How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space
Definition
Let be a metric space (Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric), let and let with (Order on the reals). Define
is the open ball, the closed ball and the sphere of centre and radius . The radius is always a strictly positive real; a ball of radius or of negative radius is never written in this library.
Immediate consequences of the definitions. For every and :
- , because (axiom (M1) of Metric space: iff , symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric); in particular open and closed balls are nonempty.
- and , and is the disjoint union of and , by trichotomy of the order of (Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Ordered field): each satisfies exactly one of , , .
- If then and , by transitivity of the order.
- Nonnegativity of the metric (Nonnegativity of a metric is a consequence of the other axioms, not an axiom) is what forces the radius convention, and it forces it for the open ball only: if then is empty, because for every . The other two sets behave differently at , and the convention excludes them for uniformity rather than for emptiness: , since together with gives and hence by (M1). For all three sets are empty.
A sphere may be empty, and so the three sets are not on a par. For the open and closed balls always contain , but nothing in the definition produces a point at distance exactly from . If a metric takes only the values and , as the discrete metric on the companion page does, then while is the whole space. So nonemptiness of a sphere is never available by convention: where it is used, it is proved.
The ambient space is part of the notation. depends on and not on and alone. When more than one space or more than one metric is in play we write , or , and likewise for and . This matters as soon as subspaces appear (Isometry, isometric embedding, and the subspace metric on a subset): a ball of a subspace is the trace on it of a ball of the ambient space, and the two are different sets.
Remarks
- The names "open ball" and "closed ball" are justified, not merely suggestive. That is an open set and a closed set in the metric topology is proved in Arbitrary unions and finite intersections of open sets are open, open balls are open and closed balls are closed; the words are used here only as names for the three sets displayed above.
- The closed ball is not in general the closure of the open ball, and the sphere is not in general the boundary of either. Both failures are recorded on this page as FALSE: in every metric space the closure of is the closed ball of radius and witnessed on the companion page. The safe reading of the three names is the displayed one and nothing more.
Depends on
Used by
- A Lebesgue measurable subgroup of (ℝⁿ,+) of positive measure is all of ℝⁿ Corollary
- A uniformly continuous real function on a subset D ⊆ ℝ extends uniquely to a uniformly continuous function on the closure of D Corollary
- Every connected component of an open subset of ℝⁿ is open and polygonally connected Corollary
- For n ≥ 1 every bounded sequence in ℝⁿ has a convergent subsequence Corollary
- Positive open-set and metric-ball volume Corollary
- ℝⁿ is polygonally connected, connected, locally path-connected and locally connected Corollary
- Spectrum of a compact operator is countable with only zero as possible accumulation Corollary
- The connected subspaces of ℝ with its usual topology are exactly the order-convex subsets, the published characterisation transported by the identification of the two descriptions of "open in ℝ" Corollary
- The index of a cycle is locally constant off its trace and vanishes far from it Corollary
- The modulus of a holomorphic function on a closed polydisc is bounded by its supremum on the distinguished boundary Corollary
- The principal logarithm is the normalised holomorphic branch on the slit plane Corollary
- A compact operator can have nondense range Counterexample
- A connected plane domain that is not homologically simply connected Counterexample
- A curl-free C¹ field on the complement of a line that is not conservative Counterexample
- A nonvanishing holomorphic function on a domain with no holomorphic logarithm Counterexample
- Compactness is not preserved by strong operator limits Counterexample
- Identity is compact iff the space is finite dimensional Counterexample
- In {0} ∪ [1,2] with the metric of ℝ, the closure of B(0,1) = {0} is {0} while the closed ball is {0,1} Counterexample
- In ℝ the interiors of ℚ and of its complement are both empty while the interior of their union is everything Counterexample
- In the bounded real-valued functions on ℕ with the supremum metric, the closed unit ball is closed and bounded and is not compact: the indicator functions of the singletons are pairwise at distance 1 Counterexample
- In the discrete metric the boundary of B(p,1) is empty while the sphere of radius 1 is everything but p Counterexample
- ℕ with the discrete metric is bounded and is not totally bounded Counterexample
- On (0,∞) the metrics |x-y| and |1/x - 1/y| have the same topology and are not uniformly equivalent Counterexample
- On (0,∞) the metrics |x-y| and |1/x - 1/y| share their topology and not their Cauchy sequences Counterexample
- On ℕ with d(m,n) = 1 + 1/(m+n) for m ≠ n the sets {n, n+1, …} are nested, closed, bounded and complete with empty intersection Counterexample
- On the positive integers the metrics |m-n| and |1/m - 1/n| both induce the discrete topology, and only the first is complete Counterexample
- ℝ covered by its closed singletons: every restriction of the indicator of {0} is continuous and the map is not, so the closed pasting lemma needs finiteness Counterexample
- Refuted: a pointwise bounded family of continuous functions is equicontinuous. The spikes are bounded by 1 everywhere and are not equicontinuous at 0 Counterexample
- Refuted: C(X,Y) is closed in the topology of pointwise convergence. The ramps on [0,1] converge pointwise to a discontinuous limit Counterexample
- Refuted: convergence uniformly on every compact subset of ℝ implies uniform convergence. The maps x ↦ x/(n+1) separate the two Counterexample
- The identity from the cocountable topology on ℝ to the usual topology is sequentially continuous and not continuous Counterexample
- The identity from the discrete topology on ℝ to the usual topology is a continuous bijection that is not a homeomorphism Counterexample
- The indiscrete topology on a two-point set is induced by no metric Counterexample
- The open interval (0,1) is totally bounded and not compact, the cover by the intervals (1/(k+2), 1) having no finite subcover Counterexample
- The open unit ball in ℝⁿ is bounded and not compact Counterexample
- Two copies of ℝ glued along ℝ ∖ {0} give a non-Hausdorff quotient of a metrizable space, by an open quotient map Counterexample
- ℤ and {n + 1/n : n ≥ 2} are disjoint closed subsets of ℝ at distance 0, so the set-to-set distance is not a metric Counterexample
- A family shrinking nicely to a point Definition
- A locally integrable function on ℝⁿ Definition
- Balls, polydiscs and the distinguished boundary in ℂᵐ Definition
…and 173 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ball (mathematics) (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Metric space (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- R. Gardner, Introduction to Topology, notes on Munkres Section 20: The Metric Topology (East Tennessee State University) (standard reference, not scraped)