Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The closure of a nonempty AA is {x:d(x,A)=0}\{x : d(x,A) = 0\}, equals AA together with its limit points, and is the smallest closed superset

Statement

Let (X,d)(X,d) be a metric space (Metric space: d(x,y)=0d(x,y) = 0 iff x=yx = y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric) and let AXA \subseteq X, with closure, derived set and limit points as in Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space. Then:

  1. If AA \ne \emptyset, then A={xX:d(x,A)=0}\overline{A} = \{\, x \in X : d(x,A) = 0 \,\}, where d(x,A)d(x,A) is the distance from a point to a nonempty set (Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space).
  2. A=AA\overline{A} = A \cup A'.
  3. A\overline{A} is closed, contains AA, and is contained in every closed FXF \subseteq X with AFA \subseteq F. So A\overline{A} is the smallest closed superset of AA, and AA is closed if and only if A=AA = \overline{A}.

Claims 2 and 3 hold for every AA, the empty set included: \overline{\emptyset} is empty because no ball meets \emptyset, and \emptyset is closed because XX is open (The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement). Claim 1 carries the hypothesis AA \ne \emptyset because d(x,A)d(x,A) is defined only for nonempty AA (Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A metric space (X,d)(X,d), a subset AXA \subseteq X, a point xXx \in X, and a closed set FXF \subseteq X with AFA \subseteq F; when AA \ne \emptyset, the set E(x):={d(x,a):aA}E(x) := \{\, d(x,a) : a \in A \,\}, whose infimum is d(x,A)d(x,A).

[A1]

Closure and derived set: xAx \in \overline{A} means B(x,r)AB(x,r) \cap A \ne \emptyset for every r>0r > 0; xAx \in A' means B(x,r)(A{x})B(x,r) \cap (A \setminus \{x\}) \ne \emptyset for every r>0r > 0 (Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space).

[A2]

Open and closed: UU is open when every point of UU has a ball around it inside UU; FF is closed when XFX \setminus F is open (The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement).

[L1]

For nonempty AA, the set E(x)E(x) is nonempty and bounded below by 00, so d(x,A)=infE(x)d(x,A) = \inf E(x) exists and is a lower bound of E(x)E(x) (Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space, Nonnegativity of a metric is a consequence of the other axioms, not an axiom, Every nonempty set bounded below has an infimum, Greatest lower bound (infimum)).

[L2]

Epsilon characterisation of the infimum: for a nonempty SRS \subseteq \mathbb{R} bounded below and a lower bound \ell of SS, one has =infS\ell = \inf S if and only if for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is sSs \in S with s<+εs < \ell + \varepsilon (Epsilon characterisation of the infimum).

[L4]

Membership in a ball: aB(x,r)a \in B(x,r) means d(x,a)<rd(x,a) < r, and xB(x,r)x \in B(x,r) always (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space); trichotomy of the order of R\mathbb{R} (Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Ordered field).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose AA \ne \emptyset and xAx \in \overline{A}, and let ε>0\varepsilon > 0 be arbitrary; then B(x,ε)AB(x,\varepsilon) \cap A \ne \emptyset, so there is aAa \in A with d(x,a)<ε=0+εd(x,a) < \varepsilon = 0 + \varepsilon, and 00 is a lower bound of E(x)E(x), so d(x,A)=0d(x,A) = 0 by the epsilon characterisation.

A1L1L2L4
1.2

Conversely suppose AA \ne \emptyset and d(x,A)=0d(x,A) = 0, and let r>0r > 0 be arbitrary; the epsilon characterisation supplies aAa \in A with d(x,a)<0+r=rd(x,a) < 0 + r = r, that is aB(x,r)Aa \in B(x,r) \cap A, so xAx \in \overline{A}.

A1L1L2L4
1.3

AAA \subseteq \overline{A} and AAA' \subseteq \overline{A}: a point aAa \in A lies in B(a,r)AB(a,r) \cap A for every rr, and a ball meeting A{x}A \setminus \{x\} meets AA.

A1L4
1.4

If xAx \in \overline{A} and xAx \notin A, then for every rr the nonempty set B(x,r)AB(x,r) \cap A equals B(x,r)(A{x})B(x,r) \cap (A \setminus \{x\}), since xx is not a member of AA; hence xAx \in A'.

A1
1.5

A\overline{A} is closed: let xXAx \in X \setminus \overline{A} and fix rr with B(x,r)A=B(x,r) \cap A = \emptyset; for yB(x,r)y \in B(x,r) there is ss with B(y,s)B(x,r)B(y,s) \subseteq B(x,r), so B(y,s)A=B(y,s) \cap A = \emptyset and yAy \notin \overline{A}, whence B(x,r)XAB(x,r) \subseteq X \setminus \overline{A} and XAX \setminus \overline{A} is open.

A1A2L3
1.6

AF\overline{A} \subseteq F for every closed FAF \supseteq A: if xAx \in \overline{A} had xFx \notin F, then XFX \setminus F open would give rr with B(x,r)XFXAB(x,r) \subseteq X \setminus F \subseteq X \setminus A, so B(x,r)A=B(x,r) \cap A = \emptyset, contradicting xAx \in \overline{A}.

A1A2given
2.1

Claim 1 follows: by step 1.1 every adherent point of a nonempty AA satisfies d(x,A)=0d(x,A) = 0, and by step 1.2 every xx with d(x,A)=0d(x,A) = 0 is adherent.

step 1.1step 1.2
2.2

Claim 2 follows: AAAA \cup A' \subseteq \overline{A} by step 1.3, and AAA\overline{A} \subseteq A \cup A' by step 1.4, since a point of A\overline{A} either lies in AA or, not lying in AA, lies in AA'.

step 1.3step 1.4
2.3

Claim 3 follows: A\overline{A} is closed by step 1.5, contains AA by step 1.3, and sits inside every closed superset of AA by step 1.6; in particular if AA is closed then AAA\overline{A} \subseteq A \subseteq \overline{A}, so A=AA = \overline{A}, and conversely if A=AA = \overline{A} then AA is closed.

step 1.3step 1.5step 1.6
3.1

Claims 1, 2 and 3 are therefore all established.

step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3

Remarks

  • Claim 1 is where the infimum does the work. Reading it right to left, d(x,A)=0d(x,A) = 0 says that AA has points arbitrarily close to xx without saying that any of them is xx; reading it left to right, adherence says the same thing in the language of balls. The equivalence is exactly the epsilon characterisation of the infimum (Epsilon characterisation of the infimum) with the lower bound 00.
  • The distance function is 11-Lipschitz (d(x,A)d(y,A)d(x,y)|d(x,A) - d(y,A)| \le d(x,y), so the distance to a fixed nonempty set is 11-Lipschitz), so claim 1 exhibits A\overline{A} as the zero set of a function that does not increase distances. That is not used above and is recorded only as orientation.
  • Claim 3 is the form that transfers to general topology, where no metric is available and the closure is defined outright as the intersection of all closed supersets. Claim 1 is the specifically metric statement, and claim 2 sits between them.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 38 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources