Hausdorff via the Diagonal
About this page
How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
✓ 11 results · all verified · 11 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full by a delegated reviewing agent on the owner's instruction; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 11 also cleared it.
1 · Prerequisites
Real Analysis
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Countability and Uncountability
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Limits of Real Functions
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Suprema and Infima
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- Topology of ℝ
Set Theory
2 · Logical flowchart
3 · Items
Definition
The diagonal Δ_X ⊆ X × X, the diagonal map δ_X, and the pairing ⟨ f, g ⟩ of two maps
Lemma
δ_X is a topological embedding of X onto Δ_X, and ⟨ f, g ⟩ is continuous whenever f and g are
Theorem
A space is Hausdorff if and only if its diagonal is closed in the square carrying the product topology
Corollary
For continuous f, g : Z → Y with Y Hausdorff the agreement set { z ∈ Z : f(z) = g(z) } is closed in Z
Corollary
Two continuous maps into a Hausdorff space that agree on a dense subset are equal
Lemma
In a Hausdorff space a sequence converges to at most one point
Theorem
A compact Hausdorff space is regular and normal, hence T₃ and T₄
Lemma
The graph of a continuous map into a Hausdorff space is closed in the product
Theorem
A map into a compact space whose graph is closed is continuous; so for a compact Hausdorff codomain, continuity and closedness of the graph are equivalent
Lemma
In a locally compact Hausdorff space every open set containing a point contains an open set containing it whose closure is compact and still inside; such a space is regular
Remark
Why the criterion is about the product topology, and the choice cost of the compact separation lemmas
False statement
FALSE: every function between topological spaces whose graph is closed in the product is continuous
False statement
FALSE: two continuous maps that agree on a dense subset of their common domain are equal, with no hypothesis on the codomain
Sources
- Product topology (Wikipedia)
- Hausdorff space (Wikipedia)
- Diagonal embedding (PlanetMath)
- Stacks Project, Topology, Lemma 5.3 (Tag 08ZD)
- Embedding (Wikipedia)
- Continuous function (Wikipedia)
- General Topology Notes (UC Riverside)
- Dense set (Wikipedia)
- Limit of a sequence (Wikipedia)
- Topological Spaces lecture notes (University of Cambridge)
- Normal space (Wikipedia)
- Compact space (Wikipedia)
- Separation axiom (Wikipedia)
- A. Hatcher, Topology Notes
- Closed graph theorem (Wikipedia)
- Introduction to Functional Analysis (MIT 18.102)
- Locally compact space (Wikipedia)
- Regular space (Wikipedia)
- B. McKay, Topology Lecture Notes
- Axiom of choice (Wikipedia)
- Analysis 3103, Handout 7 (UCL)
- Trivial topology (Wikipedia)
- Cocountable topology (Wikipedia)