Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

x↦∣x∣ is continuous everywhere and not differentiable at 0: the difference quotient equals 1 on the right and −1 on the left, so the two one-sided limits differ

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: if A⊆R, if f:A→R is continuous at a point c∈A (Continuity of f:A→R at a point of A and on A: the ε-δ condition, its agreement with lim⁡x→cf(x)=f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point) and if c is a limit point of A (Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of R), then f is differentiable at c (The derivative f′(c)=lim⁡x→cf(x)−f(c)x−c of f:A→R at a point c∈A that is a limit point of A, and differentiability on a set).

This is the converse of A function differentiable at c is continuous at c, and it is false. The witness is f(x)=∣x∣ on A=R at c=0: a single corner is enough, and the failure is visible in one line, the difference quotient taking the value 1 to the right of 0 and −1 to the left.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The set A:=R, the function f:R→R, f(x):=∣x∣ (Basic properties of the absolute value), and the point c:=0.

[L2]

Derivative (The derivative f′(c)=lim⁡x→cf(x)−f(c)x−c of f:A→R at a point c∈A that is a limit point of A, and differentiability on a set): 0 is a limit point of R, punctured neighbourhoods being never empty (Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of R, The ε-neighbourhood and the punctured ε-neighbourhood of a point of R); the difference quotient of f at 0 is q(x)=(∣x∣−∣0∣)/(x−0) on R∖{0}; and f is differentiable at 0 exactly when lim⁡x→0q(x) exists (The ε-δ limit lim⁡x→cf(x)=L of f:A→R at a limit point c of A).

[L3]

Absolute value (Basic properties of the absolute value): ∣0∣=0; ∣u∣=u for u≥0; and ∣u∣=−u for u≤0.

[L4]

One-sided limits (The left and right limits of f at c, as limits of the restrictions of f to A∩(−∞,c) and A∩(c,∞), Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length): for D⊆R and p∈R, the right limit of h:D→R at p is the limit at p of h restricted to D∩(p,∞), defined when p is a limit point of that set, and the left limit is the same with D∩(−∞,p).

[L5]

Two-sided against one-sided (If c is a limit point of the domain from both sides, the limit exists iff both one-sided limits exist and agree): if p is a limit point of both D∩(−∞,p) and D∩(p,∞), then for every real L the equality lim⁡x→ph(x)=L holds if and only if both one-sided limits at p exist and equal L.

[L6]

At a limit point of its domain a function has at most one limit (At a limit point of the domain a function has at most one limit); and the limit of a constant function K at a limit point of its domain is K, any δ serving (The ε-δ limit lim⁡x→cf(x)=L of f:A→R at a limit point c of A).

[L7]

1≠−1: 0<1 (The multiplicative identity is positive) gives −1<0<1, and trichotomy forbids equality.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

f is continuous at every point of R, in particular at 0.

L1
1.2

f(0)=∣0∣=0, so the difference quotient of f at 0 is q(x)=∣x∣/x on D:=R∖{0}.

L2L3
1.3

D∩(0,∞)=(0,∞) and D∩(−∞,0)=(−∞,0), and 0 is a limit point of each: for every real ε>0 the point ε/2 lies in (0,∞) with 0<∣ε/2−0∣<ε, and −ε/2 lies in (−∞,0) with 0<∣−ε/2−0∣<ε.

L3L4
2.1

For x>0 one has ∣x∣=x, so q(x)=x/x=1; for x<0 one has ∣x∣=−x, so q(x)=(−x)/x=−1. Thus q restricted to (0,∞) is the constant 1 and q restricted to (−∞,0) is the constant −1.

step 1.2L3
3.1

By [L6] and step 1.3 the two restrictions have limits at 0, namely 1 and −1; so by [L4] the right limit of q at 0 is 1 and the left limit is −1.

step 1.3step 2.1L4L6
4.1

Suppose lim⁡x→0q(x)=L for some real L. By step 1.3 the point 0 is a limit point of both one-sided sets, so [L5] forces both one-sided limits to equal L; with step 3.1 and [L6] that gives L=1 and L=−1, hence 1=−1, which [L7] forbids. So q has no limit at 0, and by [L2] the function f is not differentiable at 0.

step 3.1L2L5L6L7
5.1

The refuted claim therefore fails at A:=R, f:=∣⋅∣ and c:=0: the point 0 is a limit point of R, f is continuous at 0 by step 1.1, and f is not differentiable at 0 by step 4.1.

step 1.1step 4.1∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources