Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)verified 2026-07-29 (claude-fable-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A continuous image of a connected space is connected, and connectedness is a topological property

Statement

Let XX and YY be topological spaces and let f:XYf : X \to Y be continuous (Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally). Subsets carry the subspace topology (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace). Then:

  1. Images. If AXA \subseteq X is a connected subset of XX (Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets) then f[A]f[A] is a connected subset of YY. In particular, if XX is connected then f[X]f[X] is connected, and if ff is moreover surjective then YY is connected.
  2. Topological invariance. If h:XYh : X \to Y is a homeomorphism (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological) then XX is connected if and only if YY is. So connectedness is a topological property.

Nothing is assumed about ff beyond continuity: it need not be injective, open, closed or surjective. Note the direction — a continuous image of a connected space is connected, while a continuous preimage need not be, since a constant map from a disconnected space is continuous.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Topological spaces XX and YY, a continuous map f:XYf : X \to Y, and a subset AXA \subseteq X.

[A3]

Characteristic property of a map into a subspace: for SYS \subseteq Y with inclusion ι:SY\iota : S \to Y and a function g:ZSg : Z \to S, the map gg is continuous exactly when ιg\iota \circ g is (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace).

[A5]

A homeomorphism is a continuous bijection whose inverse is continuous, and a bijection is surjective (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Write g:Af[A]g : A \to f[A] for the map g(a)=f(a)g(a) = f(a), which is well defined because f(a)f[A]f(a) \in f[A] for aAa \in A, and is surjective by the definition of the image f[A]={f(a):aA}f[A] = \{\, f(a) : a \in A \,\}.

given
1.2

The composite of gg with the inclusion ι:f[A]Y\iota : f[A] \to Y is the restriction fAf|_A, which is continuous by [A2]; so gg is continuous by [A3] applied with Z=AZ = A and S=f[A]S = f[A].

A2A3
2.1

Assume AA is a connected subset of XX and let χ:f[A]2\chi : f[A] \to \mathbf{2} be continuous. Then χg:A2\chi \circ g : A \to \mathbf{2} is continuous by step 1.2 and [A4], hence constant by [A1] applied to AA.

step 1.2A1A4
3.1

Since gg is surjective by step 1.1, every pair of points of f[A]f[A] is of the form g(a1),g(a2)g(a_1), g(a_2), and χ(g(a1))=χ(g(a2))\chi(g(a_1)) = \chi(g(a_2)) by step 2.1; so χ\chi is constant.

step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

As χ\chi was an arbitrary continuous map f[A]2f[A] \to \mathbf{2}, [A1] gives that f[A]f[A] is a connected subset of YY. Taking A=XA = X gives that f[X]f[X] is connected when XX is, and if ff is surjective then f[X]=Yf[X] = Y, so YY is connected. This is claim 1.

step 3.1A1
5.1

For claim 2 let h:XYh : X \to Y be a homeomorphism. If XX is connected then Y=h[X]Y = h[X] is connected by step 4.1, since hh is continuous and surjective by [A5]; and if YY is connected then X=h1[Y]X = h^{-1}[Y] is connected by step 4.1 applied to the continuous surjection h1h^{-1}, again by [A5]. So connectedness is preserved in both directions by a homeomorphism.

step 4.1A5

Remarks

  • Why the corestriction is the only technical point. Claim 1 is about f[A]f[A] as a space, so the map that must be shown continuous is the one landing in f[A]f[A], not the one landing in YY. The characteristic property of a subspace is exactly the tool that upgrades the second to the first, and it is the reason the proof needs no hypothesis on ff at all.

  • The hypothesis cannot be moved to the target. If f[X]f[X] is connected nothing follows about XX: the constant map from any space whatever has a one-point image, which is connected. So claim 1 is a one-way implication and is used only in that direction below.

  • What the theorem buys immediately. Any property preserved by continuous images can be checked on a convenient model. That is the whole mechanism behind the intermediate value theorem in the next item, and behind the connectedness of every path-connected space later on this page: both work by pushing a connected interval forward along a continuous map.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 32 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources