Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 20 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 20 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

The Riemann Integral in R^m and Jordan Content

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The one-dimensional Riemann integral supplies Darboux sums, tagged sums, refinement, and the Riemann criterion. The normed-space structure of Rm supplies Euclidean compactness, metric continuity, and norm comparisons. These prerequisites support coordinate grids and finite product volumes without invoking iterated integration.

Rectangles, grid partitions, multidimensional Darboux sums, and tagged sums lead to an intrinsic Riemann integral and its agreement with the one-dimensional theory. Cube-cover nullity and oscillation yield the multidimensional Lebesgue criterion. Jordan inner and outer content are then connected to indicator integrability and null boundaries, supporting integration over Jordan sets, finite additivity, Lipschitz-null preservation, and content-zero graph theorems.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Axis-parallel rectangles in Rm and their volume

Definition

Fix a natural number m≥1. For a,b∈Rm with aj≤bj for j<m, define [a,b]:={x∈Rm:aj≤xj≤bj (j<m)},vol⁡[a,b]:=∏j<m(bj−aj). The product is the recursively defined finite product of Finite sums and finite products, by recursion. The rectangle is nondegenerate when every aj<bj, and it is a cube when all side lengths are equal.

Every factor is nonnegative, so volume is nonnegative. For a coordinate index r<m, cutting at c∈[ar,br] gives two rectangles whose volumes add to the original, by distributivity in that factor and Laws of finite sums and finite products. Under the standard identification R1≅R (Rn as the set of functions n→R, and d1, d2, d∞ are metrics on it, The p-norms ∥x∥p for rational p≥1, and ∥x∥∞), this is the interval [a0,b0] and its length.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Grid partitions of a rectangle in Rm, their cells, refinements and mesh

Definition

A grid partition P of a nondegenerate rectangle Q=[a,b]⊆Rm is a family, one for each j<m, of one-dimensional partitions aj=tj,0<⋯<tj,nj=bj (Partition of [a,b] as a finite strictly increasing list a=t0<t1<⋯<tn=b, its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions). For a multi-index i=(i0,…,im−1) with ij<nj, its cell is Qi:=∏j<m[tj,ij,tj,ij+1]. A sum over cells means the iterated recursive sum ∑i0<n0⋯∑im−1<nm−1 of Finite sums and finite products, by recursion. The mesh is max⁡j<m,ij<nj(tj,ij+1−tj,ij), which exists by Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum and is the largest d∞-diameter (The p-norms ∥x∥p for rational p≥1, and ∥x∥∞, Each ∥⋅∥p is a norm on Rn, and the induced metrics are exactly d1, d2 and d∞ of the published metric-spaces page).

Refinement is coordinatewise. Coordinatewise union gives a common refinement. The cells cover Q and have pairwise disjoint interiors. Repeated splitting of finite sums and induction on m give ∑ivol⁡(Qi)=vol⁡(Q). These statements include boundary overlaps: boundaries may meet, but interiors do not, and volume splitting is algebraic.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Lower and upper Darboux sums over a grid partition in Rm

Definition

Let f:Q→R be bounded on a nondegenerate rectangle and let P be a grid. For each cell Qi, put mi:=inf⁡f[Qi],Mi:=sup⁡f[Qi],L(f,P):=∑imivol⁡(Qi),U(f,P):=∑iMivol⁡(Qi). The extrema exist as finite reals because each nonempty image is bounded (Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Every nonempty set bounded below has an infimum, Greatest lower bound (infimum), Suprema and infima are unique), and the sums use the iterated convention of Grid partitions of a rectangle in Rm, their cells, refinements and mesh.

Since mi≤Mi and cell volumes are nonnegative, L(f,P)≤U(f,P). Moreover U(f,P)−L(f,P)=∑i(Mi−mi)vol⁡(Qi), the sum of cell oscillations weighted by volume (Laws of finite sums and finite products).

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Refinement raises multidimensional lower sums and lowers upper sums, with a quantitative boundary-slab estimate

Statement

If P′ refines a grid P, then L(f,P)≤L(f,P′)≤U(f,P′)≤U(f,P). Moreover, for a fixed grid P, there is a constant CP such that refining any grid of mesh δ by P changes either Darboux sum by at most 2BCPδ, where ∣f∣≤B.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The grids, bounded f, and bound B.

[L2]

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

Insert one coordinate hyperplane. Every new cell lies in one old cell, so its infimum is no smaller and its supremum no larger. Splitting the affected coordinate sum proves the four inequalities.

baseL1L2
1.2

Only fine cells meeting an interior hyperplane of P can cross a coarse-cell boundary. For a hyperplane perpendicular to coordinate j, those cells lie in a slab of thickness at most 2δ; repeated product distributivity bounds their total volume by 2δ∏r≠j(br−ar).

L1L2given
2.1

Iterating over the finitely many inserted hyperplanes and coordinates proves refinement monotonicity.

ihstep 1.1given
2.2

Sum this bound over the finitely many fixed interior hyperplanes to define CP. On all other cells refinement changes no coarse bound, while on boundary cells each contribution changes by at most 2B times its volume.

step 1.2L2given
3.1

This yields the quantitative estimate and completes both assertions.

step 2.1step 2.2discharge-induction∎
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The lower and upper Darboux integrals over a nondegenerate rectangle in Rm

Definition

For a bounded function f:Q→R on a nondegenerate rectangle Q⊆Rm, define ∫Q‾f:=sup⁡PL(f,P),∫Q‾f:=inf⁡PU(f,P), over all grid partitions P of Q. The grid family is nonempty, since the endpoints in each coordinate give a one-cell grid. Every lower sum is at most every upper sum by a common refinement and Refinement raises multidimensional lower sums and lowers upper sums, with a quantitative boundary-slab estimate, so the two sets of sums are nonempty and bounded and the extrema exist (Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Every nonempty set bounded below has an infimum, Greatest lower bound (infimum), Suprema and infima are unique).

The function is Riemann integrable over Q when the two values agree. Their unique common real is ∫Qf. No integral is defined here for a degenerate rectangle, because the grid definition requires every coordinate interval to have distinct endpoints. This is the multidimensional Darboux definition; its agreement with the published one-dimensional definition is proved separately.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Riemann's criterion on a nondegenerate rectangle in Rm: integrability is equivalent to arbitrarily small Darboux gaps

Statement

A bounded f:Q→R on a nondegenerate rectangle is Riemann integrable if and only if, for every ε>0, some grid P satisfies U(f,P)−L(f,P)<ε.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If the two integrals equal I, choose P− with L(f,P−)>I−ε/2 and P+ with U(f,P+)<I+ε/2. A common refinement P has gap below ε.

L1L2L3
1.2

Conversely, a common refinement shows every lower sum is at most every upper sum, so for every P, 0≤∫Q‾f−∫Q‾f≤U(f,P)−L(f,P). Arbitrarily small gaps force the integral difference to be 0.

L1L3given
2.1

Thus the conditions are equivalent.

step 1.1step 1.2∎
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Tagged grid partitions and Riemann sums in Rm

Definition

A tagging of a grid P assigns to every cell Qi a point ξi∈Qi. The lower corner is a canonical tagging, so taggings exist without choice. The Riemann sum is S(f,P,ξ):=∑if(ξi)vol⁡(Qi), with the iterated sum convention of Grid partitions of a rectangle in Rm, their cells, refinements and mesh.

The tagged sums converge with mesh to I if for every ε>0 some δ>0 makes ∣S(f,P,ξ)−I∣<ε for every tagged grid with mesh below δ. Finite cellwise selections used in proofs are licensed by Every natural-number-indexed list of nonempty sets has a choice function on its family of values and Choice function, not by countable choice.

For bounded f, each tag lies in its cell, so termwise inequalities and nonnegative volumes give L(f,P)≤S(f,P,ξ)≤U(f,P) (Lower and upper Darboux sums over a grid partition in Rm, Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set).

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The multidimensional Darboux and tagged-mesh definitions of the Riemann integral agree

Statement

A bounded function on a nondegenerate rectangle is Darboux integrable with value I if and only if all tagged grid sums converge with mesh to I.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded f:Q→R, with ∣f∣≤B, on a nondegenerate rectangle Q.

[L1]

Every tagged sum lies between its grid's Darboux sums (Tagged grid partitions and Riemann sums in Rm).

[L3]

Refining by a fixed grid changes the bounds only by the boundary-slab estimate (Refinement raises multidimensional lower sums and lowers upper sums, with a quantitative boundary-slab estimate).

[L5]

Repeated equal subdivision and the Archimedean reciprocal property give grid partitions of a nondegenerate rectangle with arbitrarily small mesh (Grid partitions of a rectangle in Rm, their cells, refinements and mesh, For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If f is Darboux integrable, choose a fixed grid P0 with small gap by [L2]. For any sufficiently fine P, refine it with P0; [L3] makes the Darboux bounds of P differ from those of the refinement by arbitrarily little. Since the refined lower and upper sums trap I, [L1] makes every tagged sum over P close to I.

L1L2L3
1.2

Conversely, suppose every sufficiently fine tagged sum is close to I. By [L5], choose one grid below the convergence mesh threshold and, using [L4], tag each cell near its supremum and then near its infimum. The two tagged sums approximate U(f,P) and L(f,P), so their common closeness to I makes the Darboux gap arbitrarily small.

L4L5given
2.1

Apply [L2] in step 1.2. Since the near-upper and near-lower tagged sums are both arbitrarily close to I, the common lower/upper integral lies arbitrarily close to I and therefore equals I. Both directions give the same value.

step 1.1step 1.2L1L2∎
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

At m=1, nondegenerate multidimensional rectangles, grid sums and the integral are exactly the published one-dimensional notions

Statement

Under R1≅R, nondegenerate multidimensional rectangles, grids, Darboux sums, tagged sums, integrability, and integral values are exactly the published one-dimensional notions on intervals [a,b] with a<b.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

With one coordinate, nondegeneracy says a<b. A grid is one ordinary partition of [a,b], its cells are its subintervals, and their volumes are their lengths. The iterated cell sum has one index and is the ordinary finite sum.

givenL1L2
2.1

Therefore the lower, upper, and tagged sums agree term for term; taking extrema or mesh limits gives identical integrability classes and values.

step 1.1L1L2∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm

Statement

Let Q=∏j<m[aj,bj] be nondegenerate. For integrable f,g:Q→R and scalars α,β, the function αf+βg is integrable and its integral is α∫Qf+β∫Qg. If f≤g, then ∫Qf≤∫Qg. Also ∣f∣ is integrable and ∣∫Qf∣≤∫Q∣f∣. If ar<c<br, cutting Q at the coordinate hyperplane xr=c gives two nondegenerate subrectangles; integrability on Q is equivalent to integrability on both restrictions, and their integral values add to the integral over Q.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated integrable functions on the nondegenerate rectangle, and, for coordinate-slice additivity, a strictly interior cut ar<c<br.

[L3]

∣∣u∣−∣v∣∣≤∣u−v∣, the reverse triangle inequality on the real line (The reverse triangle inequality, Absolute value in an ordered field, Basic properties of the absolute value).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Refine grids good for f and g. Cellwise supremum and infimum estimates make the gap of αf+βg at most ∣α∣ times the gap of f plus ∣β∣ times that of g; tagged-sum linearity identifies the value.

L1L2
1.2

Termwise f≤g gives monotonicity of every tagged sum and hence of integrals. By [L3], the oscillation of ∣f∣ on a cell is no larger than that of f, so ∣f∣ is integrable; −∣f∣≤f≤∣f∣ then gives the absolute-value estimate.

L1L3given
1.3

Insert the cut coordinate into the grid. [L2] splits every Darboux or tagged sum into the two subrectangle sums. Good grids splice conversely, proving integrability on Q exactly when both restrictions are integrable, and proving additivity.

L1L2
2.1

These arguments establish all clauses with positively oriented rectangles.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm is Riemann integrable

Statement

Every continuous real function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle Q⊆Rm, m≥1, is Riemann integrable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A continuous f:Q→R.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Given ε>0, use [L2] with oscillation target ε/(1+vol⁡Q) and choose a grid whose mesh is below the resulting sup-metric radius.

L1L2L3givenchoose
2.1

Every cell then has oscillation below that target. Since cell volumes sum to vol⁡Q, the Darboux gap is below ε.

step 1.1given
3.1

The multidimensional Riemann criterion proves integrability.

step 2.1L4∎
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Measure zero and content zero in Rm by countable and finite cube covers

Definition

Fix m≥1. A closed cube is a rectangle ∏j<m[aj,aj+ℓ] with ℓ≥0; its volume is ℓm. A set E⊆Rm is null when, for every ε>0, it is covered by a sequence of closed cubes whose nonnegative volume series converges with sum at most ε. It has content zero when such a cover can be finite.

The series and finite sums are Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series and Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, and their nonnegative bounds use A series of nonnegative terms converges iff its partial sums are bounded, and then the sum is their supremum and Laws of finite sums and finite products. Both properties pass to subsets. Padding a finite cover with degenerate zero-volume cubes proves that content zero implies null. This terminology defines only cover-nullity; it does not define a measure on arbitrary sets.

CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

At m=1, cube-nullity and cube-content-zero are exactly the published interval-cover notions

Statement

Under R1≅R, nullity and content zero from cube covers are exactly the published interval-cover notions.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Under the identification, countable cube covers and their volume-series bounds are word for word the countable interval-cover conditions.

givenL1L2
1.2

The same is true for finite covers and finite sums.

givenL1L2
2.1

Hence both implications hold for nullity and for content zero.

step 1.1step 1.2∎
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Subsets and countable unions of null subsets of Rm are null

Statement

Every subset of a null subset of Rm is null. Assuming countable choice, every countable union of null subsets of Rm is null.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Null sets Ej, j∈N.

[L2]

Countable choice selects one cover for each Ej (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), and N2 is countable (N×N≈N).

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1

Subset closure follows because any cover of a set covers every subset.

L1
1.2

Given ε>0, choose for each j a cube cover of Ej with total volume at most ε2−j−1. This simultaneous selection uses [L2].

L1L2L3construct
2.1

Enumerate the doubly indexed cubes through a bijection N→N2. Every finite partial sum is contained in a finite rectangle of indices and is at most ∑jε2−j−1≤ε.

step 1.2L2L3given
3.1

By [L4], the enumerated nonnegative volume series converges with sum at most ε. The cubes cover ⋃jEj, proving nullity.

step 2.1L1L4discharge-construct∎
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

For compact subsets of Rm, measure zero and content zero coincide

Statement

A compact subset of Rm is null if and only if it has content zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

One implication is [L1]. For the other, fix ε>0 and choose a countable closed-cube cover of K with total volume below ε/2.

L1given
2.1

Enlarge the j-th cube to a larger closed cube whose interior contains it, choosing the added volume below ε2−j−2. The interiors form an open cover and the total volumes of their closed containing cubes are below ε.

step 1.1givenchoose
3.1

Compactness selects finitely many of those interiors. The corresponding finite family of closed enlarged cubes still covers K, and its volume sum is at most the entire nonnegative series, hence below ε.

step 2.1L2given
4.1

Thus K has content zero.

step 3.1∎
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Oscillation of a real function on subsets of Rm and at a point

Definition

Let f:A→R, A⊆Rm. For S⊆A, define ωf(S):=sup⁡R‾{∣f(x)−f(y)∣:x,y∈S}, with value 0 when S=∅. For c∈A, define ωf(c):=inf⁡r>0ωf(A∩B(c,r)). The extended supremum exists by The extended real line R‾=R∪{−∞,+∞}, its order, and the arithmetic that is left undefined and Every subset of R‾ has a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound in R‾, agreeing with the real supremum and infimum on nonempty sets bounded in R; for bounded f all values are finite. Balls are Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space for the Euclidean metric (Rn as the set of functions n→R, and d1, d2, d∞ are metrics on it, Each ∥⋅∥p is a norm on Rn, and the induced metrics are exactly d1, d2 and d∞ of the published metric-spaces page).

If S⊆T, then ωf(S)≤ωf(T), directly from the supremum definition; hence the ball oscillations decrease as the radius shrinks and the infimum is well posed (Greatest lower bound (infimum), Basic properties of the absolute value). At m=1 this agrees with The oscillation ωf(S)=sup⁡{ ∣f(x)−f(y)∣:x,y∈S } of f on a set and the oscillation ωf(c)=inf⁡δ>0ωf(A∩Nδ(c)) at a point, both taken in the extended reals on every nonempty set; only the empty-set convention differs, being 0 here and −∞ there.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

A function on a subset of Rm is continuous at x iff its oscillation there is 0, and every oscillation superlevel set is closed

Statement

For f:A→R, f is continuous at c∈A if and only if ωf(c)=0. If f is bounded, then for every ε>0, the relative superlevel set {c∈A:ωf(c)≥ε} is closed in A.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If f is continuous at c, choose a ball on which ∣f(x)−f(c)∣<ε/3; pairwise differences are then below 2ε/3, so the ball oscillation is at most 2ε/3<ε and ωf(c)=0.

L1L2
1.2

If ωf(c)=0, choose r with ball oscillation below ε. Holding one point at c gives ∣f(x)−f(c)∣<ε, proving continuity.

L1L2
1.3

If ωf(c)<ε, choose r with ωf(A∩B(c,r))<ε. Every d∈A∩B(c,r/2) has a sufficiently small ball contained in B(c,r), so ωf(d)<ε. Thus the sublevel set is relatively open.

L1L2given
2.1

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 give the equivalence; step 1.3 makes the complementary superlevel set closed.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3given∎
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

A finite rectangle cover admits grid control with arbitrarily small volume excess

Statement

If Q is a closed nondegenerate rectangle and E⊆Q is covered by finitely many axis-parallel rectangles of total volume V, then for every η>0 there is a grid of Q such that the cells meeting E have total volume below V+η.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1

Intersect each covering rectangle with Q. Each nonempty intersection is a closed coordinate rectangle Rj⊆Q with volume no larger than the original rectangle. If some Rj=Q, the one-cell grid already has total meeting-cell volume vol⁡(Q)≤V<V+η, so assume otherwise. Move every coordinate face of each Rj that is not already a face of Q outward by a positive margin, staying inside Q, so that the resulting rectangle Rj+ has volume increase below a prescribed share of η. Continuity of the finite volume product and finiteness make the total increase below η; because no Rj equals Q, at least one face of every Rj moves, and the finite set of chosen margins has a positive least member.

L1L2givenchoose
2.1

Insert every endpoint of every Rj+ into the coordinate grids, then refine to mesh smaller than the least margin using For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε. If a closed cell meets Rj, each of its coordinate intervals lies inside the corresponding enlarged interval: away from a face of Q this follows from the mesh-margin bound, while at a face of Q there is no cell on the outside. Hence that cell lies in Rj+.

step 1.1L2construct
3.1

Assign each cell meeting E to one Rj that it meets. By step 2.1 it lies in the aligned rectangle Rj+. Splitting the iterated sums bounds the assigned cells' total volume by ∑jvol⁡(Rj+)<V+η.

step 2.1L2given
4.1

The constructed grid has the asserted control.

step 3.1discharge-construct∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)Open item page →

Lebesgue's criterion in Rm: a bounded function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle is Riemann integrable iff its discontinuity set is null

Statement

A bounded real function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm, m≥1, is Riemann integrable if and only if its discontinuity set is null.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A closed nondegenerate rectangle Q⊆Rm, m≥1, and a bounded f:Q→R, with ∣f∣≤B.

[L1]

Continuity at x is equivalent to ωf(x)=0, and each set {x:ωf(x)≥ε} is closed for ε>0 (Oscillation of a real function on subsets of Rm and at a point, A function on a subset of Rm is continuous at x iff its oscillation there is 0, and every oscillation superlevel set is closed).

[L6]

For every positive real u there is a natural r≥1 with 1/r<u (For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Finite rectangle-to-cube claim. Let Rs=∏j<m[as,j,bs,j], for s in a finite index set, and let γ>0. Put ℓs,j=bs,j−as,j. For every δ>0, [L5] supplies naturals Ns,j≥1 with ℓs,j≤ι(Ns,j)δ≤ℓs,j+δ. Partition the interval from as,j into Ns,j consecutive intervals of length δ, allowing the last one to extend past bs,j. Their Cartesian products are closed cubes of side δ covering Rs, and their total volume is ∏j<mι(Ns,j)δ≤∏j<m(ℓs,j+δ). The finite sum of the expressions on the right is a polynomial in δ whose value at 0 is ∑svol⁡(Rs). Continuity at 0 therefore permits a common δ>0 for which the resulting finite cube cover of ⋃sRs has total volume below ∑svol⁡(Rs)+γ. This includes degenerate rectangles: every zero side contributes a factor δ, so its covering volume tends to 0.

L5construct
1.2

Suppose the discontinuity set D is null. Given ε>0, choose α>0 with αvol⁡Q<ε/2, and put Sα={x:ωf(x)≥α}. Then Sα⊆D is relatively closed in Q, hence compact, and is null.

L1L2choose
1.3

Conversely, suppose f is integrable. Fix r≥1 and η>0, and choose a grid P whose Darboux gap is below η/(2r). Let HP⊆Q be the finite union of the pieces of the coordinate hyperplanes forming cell boundaries. Every point of S1/r∖HP lies in the interior of a unique cell whose oscillation is at least 1/r. Thus the total volume of these high-oscillation cells is below η/2.

L1L3choosealgebra
2.1

Cover Sα by finitely many cubes and enlarge them so that their interiors still cover Sα, keeping their total volume below ε/(8(B+1)). Apply [L3] to the union of the enlarged cubes, with the remaining volume budget, to obtain a grid P0 whose cells meeting that union have total volume below ε/(4(B+1)).

step 1.2L2L3choose
2.2

The set S1/r is contained in the union of the high-oscillation cells and the finitely many pieces forming HP. Each hyperplane piece is a degenerate rectangle of volume 0.

step 1.3L5
3.1

Let O be the union of those cube interiors and K=Q∖O. The set K is relatively closed in compact Q, hence compact by [L2]. For every z∈K, ωf(z)<α, so some Euclidean ball about z has oscillation below α. Shrink these balls by a factor of two; compactness gives a finite subcover of K.

step 2.1L1L2L4choose
3.2

Apply the finite rectangle-to-cube claim of step 1.1 to that finite family, with γ=η/2. Its rectangle-volume sum is below η/2, so S1/r has a finite cube cover of total volume below η. Since η>0 was arbitrary, S1/r has content zero and is null.

step 1.1step 1.3step 2.2L2
4.1

Refine P0 to mesh small enough that the fixed norm comparison in [L4] makes every cell meeting a shrunken ball lie inside the corresponding original ball. Every cell not meeting O contains a point of K, hence is contained in one of those original oscillation balls; refinement does not increase the total volume of cells meeting O.

step 3.1L3L4
5.1

The Darboux gap is therefore below αvol⁡Q+2B ε/(4(B+1))<ε. By [L3], f is integrable.

step 1.2step 2.1step 4.1L3algebra
6.1

By [L1] and [L6], D=⋃r≥1S1/r. Countable-union closure makes D null, with countable choice used exactly through Subsets and countable unions of null subsets of Rm are null and The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω). Together with step 5.1, this proves both directions using cover-nullity only.

step 5.1step 3.2L1L6∎
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Jordan inner and outer content and Jordan measurable bounded sets in Rm

Definition

For bounded E⊆Rm, in the metric sense of Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space, its Jordan outer content is the infimum of ∑r<qvol⁡(Rr) over finite axis-parallel rectangle covers of E. Its Jordan inner content is the supremum of the same sums over finite families of rectangles contained in E whose interiors are pairwise disjoint.

Metric boundedness always supplies a nondegenerate bounding rectangle. For nonempty E, choose x0∈Rm and r>0 with E⊆B(x0,r). Since ∣xj−(x0)j∣≤d∞(x,x0)≤d2(x,x0)<r for every coordinate (Rn as the set of functions n→R, and d1, d2, d∞ are metrics on it, The finite and reverse triangle inequalities for a norm; and for n≥1 every norm N on Rn satisfies N(x)≤C∥x∥1 and is Lipschitz, hence continuous, for d2 clause 3, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space), the nondegenerate box ∏j<m[(x0)j−r,(x0)j+r] contains E. The empty set lies in any fixed nondegenerate rectangle.

Thus the outer family is nonempty and the same bounding rectangle bounds the inner sums; the empty family gives inner sum 0. Refining all listed endpoints into one grid and splitting the nested finite sums shows every inscribed sum is at most every covering sum (Grid partitions of a rectangle in Rm, their cells, refinements and mesh, Laws of finite sums and finite products). Completeness therefore supplies finite real extrema (Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Every nonempty set bounded below has an infimum, Greatest lower bound (infimum), Suprema and infima are unique).

The set is Jordan measurable when the contents agree, and their common value is its Jordan content. The empty set and every degenerate rectangle have content 0.

TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

A bounded set is Jordan measurable iff its indicator is Riemann integrable, and the integral is its Jordan content

Statement

A metric-bounded set E⊆Rm is Jordan measurable if and only if its indicator 1E is Riemann integrable on a fixed nondegenerate bounding rectangle Q. In that case ∫Q1E=cont⁡(E).

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

On a grid cell, the infimum of 1E is 1 exactly when the cell is contained in E, while its supremum is 1 exactly when the cell meets E. Thus lower and upper sums are inscribed and covering grid approximations.

L1L2
2.1

Apply [L3] to each finite outer rectangle approximation to obtain a grid whose cells meeting E have arbitrarily small excess volume. For an inner approximation, shrink each nondegenerate inscribed rectangle by an arbitrarily small volume, insert the shrunken endpoints, and retain the grid cells inside it. Degenerate rectangles contribute zero. Splitting along the aligned endpoints shows that arbitrary Jordan approximations and grid approximations have the same infimum and supremum.

step 1.1L3given
3.1

Equality of Jordan contents is therefore equality of the lower and upper integrals on the fixed bounding rectangle, and their common value is cont⁡(E).

step 2.1L1L2given∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)Open item page →

A bounded set in Rm is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero

Statement

A metric-bounded set E⊆Rm is Jordan measurable if and only if its boundary ∂E is null, equivalently has content zero.

Facts & Assumptions

[L1]

If Q is a nondegenerate rectangle with E‾⊆int⁡Q, then the relative-domain indicator 1E:Q→R is discontinuous exactly at the ambient boundary ∂E. At a boundary point every sufficiently small ambient ball lies in Q and meets both E and its ambient complement, while away from the boundary the indicator is locally constant (Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L3], choose a closed bounding rectangle Q0 for E and enlarge every coordinate interval by a fixed positive margin to obtain a nondegenerate rectangle Q with E‾⊆Q0⊆int⁡Q. By [L1] and [L2], E is Jordan measurable exactly when ∂E is null.

L1L2L3givenchoose
1.2

By [L3], nullity of this compact boundary is equivalent to content zero.

L3given
2.1

Combining the equivalences proves the criterion.

step 1.1step 1.2given∎
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The Riemann integral of a bounded function over a bounded Jordan measurable set

Definition

Let E⊆Rm be bounded in the metric sense of Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space and Jordan measurable, and let f:E→R be bounded. Choose a nondegenerate rectangle Q⊇E, whose existence follows from Jordan inner and outer content and Jordan measurable bounded sets in Rm, and define the zero extension f~Q(x):={f(x),x∈E,0,x∈Q∖E. The function f is Riemann integrable over E when f~Q is integrable over Q, and then ∫Ef:=∫Qf~Q. Independence of the bounding rectangle, for both integrability and value, is proved in The Riemann integral over a Jordan set is independent of the bounding rectangle ↗ and recorded as the definition's forward justification. For f=1, the zero extension is 1E, so A bounded set is Jordan measurable iff its indicator is Riemann integrable, and the integral is its Jordan content gives ∫E1=cont⁡(E).

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The Riemann integral over a Jordan set is independent of the bounding rectangle

Statement

The definition of ∫Ef is independent of the chosen bounding rectangle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Nondegenerate bounding rectangles Q1,Q2 for E.

[L1]

There is a nondegenerate rectangle Q that contains both Q1,Q2 strictly in every coordinate: decrease each of the finitely many lower endpoints and increase each upper endpoint by any fixed positive margin (Axis-parallel rectangles in Rm and their volume).

[L2]

Coordinate-slice additivity, including its converse integrability clause, is part of Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm.

[L3]

A bounded function on a nondegenerate rectangle is integrable when its discontinuity set is null (Lebesgue's criterion in Rm: a bounded function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle is Riemann integrable iff its discontinuity set is null), and the indicator of a Jordan measurable set integrates to its Jordan content (A bounded set is Jordan measurable iff its indicator is Riemann integrable, and the integral is its Jordan content).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Extend the zero extension on Qi further by zero to Q. Cut Q at the lower and upper endpoint of Qi in each coordinate. The strict containment in [L1] and nondegeneracy of Qi make every cut strictly interior. On every added nondegenerate subrectangle the restriction is zero away from the finitely many coordinate faces of Qi; only shared boundary points may retain nonzero values.

L1given
2.1

Every bounded piece of a coordinate hyperplane has content zero: subdivide its bounded (m−1)-dimensional coordinate ranges into cubes of side at most 1/ι(N), and thicken the fixed coordinate by the same amount. The number of cubes grows at most as a fixed multiple of ι(N)m−1, so their total m-volume is at most a fixed multiple of 1/ι(N), which can be made arbitrarily small (Measure zero and content zero in Rm by countable and finite cube covers, For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε). Finite unions preserve this estimate. Thus the exceptional face set H from step 1.1 is Jordan measurable with content zero, and [L3] gives ∫1H=0.

step 1.1L3
3.1

On each added subrectangle the extended function is bounded and is zero off H, so its discontinuities lie in the null set H. It is integrable by [L3]. If ∣f∣≤B, then ∣h∣≤B1H; monotonicity and the absolute-value estimate in [L2] give ∣∫h∣≤∫∣h∣≤B∫1H=0. Hence every added subrectangle has integral 0.

step 1.1step 2.1L2L3
4.1

Repeated coordinate-slice additivity [L2] now says that the extension is integrable on Q exactly when it is integrable on Qi, and its integral equals the Qi-integral because every added integral is 0. Applying this to i=1,2 gives the same integrability decision and value in both rectangles.

step 3.1L2given∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

A continuous real function on a compact Jordan measurable set is Riemann integrable over that set

Statement

Every continuous real function on a compact Jordan measurable set E⊆Rm is Riemann integrable over E.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Compact Jordan measurable E and continuous f:E→R.

[L3]

A bounded function on a rectangle is integrable exactly when its discontinuity set is null (Lebesgue's criterion in Rm: a bounded function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle is Riemann integrable iff its discontinuity set is null).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If E=∅, its zero extension is identically zero and the conclusion is immediate. Otherwise [L1] makes f bounded. Choose a bounding rectangle and form its zero extension as in The Riemann integral of a bounded function over a bounded Jordan measurable set.

L1choose
2.1

The extension is continuous at every point of the interior of E, by continuity of f, and at every point outside the closure of E, because it is locally zero. Its discontinuities are therefore contained in ∂E.

step 1.1given
3.1

The containing boundary is null by [L2], so subset closure and [L3] make the extension integrable. Bounding-rectangle independence is The Riemann integral over a Jordan set is independent of the bounding rectangle.

step 2.1L2L3∎
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Jordan content is finitely additive when the overlap has content zero

Statement

If bounded Jordan measurable sets E,F have E∩F of content zero, then cont⁡(E∪F)=cont⁡(E)+cont⁡(F). In particular Jordan content is additive on disjoint finite families.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: E,F as stated.

[L3]

Content zero means that for every positive ε there is a finite cube cover of total volume below ε (Measure zero and content zero in Rm by countable and finite cube covers); Jordan inner and outer content are the inscribed supremum and covering infimum (Jordan inner and outer content and Jordan measurable bounded sets in Rm).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

Pointwise, 1E∪F=1E+1F−1E∩F. Cube-cover content zero makes the Jordan outer content of E∩F at most every positive ε, hence zero; its nonnegative inner content is no larger, so it too is zero. Thus E∩F is Jordan measurable with content zero, and [L1] gives ∫1E∩F=0.

L1L3given
1.2

The finite-family formula is immediate for a family of length one.

base
1.3

Assume it holds for a disjoint family of length r.

ih
2.1

Integrate and apply [L2] to obtain the two-set formula.

step 1.1L2given
3.1

Apply the two-set formula to the union of that family and the next set. Their intersection is empty, so this adds the next content and proves the formula at length r+1.

step 2.1step 1.3
4.1

Hence Jordan content is additive on every finite disjoint family.

step 1.2step 3.1discharge-induction∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

A Lipschitz map Rm→Rm sends null sets to null sets

Statement

If T:Rm→Rm is Lipschitz and E is null, then T[E] is null.

Proof

technique · cases
1.1

If L=0, T[E] is empty or a singleton, covered by cubes of arbitrarily small side.

assume-case zeroL1given
1.2

Suppose L>0. The image of a side-ℓ cube lies in a cube of side CmLℓ, where Cm is the fixed norm-comparison factor. Its volume is (CmL)mℓm.

assume-case positiveL1L2given
2.1

Given an output budget ε, cover E by cubes with total volume below ε/(CmL)m. Replacing each by its image-containing cube gives a cover of T[E] with total volume below ε.

step 1.2given
3.1

Both cases prove nullity. Equal domain and codomain dimensions are used in the volume scaling.

step 1.1step 2.1cases-exhaustive∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The graph of a continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm has content zero in Rm+1

Statement

Let m≥1, let Q⊆Rm be a closed nondegenerate rectangle, and let f:Q→R be continuous. Its graph has content zero in Rm+1.

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1

Given ε>0, choose a uniform coordinate grid with cell widths at most δ, where uniform continuity makes the oscillation of f on each cell below a vertical amount η. Since Q is nondegenerate, the grid may be chosen so that the number Nδ of cells satisfies Nδδm≤CQ for a constant depending only on Q.

L1L2givenchooseconstruct
2.1

One horizontal cube footprint of side δ covers each domain cell. Above it, stack (m+1)-cubes of side δ across the graph's vertical range. Integer part: for every real x there is exactly one integer m with m≤x<m+1 bounds their number by η/δ+2, so all stacks together have volume at most Nδ(ηδm+2δm+1)≤CQ(η+2δ).

step 1.1L2given
3.1

Summing over the finitely many domain cells gives total covering volume at most a rectangle-dependent constant times η+δ. Choose η and then δ to make this below ε.

step 2.1givenchoose
4.1

This finite cube cover proves content zero in the sense of Measure zero and content zero in Rm by countable and finite cube covers.

step 3.1discharge-construct∎
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

If every finite interval cover of A⊆R has total length at least c, then every rectangle cover of A×[0,d] has total area at least cd

Statement

Let A⊆R. If every finite interval cover of A has total length at least c≥0, then every finite rectangle cover of A×[0,d], d≥0, has total area at least cd.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite rectangle cover and the stated interval-cover lower bound.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If d=0, then every covering area is nonnegative and the required lower bound is cd=0. Hence assume d>0. Clip the rectangles to a common bounding rectangle and partition the nondegenerate interval [0,d] at every vertical endpoint.

L1given
2.1

On each nondegenerate horizontal strip, choose an interior height. The horizontal projections of the rectangles active at that height cover A, so their total widths are at least c.

givenstep 1.1choose
3.1

Multiply the inequality for each strip by its height and sum. Reindexing the nested finite sums counts each covering rectangle by its width times its total active height, at most its area. Thus the covering area is at least c∑strip heights=cd.

step 2.1L2algebra∎
RemarkRemark: AI-generatedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Conventions and proved scope for the Riemann integral in Rm and Jordan content

Remarks

Throughout, m≥1. Rectangles and grids are axis-parallel. The multidimensional Darboux and tagged integrals are defined on nondegenerate rectangles, and integration over a Jordan set chooses a nondegenerate bounding rectangle. Degenerate rectangles still have geometric volume and Jordan content 0, but no competing integral convention is introduced for them. Nullity in Measure zero and content zero in Rm by countable and finite cube covers uses cube covers, while Jordan outer content in Jordan inner and outer content and Jordan measurable bounded sets in Rm uses arbitrary finite rectangle covers. The one-dimensional dictionaries are At m=1, nondegenerate multidimensional rectangles, grid sums and the integral are exactly the published one-dimensional notions and At m=1, cube-nullity and cube-content-zero are exactly the published interval-cover notions.

The historical Lebesgue criterion Lebesgue's criterion in Rm: a bounded function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle is Riemann integrable iff its discontinuity set is null uses only cover-nullity and no Lebesgue measure or integral. The proved image results are the equal-dimensional Lipschitz theorem A Lipschitz map Rm→Rm sends null sets to null sets and the graph theorem The graph of a continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm has content zero in Rm+1. No general continuously differentiable image theorem is asserted.

Jordan measurability is related to null boundaries by A bounded set in Rm is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero. Integration over a Jordan set uses the zero-extension convention of The Riemann integral of a bounded function over a bounded Jordan measurable set; no integration over arbitrary bounded sets is defined here.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources