Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)judge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace

Definition

Let (X,T)(X, \mathcal{T}) be a topological space (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison) and let SXS \subseteq X. The subspace topology (also relative topology) on SS is

TS:={US:UT},\mathcal{T}_S := \{\, U \cap S : U \in \mathcal{T} \,\},

the family of traces on SS of the open sets of XX. The pair (S,TS)(S, \mathcal{T}_S) is a subspace of XX. A subset of SS that lies in TS\mathcal{T}_S is said to be open in SS, and relatively open where the ambient space needs emphasis.

TS\mathcal{T}_S is a topology, and this is discharged here. (T1): =S\varnothing = \varnothing \cap S and S=XSS = X \cap S are traces. (T2): if STS\mathcal{S}' \subseteq \mathcal{T}_S, choose for each member a set of T\mathcal{T} tracing to it — no choice principle is needed, since U:={UT:USW}U' := \bigcup \{\, U \in \mathcal{T} : U \cap S \subseteq W \,\} is a canonical such set for WTSW \in \mathcal{T}_S, being open by (T2) in XX and satisfying US=WU' \cap S = W — and then i(UiS)=(iUi)STS\bigcup_i (U_i \cap S) = (\bigcup_i U_i) \cap S \in \mathcal{T}_S by (T2) in XX. (T3): (US)(VS)=(UV)STS(U \cap S) \cap (V \cap S) = (U \cap V) \cap S \in \mathcal{T}_S by (T3) in XX.

Closed sets of a subspace are the traces of the closed sets. A set CSC \subseteq S is closed in SS if and only if C=FSC = F \cap S for some closed FXF \subseteq X. Indeed S(US)=(XU)SS \setminus (U \cap S) = (X \setminus U) \cap S and S(FS)=(XF)SS \setminus (F \cap S) = (X \setminus F) \cap S, so complementation inside SS matches complementation inside XX under tracing.

Bases and subbases trace as well. If B\mathcal{B} is a basis for T\mathcal{T} (Basis and subbasis for a topology, and the topology generated by a family of sets) then BS:={BS:BB}\mathcal{B}_S := \{\, B \cap S : B \in \mathcal{B} \,\} is a basis for TS\mathcal{T}_S: its members are open in SS, and for W=USW = U \cap S open in SS and xWx \in W there is BBB \in \mathcal{B} with xBUx \in B \subseteq U, whence xBSWx \in B \cap S \subseteq W. The same computation with a subbasis S\mathcal{S} shows that {S0S:S0S}\{\, S_0 \cap S : S_0 \in \mathcal{S} \,\} is a subbasis for TS\mathcal{T}_S, since tracing commutes with finite intersections and with unions.

The inclusion is continuous. The inclusion map ι:SX\iota : S \to X, ι(s)=s\iota(s) = s, satisfies ι1[U]=US\iota^{-1}[U] = U \cap S for every UXU \subseteq X, so preimages of open sets are open and ι\iota is continuous (For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and f(A)f(A)f(\overline{A}) \subseteq \overline{f(A)}, clause (b)). Moreover TS\mathcal{T}_S is the coarsest topology on SS making ι\iota continuous: any topology on SS for which ι\iota is continuous must contain every ι1[U]=US\iota^{-1}[U] = U \cap S, hence contain TS\mathcal{T}_S.

Characteristic property of a map into a subspace. Let (Z,TZ)(Z, \mathcal{T}_Z) be a topological space and let g:ZSg : Z \to S be a function. Then

g is continuous as a map Z(S,TS)    ιg is continuous as a map Z(X,T).g \text{ is continuous as a map } Z \to (S,\mathcal{T}_S) \iff \iota \circ g \text{ is continuous as a map } Z \to (X,\mathcal{T}) .

Proof. For UTU \in \mathcal{T} one has (ιg)1[U]=g1[ι1[U]]=g1[US](\iota \circ g)^{-1}[U] = g^{-1}[\iota^{-1}[U]] = g^{-1}[U \cap S]. If gg is continuous then each g1[US]g^{-1}[U \cap S] is open, so ιg\iota \circ g is continuous; conversely if ιg\iota \circ g is continuous then for any W=USW = U \cap S open in SS the set g1[W]=(ιg)1[U]g^{-1}[W] = (\iota \circ g)^{-1}[U] is open, so gg is continuous. Both directions use only clause (b) of For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and f(A)f(A)f(\overline{A}) \subseteq \overline{f(A)}.

Restriction of a continuous map. If f:XYf : X \to Y is continuous and SXS \subseteq X, then fS:SYf|_S : S \to Y is continuous, since (fS)1[V]=f1[V]S(f|_S)^{-1}[V] = f^{-1}[V] \cap S is open in SS for every open VYV \subseteq Y (Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally, For a map of spaces the following agree: continuity at every point, preimages of open sets open, preimages of closed sets closed, preimages of subbasic open sets open, and f(A)f(A)f(\overline{A}) \subseteq \overline{f(A)}).

When relative and ambient agree. If SS is open in XX then a subset of SS is open in SS if and only if it is open in XX: a trace USU \cap S is then an intersection of two open sets of XX, and conversely an open subset of XX contained in SS is its own trace. The same statement with "closed" throughout holds when SS is closed in XX. Both are used in the pasting lemma of the next item, and both fail without the hypothesis: SS itself is always open and closed in SS, and need be neither in XX.

Remarks

  • The subspace topology is what makes a subset a space. Before it, a statement such as "the restriction of ff to CC is continuous" has no meaning, because CC carries no topology. Every restriction below is taken with respect to the subspace topology and with no other convention available.

  • Openness and closedness are not absolute. [0,1)[0,1) is open in [0,2)[0,2) and is neither open nor closed in R\mathbb{R}; the interval (0,1)(0,1) is closed in itself. A sentence of the form "AA is open" is incomplete unless the space is named, and this library names it whenever more than one is in play.

  • Transitivity. If STXS \subseteq T \subseteq X then the subspace topology SS inherits from (T,TT)(T, \mathcal{T}_T) is the subspace topology it inherits from XX, since (UT)S=US(U \cap T) \cap S = U \cap S for UTU \in \mathcal{T}. So no ambiguity arises from the route by which a subset is reached.

Depends on

Used by

…and 87 more results.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 12 results over 7 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources