Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)verified 2026-07-29 (claude-fable-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Refuted: a function into a Hausdorff space whose graph is closed is continuous. The function equal to 1/x1/x off 00 and to 00 at 00 has a closed graph, is discontinuous at 00 alone, and has a Hausdorff codomain

Statement refuted

False claim: if XX is a topological space, YY is Hausdorff (Hausdorff space: distinct points have disjoint open neighbourhoods; every metrizable space is Hausdorff and the indiscrete topology on two points is not) and f:XYf : X \to Y has graph closed in X×YX \times Y with the product topology (The product set iIXi\prod_{i \in I} X_i of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space), then ff is continuous (Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally).

This is the sharpening of FALSE: every function between topological spaces whose graph is closed in the product is continuous that adds to the codomain the hypothesis under which the other half of the closed-graph criterion holds. It is still false, and the same witness refutes it:

f:RR,f(x)=1x  (x0),f(0)=0,f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}, \qquad f(x) = \frac{1}{x} \ \ (x \ne 0), \qquad f(0) = 0 ,

with R\mathbb{R} carrying its usual topology, which is metrizable and hence Hausdorff. Its graph is closed in R2\mathbb{R}^2, it is continuous at every c0c \ne 0, and it is not continuous at 00; so its set of discontinuities is exactly {0}\{0\}.

What the criterion of A map into a compact space whose graph is closed is continuous; so for a compact Hausdorff codomain, continuity and closedness of the graph are equivalent asks of the codomain in the direction "closed graph implies continuous" is compactness, and the Hausdorff condition contributes nothing there.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: R\mathbb{R} with its usual topology, R2=R×R\mathbb{R}^2 = \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} with the product topology, and the function ff above with graph GfG_f.

[L1]

The function ff above has graph closed in R2\mathbb{R}^2 and is not continuous at 00 (FALSE: every function between topological spaces whose graph is closed in the product is continuous).

Counterexample

technique · constructive
1.1

Take f:RRf : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} with f(x)=1/xf(x) = 1/x for x0x \ne 0 and f(0)=0f(0) = 0, and give R\mathbb{R} its usual topology; the codomain is then Hausdorff.

A1construct
1.2

GfG_f is closed in R2\mathbb{R}^2 and ff is not continuous at 00.

L1
2.1

ff is continuous at every c0c \ne 0: given a real ε>0\varepsilon > 0, [L2] supplies a real δ>0\delta > 0 such that x0x \ne 0 and xc<δ|x - c| < \delta imply 1/x1/c<ε|1/x - 1/c| < \varepsilon; put δ:=min{δ,c}>0\delta' := \min\{\delta, |c|\} > 0, and then every xRx \in \mathbb{R} with xc<δ|x - c| < \delta' satisfies x0x \ne 0, hence f(x)f(c)=1/x1/c<ε|f(x) - f(c)| = |1/x - 1/c| < \varepsilon. So ff is continuous at cc in the sense of Continuity of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a point of AA and on AA: the ε\varepsilon-δ\delta condition, its agreement with limxcf(x)=f(c)\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point, hence at cc as a map of topological spaces.

step 1.1L2
3.1

By steps 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1 the map ff has a closed graph and a Hausdorff codomain and is not continuous, its set of discontinuities being exactly {0}\{0\}; so the claim is false.

step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1
4.1

By [L3] the same three facts show that R\mathbb{R} with its usual topology is not compact, so the hypothesis the claim should have carried is compactness of the codomain and not any separation property of it.

step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1L3discharge-construct

Remarks

  • Adding a separation hypothesis to the codomain cannot repair the claim, and this is why. In A map into a compact space whose graph is closed is continuous; so for a compact Hausdorff codomain, continuity and closedness of the graph are equivalent the Hausdorff condition is what makes a continuous map have closed graph, and compactness is what makes a closed-graph map continuous. The two hypotheses belong to opposite directions, and the witness above has the first without the second.

  • The failure is a single point, and it is not removable by redefining ff there. No value at 00 makes ff continuous, because f(x)|f(x)| exceeds every bound as xx approaches 00; and no value at 00 destroys the closedness of the graph. The example is therefore not a matter of a badly chosen value: it is the behaviour of the reciprocal near 00, and a compact codomain is exactly what would forbid that behaviour.

  • Where this sits relative to the functional-analytic closed graph theorem. That theorem replaces compactness of the codomain by completeness of both spaces and linearity of the map, and neither hypothesis is available or claimed here; the witness above is not linear, and nothing on this page bears on the functional-analytic statement.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 152 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources