How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A field on an open subset of is closed exactly when its curl vanishes
Statement
Let be open and let be . Then a field on an open subset of is closed if and only if its curl vanishes identically: is closed in the sense of Exact and closed C1 vector fields exactly when for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The open set and the field of the Statement, with the three coordinates named as on this page.
The curl of a field on an open is (Divergence and curl of a vector field).
A field on an open , with coordinates and partial derivatives indexed from , is closed when for all (Exact and closed C1 vector fields).
For one writes for (The Euclidean inner product on ).
Proof
By [F3] the coordinates of a point of are indexed , and the names used on this page are those three indices in that order; so the closedness condition of [F2] at is the system of equations ranging over all pairs drawn from .
In that system the equations with read and hold for every field, and the equation indexed is the same equation as the one indexed . Hence the system is equivalent to its three equations indexed by the unordered pairs , and .
Written out, those three equations are , and . Their left-minus-right differences , and are, by [F1], exactly the first, second and third coordinates of .
For the forward direction, suppose is closed. By steps 1.1 and 1.2 the three equations of step 2.1 hold at every , so by [F1] each of the three coordinates of is zero; hence vanishes identically on .
For the converse direction, suppose for every . By [F1] each of the three differences of step 2.1 is zero at every , so the three equations of step 2.1 hold on ; by steps 1.1 and 1.2 these are equivalent to the full system of [F2], so is closed.
Steps 3.1 and 3.2 are the two implications, so is closed if and only if its curl vanishes identically.
Remarks
- Why the count of equations matters. Closedness in is a condition on all ordered pairs of indices, and the curl in has three coordinates. Step 1.2 is what shows that these are the same amount of information: the diagonal equations are automatic and each off-diagonal equation is listed twice. In with the number of independent equations is , so there is no vector of that many coordinates in the same space to collect them into, and closedness is then stated only as the system itself.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Feldman, A. Rechnitzer and E. Yeager, CLP-4 Vector Calculus (University of British Columbia), section 4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)