Topology
Topology here is developed twice over, once with a distance and once without. Metric spaces come first: open sets, closure, convergence, continuity, completeness and the completion of a space, uniform continuity, and compactness in its equivalent metric forms, by covers, by sequences and by total boundedness. Dropping the distance and keeping the open sets gives the topological space, where continuity is a condition on preimages and subspaces, products, disjoint unions and quotients are initial or final topologies. Connectedness and compactness follow in that generality. Nets and filters repair what sequences no longer detect, the separation axioms grade how far apart a topology can hold points and closed sets, and Urysohn's lemma and Tietze's extension theorem produce the functions a normal space is supposed to have. Paracompactness and partitions of unity, the Tychonoff embedding, the Stone-Cech compactification, uniform spaces, the countability axioms and the metrization theorems follow. Function space topologies, Ascoli-Arzela and Stone-Weierstrass carry it into spaces of maps, and homotopy, the fundamental group and covering spaces open the algebraic side.
Much of the mathematics still to be built rests on it. Measure theory takes compactness, the Euclidean topology, Urysohn and Tietze, partitions of unity and the countability axioms. Functional analysis takes compactness, nets and filters and the function space topologies. Probability takes metric completeness and the Polish spaces. Algebraic topology begins at homotopy and the fundamental group. Differential geometry takes the product and quotient topologies and paracompactness. Commutative algebra puts the Zariski topology on a prime spectrum only after continuity and compactness exist.
Pathway
The parts run in order. Everything a page needs from this group has been read by the time you reach it, and the level on each row is how many dependency steps into the group that page sits.
Part 1 · Metric spaces
3 pagesA first course in analysis uses the distance between two points without naming it, and three axioms are all it needs. Open sets, closure, convergence and continuity are defined from the metric here, then completeness gives the Cauchy criterion and the completion of a space, and uniform continuity separates a property of a function from a property at a point. Compactness in this setting has the three equivalent forms, by covers, by sequences and by total boundedness with completeness.
- Metric Spaces28 results
This page opens the topology track. It takes the one structure that a first course in analysis uses without naming, the distance between two points, isolates it into three…
9 definitions, 10 lemmas, 6 theorems, 2 false statements, 1 remarkExamples & counterexamples → Metric spaces, metric convergence, and subsequential limits supply the ambient language.
5 definitions, 4 lemmas, 9 theorems, 1 corollary, 4 false statements, 1 remarkExamples & counterexamples →- Compactness in Metric Spaces25 results
Compactness in metric spaces turns arbitrary open covers into finite data and supports the finite-intersection method.
3 definitions, 5 lemmas, 13 theorems, 3 false statements, 1 remarkExamples & counterexamples →
Part 2 · Topological spaces
4 pages · after Part 1Dropping the distance and keeping the open sets is what makes a topology, and continuity becomes preimages of open sets rather than an epsilon and a delta. Subspaces, products, disjoint unions and quotients are all initial or final topologies, so their characteristic properties turn continuity into a componentwise test. Connectedness and compactness are then stated for an arbitrary space, and the theorems they buy are the ones the metric versions had.
- Topological Spaces and Continuity26 results
Metric spaces provide the motivating examples: metric balls generate a topology, and the established metric notions of closure, convergence, and continuity supply comparison results.
12 definitions, 4 lemmas, 5 theorems, 4 false statements, 1 remarkExamples & counterexamples → - Subspaces, Products, and Quotients24 results
Subspaces, products, disjoint unions and quotients are organised through initial and final topologies.
7 definitions, 2 lemmas, 8 theorems, 1 corollary, 5 false statements, 1 remarkExamples & counterexamples → - Connectedness28 results
A space is connected when it cannot be split into two nonempty open pieces.
6 definitions, 2 lemmas, 12 theorems, 2 corollaries, 5 false statements, 1 remarkExamples & counterexamples → - Compactness31 results
Compactness is the hypothesis under which an infinite covering argument collapses to a finite one.
5 definitions, 4 lemmas, 15 theorems, 1 corollary, 5 false statements, 1 remarkExamples & counterexamples →
Part 3 · Convergence and separation
5 pages · after Part 2Sequences do not detect closure outside metric spaces, and nets and filters are the two repairs; ultrafilter convergence gives compactness a form with no covers in it. The separation axioms grade how far apart a topology can hold points and closed sets, from T0 to normality, with the Hausdorff condition equivalent to a closed diagonal. Urysohn's lemma produces the functions a normal space is supposed to have, Tietze extends them, and the last page asks which of these properties survive subspaces and products.
- Convergence: Nets and Filters28 results
Open-cover compactness is equivalent to the closed finite-intersection condition, while filters and ultrafilters record upward-closed families of subsets.
9 definitions, 7 lemmas, 9 theorems, 1 corollary, 1 false statement, 1 remarkExamples & counterexamples → - Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy28 results
Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison assumes no separation at all: distinct points need not…
10 definitions, 5 lemmas, 8 theorems, 4 false statements, 1 remarkExamples & counterexamples → - Hausdorff via the Diagonal13 results
The Hausdorff condition (Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is…
1 definition, 4 lemmas, 3 theorems, 2 corollaries, 2 false statements, 1 remarkExamples & counterexamples → This page studies which separation properties survive subspaces and products.
1 definition, 13 lemmas, 5 theorems, 3 corollaries, 1 false statement, 1 remarkExamples & counterexamples →Urysohn's lemma separates two disjoint closed sets of a normal space by a continuous real-valued function; Tietze's extension theorem extends a continuous function on a closed subspace of a normal space to the whole space.
1 definition, 2 lemmas, 4 theorems, 3 corollaries, 2 false statements, 1 remarkExamples & counterexamples →
Part 4 · Paracompactness, uniformities and compactification
4 pages · after Part 3A locally finite refinement is what replaces a finite subcover when compactness is absent, and a partition of unity is what makes it usable for building functions. The Tychonoff embedding puts a completely regular space inside a cube of intervals, and the Stone-Cech compactification is the universal way to compactify it. A uniformity carries the comparison of pairs of points that a metric had and a topology does not, which is what completeness needs to be stated without numbers.
- Uniform Spaces: the Three Definitions54 results
Filter convergence and ultrafilter compactness from nets-and-filters describe convergence without numerical distance, and the diagonal characterization from hausdorff-via-the-diagonal supplies the separation condition used here.
16 definitions, 21 lemmas, 13 theorems, 4 corollariesExamples & counterexamples → - Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness25 results
Open covers, compactness, and the separation axioms provide the setting for refinements and local finiteness.
3 definitions, 10 lemmas, 2 propositions, 4 theorems, 2 corollaries, 3 false statements, 1 remarkExamples & counterexamples → Complete regularity supplies continuous [0,1]-valued functions that distinguish a point from a disjoint closed set.
4 definitions, 3 lemmas, 2 theorems, 3 corollariesExamples & counterexamples →A uniformity controls comparisons of pairs of points rather than just neighbourhoods of single points.
2 definitions, 5 lemmas, 2 theorems, 3 corollariesExamples & counterexamples →
Part 5 · Countability and metrization
4 pages · after Parts 2, 3 and 4The Euclidean topology is where the product, the metric and every finite-dimensional norm agree, and it is the reference case for everything here. Countability axioms bound a space by how many open sets it takes to describe it, and the metrization theorems say when those bounds are enough to recover a metric: Urysohn for the second countable regular case, Nagata-Smirnov and Bing in general, Smirnov for the locally metrizable one. Complete metrizability and Cech-completeness carry Baire category to spaces with no metric attached.
The development uses bases, dense subsets, neighbourhood bases, open covers, product and subspace topologies, ordinal spaces, and cardinal arithmetic from its declared prerequisites.
5 definitions, 8 lemmas, 4 propositions, 9 theorems, 1 corollary, 7 false statements, 1 remarkExamples & counterexamples →- The Topology of Euclidean Space23 results
The product topology, the Euclidean metric topology, and the topologies from finite-dimensional norms agree on ℝⁿ.
3 definitions, 7 lemmas, 5 theorems, 6 corollaries, 1 false statement, 1 remarkExamples & counterexamples → Complete metrizability is the topological form of completeness supplied by Complete metrizability: admitting a topologically equivalent complete metric is preserved by…
5 definitions, 6 lemmas, 5 propositions, 18 theorems, 6 corollariesExamples & counterexamples →Metrizability is controlled here by families of open sets: locally finite and discrete decompositions of a basis, and normal sequences whose stars shrink around points.
3 definitions, 4 lemmas, 3 theorems, 1 corollary, 2 remarksExamples & counterexamples →
Part 6 · Function spaces
3 pages · after Parts 2 and 4A set of functions carries no single topology, so this part puts four on the continuous maps between two spaces and says what each one measures, with the exponential law relating the compact-open topology to continuity of a map of two variables. Ascoli-Arzela describes the compact families through equicontinuity, and Stone-Weierstrass says when a family that separates points is uniformly dense.
A set of functions is a set, and there is no one topology on it.
7 definitions, 5 lemmas, 8 theorems, 3 false statements, 1 remarkExamples & counterexamples →- Stone–Weierstrass in General18 results
Stone–Weierstrass turns the ability of a family of continuous functions to distinguish points into uniform approximation.
5 definitions, 5 lemmas, 1 proposition, 5 theorems, 2 corollariesExamples & counterexamples → - The Ascoli–Arzelà Theorem24 results
The published function-space material supplies the two topologies compared throughout: The topology of pointwise convergence on Y^X, which is the product topology, and its…
2 definitions, 2 lemmas, 4 propositions, 5 theorems, 6 corollaries, 4 examples, 1 counterexampleExamples & counterexamples →
Part 7 · Homotopy and covering spaces
7 pages · after Parts 4 and 5Homotopy deforms maps; based loops form the fundamental group. Covering maps lift paths and homotopies uniquely; universal-cover quotients classify connected coverings by conjugacy classes of subgroups, normal ones the regular coverings and normalizer quotients their deck groups; for the circle the cover is the line and the subgroups are those of . Seifert-van Kampen makes an open union's group a pushout, giving simply connected higher spheres, free groups for wedges of circles, the product formula and for the torus. Functoriality makes these obstructions: the circle is no retract of the disk, giving Brouwer's theorem and the fundamental theorem of algebra; Borsuk-Ulam constrains sphere-to-plane maps; topological-group loops commute; punctured spaces separate the plane from other .
- Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence22 results
The unit interval with its usual subspace topology supplies the deformation parameter.
4 definitions, 3 lemmas, 5 theorems, 8 corollaries, 2 false statementsExamples & counterexamples → - The Fundamental Group6 results
Paths, endpoint-fixed homotopies, finite closed pasting and product continuity supply the topological input.
3 definitions, 3 theoremsExamples & counterexamples → - Covering Spaces and Lifting32 results
Covering spaces combine the local topology of homeomorphic sheets with the global path and homotopy invariants supplied by Based loops and the fundamental group.
10 definitions, 1 lemma, 7 propositions, 12 theorems, 2 corollariesExamples & counterexamples → - The Fundamental Group of the Circle21 results
The quotient topology turns integer translation classes in ℝ into a circle.
3 definitions, 3 lemmas, 4 propositions, 6 theorems, 4 corollaries, 1 remarkExamples & counterexamples → - Classification of Covering Spaces16 results
Covering-space lifting supplies unique path and map lifts, injective induced maps, and the subgroup criterion (Existence and uniqueness of path lifts through a covering map…
2 definitions, 4 lemmas, 2 propositions, 3 theorems, 5 corollariesExamples & counterexamples → - The Seifert–van Kampen Theorem15 results
Based loops and induced homomorphisms turn continuous maps into group maps (Based loops and the fundamental group, The homomorphism on fundamental groups induced by a pointed continuous map).
2 definitions, 5 lemmas, 4 theorems, 4 corollariesExamples & counterexamples → - Applications of the Fundamental Group17 results
Functoriality of induced fundamental-group maps, the calculation π 1(S¹)≅ℤ, and simple connectedness of higher-dimensional spheres turn geometric constructions into algebraic obstructions.
5 lemmas, 3 propositions, 6 theorems, 2 corollaries, 1 remarkExamples & counterexamples →