How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function
Statement
Let , let , let and let . Suppose and are continuous at (Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point). Then:
- , and are continuous at ;
- , the function , is continuous at ;
- and , defined pointwise by and (Maximum and minimum of a set), are continuous at ;
- if then, writing , the point lies in and the quotient , , is continuous at as a function on .
Moreover, with no hypothesis at all:
- every constant function and the identity , , are continuous on ; hence so is for every (Integer powers ), and hence so is every polynomial function with real coefficients.
Consequently, if and are continuous on then so are , , , , and , and is continuous on .
Claim 4 is stated on because is not defined where vanishes, and may well vanish at points of far from . The hypothesis is , not " nowhere zero"; what it buys is that itself lies in the smaller domain, which is what makes continuity there mean anything.
Nothing here is proved through a sequence. Claims 1 and 4 are read off from Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients of function limits, the quotient under the hypothesis that the denominator limit is nonzero, which is itself proved from and , and claims 2, 3 and 5 are proved directly below. So no choice principle is used anywhere in this item.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A set , functions , a real , a point at which and are continuous, and, for claim 4, the hypothesis together with .
Continuity at : for every real there is a real such that every with satisfies (Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point).
A point of is either a limit point of or an isolated point of , and never both; at an isolated point of its domain every function is continuous; at a limit point of , continuity of at is exactly the statement that the limit of at exists and equals (Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point, Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of , The -neighbourhood and the punctured -neighbourhood of a point of , The - limit of at a limit point of ).
Algebra of function limits at a limit point of : if the limits of and at exist with values and , then the limits of , and at exist with values , and ; and if then is a limit point of , and the limit of at exists and equals (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients of function limits, the quotient under the hypothesis that the denominator limit is nonzero).
Sign preservation: if the limit of at a limit point of exists and is nonzero, then is a limit point of (If then on a punctured neighbourhood of ; in particular if then there).
Reverse triangle inequality: (The reverse triangle inequality); and , exactly when , (Basic properties of the absolute value).
Maximum and minimum of a two-element set of reals exist (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set), and for all reals one has and .
Ordered-field arithmetic in : trichotomy and totality of the order, the field identities, and so that and is defined (Ordered field, Field).
Integer powers: and (Integer powers ).
Proof
Justification of the identity in [L6]. Let . By totality either or . If then , so and , while . If the same computation with the roles exchanged applies, since there.
The isolated case. Suppose is an isolated point of , say with real. Then every function on is continuous at by [L2], which gives claims 1, 2 and 3 at once. For claim 4, assume ; then , and with in the left-hand side, so is an isolated point of and every function on , in particular , is continuous at .
Claim 2, at any point of . Let a real be given and let be as in [L1] for and this . For with the reverse triangle inequality gives . So is continuous at , and no case distinction was needed.
Claim 5, constants and the identity. If is constant then for every and every real , so any serves. For the identity, given a real take : every with has . Both are continuous at every point of .
The limit-point case, claim 1. Suppose is a limit point of . By [L2] the limits of and of at exist and equal and . By [L3] the limits of , and at exist and equal , and , which are exactly the values of those three functions at ; by [L2] again, each of them is continuous at .
The limit-point case, claim 4. Suppose is a limit point of and . Then , and by [L4] the point is a limit point of . By [L3] the limit of at exists and equals , which is the value of at ; by [L2] applied on the domain , that function is continuous at .
Claims 1 and 4 in general. By [L2] the point is either isolated in or a limit point of ; step 1.2 settles the first case and steps 1.5 and 1.6 the second. So claims 1 and 4 hold as stated.
Claim 3. By claim 1 the function is continuous at , by step 1.3 so is , and by claim 1 again so are and its scalar multiple by . By step 1.1 that scalar multiple is the function , so the maximum is continuous at ; the same argument with gives the minimum.
Claim 5, powers and polynomials. The map is the constant and is the identity, both continuous on by step 1.4; and if is continuous on then so is , being a product of two functions continuous on by step 2.1. By induction on , is continuous on for every . A polynomial function is obtained from these by finitely many scalar multiplications and additions, each of which preserves continuity by step 2.1.
Claims 1 to 5 are proved, all of them at an arbitrary point of and therefore, applied at every point, on the whole of ; and no sequence and no choice principle was used.
Remarks
-
Why the two-case shape, and why it is not an inconvenience. Continuity is defined at every point of the domain, including isolated points, where no limit exists (Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point). The algebra of limits therefore cannot be applied blindly; but at an isolated point every function is continuous, so the case is settled before it is opened. Claims 2 and 5 are proved directly from and and need no case distinction at all.
-
Absolute value, maximum and minimum are not in Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients of function limits, the quotient under the hypothesis that the denominator limit is nonzero, and the reason is that they are not needed there. They are needed here: the extreme value theorem and the one-dimensional fixed point theorem both build auxiliary functions out of maxima, minima and differences, and Rudin 4.20, the sharp converse: on a noncompact there is an unbounded continuous function and a bounded continuous function with no greatest value, and if is bounded there is a continuous function on that is not uniformly continuous builds its witnesses out of and quotients.
-
The converse of claim 2 is false: may be continuous while is continuous nowhere. The function equal to on and to elsewhere has constant absolute value; that it is nowhere continuous follows from the argument of The indicator of is continuous at no point of ↗ applied verbatim, since that argument uses only that the two values are distinct.
Depends on
- Continuity of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a point of $A$ and on $A$: the $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ condition, its agreement with $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c)$ at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point
- Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients of function limits, the quotient under the hypothesis that the denominator limit is nonzero
- If $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L \ne 0$ then $|f| > |L|/2$ on a punctured neighbourhood of $c$; in particular if $L > 0$ then $f > L/2 > 0$ there
- The $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ limit $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L$ of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a limit point $c$ of $A$
- Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of $\mathbb{R}$
- The $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood and the punctured $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood of a point of $\mathbb{R}$
- Basic properties of the absolute value
- The reverse triangle inequality
- Maximum and minimum of a set
- Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum
- Integer powers $a^m$
- Ordered field
- Field
Used by
- A function continuous on an interval I whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of I is constant on I; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant Corollary
- A function differentiable at c is continuous at c Corollary
- If f,g are integrable on [a,b] then so are | f|, f², fg, max(f,g) and min(f,g), and |∫ₐᵇ f| ≤ ∫ₐᵇ| f| Corollary
- The mean value theorem, as the case g(x) = x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a < b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c ∈ (a,b) with f(b) - f(a) = f'(c)(b-a) Corollary
- The sum of a real power series is continuous at every point strictly inside its interval of convergence Corollary
- Under dependent choice, a continuous real-valued map on a closed subspace of a normal space extends to the whole space, and a map into an open interval extends into that same open interval Corollary
- A continuous injection on [0,1] ∪ [2,3] that is not monotone, so the interval hypothesis cannot be dropped from the strict-monotonicity theorem Counterexample
- A curve for which the mean value inequality is an equality, showing the constant cannot be improved Counterexample
- A function differentiable on [0,1] whose derivative is unbounded, hence not Riemann integrable Counterexample
- An upper semicontinuous function on [0,1] that is bounded below and attains no minimum, so the semicontinuous extreme value theorem is genuinely one-sided Counterexample
- Continuous f and integrable sign-changing g with ∫ₐᵇ fg ≠ f(ξ)∫ₐᵇ g for every ξ Counterexample
- Continuous fₙ → 0 pointwise on [0,1] with ∫₀¹ fₙ = 1 for every n Counterexample
- Continuous triangular spikes on [0,1] converge pointwise to zero but not uniformly when monotonicity is absent Counterexample
- Dini's theorem fails for a discontinuous limit: powers on [0,1] decrease pointwise to a discontinuous endpoint indicator but not uniformly Counterexample
- Dini's theorem fails on [0,∞): x/(ι(k+1)+x) decreases pointwise to zero but not uniformly Counterexample
- g(x,y) = xy/(x²+y²), extended by g(0,0)=0, is continuous in each variable separately and not continuous at the origin Counterexample
- Refuted: a function into a Hausdorff space whose graph is closed is continuous. The function equal to 1/x off 0 and to 0 at 0 has a closed graph, is discontinuous at 0 alone, and has a Hausdorff codomain Counterexample
- The identity is uniformly continuous on ℝ and its square is not, so uniform continuity is not preserved by products Counterexample
- The identity on (0,1) is bounded with no greatest value, and on [0,∞) it is continuous and unbounded Counterexample
- The reciprocal on (0,1] is continuous and extends to no continuous function on ℝ, so closedness of the subspace is not decoration in the ℝ-valued Tietze extension Counterexample
- With f(x) = x³ and g(x) = x² on [-1,1] the quotient form f(b)-f(a)/g(b)-g(a) = f'(c)/g'(c) is meaningless because g(b) = g(a), while the product form of Cauchy's theorem still holds Counterexample
- x ↦ |x| is continuous everywhere and not differentiable at 0: the difference quotient equals 1 on the right and -1 on the left, so the two one-sided limits differ Counterexample
- x ↦ 1/x is continuous on (0,1) and not uniformly continuous there, the pairs 1/(k+2) and 1/(k+3) defeating every δ Counterexample
- x ↦ x² is continuous on ℝ and not uniformly continuous, the pairs k+1 and k+1+1/(k+1) defeating every δ Counterexample
- ∫_-∞^∞(1+x²)⁻¹ dx converges absolutely Example
- ∫₀¹ x² = 1/3, computed from the Darboux definition with uniform partitions and the closed form ∑_k<n k² = n(n-1)(2n-1)/6 Example
- ∫₀¹ xᵐ = 1/ι(m+1), computed by the fundamental theorem and checked against the definition Example
- A continuous function on [0,1] ⊆ ℝ extended to all of ℝ, both by Tietze and by hand Example
- A convergent sequence in ℝ³ and the integral ∫₀¹ (1, t, t²), computed componentwise Example
- A Urysohn function for (-∞, 0] and [1, ∞) in ℝ, written down and checked against the definition Example
- A worked fixed point on [1,2] for the map x ↦ (x + 2/x)/2, from the one-dimensional fixed point theorem Example
- For a natural n ≥ 1, the derivative of x ↦ x^1/n on (0,∞) is 1/ι(n)x^1/n - 1, obtained from the inverse rule applied to x ↦ xⁿ; in particular (√x)' = 1/(ι(2)√x) Example
- H(x) = 2√x on [0,1]: H is continuous, H' is unbounded on (0,1], and H' is therefore not Riemann integrable Example
- ℝ^* is homeomorphic to the unit circle by inverse stereographic projection, and ℕ^* is the ordinal space ω + 1 Example
- The chain rule applied to x ↦ (x²+1)⁵ and to x ↦ ((3x-1)²+2)³, with the Carathéodory factor written out in closed form in the first case Example
- The Dirichlet function is the pointwise limit of a sequence of Baire class one functions and is itself not Baire class one, so the Baire hierarchy on [0,1] is already strict at the first level Example
- The integral test applied to ∑ 1/ι(k+1)ᵖ for rational p>0, cross-checked against the published p-series theorem Example
- The intermediate value theorem gives a second proof that every nonnegative real has an n-th root, applied to xⁿ on a closed bounded interval Example
- The n-th root as a continuous inverse: for a natural n ≥ 1 the map x ↦ xⁿ is continuous and strictly increasing on [0,∞) with image [0,∞), so its inverse x ↦ x^1/n is continuous and strictly increasing Example
- The parabola segment {(x,x²):0≤ x≤1} has content zero in ℝ² Example
…and 28 more results.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 68 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Continuous function (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4 (Thm 4.4, 4.9) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I, §3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- MIT 18.100B lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)