How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
De rham and singular cohomology respect countable disjoint unions
Statement
Let be a supplied at most countable family of smooth manifolds of a fixed dimension, with disjoint union . Continuous and smooth singular cochain complexes are canonically the products of their component complexes. For boundaryless the same is true of the de Rham complexes. Under , for each of these theories there is a canonical isomorphism These maps commute with component restrictions and with any supplied comparison natural under the component inclusions, in particular continuous-to-smooth singular restriction.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The indexed disjoint family; empty components are allowed.
Ordinary real cohomology is the cochain quotient (Real singular cohomology).
Smooth chains are finite sums of smooth simplices, and smooth cochains are their real dual (Smooth singular chain and cochain complexes).
De Rham cochains are smooth differential forms with the local exterior derivative, in the boundaryless convention (De rham cochain complex).
Path-connected spaces are connected, and continuous images of connected spaces are connected (Every path-connected space is connected, and every path component lies inside a component, A continuous image of a connected space is connected, and connectedness is a topological property).
Assume countable choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (), the countable instance of The Axiom of Choice, only for the cohomology-product conclusion.
Proof
The standard simplex is path-connected: the segment between two nonnegative barycentric vectors stays nonnegative and has coordinate sum one. Thus [F4] makes its continuous image connected. A nonempty connected subset of a disjoint union lies in one component, since a component and the union of all others are complementary open sets. Every singular simplex therefore has a unique component. For a smooth simplex the corestriction is smooth: restrict its extension to the open inverse image of that component. Conversely a smooth simplex in a component remains smooth under its open inclusion. Hence both chain complexes are the direct sums of their component chain complexes.
A linear functional on a direct sum is specified by an arbitrary family of component functionals: evaluate a finite-support chain by summing the finitely many component evaluations. This is inverse to restriction and commutes with signed boundary precomposition. Thus both singular cochain complexes are the stated products. Forms similarly restrict to component forms and glue uniquely: every point has an open neighbourhood in a single component, where the specified form is smooth, and the exterior derivative is computed there. This gives the de Rham complex product without choice.
For any one of these product complexes, kernels are products of kernels because differential is componentwise. A product boundary is a family of component boundaries. Conversely, given a family of component boundaries, [A1] chooses one primitive in each component, forming a product cochain whose differential is that family. Thus the product image equals the product of images. For a tuple of cohomology classes, [A1] likewise chooses one cocycle representative per component. These representatives give surjectivity of the map from product-complex cohomology to the product of cohomologies; its kernel is zero by the image equality. Therefore the map is a linear isomorphism.
The isomorphism sends a class to its restrictions, so it is independent of every chosen representative or primitive. A comparison natural under each component inclusion commutes with every coordinate restriction, hence with the product map by equality in each coordinate. For an empty index set the product in vector spaces is the zero space, and every component-empty union is empty. For a singleton family the map is identity. In degree zero primitives in degree minus one are uniquely zero; other negative groups also vanish. Constant and degenerate simplices remain in their unique components. No choice is needed for the complex identifications; precisely the two countable selections in step 3.1 are charged to [A1].
Depends on
- Real singular cohomology
- Smooth singular chain and cochain complexes
- De rham cochain complex
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Every path-connected space is connected, and every path component lies inside a component
- A continuous image of a connected space is connected, and connectedness is a topological property
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- DG-16 design; Hatcher/Park control (standard reference, not scraped)