

Statement

For f:ARf:A\to\mathbb R, ff is continuous at cAc\in A if and only if ωf(c)=0\omega_f(c)=0. If ff is bounded, then for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, the relative superlevel set {cA:ωf(c)ε}\{c\in A:\omega_f(c)\ge\varepsilon\} is closed in AA.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If ff is continuous at cc, choose a ball on which f(x)f(c)<ε/3|f(x)-f(c)|<\varepsilon/3; pairwise differences are then below 2ε/32\varepsilon/3, so the ball oscillation is at most 2ε/3<ε2\varepsilon/3<\varepsilon and ωf(c)=0\omega_f(c)=0.

L1L2
1.2

If ωf(c)=0\omega_f(c)=0, choose rr with ball oscillation below ε\varepsilon. Holding one point at cc gives f(x)f(c)<ε|f(x)-f(c)|<\varepsilon, proving continuity.

L1L2
1.3

If ωf(c)<ε\omega_f(c)<\varepsilon, choose rr with ωf(AB(c,r))<ε\omega_f(A\cap B(c,r))<\varepsilon. Every dAB(c,r/2)d\in A\cap B(c,r/2) has a sufficiently small ball contained in B(c,r)B(c,r), so ωf(d)<ε\omega_f(d)<\varepsilon. Thus the sublevel set is relatively open.

L1L2given
2.1

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 give the equivalence; step 1.3 makes the complementary superlevel set closed.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3given
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

A finite rectangle cover admits grid control with arbitrarily small volume excess

Statement

If QQ is a closed nondegenerate rectangle and EQE\subseteq Q is covered by finitely many axis-parallel rectangles of total volume VV, then for every η>0\eta>0 there is a grid of QQ such that the cells meeting EE have total volume below V+ηV+\eta.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1

Intersect each covering rectangle with QQ. Each nonempty intersection is a closed coordinate rectangle RjQR_j\subseteq Q with volume no larger than the original rectangle. If some Rj=QR_j=Q, the one-cell grid already has total meeting-cell volume vol(Q)V<V+η\operatorname{vol}(Q)\le V<V+\eta, so assume otherwise. Move every coordinate face of each RjR_j that is not already a face of QQ outward by a positive margin, staying inside QQ, so that the resulting rectangle Rj+R_j^+ has volume increase below a prescribed share of η\eta. Continuity of the finite volume product and finiteness make the total increase below η\eta; because no RjR_j equals QQ, at least one face of every RjR_j moves, and the finite set of chosen margins has a positive least member.

L1L2givenchoose
2.1

Insert every endpoint of every Rj+R_j^+ into the coordinate grids, then refine to mesh smaller than the least margin using For every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n1n \ge 1 with 1/n<ε1/n < \varepsilon. If a closed cell meets RjR_j, each of its coordinate intervals lies inside the corresponding enlarged interval: away from a face of QQ this follows from the mesh-margin bound, while at a face of QQ there is no cell on the outside. Hence that cell lies in Rj+R_j^+.

step 1.1L2construct
3.1

Assign each cell meeting EE to one RjR_j that it meets. By step 2.1 it lies in the aligned rectangle Rj+R_j^+. Splitting the iterated sums bounds the assigned cells' total volume by jvol(Rj+)<V+η\sum_j\operatorname{vol}(R_j^+) < V+\eta.

step 2.1L2given
4.1

The constructed grid has the asserted control.

step 3.1discharge-construct
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)Open item page →

Lebesgue's criterion in Rm\mathbb{R}^m: a bounded function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle is Riemann integrable iff its discontinuity set is null

Statement

A bounded real function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm\mathbb R^m, m1m\ge1, is Riemann integrable if and only if its discontinuity set is null.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A closed nondegenerate rectangle QRmQ\subseteq\mathbb R^m, m1m\ge1, and a bounded f:QRf:Q\to\mathbb R, with fB|f|\le B.

[L1]

Continuity at xx is equivalent to ωf(x)=0\omega_f(x)=0, and each set {x:ωf(x)ε}\{x:\omega_f(x)\ge\varepsilon\} is closed for ε>0\varepsilon>0 (Oscillation of a real function on subsets of Rm\mathbb{R}^m and at a point, A function on a subset of Rm\mathbb{R}^m is continuous at xx iff its oscillation there is 00, and every oscillation superlevel set is closed).

[L6]

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Finite rectangle-to-cube claim. Let Rs=j<m[as,j,bs,j]R_s=\prod_{j<m}[a_{s,j},b_{s,j}], for ss in a finite index set, and let γ>0\gamma>0. Put s,j=bs,jas,j\ell_{s,j}=b_{s,j}-a_{s,j}. For every δ>0\delta>0, [L5] supplies naturals Ns,j1N_{s,j}\ge1 with s,jι(Ns,j)δs,j+δ\ell_{s,j}\le\iota(N_{s,j})\delta\le\ell_{s,j}+\delta. Partition the interval from as,ja_{s,j} into Ns,jN_{s,j} consecutive intervals of length δ\delta, allowing the last one to extend past bs,jb_{s,j}. Their Cartesian products are closed cubes of side δ\delta covering RsR_s, and their total volume is j<mι(Ns,j)δj<m(s,j+δ).\prod_{j<m}\iota(N_{s,j})\delta \le \prod_{j<m}(\ell_{s,j}+\delta). The finite sum of the expressions on the right is a polynomial in δ\delta whose value at 00 is svol(Rs)\sum_s\operatorname{vol}(R_s). Continuity at 00 therefore permits a common δ>0\delta>0 for which the resulting finite cube cover of sRs\bigcup_sR_s has total volume below svol(Rs)+γ\sum_s\operatorname{vol}(R_s)+\gamma. This includes degenerate rectangles: every zero side contributes a factor δ\delta, so its covering volume tends to 00.

L5construct
1.2

Suppose the discontinuity set DD is null. Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose α>0\alpha>0 with αvolQ<ε/2\alpha\operatorname{vol}Q<\varepsilon/2, and put Sα={x:ωf(x)α}S_\alpha=\{x:\omega_f(x)\ge\alpha\}. Then SαDS_\alpha\subseteq D is relatively closed in QQ, hence compact, and is null.

L1L2choose
1.3

Conversely, suppose ff is integrable. Fix r1r\ge1 and η>0\eta>0, and choose a grid PP whose Darboux gap is below η/(2r)\eta/(2r). Let HPQH_P\subseteq Q be the finite union of the pieces of the coordinate hyperplanes forming cell boundaries. Every point of S1/rHPS_{1/r}\setminus H_P lies in the interior of a unique cell whose oscillation is at least 1/r1/r. Thus the total volume of these high-oscillation cells is below η/2\eta/2.

L1L3choosealgebra
2.1

Cover SαS_\alpha by finitely many cubes and enlarge them so that their interiors still cover SαS_\alpha, keeping their total volume below ε/(8(B+1))\varepsilon/(8(B+1)). Apply [L3] to the union of the enlarged cubes, with the remaining volume budget, to obtain a grid P0P_0 whose cells meeting that union have total volume below ε/(4(B+1))\varepsilon/(4(B+1)).

step 1.2L2L3choose
2.2

The set S1/rS_{1/r} is contained in the union of the high-oscillation cells and the finitely many pieces forming HPH_P. Each hyperplane piece is a degenerate rectangle of volume 00.

step 1.3L5
3.1

Let OO be the union of those cube interiors and K=QOK=Q\setminus O. The set KK is relatively closed in compact QQ, hence compact by [L2]. For every zKz\in K, ωf(z)<α\omega_f(z)<\alpha, so some Euclidean ball about zz has oscillation below α\alpha. Shrink these balls by a factor of two; compactness gives a finite subcover of KK.

step 2.1L1L2L4choose
3.2

Apply the finite rectangle-to-cube claim of step 1.1 to that finite family, with γ=η/2\gamma=\eta/2. Its rectangle-volume sum is below η/2\eta/2, so S1/rS_{1/r} has a finite cube cover of total volume below η\eta. Since η>0\eta>0 was arbitrary, S1/rS_{1/r} has content zero and is null.

step 1.1step 1.3step 2.2L2
4.1

Refine P0P_0 to mesh small enough that the fixed norm comparison in [L4] makes every cell meeting a shrunken ball lie inside the corresponding original ball. Every cell not meeting OO contains a point of KK, hence is contained in one of those original oscillation balls; refinement does not increase the total volume of cells meeting OO.

step 3.1L3L4
5.1

The Darboux gap is therefore below αvolQ+2Bε/(4(B+1))<ε\alpha\operatorname{vol}Q+2B\,\varepsilon/(4(B+1))<\varepsilon. By [L3], ff is integrable.

step 1.2step 2.1step 4.1L3algebra
6.1

By [L1] and [L6], D=r1S1/rD=\bigcup_{r\ge1}S_{1/r}. Countable-union closure makes DD null, with countable choice used exactly through Subsets and countable unions of null subsets of Rm\mathbb{R}^m are null and The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω\mathrm{AC}_\omega). Together with step 5.1, this proves both directions using cover-nullity only.

step 5.1step 3.2L1L6
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Jordan inner and outer content and Jordan measurable bounded sets in Rm\mathbb{R}^m

Definition

For bounded ERmE\subseteq\mathbb R^m, in the metric sense of Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space, its Jordan outer content is the infimum of r<qvol(Rr)\sum_{r<q}\operatorname{vol}(R_r) over finite axis-parallel rectangle covers of EE. Its Jordan inner content is the supremum of the same sums over finite families of rectangles contained in EE whose interiors are pairwise disjoint.

Metric boundedness always supplies a nondegenerate bounding rectangle. For nonempty EE, choose x0Rmx_0\in\mathbb R^m and r>0r>0 with EB(x0,r)E\subseteq B(x_0,r). Since xj(x0)jd(x,x0)d2(x,x0)<r|x_j-(x_0)_j|\le d_\infty(x,x_0)\le d_2(x,x_0)<r for every coordinate (Rn\mathbb{R}^n as the set of functions nRn \to \mathbb{R}, and d1d_1, d2d_2, dd_\infty are metrics on it, The finite and reverse triangle inequalities for a norm; and for n1n \ge 1 every norm NN on Rn\mathbb{R}^n satisfies N(x)Cx1N(x) \le C\lVert x\rVert_1 and is Lipschitz, hence continuous, for d2d_2 clause 3, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space), the nondegenerate box j<m[(x0)jr,(x0)j+r]\prod_{j<m}[(x_0)_j-r,(x_0)_j+r] contains EE. The empty set lies in any fixed nondegenerate rectangle.

Thus the outer family is nonempty and the same bounding rectangle bounds the inner sums; the empty family gives inner sum 00. Refining all listed endpoints into one grid and splitting the nested finite sums shows every inscribed sum is at most every covering sum (Grid partitions of a rectangle in Rm\mathbb{R}^m, their cells, refinements and mesh, Laws of finite sums and finite products). Completeness therefore supplies finite real extrema (Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Every nonempty set bounded below has an infimum, Greatest lower bound (infimum), Suprema and infima are unique).

The set is Jordan measurable when the contents agree, and their common value is its Jordan content. The empty set and every degenerate rectangle have content 00.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

A bounded set is Jordan measurable iff its indicator is Riemann integrable, and the integral is its Jordan content

Statement

A metric-bounded set ERmE\subseteq\mathbb R^m is Jordan measurable if and only if its indicator 1E1_E is Riemann integrable on a fixed nondegenerate bounding rectangle QQ. In that case Q1E=cont(E).\int_Q1_E=\operatorname{cont}(E).

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

On a grid cell, the infimum of 1E1_E is 11 exactly when the cell is contained in EE, while its supremum is 11 exactly when the cell meets EE. Thus lower and upper sums are inscribed and covering grid approximations.

L1L2
2.1

Apply [L3] to each finite outer rectangle approximation to obtain a grid whose cells meeting EE have arbitrarily small excess volume. For an inner approximation, shrink each nondegenerate inscribed rectangle by an arbitrarily small volume, insert the shrunken endpoints, and retain the grid cells inside it. Degenerate rectangles contribute zero. Splitting along the aligned endpoints shows that arbitrary Jordan approximations and grid approximations have the same infimum and supremum.

step 1.1L3given
3.1

Equality of Jordan contents is therefore equality of the lower and upper integrals on the fixed bounding rectangle, and their common value is cont(E)\operatorname{cont}(E).

step 2.1L1L2given
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)Open item page →

A bounded set in Rm\mathbb{R}^m is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero

Statement

A metric-bounded set ERmE\subseteq\mathbb R^m is Jordan measurable if and only if its boundary E\partial E is null, equivalently has content zero.

Facts & Assumptions

[L1]

If QQ is a nondegenerate rectangle with EintQ\overline E\subseteq\operatorname{int}Q, then the relative-domain indicator 1E:QR1_E:Q\to\mathbb R is discontinuous exactly at the ambient boundary E\partial E. At a boundary point every sufficiently small ambient ball lies in QQ and meets both EE and its ambient complement, while away from the boundary the indicator is locally constant (Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L3], choose a closed bounding rectangle Q0Q_0 for EE and enlarge every coordinate interval by a fixed positive margin to obtain a nondegenerate rectangle QQ with EQ0intQ\overline E\subseteq Q_0\subseteq\operatorname{int}Q. By [L1] and [L2], EE is Jordan measurable exactly when E\partial E is null.

L1L2L3givenchoose
1.2

By [L3], nullity of this compact boundary is equivalent to content zero.

L3given
2.1

Combining the equivalences proves the criterion.

step 1.1step 1.2given
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The Riemann integral of a bounded function over a bounded Jordan measurable set

Definition

Let ERmE\subseteq\mathbb R^m be bounded in the metric sense of Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space and Jordan measurable, and let f:ERf:E\to\mathbb R be bounded. Choose a nondegenerate rectangle QEQ\supseteq E, whose existence follows from Jordan inner and outer content and Jordan measurable bounded sets in Rm\mathbb{R}^m, and define the zero extension f~Q(x):={f(x),xE,0,xQE.\widetilde f_Q(x):=\begin{cases}f(x),&x\in E,\\0,&x\in Q\setminus E.\end{cases} The function ff is Riemann integrable over EE when f~Q\widetilde f_Q is integrable over QQ, and then Ef:=Qf~Q.\int_Ef:=\int_Q\widetilde f_Q. Independence of the bounding rectangle, for both integrability and value, is proved in The Riemann integral over a Jordan set is independent of the bounding rectangle and recorded as the definition's forward justification. For f=1f=1, the zero extension is 1E1_E, so A bounded set is Jordan measurable iff its indicator is Riemann integrable, and the integral is its Jordan content gives E1=cont(E)\int_E1=\operatorname{cont}(E).

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The Riemann integral over a Jordan set is independent of the bounding rectangle

Statement

The definition of Ef\int_E f is independent of the chosen bounding rectangle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Nondegenerate bounding rectangles Q1,Q2Q_1,Q_2 for EE.

[L1]

There is a nondegenerate rectangle QQ that contains both Q1,Q2Q_1,Q_2 strictly in every coordinate: decrease each of the finitely many lower endpoints and increase each upper endpoint by any fixed positive margin (Axis-parallel rectangles in Rm\mathbb{R}^m and their volume).

[L2]

Coordinate-slice additivity, including its converse integrability clause, is part of Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm\mathbb{R}^m.

[L3]

A bounded function on a nondegenerate rectangle is integrable when its discontinuity set is null (Lebesgue's criterion in Rm\mathbb{R}^m: a bounded function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle is Riemann integrable iff its discontinuity set is null), and the indicator of a Jordan measurable set integrates to its Jordan content (A bounded set is Jordan measurable iff its indicator is Riemann integrable, and the integral is its Jordan content).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Extend the zero extension on QiQ_i further by zero to QQ. Cut QQ at the lower and upper endpoint of QiQ_i in each coordinate. The strict containment in [L1] and nondegeneracy of QiQ_i make every cut strictly interior. On every added nondegenerate subrectangle the restriction is zero away from the finitely many coordinate faces of QiQ_i; only shared boundary points may retain nonzero values.

L1given
2.1

Every bounded piece of a coordinate hyperplane has content zero: subdivide its bounded (m1)(m-1)-dimensional coordinate ranges into cubes of side at most 1/ι(N)1/\iota(N), and thicken the fixed coordinate by the same amount. The number of cubes grows at most as a fixed multiple of ι(N)m1\iota(N)^{m-1}, so their total mm-volume is at most a fixed multiple of 1/ι(N)1/\iota(N), which can be made arbitrarily small (Measure zero and content zero in Rm\mathbb{R}^m by countable and finite cube covers, For every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n1n \ge 1 with 1/n<ε1/n < \varepsilon). Finite unions preserve this estimate. Thus the exceptional face set HH from step 1.1 is Jordan measurable with content zero, and [L3] gives 1H=0\int 1_H=0.

step 1.1L3
3.1

On each added subrectangle the extended function is bounded and is zero off HH, so its discontinuities lie in the null set HH. It is integrable by [L3]. If fB|f|\le B, then hB1H|h|\le B1_H; monotonicity and the absolute-value estimate in [L2] give hhB1H=0\left|\int h\right|\le\int|h|\le B\int1_H=0. Hence every added subrectangle has integral 00.

step 1.1step 2.1L2L3
4.1

Repeated coordinate-slice additivity [L2] now says that the extension is integrable on QQ exactly when it is integrable on QiQ_i, and its integral equals the QiQ_i-integral because every added integral is 00. Applying this to i=1,2i=1,2 gives the same integrability decision and value in both rectangles.

step 3.1L2given
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

A continuous real function on a compact Jordan measurable set is Riemann integrable over that set

Statement

Every continuous real function on a compact Jordan measurable set ERmE\subseteq\mathbb R^m is Riemann integrable over EE.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Compact Jordan measurable EE and continuous f:ERf:E\to\mathbb R.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If E=E=\varnothing, its zero extension is identically zero and the conclusion is immediate. Otherwise [L1] makes ff bounded. Choose a bounding rectangle and form its zero extension as in The Riemann integral of a bounded function over a bounded Jordan measurable set.

L1choose
2.1

The extension is continuous at every point of the interior of EE, by continuity of ff, and at every point outside the closure of EE, because it is locally zero. Its discontinuities are therefore contained in E\partial E.

step 1.1given
3.1

The containing boundary is null by [L2], so subset closure and [L3] make the extension integrable. Bounding-rectangle independence is The Riemann integral over a Jordan set is independent of the bounding rectangle.

step 2.1L2L3
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Jordan content is finitely additive when the overlap has content zero

Statement

If bounded Jordan measurable sets E,FE,F have EFE\cap F of content zero, then cont(EF)=cont(E)+cont(F).\operatorname{cont}(E\cup F)=\operatorname{cont}(E)+\operatorname{cont}(F). In particular Jordan content is additive on disjoint finite families.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: E,FE,F as stated.

[L3]

Content zero means that for every positive ε\varepsilon there is a finite cube cover of total volume below ε\varepsilon (Measure zero and content zero in Rm\mathbb{R}^m by countable and finite cube covers); Jordan inner and outer content are the inscribed supremum and covering infimum (Jordan inner and outer content and Jordan measurable bounded sets in Rm\mathbb{R}^m).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

Pointwise, 1EF=1E+1F1EF1_{E\cup F}=1_E+1_F-1_{E\cap F}. Cube-cover content zero makes the Jordan outer content of EFE\cap F at most every positive ε\varepsilon, hence zero; its nonnegative inner content is no larger, so it too is zero. Thus EFE\cap F is Jordan measurable with content zero, and [L1] gives 1EF=0\int1_{E\cap F}=0.

L1L3given
1.2

The finite-family formula is immediate for a family of length one.

base
1.3

Assume it holds for a disjoint family of length rr.

ih
2.1

Integrate and apply [L2] to obtain the two-set formula.

step 1.1L2given
3.1

Apply the two-set formula to the union of that family and the next set. Their intersection is empty, so this adds the next content and proves the formula at length r+1r+1.

step 2.1step 1.3
4.1

Hence Jordan content is additive on every finite disjoint family.

step 1.2step 3.1discharge-induction
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

A Lipschitz map RmRm\mathbb{R}^m\to\mathbb{R}^m sends null sets to null sets

Statement

If T:RmRmT:\mathbb R^m\to\mathbb R^m is Lipschitz and EE is null, then T[E]T[E] is null.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · cases
1.1

If L=0L=0, T[E]T[E] is empty or a singleton, covered by cubes of arbitrarily small side.

assume-case zeroL1given
1.2

Suppose L>0L>0. The image of a side-\ell cube lies in a cube of side CmLC_mL\ell, where CmC_m is the fixed norm-comparison factor. Its volume is (CmL)mm(C_mL)^m\ell^m.

assume-case positiveL1L2given
2.1

Given an output budget ε\varepsilon, cover EE by cubes with total volume below ε/(CmL)m\varepsilon/(C_mL)^m. Replacing each by its image-containing cube gives a cover of T[E]T[E] with total volume below ε\varepsilon.

step 1.2given
3.1

Both cases prove nullity. Equal domain and codomain dimensions are used in the volume scaling.

step 1.1step 2.1cases-exhaustive
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The graph of a continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm\mathbb{R}^m has content zero in Rm+1\mathbb{R}^{m+1}

Statement

Let m1m\ge1, let QRmQ\subseteq\mathbb R^m be a closed nondegenerate rectangle, and let f:QRf:Q\to\mathbb R be continuous. Its graph has content zero in Rm+1\mathbb R^{m+1}.

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1

Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose a uniform coordinate grid with cell widths at most δ\delta, where uniform continuity makes the oscillation of ff on each cell below a vertical amount η\eta. Since QQ is nondegenerate, the grid may be chosen so that the number NδN_\delta of cells satisfies NδδmCQN_\delta\delta^m\le C_Q for a constant depending only on QQ.

L1L2givenchooseconstruct
2.1

One horizontal cube footprint of side δ\delta covers each domain cell. Above it, stack (m+1)(m+1)-cubes of side δ\delta across the graph's vertical range. Integer part: for every real xx there is exactly one integer mm with mx<m+1m \le x < m + 1 bounds their number by η/δ+2\eta/\delta+2, so all stacks together have volume at most Nδ(ηδm+2δm+1)CQ(η+2δ)N_\delta(\eta\delta^m+2\delta^{m+1})\le C_Q(\eta+2\delta).

step 1.1L2given
3.1

Summing over the finitely many domain cells gives total covering volume at most a rectangle-dependent constant times η+δ\eta+\delta. Choose η\eta and then δ\delta to make this below ε\varepsilon.

step 2.1givenchoose
4.1

This finite cube cover proves content zero in the sense of Measure zero and content zero in Rm\mathbb{R}^m by countable and finite cube covers.

step 3.1discharge-construct
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

If every finite interval cover of ARA\subseteq\mathbb{R} has total length at least cc, then every rectangle cover of A×[0,d]A\times[0,d] has total area at least cdcd

Statement

Let ARA\subseteq\mathbb R. If every finite interval cover of AA has total length at least c0c\ge0, then every finite rectangle cover of A×[0,d]A\times[0,d], d0d\ge0, has total area at least cdcd.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If d=0d=0, then every covering area is nonnegative and the required lower bound is cd=0cd=0. Hence assume d>0d>0. Clip the rectangles to a common bounding rectangle and partition the nondegenerate interval [0,d][0,d] at every vertical endpoint.

L1given
2.1

On each nondegenerate horizontal strip, choose an interior height. The horizontal projections of the rectangles active at that height cover AA, so their total widths are at least cc.

givenstep 1.1choose
3.1

Multiply the inequality for each strip by its height and sum. Reindexing the nested finite sums counts each covering rectangle by its width times its total active height, at most its area. Thus the covering area is at least cstrip heights=cdc\sum\text{strip heights}=cd.

step 2.1L2algebra
RemarkRemark: AI-generatedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Conventions and proved scope for the Riemann integral in Rm\mathbb{R}^m and Jordan content

Remarks

Throughout, m1m\ge1. Rectangles and grids are axis-parallel. The multidimensional Darboux and tagged integrals are defined on nondegenerate rectangles, and integration over a Jordan set chooses a nondegenerate bounding rectangle. Degenerate rectangles still have geometric volume and Jordan content 00, but no competing integral convention is introduced for them. Nullity in Measure zero and content zero in Rm\mathbb{R}^m by countable and finite cube covers uses cube covers, while Jordan outer content in Jordan inner and outer content and Jordan measurable bounded sets in Rm\mathbb{R}^m uses arbitrary finite rectangle covers. The one-dimensional dictionaries are At m=1m=1, nondegenerate multidimensional rectangles, grid sums and the integral are exactly the published one-dimensional notions and At m=1m=1, cube-nullity and cube-content-zero are exactly the published interval-cover notions.

The historical Lebesgue criterion Lebesgue's criterion in Rm\mathbb{R}^m: a bounded function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle is Riemann integrable iff its discontinuity set is null uses only cover-nullity and no Lebesgue measure or integral. The proved image results are the equal-dimensional Lipschitz theorem A Lipschitz map RmRm\mathbb{R}^m\to\mathbb{R}^m sends null sets to null sets and the graph theorem The graph of a continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm\mathbb{R}^m has content zero in Rm+1\mathbb{R}^{m+1}. No general continuously differentiable image theorem is asserted.

Jordan measurability is related to null boundaries by A bounded set in Rm\mathbb{R}^m is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero. Integration over a Jordan set uses the zero-extension convention of The Riemann integral of a bounded function over a bounded Jordan measurable set; no integration over arbitrary bounded sets is defined here.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources