How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A point lies in the closure of iff every basic neighbourhood of it meets ; the closure is the smallest closed superset and equals together with its derived set
Statement
Let be a topological space, let be a basis for (Basis and subbasis for a topology, and the topology generated by a family of sets), let and let . Closure, derived set and limit points are as in Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space. Then:
- The following four conditions are equivalent.
- (a) ;
- (b) for every neighbourhood of (Neighbourhood of a point and neighbourhood base, with this library's convention that a neighbourhood need not be open);
- (c) for every open with ;
- (d) for every with .
- is closed, contains , and is contained in every closed with ; so it is the smallest closed superset of , and is closed if and only if .
- .
Claim 2 is recorded here for reference and is discharged in Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space, where it is what makes the definition of well posed; claims 1 and 3 are proved below. Claim 1 is the form in which the closure is used everywhere afterwards, and clause (d) is what makes a closure computable from a basis rather than from all open sets.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A topological space , a basis for , a subset and a point .
is the intersection of all closed supersets of ; it is closed, contains , and is contained in every closed superset of (Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space).
means that for every neighbourhood of (Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space).
is a neighbourhood of when for some open ; an open set containing is a neighbourhood of (Neighbourhood of a point and neighbourhood base, with this library's convention that a neighbourhood need not be open).
is a basis for : for every open and every there is with , and every member of is open (Basis and subbasis for a topology, and the topology generated by a family of sets).
A set is closed exactly when its complement is open (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison).
Proof
(a) implies (c): let be open with and suppose ; then is closed and contains , so by [A1], whence , contradicting (a); therefore .
(c) implies (a): suppose ; then is open by [A1] and [L3], contains , and satisfies because , so (c) fails.
(b) implies (c): an open containing is a neighbourhood of , so (b) applies to it.
(c) implies (b): let be a neighbourhood of and fix open with ; then .
(c) implies (d): every with is an open set containing .
(d) implies (c): let be open with and fix with ; then .
and is closed, and is contained in every closed superset of , which is claim 2; in particular is closed exactly when , since one inclusion always holds and the other says that is a closed superset of itself.
By steps 1.1 to 1.6 the four conditions (a), (b), (c) and (d) are equivalent, which is claim 1: (a) and (c) are equivalent by steps 1.1 and 1.2, (b) and (c) by steps 1.3 and 1.4, and (c) and (d) by steps 1.5 and 1.6.
: points of lie in by [A1], and if then every neighbourhood of meets and hence meets , so by condition (b).
: let and suppose ; then for every neighbourhood of condition (b) gives , and because , so and .
Steps 3.1 and 3.2 give , which is claim 3; with step 2.1 for claim 1 and step 1.7 for claim 2 the theorem is proved.
Remarks
-
Clause (d) is relative to a basis and clause (c) is not. Different bases for one topology give different families of test sets in (d), and the theorem says all of them detect the same closure. This is why a closure in a metric space may be computed with balls alone, and a closure in with bounded open intervals alone.
-
The empty set and the whole space. , since is closed, and ; claim 1 reads correctly in both cases, no neighbourhood meeting and every neighbourhood meeting .
-
Nothing here assumes that singletons are closed. In the indiscrete topology on a set with at least two points, for every , since the only neighbourhood of any point is ; claim 3 then says is contained in , which it is.
Depends on
- Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space
- Neighbourhood of a point and neighbourhood base, with this library's convention that a neighbourhood need not be open
- Basis and subbasis for a topology, and the topology generated by a family of sets
- Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison
Used by
- Assuming the ultrafilter lemma, every Tychonoff space has a Hausdorff compactification Corollary
- The Stone–Čech compactification of a compact Hausdorff space adds no points Corollary
- Two continuous maps into a Hausdorff space that agree on a dense subset are equal Corollary
- In the cocountable topology on ℝ the sequential closure of [0,1] is [0,1] while its closure is all of ℝ Counterexample
- In the subspace of ℝ² made of the vertical unit segments over 1/(n+1) together with the two points (0,0) and (0,1), the component of (0,0) is a singleton while its quasicomponent is {(0,0), (0,1)} Counterexample
- Refuted, assuming countable choice: every Hausdorff space built from ordinal spaces is normal. The deleted Tychonoff plank ((ω₁ + 1) × (ω + 1)) ∖ {(ω₁, ω)} is Hausdorff and not normal Counterexample
- Refuted: the agreement set of two continuous maps is closed, with no hypothesis on the codomain. Two continuous maps ℝ → {a,b} into the indiscrete two-point space have agreement set ℚ Counterexample
- The comb space is path-connected and fails to be locally connected at every point of the limit tooth strictly above the base, so path-connectedness does not imply local connectedness Counterexample
- Dense, nowhere dense and codense subsets of a topological space, and the criterion by basic open sets Definition
- Fréchet–Urysohn spaces and sequential spaces Definition
- Separated sets: overlineA ∩ B = A ∩ overlineB = ∅ Definition
- Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets Definition
- A discrete space satisfies every axiom in the chain; an indiscrete space with two points is regular, completely regular, normal, completely normal and perfectly normal, and fails T₀ Example
- Arens space S₂ is sequential but not Fréchet–Urysohn Example
- Closure and complement generate at most fourteen sets from any subset, and (0,1) ∪ (1,2) ∪ {3} ∪ ([4,5] ∩ ℚ) attains fourteen Example
- In the cocountable topology on ℝ the closed sets are the countable sets and ℝ, and a sequence converges iff it is eventually constant Example
- On an infinite set the cofinite topology has every infinite subset dense and no two nonempty open sets disjoint Example
- ℝ and ℚ are σ-compact, and Lindel"of assuming countable choice; ℝ is locally compact and ℚ is nowhere locally compact Example
- The cofinite topology on an infinite set, and the cocountable topology on ℝ, are T₁ with a diagonal whose closure is the whole square; on a countably infinite set the cocountable topology is discrete instead Example
- The diagonal of ℝ is closed in ℝ², computed from the product basis Example
- The particular-point topology is T₀, it is not T₁ and not regular once the set has at least two points, and it is not normal once the set has at least three Example
- The sets U₀, U₁, U_1/2, U_1/4, U_3/4 of the Urysohn construction computed for two disjoint closed subsets of ℝ Example
- The Sorgenfrey plane: the product of two half-open-interval lines has the rectangles [a,b) × [c,d) as a basis and ℚ × ℚ as a countable dense subset Example
- The zigzag curve and its closure worked out: the components, the path components, and the points at which local connectedness fails Example
- FALSE: every function between topological spaces whose graph is closed in the product is continuous False statement
- FALSE: every subspace of a locally compact space is locally compact False statement
- A pseudocompact subset of ℝⁿ is closed Lemma
- A space is normal if and only if every closed A inside an open U admits an open V with A ⊆ V ⊆ overlineV ⊆ U Lemma
- A space is regular if and only if every point has a neighbourhood base of closed neighbourhoods, if and only if x ∈ U open gives an open V with x ∈ V ⊆ overlineV ⊆ U Lemma
- A subspace A ⊆ X is disconnected exactly when A = A₁ ∪ A₂ with A₁, A₂ nonempty and separated in X, which is the criterion this library already uses on the real line Lemma
- Every continuous [0,1]-valued function extends uniquely over the closure of the full evaluation image Lemma
- Locally finite families remain locally finite after taking closures, closure commutes with their union, and a locally finite union of closed sets is closed Lemma
- The graph of the piecewise-linear map oscillating between 0 and 1 on the intervals [1/(n+2), 1/(n+1)] is path-connected, its closure adds the segment {0} × [0,1], and that closure is connected, is not path-connected because no path joins the segment to the graph, and is not locally connected Lemma
- The sequential closure is contained in the closure, continuity implies sequential continuity, and sequential limits need not be unique Lemma
- A point lies in the closure of a set if and only if a net in the set converges to it Theorem
- A product of connected spaces is connected in the product topology, and that argument is a theorem of ZF; for an infinite index set it is the assertion that the product of nonempty spaces is nonempty that uses the Axiom of Choice Theorem
- A space is Hausdorff if and only if its diagonal is closed in the square carrying the product topology Theorem
- Assuming countable choice, every perfectly normal space is completely normal: separated sets in a normal space whose open sets are all F_σ can be separated by disjoint open sets Theorem
- Assuming Countable Choice, in a first countable space sequential closure equals closure and sequential continuity at a point equals continuity there Theorem
- Compact implies countably compact, Lindel"of and limit point compact; countably compact together with Lindel"of implies compact; and, at the cost of countable or dependent choice, sequentially compact implies countably compact, countably compact implies limit point compact, and the converse holds when every singleton is closed Theorem
…and 6 more results.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 5 results over 5 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Closure (topology) (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Limit point (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Munkres, Topology, 2nd ed., §17 (standard reference, not scraped)