Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)verified 2026-07-29 (claude-fable-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A continuous image of a connected space is connected, and connectedness is a topological property

Statement

Let X and Y be topological spaces and let f:X→Y be continuous (Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally). Subsets carry the subspace topology (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace). Then:

  1. Images. If A⊆X is a connected subset of X (Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets) then f[A] is a connected subset of Y. In particular, if X is connected then f[X] is connected, and if f is moreover surjective then Y is connected.
  2. Topological invariance. If h:X→Y is a homeomorphism (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological) then X is connected if and only if Y is. So connectedness is a topological property.

Nothing is assumed about f beyond continuity: it need not be injective, open, closed or surjective. Note the direction — a continuous image of a connected space is connected, while a continuous preimage need not be, since a constant map from a disconnected space is continuous.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Topological spaces X and Y, a continuous map f:X→Y, and a subset A⊆X.

[A3]

Characteristic property of a map into a subspace: for S⊆Y with inclusion ι:S→Y and a function g:Z→S, the map g is continuous exactly when ι∘g is (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace).

[A5]

A homeomorphism is a continuous bijection whose inverse is continuous, and a bijection is surjective (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Write g:A→f[A] for the map g(a)=f(a), which is well defined because f(a)∈f[A] for a∈A, and is surjective by the definition of the image f[A]={ f(a):a∈A }.

given
1.2

The composite of g with the inclusion ι:f[A]→Y is the restriction f∣A, which is continuous by [A2]; so g is continuous by [A3] applied with Z=A and S=f[A].

A2A3
2.1

Assume A is a connected subset of X and let χ:f[A]→2 be continuous. Then χ∘g:A→2 is continuous by step 1.2 and [A4], hence constant by [A1] applied to A.

step 1.2A1A4
3.1

Since g is surjective by step 1.1, every pair of points of f[A] is of the form g(a1),g(a2), and χ(g(a1))=χ(g(a2)) by step 2.1; so χ is constant.

step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

As χ was an arbitrary continuous map f[A]→2, [A1] gives that f[A] is a connected subset of Y. Taking A=X gives that f[X] is connected when X is, and if f is surjective then f[X]=Y, so Y is connected. This is claim 1.

step 3.1A1
5.1

For claim 2 let h:X→Y be a homeomorphism. If X is connected then Y=h[X] is connected by step 4.1, since h is continuous and surjective by [A5]; and if Y is connected then X=h−1[Y] is connected by step 4.1 applied to the continuous surjection h−1, again by [A5]. So connectedness is preserved in both directions by a homeomorphism.

step 4.1A5∎

Remarks

  • Why the corestriction is the only technical point. Claim 1 is about f[A] as a space, so the map that must be shown continuous is the one landing in f[A], not the one landing in Y. The characteristic property of a subspace is exactly the tool that upgrades the second to the first, and it is the reason the proof needs no hypothesis on f at all.

  • The hypothesis cannot be moved to the target. If f[X] is connected nothing follows about X: the constant map from any space whatever has a one-point image, which is connected. So claim 1 is a one-way implication and is used only in that direction below.

  • What the theorem buys immediately. Any property preserved by continuous images can be checked on a convenient model. That is the whole mechanism behind the intermediate value theorem in the next item, and behind the connectedness of every path-connected space later on this page: both work by pushing a connected interval forward along a continuous map.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources