Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The closure of a nonempty A is {x:d(x,A)=0}, equals A together with its limit points, and is the smallest closed superset

Statement

Let (X,d) be a metric space (Metric space: d(x,y)=0 iff x=y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric) and let A⊆X, with closure, derived set and limit points as in Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space. Then:

  1. If A≠∅, then A‾={ x∈X:d(x,A)=0 }, where d(x,A) is the distance from a point to a nonempty set (Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space).
  2. A‾=A∪A′.
  3. A‾ is closed, contains A, and is contained in every closed F⊆X with A⊆F. So A‾ is the smallest closed superset of A, and A is closed if and only if A=A‾.

Claims 2 and 3 hold for every A, the empty set included: ∅‾ is empty because no ball meets ∅, and ∅ is closed because X is open (The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement). Claim 1 carries the hypothesis A≠∅ because d(x,A) is defined only for nonempty A (Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A metric space (X,d), a subset A⊆X, a point x∈X, and a closed set F⊆X with A⊆F; when A≠∅, the set E(x):={ d(x,a):a∈A }, whose infimum is d(x,A).

[A1]

Closure and derived set: x∈A‾ means B(x,r)∩A≠∅ for every r>0; x∈A′ means B(x,r)∩(A∖{x})≠∅ for every r>0 (Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space).

[A2]

Open and closed: U is open when every point of U has a ball around it inside U; F is closed when X∖F is open (The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement).

[L2]

Epsilon characterisation of the infimum: for a nonempty S⊆R bounded below and a lower bound ℓ of S, one has ℓ=inf⁡S if and only if for every ε>0 there is s∈S with s<ℓ+ε (Epsilon characterisation of the infimum).

[L4]

Membership in a ball: a∈B(x,r) means d(x,a)<r, and x∈B(x,r) always (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space); trichotomy of the order of R (Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Ordered field).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose A≠∅ and x∈A‾, and let ε>0 be arbitrary; then B(x,ε)∩A≠∅, so there is a∈A with d(x,a)<ε=0+ε, and 0 is a lower bound of E(x), so d(x,A)=0 by the epsilon characterisation.

A1L1L2L4
1.2

Conversely suppose A≠∅ and d(x,A)=0, and let r>0 be arbitrary; the epsilon characterisation supplies a∈A with d(x,a)<0+r=r, that is a∈B(x,r)∩A, so x∈A‾.

A1L1L2L4
1.3

A⊆A‾ and A′⊆A‾: a point a∈A lies in B(a,r)∩A for every r, and a ball meeting A∖{x} meets A.

A1L4
1.4

If x∈A‾ and x∉A, then for every r the nonempty set B(x,r)∩A equals B(x,r)∩(A∖{x}), since x is not a member of A; hence x∈A′.

A1
1.5

A‾ is closed: let x∈X∖A‾ and fix r with B(x,r)∩A=∅; for y∈B(x,r) there is s with B(y,s)⊆B(x,r), so B(y,s)∩A=∅ and y∉A‾, whence B(x,r)⊆X∖A‾ and X∖A‾ is open.

A1A2L3
1.6

A‾⊆F for every closed F⊇A: if x∈A‾ had x∉F, then X∖F open would give r with B(x,r)⊆X∖F⊆X∖A, so B(x,r)∩A=∅, contradicting x∈A‾.

A1A2given
2.1

Claim 1 follows: by step 1.1 every adherent point of a nonempty A satisfies d(x,A)=0, and by step 1.2 every x with d(x,A)=0 is adherent.

step 1.1step 1.2
2.2

Claim 2 follows: A∪A′⊆A‾ by step 1.3, and A‾⊆A∪A′ by step 1.4, since a point of A‾ either lies in A or, not lying in A, lies in A′.

step 1.3step 1.4
2.3

Claim 3 follows: A‾ is closed by step 1.5, contains A by step 1.3, and sits inside every closed superset of A by step 1.6; in particular if A is closed then A‾⊆A⊆A‾, so A=A‾, and conversely if A=A‾ then A is closed.

step 1.3step 1.5step 1.6
3.1

Claims 1, 2 and 3 are therefore all established.

step 2.1step 2.2step 2.3∎

Remarks

  • Claim 1 is where the infimum does the work. Reading it right to left, d(x,A)=0 says that A has points arbitrarily close to x without saying that any of them is x; reading it left to right, adherence says the same thing in the language of balls. The equivalence is exactly the epsilon characterisation of the infimum (Epsilon characterisation of the infimum) with the lower bound 0.
  • The distance function is 1-Lipschitz (∣d(x,A)−d(y,A)∣≤d(x,y), so the distance to a fixed nonempty set is 1-Lipschitz), so claim 1 exhibits A‾ as the zero set of a function that does not increase distances. That is not used above and is recorded only as orientation.
  • Claim 3 is the form that transfers to general topology, where no metric is available and the closure is defined outright as the intersection of all closed supersets. Claim 1 is the specifically metric statement, and claim 2 sits between them.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources