Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)verified 2026-07-29 (claude-fable-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

δX\delta_X is a topological embedding of XX onto ΔX\Delta_X, and f,g\langle f, g \rangle is continuous whenever ff and gg are

Statement

Let XX, YY and ZZ be topological spaces, with X×YX \times Y and X×XX \times X carrying the product topology and ΔX\Delta_X the subspace topology (The diagonal ΔXX×X\Delta_X \subseteq X \times X, the diagonal map δX\delta_X, and the pairing f,g\langle f, g \rangle of two maps, The product set iIXi\prod_{i \in I} X_i of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space, Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace). Then:

  1. The pairing is continuous exactly when both components are. For functions f:ZXf : Z \to X and g:ZYg : Z \to Y, the pairing f,g\langle f, g \rangle is continuous if and only if ff and gg are continuous (Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally).
  2. The diagonal map is an embedding. δX:XX×X\delta_X : X \to X \times X is injective and continuous, its image is ΔX\Delta_X, and the corestriction δX0:XΔX\delta_X^{0} : X \to \Delta_X, δX0(x)=(x,x)\delta_X^{0}(x) = (x,x), is a homeomorphism. So δX\delta_X is an embedding (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological) and XΔXX \cong \Delta_X.
  3. The inverse of δX0\delta_X^{0} is the restriction of the projection π0\pi_0 to ΔX\Delta_X, and this restriction agrees with the restriction of π1\pi_1.

Claim 2 is what licenses reading a property of ΔX\Delta_X as a property of XX: being a topological property is exactly invariance under homeomorphism (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Topological spaces XX, YY, ZZ; the products X×YX \times Y and X×XX \times X with the product topology; functions f:ZXf : Z \to X and g:ZYg : Z \to Y; the diagonal ΔX\Delta_X with the subspace topology; and the maps δX\delta_X, f,g\langle f, g \rangle of The diagonal ΔXX×X\Delta_X \subseteq X \times X, the diagonal map δX\delta_X, and the pairing f,g\langle f, g \rangle of two maps.

[A1]

δX(x)=(x,x)\delta_X(x) = (x,x) and f,g(z)=(f(z),g(z))\langle f, g \rangle(z) = (f(z), g(z)); ΔX={zX×X:z0=z1}\Delta_X = \{\, z \in X \times X : z_0 = z_1 \,\}; and π0δX=π1δX=idX\pi_0 \circ \delta_X = \pi_1 \circ \delta_X = \mathrm{id}_X, π0f,g=f\pi_0 \circ \langle f, g \rangle = f, π1f,g=g\pi_1 \circ \langle f, g \rangle = g (The diagonal ΔXX×X\Delta_X \subseteq X \times X, the diagonal map δX\delta_X, and the pairing f,g\langle f, g \rangle of two maps).

[L1]

A map hh into a product is continuous if and only if every component πih\pi_i \circ h is continuous, and every projection is continuous (A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice, claims 1 and 2).

[L2]

The identity map of a space is continuous, since the preimage of an open set under it is that open set (Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally).

[L3]

For SWS \subseteq W with the subspace topology, a function g0:ZSg_0 : Z \to S is continuous if and only if ιg0:ZW\iota \circ g_0 : Z \to W is continuous, ι\iota being the inclusion; and the restriction of a continuous map WYW \to Y to SS is continuous (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace).

[L4]

A continuous bijection whose inverse is continuous is a homeomorphism, and a map that is injective and restricts to a homeomorphism onto its image with the subspace topology is an embedding (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose ff and gg are continuous; then the components π0f,g=f\pi_0 \circ \langle f, g \rangle = f and π1f,g=g\pi_1 \circ \langle f, g \rangle = g of f,g\langle f, g \rangle are continuous, so f,g\langle f, g \rangle is continuous.

A1L1
1.2

Suppose f,g\langle f, g \rangle is continuous; then its components ff and gg are continuous.

A1L1
1.3

δX\delta_X is continuous, its two components both being idX\mathrm{id}_X, which is continuous.

A1L1L2
1.4

δX\delta_X is injective: if δX(x)=δX(x)\delta_X(x) = \delta_X(x') then reading the coordinate at 00 gives x=xx = x'.

A1
1.5

The image of δX\delta_X is ΔX\Delta_X: each (x,x)(x,x) lies in ΔX\Delta_X, and each zΔXz \in \Delta_X satisfies z=(z0,z0)=δX(z0)z = (z_0, z_0) = \delta_X(z_0).

A1
1.6

The restriction p:=π0ΔX:ΔXXp := \pi_0|_{\Delta_X} : \Delta_X \to X is continuous, being the restriction of the continuous π0\pi_0 to a subspace; and π0ΔX=π1ΔX\pi_0|_{\Delta_X} = \pi_1|_{\Delta_X}, since z0=z1z_0 = z_1 for zΔXz \in \Delta_X.

A1L1L3
2.1

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 together are claim 1.

step 1.1step 1.2
2.2

The corestriction δX0:XΔX\delta_X^{0} : X \to \Delta_X is continuous, since composing it with the inclusion ΔXX×X\Delta_X \to X \times X gives δX\delta_X, which is continuous by step 1.3.

step 1.3L3
2.3

δX0\delta_X^{0} and pp are mutually inverse: p(δX0(x))=π0(x,x)=xp(\delta_X^{0}(x)) = \pi_0(x,x) = x for xXx \in X, and δX0(p(z))=(z0,z0)=(z0,z1)=z\delta_X^{0}(p(z)) = (z_0, z_0) = (z_0, z_1) = z for zΔXz \in \Delta_X, the middle equality holding because z0=z1z_0 = z_1.

step 1.5step 1.6A1
3.1

By steps 2.2, 2.3 and 1.6 the map δX0\delta_X^{0} is a continuous bijection with continuous inverse pp, hence a homeomorphism, and its inverse is π0ΔX=π1ΔX\pi_0|_{\Delta_X} = \pi_1|_{\Delta_X}; this is claim 3 and, with steps 1.4 and 1.5, claim 2.

step 1.4step 1.5step 1.6step 2.2step 2.3L4
4.1

Claims 1, 2 and 3 are steps 2.1, 3.1 and 3.1 respectively, so the lemma is proved.

step 2.1step 3.1

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 36 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources