How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
In the cocountable topology on the sequential closure of is while its closure is all of
Statement refuted
Refuted: that the sequential closure of a subset of a topological space equals its closure. The sequential closure is contained in the closure, continuity implies sequential continuity, and sequential limits need not be unique asserts only the inclusion , and asserts it without any hypothesis; the witness below shows that the inclusion can be as far from an equality as it is possible to be, the two sides differing by all but a bounded interval.
Witness. Give the cocountable topology (The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies, In the cocountable topology on the closed sets are the countable sets and , and a sequence converges iff it is eventually constant) and take (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length). Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: with the cocountable topology, and the set .
is the set of points to which some sequence with all terms in converges (Convergence and cluster points of a sequence in a topological space, sequential continuity, and the sequential closure).
In the cocountable topology on a sequence converges if and only if it is eventually constant, and it then converges to its eventual value and to no other point (In the cocountable topology on the closed sets are the countable sets and , and a sequence converges iff it is eventually constant, claim 3).
In the cocountable topology on the closure of an uncountable set is (In the cocountable topology on the closed sets are the countable sets and , and a sequence converges iff it is eventually constant, claim 2).
For the interval is uncountable (Every nondegenerate interval of is uncountable, Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable); (The multiplicative identity is positive).
in every topological space (The sequential closure is contained in the closure, continuity implies sequential continuity, and sequential limits need not be unique, claim 1), and is the smallest closed superset of (A point lies in the closure of iff every basic neighbourhood of it meets ; the closure is the smallest closed superset and equals together with its derived set, claim 2).
Counterexample
by [L3], so is a nondegenerate closed interval and is uncountable by [L3].
Let be a sequence with for every and suppose in the cocountable topology. By [L1] the sequence is eventually constant with value , so for some index , and ; hence .
Conversely every lies in , the constant sequence with value having all its terms in and converging to by [L1].
By steps 1.2 and 1.3, .
By step 1.1 the set is uncountable, so by [L2].
The inclusion is strict, since ; so by steps 2.1 and 2.2 the sequential closure of is strictly smaller than its closure, and the inclusion of [L4] cannot in general be improved to an equality.
Remarks
-
The set plays no special role beyond being uncountable and not all of . Any uncountable proper subset would do, and by claim 3 of In the cocountable topology on the closed sets are the countable sets and , and a sequence converges iff it is eventually constant the sequential closure of any subset of this space is the subset itself, so the sequential closure operator here is the identity while the closure operator is far from it.
-
What the witness rules out. It shows that no theorem of the form " in every space" is available, so the countability hypothesis of Assuming Countable Choice, in a first countable space sequential closure equals closure and sequential continuity at a point equals continuity there is doing real work. Assuming the Axiom of Countable Choice, as that theorem does, it also shows that the cocountable topology on is not first countable.
-
Sequences are the wrong index set here, not the wrong idea. Replacing sequences by nets or filters restores the equality in every space; neither is developed in this library at this point, and the failure above is exactly the reason they exist.
Depends on
- In the cocountable topology on $\mathbb{R}$ the closed sets are the countable sets and $\mathbb{R}$, and a sequence converges iff it is eventually constant
- The sequential closure is contained in the closure, continuity implies sequential continuity, and sequential limits need not be unique
- Convergence and cluster points of a sequence in a topological space, sequential continuity, and the sequential closure
- A point lies in the closure of $A$ iff every basic neighbourhood of it meets $A$; the closure is the smallest closed superset and equals $A$ together with its derived set
- Every nondegenerate interval of $\mathbb{R}$ is uncountable
- Intervals of $\mathbb{R}$: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
- The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies
- Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable
- The multiplicative identity is positive
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 86 results over 19 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sequential space (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Cocountable topology (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)