How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A curl-free field on the complement of a line that is not conservative
Statement refuted
Every curl-free vector field on a connected open subset of is conservative.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: On let
For a field on an open subset of , closedness is equivalent to vanishing curl (A field on an open subset of is closed exactly when its curl vanishes).
The curl is (Divergence and curl of a vector field).
On a star-shaped open subset of , a curl-free field is conservative (A field with vanishing curl on a star-shaped open subset of is conservative).
A field is conservative when it has a potential (Piecewise-C1 path-connected domains, potential functions, conservative fields, and path independence).
Conservative fields have zero circulation around every closed piecewise- path in the domain (Conservative fields are path-independent and have zero integral around every closed path).
Vector line integrals are computed from (Scalar line integrals with respect to arc length and vector-field line integrals).
Sums, products, and nonvanishing quotients differentiate by the usual rules (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
If , is differentiable on , and is integrable there, then (The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then ).
A star-shaped open set contains every segment from a chosen centre to every point of the set (Star-shaped open subsets of Euclidean space).
The Jacobian matrix records the coordinate partial derivatives (The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case).
Every path-connected space is connected (Every path-connected space is connected, and every path component lies inside a component).
A subset of a metric space is open when each of its points contains an open metric ball lying in the subset; on the Euclidean metric is the square root of the sum of the three squared coordinate differences (The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space, as the set of functions , and , , are metrics on it).
Every nonzero point of the plane has a representation with (Every nonzero complex number has a unique polar form with and ).
Counterexample
The field is on , because the denominator never vanishes there and the coordinate functions are rational in and .
The first two curl coordinates vanish because and the first two components do not depend on , while the third is by the quotient rule and cancellation. Therefore on .
On the unit circle , , one has by [L5] and [L6], so by [F3], [F6], and [L7].
By [L1], the field is closed on .
If were conservative, [L3] and [F2] would force the closed-loop integral in step 2.2 to be , a contradiction. Hence is not conservative.
The domain is open, connected, and not star-shaped. To see openness, fix and put . Every point of the deleted axis differs from by at least in one of its first two coordinates, so the Euclidean ball misses that axis and lies in . To see connectedness, use [L9] to write with . The circular arc joins to , the radial segment joins that point to , and the vertical segment joins it to ; all three pieces are piecewise and stay in . Thus is path-connected and hence connected by [L8]. Finally, for any proposed star centre, the segment to its reflection across the deleted axis meets that axis, so is not star-shaped. This is exactly the hypothesis of [L2] that fails.
Remarks
- Restricting to the plane recovers the published planar vortex example. The three-dimensional version shows that the same obstruction survives on the complement of a line.
Depends on
- A $C^1$ field on an open subset of $\mathbb R^3$ is closed exactly when its curl vanishes
- Divergence and curl of a $C^1$ vector field
- A $C^1$ field with vanishing curl on a star-shaped open subset of $\mathbb R^3$ is conservative
- Piecewise-C1 path-connected domains, potential functions, conservative fields, and path independence
- Conservative fields are path-independent and have zero integral around every closed path
- Scalar line integrals with respect to arc length and vector-field line integrals
- Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: $(f+g)'(c) = f'(c) + g'(c)$, $(\alpha f)'(c) = \alpha f'(c)$, $(fg)'(c) = f'(c)g(c) + f(c)g'(c)$, and $(f/g)'(c) = \bigl(f'(c)g(c) - f(c)g'(c)\bigr)/g(c)^{2}$ when $g(c) \ne 0$
- The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine
- Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine
- The second fundamental theorem: if $G$ is differentiable on $[a,b]$ with $G' = f$ and $f$ is integrable, then $\int_a^b f = G(b)-G(a)$
- Star-shaped open subsets of Euclidean space
- The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case
- The Euclidean inner product $\langle x,y\rangle = \sum_{k<n} x_k y_k$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Every path-connected space is connected, and every path component lies inside a component
- Every nonzero complex number has a unique polar form $r(\cos\theta+i\sin\theta)$ with $r>0$ and $-\pi<\theta\le\pi$
- The metric topology: a set is open when every one of its points has a ball around it inside the set; closed means open complement
- Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space
- $\mathbb{R}^n$ as the set of functions $n \to \mathbb{R}$, and $d_1$, $d_2$, $d_\infty$ are metrics on it
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
84 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis II, Example 9.3.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J.-B. Campesato, Poincare Lemma, section 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Feldman, A. Rechnitzer and E. Yeager, CLP-4 Vector Calculus, section 4.4 (standard reference, not scraped)