Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)verified 2026-07-29 (claude-fable-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The components of a space are its maximal connected subsets, they partition it, and each of them is closed

Statement

Let X be a topological space and let C(x) be the connected component of xX (Connected components, quasicomponents, and totally disconnected spaces). Then:

  1. Maximality. C(x) is connected, contains x, and contains every connected subset of X that contains x. So the components are exactly the maximal connected subsets of X: a connected AX is a component if and only if no connected subset of X properly contains A — except in the empty space, where is vacuously maximal and yet is not a component, there being no points; for nonempty X no exception is needed, since is properly contained in a connected singleton and so is never maximal.
  2. Partition. For x,yX, either C(x)=C(y) or C(x)C(y)=; every point lies in its own component; and X=xXC(x). So the components are nonempty, pairwise disjoint, and cover X.
  3. Closedness. Every component is closed in X.

Components need not be open, and no clause above says they are. Openness of the components is a genuine extra hypothesis on X, taken up later on this page under the name local connectedness.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Claim 1 is [A1]: C(x) is connected, contains x by [A5] since {x} is one of the sets united, and contains every connected Ax because such an A is one of the sets united.

A1A5
2.1

A connected AX with A satisfies AC(a) for every aA, by step 1.1; so A is maximal among connected subsets exactly when A=C(a), and every component is nonempty.

A1A5
2.2

Suppose zC(x)C(y). Then C(x)C(y) is connected by [A2], the two sets being connected by [A1] and sharing z.

step 1.1A1A2
2.3

For claim 3, apply [A3] with A=C(x) and B=C(x), the hypothesis ABA holding by [A4]; so C(x) is connected, and it contains x, hence C(x)C(x) by step 1.1.

step 1.1A3A4
3.1

That union contains x, so it is contained in C(x) by step 1.1, whence C(y)C(x); it also contains y, so symmetrically C(x)C(y), and therefore C(x)=C(y).

step 1.1step 2.2
4.1

So for any x,y either C(x)C(y)= or C(x)=C(y) by step 3.1; and xC(x) by step 1.1, so X=xXC(x) and every component is nonempty by step 2.1. This is claim 2.

step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1
5.1

With C(x)C(x) from [A4] this gives C(x)=C(x), so C(x) is closed by [A4].

step 2.3A4

Remarks

  • The exception for in claim 1 is not a quibble. The empty set is connected under the convention of Connected components, quasicomponents, and totally disconnected spaces, and it is contained in every set, so "maximal connected subset" has to be read as "maximal among the nonempty connected subsets" for the identification with components to be exact. Step 2.1 is where that is pinned down.

  • Closed but not open is the typical case. Claim 3 uses only that the closure of a connected set is connected, which is available in every space. There is no matching argument for openness, because the union of the connected sets through a point carries no information about neighbourhoods; that is what local connectedness supplies, and it is a genuine extra hypothesis rather than a missing step.

  • A component of a subspace is computed in that subspace. For SX the components of S are the maximal connected subsets of the space S, and claim 3 then says each is closed in S, not in X. Closedness in X follows only when S itself is closed in X.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 33 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources