How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The components of a space are its maximal connected subsets, they partition it, and each of them is closed
Statement
Let be a topological space and let be the connected component of (Connected components, quasicomponents, and totally disconnected spaces). Then:
- Maximality. is connected, contains , and contains every connected subset of that contains . So the components are exactly the maximal connected subsets of : a connected is a component if and only if no connected subset of properly contains — except in the empty space, where is vacuously maximal and yet is not a component, there being no points; for nonempty no exception is needed, since is properly contained in a connected singleton and so is never maximal.
- Partition. For , either or ; every point lies in its own component; and . So the components are nonempty, pairwise disjoint, and cover .
- Closedness. Every component is closed in .
Components need not be open, and no clause above says they are. Openness of the components is a genuine extra hypothesis on , taken up later on this page under the name local connectedness.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A topological space , with subsets carrying the subspace topology (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace).
is the union of all connected subsets of containing ; it is connected, contains , and contains every connected set through (Connected components, quasicomponents, and totally disconnected spaces, A union of connected subspaces with a point in common is connected, and so is a union of a family in which every member meets a fixed connected member, claim 1).
A union of connected subsets with a point in common is connected (A union of connected subspaces with a point in common is connected, and so is a union of a family in which every member meets a fixed connected member, claim 1).
If is connected and then is connected (If is connected and then is connected; in particular the closure of a connected set is connected).
, and is closed exactly when (Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space).
A singleton is connected, no separation of it existing (Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets).
Proof
Claim 1 is [A1]: is connected, contains by [A5] since is one of the sets united, and contains every connected because such an is one of the sets united.
A connected with satisfies for every , by step 1.1; so is maximal among connected subsets exactly when , and every component is nonempty.
Suppose . Then is connected by [A2], the two sets being connected by [A1] and sharing .
For claim 3, apply [A3] with and , the hypothesis holding by [A4]; so is connected, and it contains , hence by step 1.1.
That union contains , so it is contained in by step 1.1, whence ; it also contains , so symmetrically , and therefore .
So for any either or by step 3.1; and by step 1.1, so and every component is nonempty by step 2.1. This is claim 2.
With from [A4] this gives , so is closed by [A4].
Remarks
-
The exception for in claim 1 is not a quibble. The empty set is connected under the convention of Connected components, quasicomponents, and totally disconnected spaces, and it is contained in every set, so "maximal connected subset" has to be read as "maximal among the nonempty connected subsets" for the identification with components to be exact. Step 2.1 is where that is pinned down.
-
Closed but not open is the typical case. Claim 3 uses only that the closure of a connected set is connected, which is available in every space. There is no matching argument for openness, because the union of the connected sets through a point carries no information about neighbourhoods; that is what local connectedness supplies, and it is a genuine extra hypothesis rather than a missing step.
-
A component of a subspace is computed in that subspace. For the components of are the maximal connected subsets of the space , and claim 3 then says each is closed in , not in . Closedness in follows only when itself is closed in .
Depends on
- Connected components, quasicomponents, and totally disconnected spaces
- A union of connected subspaces with a point in common is connected, and so is a union of a family in which every member meets a fixed connected member
- If $A$ is connected and $A \subseteq B \subseteq \overline{A}$ then $B$ is connected; in particular the closure of a connected set is connected
- Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets
- Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace
- Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space
Used by
- In the subspace of ℝ² made of the vertical unit segments over 1/(n+1) together with the two points (0,0) and (0,1), the component of (0,0) is a singleton while its quasicomponent is {(0,0), (0,1)} Counterexample
- ℚ as a subspace of ℝ: every component is a single point, no point is isolated, and the space is not locally connected anywhere Example
- The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies placed in the connectedness hierarchy Example
- The zigzag curve and its closure worked out: the components, the path components, and the points at which local connectedness fails Example
- A space is locally connected exactly when every component of every open subspace is open; in that case the components of the space itself are clopen Theorem
- Every quasicomponent is a closed union of components, so each component is contained in a quasicomponent, and the quasicomponents partition the space Theorem
- In a compact Hausdorff space every quasicomponent is connected, so quasicomponents and components coincide Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 33 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Connected space (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- The Stacks Project, Lemma 5.7.3 (standard reference, not scraped)