Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)verified 2026-07-29 (claude-fable-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

In the subspace of R2\mathbb{R}^2 made of the vertical unit segments over 1/(n+1)1/(n+1) together with the two points (0,0)(0,0) and (0,1)(0,1), the component of (0,0)(0,0) is a singleton while its quasicomponent is {(0,0),(0,1)}\{(0,0), (0,1)\}

Statement refuted

Refuted: that the component and the quasicomponent of a point always agree. Every quasicomponent is a closed union of components, so each component is contained in a quasicomponent, and the quasicomponents partition the space proves only the inclusion C(x)Q(x)C(x) \subseteq Q(x) and asserts no converse; the inclusion can be strict.

Witness. In R2\mathbb{R}^2 with the product topology (For n1n \ge 1 the product topology on nn copies of the usual topology of R\mathbb{R} is the metric topology of dd_\infty on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and hence also of d1d_1 and d2d_2, so Rn\mathbb{R}^n as a product and Rn\mathbb{R}^n as a metric space are one space, The product set iIXi\prod_{i \in I} X_i of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space), and writing ι\iota for the canonical natural so that 1/(n+1)1/(n+1) means 1/ι(n+1)1/\iota(n+1) with nNn \in \mathbb{N} and N\mathbb{N} containing 00 (The canonical natural ι(n)=n1F\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F of a field), put

Sn:={1n+1}×[0,1](nN),a:=(0,0),b:=(0,1),S_n := \Bigl\{\tfrac{1}{n+1}\Bigr\} \times [0,1] \quad (n \in \mathbb{N}), \qquad a := (0,0), \qquad b := (0,1),

X  :=  {a,b}    nNSn,X \;:=\; \{a, b\} \;\cup\; \bigcup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} S_n ,

with the subspace topology (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace). Then

C(a)={a}andQ(a)={a,b}C(a) = \{a\} \qquad \text{and} \qquad Q(a) = \{a, b\}

(Connected components, quasicomponents, and totally disconnected spaces), so the inclusion is strict.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: R2\mathbb{R}^2 with the product topology and the subspace XX above, with π0,π1\pi_0, \pi_1 the two projections.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Each SnS_n is a connected subset of XX: it is the image of [0,1][0,1], connected by [A2], under t(1/(n+1),t)t \mapsto (1/(n+1), t), whose components are a constant map and the identity, both continuous by [A1].

A1A2
1.2

Write P:=π0[X]={0}{1/(k+1):kN}P := \pi_0[X] = \{0\} \cup \{\, 1/(k+1) : k \in \mathbb{N} \,\} and, for kNk \in \mathbb{N}, μk:=12(1/(k+2)+1/(k+1))\mu_k := \tfrac12\bigl(1/(k+2) + 1/(k+1)\bigr), which satisfies 1/(k+2)<μk<1/(k+1)1/(k+2) < \mu_k < 1/(k+1) and lies in no PP, being strictly between two consecutive members of PP and strictly positive. No subset of PP with two distinct points is order-convex: given p<qp < q in PP, if p=0p = 0 and q=1/(m+1)q = 1/(m+1) take k:=mk := m, and if p=1/(n+1)p = 1/(n+1) and q=1/(m+1)q = 1/(m+1) with m<nm < n take k:=n1k := n-1, which is a natural number since n1n \ge 1; in both cases p1/(k+2)<μk<1/(k+1)qp \le 1/(k+2) < \mu_k < 1/(k+1) \le q, so μk\mu_k lies strictly between pp and qq and outside PP.

A2A6
1.3

Each SnS_n is clopen in XX: with δ:=12(1n+11n+2)>0\delta := \tfrac12\bigl(\tfrac{1}{n+1} - \tfrac{1}{n+2}\bigr) > 0, the trace on XX of the open strip (1/(n+1)δ, 1/(n+1)+δ)×R(1/(n+1) - \delta,\ 1/(n+1) + \delta) \times \mathbb{R} is exactly SnS_n, so SnS_n is open in XX; and the trace of the closed strip [1/(n+1)δ, 1/(n+1)+δ]×R[1/(n+1) - \delta,\ 1/(n+1)+\delta] \times \mathbb{R} is also exactly SnS_n, so SnS_n is closed in XX by [A5].

A1A5
1.4

bQ(a)b \in Q(a). Let KK be clopen in XX with aKa \in K. Since KK is open, [A1] gives ε>0\varepsilon > 0 with X((ε,ε)×(ε,ε))KX \cap \bigl((-\varepsilon,\varepsilon) \times (-\varepsilon,\varepsilon)\bigr) \subseteq K; by [A6] there is k1k \ge 1 with 1/k<ε1/k < \varepsilon, and putting n:=k1Nn := k-1 \in \mathbb{N} the point (1/(n+1),0)(1/(n+1), 0) lies in that trace, hence in KK. The same holds for every mnm \ge n, since 1/(m+1)1/(n+1)<ε1/(m+1) \le 1/(n+1) < \varepsilon.

A1A6
2.1

C(a)={a}C(a) = \{a\}. Let EXE \subseteq X be connected with aEa \in E. Then π0[E]\pi_0[E] is a connected subset of R\mathbb{R} by [A1] and [A2], hence order-convex, and it lies inside π0[X]\pi_0[X]; by step 1.2 it has at most one point, so π0[E]={0}\pi_0[E] = \{0\} and E{a,b}E \subseteq \{a,b\}. But {a}\{a\} is the trace on {a,b}\{a,b\} of the open set R×(1/2,1/2)\mathbb{R} \times (-1/2, 1/2), so {a}\{a\} and {b}\{b\} are both open in the subspace {a,b}\{a,b\}; a connected EE containing aa therefore cannot contain bb, and E={a}E = \{a\}. Hence C(a)={a}C(a) = \{a\} by [A3].

step 1.2A1A2A3
2.2

Q(a){a,b}Q(a) \subseteq \{a,b\}: for each nn the set XSnX \setminus S_n is clopen by step 1.3 and contains aa, so Q(a)XSnQ(a) \subseteq X \setminus S_n by [A3]; intersecting over all nn leaves Q(a)XnSn={a,b}Q(a) \subseteq X \setminus \bigcup_n S_n = \{a,b\}.

step 1.3A3
2.3

Each such SmS_m is connected by step 1.1 and meets KK at (1/(m+1),0)(1/(m+1), 0), so SmKS_m \subseteq K by [A4]; in particular (1/(m+1),1)K(1/(m+1), 1) \in K for every mnm \ge n.

step 1.1step 1.4A4
3.1

Every basic open set containing b=(0,1)b = (0,1) contains, for large enough mm, the point (1/(m+1),1)(1/(m+1), 1): such a set includes (η,η)×(1η,1+η)(-\eta,\eta) \times (1-\eta, 1+\eta) for some η>0\eta > 0, and [A6] supplies mnm \ge n with 1/(m+1)<η1/(m+1) < \eta. So bKb \in \overline{K} by [A5], and KK being closed in XX gives bKb \in K. As KK was an arbitrary clopen set containing aa, this shows bQ(a)b \in Q(a).

step 2.3A5A6
4.1

With step 2.2 and aQ(a)a \in Q(a) from [A3], Q(a)={a,b}Q(a) = \{a,b\}, while C(a)={a}C(a) = \{a\} by step 2.1. So C(a)Q(a)C(a) \subsetneq Q(a) and the two notions differ.

step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1A3

Remarks

  • Why no clopen set can separate aa from bb. A clopen set containing aa must, by openness, catch a point of SnS_n for every large nn; being clopen it must then swallow each of those whole segments, by [A4]; and being closed it must contain the limit of their top endpoints, which is bb. The segments act as a ladder that is invisible to connectedness — no connected set climbs it, since π0\pi_0 would have to be order-convex — and unavoidable for clopen sets.

  • The two points are essential and so are the segments. Removing bb makes Q(a)={a}Q(a) = \{a\}; replacing the segments by single points makes XX totally separated, because each column becomes clopen on its own and no ladder survives. This is why the witness needs sets that are connected and shrinking towards the limit, not merely a sequence of points.

  • The space has no isolated ladder rung near the limit. By step 1.3 each SnS_n is clopen, so XX is not connected; the failure recorded here is not about XX being connected but about the two ways of measuring how XX falls apart giving different answers at aa.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 122 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources