Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)verified 2026-07-29 (claude-fable-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: every function between topological spaces whose graph is closed in the product is continuous

Statement

False claim: if XX and YY are topological spaces and f:XYf : X \to Y is a function whose graph GfG_f is closed in X×YX \times Y with the product topology (The product set iIXi\prod_{i \in I} X_i of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space), then ff is continuous (Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally).

The refutation is the function f:RRf : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}, with R\mathbb{R} carrying its usual topology (The absolute value makes R\mathbb{R} a metric space: d(x,y)=xyd(x,y) = |x-y| is a metric, its open balls are the intervals (xr,x+r)(x-r, x+r), and it is unbounded, Metrizable space: a topological space whose topology is induced by some metric; metrizability is topological, the metric is not), given by

f(x):=1x  (x0),f(0):=0.f(x) := \frac{1}{x} \ \ (x \ne 0), \qquad f(0) := 0 .

Its graph is closed in R×R\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} and it is not continuous at 00. Since a map into a compact space with closed graph is continuous (A map into a compact space whose graph is closed is continuous; so for a compact Hausdorff codomain, continuity and closedness of the graph are equivalent, claim 1), the same witness shows as a by-product that R\mathbb{R} with its usual topology is not compact (Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right): the compactness hypothesis in that theorem is what the claim above drops, and it is not redundant.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: R\mathbb{R} with its usual topology, the product R×R\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} with the product topology, the function ff above, and its graph Gf={zR×R:z1=f(z0)}G_f = \{\, z \in \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} : z_1 = f(z_0) \,\}.

[A1]
[A3]

ff is continuous at x0x_0 exactly when for every open VV with f(x0)Vf(x_0) \in V there is an open Ux0U \ni x_0 with f[U]Vf[U] \subseteq V, and continuous when this holds everywhere (Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally).

[L1]

A point lies in A\overline{A} exactly when every basic open set containing it meets AA, and AA is closed exactly when A=AA = \overline{A} (A point lies in the closure of AA iff every basic neighbourhood of it meets AA; the closure is the smallest closed superset and equals AA together with its derived set, claims 1(d) and 2).

[L2]

The reciprocal x1/xx \mapsto 1/x is continuous at every c0c \ne 0 as a function on {xR:x0}\{\, x \in \mathbb{R} : x \ne 0 \,\}, being the quotient of the constant function 11 by the identity (Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function, claims 4 and 5); continuity at cc means that for every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is a real δ>0\delta > 0 such that x0x \ne 0 and xc<δ|x - c| < \delta imply 1/x1/c<ε|1/x - 1/c| < \varepsilon (Continuity of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a point of AA and on AA: the ε\varepsilon-δ\delta condition, its agreement with limxcf(x)=f(c)\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point).

[L3]

For every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is a natural number n1n \ge 1 with 1/n<ε1/n < \varepsilon (For every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n1n \ge 1 with 1/n<ε1/n < \varepsilon).

Refutation

technique · constructive
1.1

Define f:RRf : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} by f(x):=1/xf(x) := 1/x for x0x \ne 0 and f(0):=0f(0) := 0; this is a function on all of R\mathbb{R}, every nonzero real having a multiplicative inverse.

construct
1.2

Let z=(a,b)R×Rz = (a,b) \in \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} with zGfz \notin G_f, so that bf(a)b \ne f(a).

given
1.3

ff is not continuous at 00: put V:=(1,1)V := (-1,1), an open set containing f(0)=0f(0) = 0, and let UU be any open set with 0U0 \in U; by [A1] there is a real r>0r > 0 with (r,r)U(-r, r) \subseteq U, by [L3] there is a natural n1n \ge 1 with 1/n<min{r,1}1/n < \min\{r, 1\}, and then 1/nU1/n \in U while f(1/n)=n>1f(1/n) = n > 1, so f(1/n)Vf(1/n) \notin V and f[U]⊈Vf[U] \not\subseteq V.

A1A3L3
2.1

Suppose a0a \ne 0, so f(a)=1/af(a) = 1/a and ε:=b1/a/2>0\varepsilon := |b - 1/a|/2 > 0; by [L2] fix a real δ1>0\delta_1 > 0 such that x0x \ne 0 and xa<δ1|x - a| < \delta_1 imply 1/x1/a<ε|1/x - 1/a| < \varepsilon, and put δ:=min{δ1,a}>0\delta := \min\{\delta_1, |a|\} > 0.

step 1.2L2choose
2.2

Suppose a=0a = 0, so f(a)=0f(a) = 0 and b0b \ne 0, hence b>0|b| > 0; put ρ:=1/(2b)>0\rho := 1/(2|b|) > 0 and σ:=b/2>0\sigma := |b|/2 > 0 and B:=(ρ,ρ)×(bσ,b+σ)B := (-\rho, \rho) \times (b - \sigma, b + \sigma), a basic open set containing z=(0,b)z = (0,b).

step 1.2A1A2construct
3.1

With a0a \ne 0 the box B:=(aδ,a+δ)×(bε,b+ε)B := (a - \delta, a + \delta) \times (b - \varepsilon, b + \varepsilon) is a basic open set containing zz and BGf=B \cap G_f = \varnothing: for (x,y)B(x,y) \in B one has xa<δa|x - a| < \delta \le |a|, so x0x \ne 0 and f(x)=1/xf(x) = 1/x with 1/x1/a<ε|1/x - 1/a| < \varepsilon, whence f(x)bb1/a1/x1/a>2εε=ε>yb|f(x) - b| \ge |b - 1/a| - |1/x - 1/a| > 2\varepsilon - \varepsilon = \varepsilon > |y - b| and therefore yf(x)y \ne f(x).

step 2.1A1A2
3.2

With a=0a = 0 the box BB of step 2.2 satisfies BGf=B \cap G_f = \varnothing: let (x,y)B(x,y) \in B with y=f(x)y = f(x); if x=0x = 0 then y=0y = 0 and yb=b>σ|y - b| = |b| > \sigma, contradicting y(bσ,b+σ)y \in (b - \sigma, b + \sigma); and if x0x \ne 0 then 0<x<ρ0 < |x| < \rho gives f(x)=1/x>1/ρ=2b|f(x)| = 1/|x| > 1/\rho = 2|b|, while yb+yb<b+σ=3b/2<2b|y| \le |b| + |y - b| < |b| + \sigma = 3|b|/2 < 2|b|, contradicting y=f(x)y = f(x).

step 2.2
4.1

Every zGfz \notin G_f has a basic open set containing it and missing GfG_f, by step 3.1 if its first coordinate is nonzero and by step 3.2 if it is zero; so no such zz lies in Gf\overline{G_f}, whence Gf=Gf\overline{G_f} = G_f and GfG_f is closed in R×R\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}.

step 1.2step 3.1step 3.2L1
5.1

By step 1.3 and [A3] the function ff is not continuous, while by step 4.1 its graph is closed; so the claim is false.

step 4.1step 1.3A3
6.1

By [L4] a function into a compact codomain with closed graph is continuous, so steps 4.1 and 1.3 also show that R\mathbb{R} with its usual topology is not compact; the witness therefore refutes the claim and locates the missing hypothesis at the same time.

step 4.1step 1.3step 5.1L4discharge-construct

Remarks

  • Which hypothesis was dropped. The true statements in this neighbourhood are the two halves of A map into a compact space whose graph is closed is continuous; so for a compact Hausdorff codomain, continuity and closedness of the graph are equivalent: a closed graph gives continuity when the codomain is compact, and continuity gives a closed graph when the codomain is Hausdorff (The graph of a continuous map into a Hausdorff space is closed in the product). The claim above asks for the first conclusion with neither hypothesis, and the witness has a Hausdorff codomain, so it is compactness and not separation that is missing.

  • Where the closedness of the graph comes from, informally. Off the vertical axis the graph is closed because the reciprocal is continuous there; on the axis it is closed because the function escapes: near 00 the values are large in absolute value, so a small box around a point (0,b)(0,b) with b0b \ne 0 cannot meet the graph at all. That escape is exactly what a compact codomain would forbid.

  • The value chosen at 00 is immaterial. Replacing f(0)=0f(0) = 0 by any fixed real cc leaves both conclusions standing. For the graph, a point (0,b)(0,b) with bcb \ne c is separated from it by the box (ρ,ρ)×(bσ,b+σ)(-\rho, \rho) \times (b - \sigma, b + \sigma) with σ:=bc/2\sigma := |b - c|/2 and ρ:=1/(b+σ)\rho := 1/(|b| + \sigma): the value at 00 is cc, which lies outside the second factor, and for x0x \ne 0 in the first factor 1/x>b+σ|1/x| > |b| + \sigma forces 1/xb>σ|1/x - b| > \sigma. For the discontinuity, step 1.3 uses only that f(1/n)=nf(1/n) = n exceeds every bound, which does not involve f(0)f(0) at all. The value 00 is chosen above only because it makes the two computations shortest.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 119 results over 19 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources