Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)verified 2026-07-29 (claude-fable-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: every function between topological spaces whose graph is closed in the product is continuous

Statement

False claim: if X and Y are topological spaces and f:X→Y is a function whose graph Gf is closed in X×Y with the product topology (The product set ∏i∈IXi of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space), then f is continuous (Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally).

The refutation is the function f:R→R, with R carrying its usual topology (The absolute value makes R a metric space: d(x,y)=∣x−y∣ is a metric, its open balls are the intervals (x−r,x+r), and it is unbounded, Metrizable space: a topological space whose topology is induced by some metric; metrizability is topological, the metric is not), given by

f(x):=1x  (x≠0),f(0):=0.

Its graph is closed in R×R and it is not continuous at 0. Since a map into a compact space with closed graph is continuous (A map into a compact space whose graph is closed is continuous; so for a compact Hausdorff codomain, continuity and closedness of the graph are equivalent, claim 1), the same witness shows as a by-product that R with its usual topology is not compact (Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right): the compactness hypothesis in that theorem is what the claim above drops, and it is not redundant.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: R with its usual topology, the product R×R with the product topology, the function f above, and its graph Gf={ z∈R×R:z1=f(z0) }.

[A3]

f is continuous at x0 exactly when for every open V with f(x0)∈V there is an open U∋x0 with f[U]⊆V, and continuous when this holds everywhere (Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally).

[L1]

A point lies in A‾ exactly when every basic open set containing it meets A, and A is closed exactly when A=A‾ (A point lies in the closure of A iff every basic neighbourhood of it meets A; the closure is the smallest closed superset and equals A together with its derived set, claims 1(d) and 2).

[L2]

The reciprocal x↦1/x is continuous at every c≠0 as a function on { x∈R:x≠0 }, being the quotient of the constant function 1 by the identity (Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function, claims 4 and 5); continuity at c means that for every real ε>0 there is a real δ>0 such that x≠0 and ∣x−c∣<δ imply ∣1/x−1/c∣<ε (Continuity of f:A→R at a point of A and on A: the ε-δ condition, its agreement with lim⁡x→cf(x)=f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point).

[L3]

For every real ε>0 there is a natural number n≥1 with 1/n<ε (For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε).

Refutation

technique · constructive
1.1

Define f:R→R by f(x):=1/x for x≠0 and f(0):=0; this is a function on all of R, every nonzero real having a multiplicative inverse.

construct
1.2

Let z=(a,b)∈R×R with z∉Gf, so that b≠f(a).

given
1.3

f is not continuous at 0: put V:=(−1,1), an open set containing f(0)=0, and let U be any open set with 0∈U; by [A1] there is a real r>0 with (−r,r)⊆U, by [L3] there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<min⁡{r,1}, and then 1/n∈U while f(1/n)=n>1, so f(1/n)∉V and f[U]⊈V.

A1A3L3
2.1

Suppose a≠0, so f(a)=1/a and ε:=∣b−1/a∣/2>0; by [L2] fix a real δ1>0 such that x≠0 and ∣x−a∣<δ1 imply ∣1/x−1/a∣<ε, and put δ:=min⁡{δ1,∣a∣}>0.

step 1.2L2choose
2.2

Suppose a=0, so f(a)=0 and b≠0, hence ∣b∣>0; put ρ:=1/(2∣b∣)>0 and σ:=∣b∣/2>0 and B:=(−ρ,ρ)×(b−σ,b+σ), a basic open set containing z=(0,b).

step 1.2A1A2construct
3.1

With a≠0 the box B:=(a−δ,a+δ)×(b−ε,b+ε) is a basic open set containing z and B∩Gf=∅: for (x,y)∈B one has ∣x−a∣<δ≤∣a∣, so x≠0 and f(x)=1/x with ∣1/x−1/a∣<ε, whence ∣f(x)−b∣≥∣b−1/a∣−∣1/x−1/a∣>2ε−ε=ε>∣y−b∣ and therefore y≠f(x).

step 2.1A1A2
3.2

With a=0 the box B of step 2.2 satisfies B∩Gf=∅: let (x,y)∈B with y=f(x); if x=0 then y=0 and ∣y−b∣=∣b∣>σ, contradicting y∈(b−σ,b+σ); and if x≠0 then 0<∣x∣<ρ gives ∣f(x)∣=1/∣x∣>1/ρ=2∣b∣, while ∣y∣≤∣b∣+∣y−b∣<∣b∣+σ=3∣b∣/2<2∣b∣, contradicting y=f(x).

step 2.2
4.1

Every z∉Gf has a basic open set containing it and missing Gf, by step 3.1 if its first coordinate is nonzero and by step 3.2 if it is zero; so no such z lies in Gf‾, whence Gf‾=Gf and Gf is closed in R×R.

step 1.2step 3.1step 3.2L1
5.1

By step 1.3 and [A3] the function f is not continuous, while by step 4.1 its graph is closed; so the claim is false.

step 4.1step 1.3A3
6.1

By [L4] a function into a compact codomain with closed graph is continuous, so steps 4.1 and 1.3 also show that R with its usual topology is not compact; the witness therefore refutes the claim and locates the missing hypothesis at the same time.

step 4.1step 1.3step 5.1L4discharge-construct∎

Remarks

  • Which hypothesis was dropped. The true statements in this neighbourhood are the two halves of A map into a compact space whose graph is closed is continuous; so for a compact Hausdorff codomain, continuity and closedness of the graph are equivalent: a closed graph gives continuity when the codomain is compact, and continuity gives a closed graph when the codomain is Hausdorff (The graph of a continuous map into a Hausdorff space is closed in the product). The claim above asks for the first conclusion with neither hypothesis, and the witness has a Hausdorff codomain, so it is compactness and not separation that is missing.

  • Where the closedness of the graph comes from, informally. Off the vertical axis the graph is closed because the reciprocal is continuous there; on the axis it is closed because the function escapes: near 0 the values are large in absolute value, so a small box around a point (0,b) with b≠0 cannot meet the graph at all. That escape is exactly what a compact codomain would forbid.

  • The value chosen at 0 is immaterial. Replacing f(0)=0 by any fixed real c leaves both conclusions standing. For the graph, a point (0,b) with b≠c is separated from it by the box (−ρ,ρ)×(b−σ,b+σ) with σ:=∣b−c∣/2 and ρ:=1/(∣b∣+σ): the value at 0 is c, which lies outside the second factor, and for x≠0 in the first factor ∣1/x∣>∣b∣+σ forces ∣1/x−b∣>σ. For the discontinuity, step 1.3 uses only that f(1/n)=n exceeds every bound, which does not involve f(0) at all. The value 0 is chosen above only because it makes the two computations shortest.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

67 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources