How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A continuous image of a connected space is connected, and connectedness is a topological property
Statement
Let and be topological spaces and let be continuous (Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally). Subsets carry the subspace topology (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace). Then:
- Images. If is a connected subset of (Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets) then is a connected subset of . In particular, if is connected then is connected, and if is moreover surjective then is connected.
- Topological invariance. If is a homeomorphism (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological) then is connected if and only if is. So connectedness is a topological property.
Nothing is assumed about beyond continuity: it need not be injective, open, closed or surjective. Note the direction — a continuous image of a connected space is connected, while a continuous preimage need not be, since a constant map from a disconnected space is continuous.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Topological spaces and , a continuous map , and a subset .
A subset of a space is connected exactly when every continuous map is constant, being the two-point discrete space (For a topological space the following agree: no separation exists, the only clopen subsets are and , and every continuous map to the two-point discrete space is constant, claim 2, Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets).
A restriction of a continuous map to a subspace is continuous (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace).
Characteristic property of a map into a subspace: for with inclusion and a function , the map is continuous exactly when is (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace).
A composite of continuous maps is continuous (Continuity may be checked on any open cover, and on any finite closed cover; composites of continuous maps are continuous, claim 1).
A homeomorphism is a continuous bijection whose inverse is continuous, and a bijection is surjective (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological).
Proof
Write for the map , which is well defined because for , and is surjective by the definition of the image .
The composite of with the inclusion is the restriction , which is continuous by [A2]; so is continuous by [A3] applied with and .
Assume is a connected subset of and let be continuous. Then is continuous by step 1.2 and [A4], hence constant by [A1] applied to .
Since is surjective by step 1.1, every pair of points of is of the form , and by step 2.1; so is constant.
As was an arbitrary continuous map , [A1] gives that is a connected subset of . Taking gives that is connected when is, and if is surjective then , so is connected. This is claim 1.
For claim 2 let be a homeomorphism. If is connected then is connected by step 4.1, since is continuous and surjective by [A5]; and if is connected then is connected by step 4.1 applied to the continuous surjection , again by [A5]. So connectedness is preserved in both directions by a homeomorphism.
Remarks
-
Why the corestriction is the only technical point. Claim 1 is about as a space, so the map that must be shown continuous is the one landing in , not the one landing in . The characteristic property of a subspace is exactly the tool that upgrades the second to the first, and it is the reason the proof needs no hypothesis on at all.
-
The hypothesis cannot be moved to the target. If is connected nothing follows about : the constant map from any space whatever has a one-point image, which is connected. So claim 1 is a one-way implication and is used only in that direction below.
-
What the theorem buys immediately. Any property preserved by continuous images can be checked on a convenient model. That is the whole mechanism behind the intermediate value theorem in the next item, and behind the connectedness of every path-connected space later on this page: both work by pushing a connected interval forward along a continuous map.
Depends on
- Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets
- For a topological space the following agree: no separation exists, the only clopen subsets are $\varnothing$ and $X$, and every continuous map to the two-point discrete space is constant
- Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally
- Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace
- Continuity may be checked on any open cover, and on any finite closed cover; composites of continuous maps are continuous
- Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological
Used by
- A real-valued continuous map on a connected space has order-convex image, so it takes every value between any two of its values Corollary
- In the subspace of ℝ² made of the vertical unit segments over 1/(n+1) together with the two points (0,0) and (0,1), the component of (0,0) is a singleton while its quasicomponent is {(0,0), (0,1)} Counterexample
- The comb space is path-connected and fails to be locally connected at every point of the limit tooth strictly above the base, so path-connectedness does not imply local connectedness Counterexample
- The zigzag curve and its closure worked out: the components, the path components, and the points at which local connectedness fails Example
- FALSE: the intersection of two connected subspaces is connected False statement
- The graph of the piecewise-linear map oscillating between 0 and 1 on the intervals [1/(n+2), 1/(n+1)] is path-connected, its closure adds the segment {0} × [0,1], and that closure is connected, is not path-connected because no path joins the segment to the graph, and is not locally connected Lemma
- A product of connected spaces is connected in the product topology, and that argument is a theorem of ZF; for an infinite index set it is the assertion that the product of nonempty spaces is nonempty that uses the Axiom of Choice Theorem
- Every path-connected space is connected, and every path component lies inside a component Theorem
- ℝ is not homeomorphic to ℝⁿ for any n≥2 Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 32 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Connected space (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Section 5.7: Connected components (standard reference, not scraped)