Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-09 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A Urysohn function for (,0](-\infty, 0] and [1,)[1, \infty) in R\mathbb{R}, written down and checked against the definition

Example

In R\mathbb{R} with its usual topology, normal by In a metric space any two separated sets have disjoint open neighbourhoods, so every metrizable space is completely normal, the sets A:=(,0]A := (-\infty,0] and B:=[1,)B := [1,\infty) (Intervals of R\mathbb{R}: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length) are disjoint and closed. Define g:R[0,1]g : \mathbb{R} \to [0,1] by

g(x)  :=  max{0, min{1, x}}.g(x) \;:=\; \max\{0,\ \min\{1,\ x\}\}.

This gg is a witness for Urysohn's lemma, under the axiom of dependent choice: in a normal space two disjoint closed sets are separated by a continuous function into [0,1][0,1], and conversely such a space is normal applied to AA and BB: continuous, with Ag1({0})A \subseteq g^{-1}(\{0\}) and Bg1({1})B \subseteq g^{-1}(\{1\}).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: R\mathbb{R} with its usual topology, A=(,0]A = (-\infty,0], B=[1,)B=[1,\infty), and g(x)=max{0,min{1,x}}g(x) = \max\{0,\min\{1,x\}\}.

[L1]

The constant maps and the identity are continuous, and so are max{p,q}\max\{p,q\} and min{p,q}\min\{p,q\} of two continuous real functions (Sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values, maxima, minima and quotients with nonvanishing denominator of continuous functions are continuous, as are constants, the identity and every polynomial function, clauses 3 and 5).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

gg is continuous, being xmax{0,min{1,x}}x \mapsto \max\{0, \min\{1,x\}\}, a composition of max\max and min\min applied to the constants 0,10,1 and the identity, all continuous by [L1].

givenL1
1.2

For x0x \le 0: min{1,x}=x\min\{1,x\} = x, since x0<1x \le 0 < 1; and max{0,x}=0\max\{0,x\}=0, since x0x \le 0. So g(x)=0g(x)=0 for every xAx \in A.

givenalgebra
1.3

For x1x \ge 1: min{1,x}=1\min\{1,x\}=1, since x1x \ge 1; and max{0,1}=1\max\{0,1\}=1. So g(x)=1g(x)=1 for every xBx \in B.

givenalgebra
2.1

By steps 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3, g:R[0,1]g : \mathbb{R} \to [0,1] is continuous with Ag1({0})A \subseteq g^{-1}(\{0\}) and Bg1({1})B \subseteq g^{-1}(\{1\}), exactly the conclusion Urysohn's lemma, under the axiom of dependent choice: in a normal space two disjoint closed sets are separated by a continuous function into [0,1][0,1], and conversely such a space is normal promises for the disjoint closed pair A,BA,B.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 120 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources