How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
At a limit point of the domain a function has at most one limit
Statement
Let , let , let be a limit point of (Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of ) and let . If
(The - limit of at a limit point of ), then .
A function therefore has at most one limit at a limit point of its domain,
which is what licenses the notation for a single real
number. This lemma is recorded in the justified_by field of
The - limit of at a limit point of for exactly that reason.
The hypothesis that is a limit point is not removable. At an isolated point of the domain the same - formula is satisfied vacuously by every real at once, which is the content of FALSE: a function has at most one limit at every point of its domain, isolated points included.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A set , a function , a limit point of , and reals with and (The - limit of at a limit point of , Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of ).
The limit condition: for every real there is a real such that every with satisfies , and likewise with in place of (The - limit of at a limit point of ).
Limit point: for every real there is with (Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of , The -neighbourhood and the punctured -neighbourhood of a point of ).
Triangle inequality: in (The triangle inequality).
Absolute value: ; if and only if ; and (Basic properties of the absolute value).
Order arithmetic in : trichotomy, so together with and forces , and is impossible; adding two strict inequalities (Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities); (The multiplicative identity is positive), hence and (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order), so and whenever (Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication, Ordered field); and of two positive reals the smaller is positive, the order being total.
Proof
Suppose, for contradiction, that .
Then , so while , and trichotomy gives ; hence and .
Applying [L1] twice with this , fix reals and such that every with has and every with has ; put to be the smaller of and , so .
Since is a limit point of , fix with .
That satisfies and , hence both and .
Therefore .
So , which trichotomy forbids; the assumption is untenable, and hence .
Remarks
-
Where each hypothesis is spent. The limit conditions are used only in step 5.1, and the limit-point hypothesis only in step 4.1, to produce a single point of the domain near at which both estimates can be read. Without such a point the two estimates never meet and nothing forces ; that is the whole mechanism, and it is the reason FALSE: a function has at most one limit at every point of its domain, isolated points included is false.
-
The sequential analogue is A sequence has at most one limit, proved by the same two-estimates-at-one-index argument. Neither statement uses any choice principle.
-
One-sided limits inherit this. By The left and right limits of at , as limits of the restrictions of to and a one-sided limit is the limit of a restriction of , so applying this lemma to that restriction gives uniqueness there too; nothing has to be reproved.
Depends on
- The $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ limit $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L$ of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a limit point $c$ of $A$
- Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of $\mathbb{R}$
- The $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood and the punctured $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood of a point of $\mathbb{R}$
- The triangle inequality
- Basic properties of the absolute value
- Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities
- Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication
- Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order
- The multiplicative identity is positive
- Ordered field
Used by
- On the domain {0} ∪ [1,2] every real is vacuously a limit at 0 Counterexample
- x ↦ |x| is continuous everywhere and not differentiable at 0: the difference quotient equals 1 on the right and -1 on the left, so the two one-sided limits differ Counterexample
- The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral Definition
- The derivative f'(c) = lim_x → c f(x) - f(c)/x - c of f : A → ℝ at a point c ∈ A that is a limit point of A, and differentiability on a set Definition
- The left and right limits of f at c, as limits of the restrictions of f to A ∩ (-∞, c) and A ∩ (c, ∞) Definition
- The sign function has both one-sided limits at 0 and no two-sided limit Example
- FALSE: a function has at most one limit at every point of its domain, isolated points included False statement
- FALSE: lim_x → c f(x) = f(c) whenever both sides exist False statement
- The limit at c depends only on the restriction of f to a punctured neighbourhood of c, and passes to any subset of the domain having c as a limit point Lemma
- Carathéodory's characterisation: f is differentiable at c if and only if there is φ : A → ℝ, continuous at c, with f(x) - f(c) = φ(x)(x - c) for every x ∈ A, and then φ is unique and φ(c) = f'(c) Theorem
- If c is a limit point of the domain from both sides, the limit exists iff both one-sided limits exist and agree Theorem
- One-sided limits of a monotone function always exist: for f nondecreasing on an interval I and c ∈ I, lim_x → c⁻ f(x) = sup{f(x) : x ∈ I, x < c} whenever I has points below c, lim_x → c⁺ f(x) = inf{f(x) : x ∈ I, x > c} whenever it has points above c, and these satisfy lim_x → c⁻ f(x) ≤ f(c) ≤ lim_x → c⁺ f(x) Theorem
- Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients of function limits, the quotient under the hypothesis that the denominator limit is nonzero Theorem
- The linear-approximation form of the derivative: f is differentiable at c with f'(c) = L if and only if the remainder r(x) = f(x) - f(c) - L(x-c) satisfies lim_x → c r(x)/(x-c) = 0; at most one L does so, so x ↦ f(c) + L(x-c) is the unique affine map approximating f to first order at c Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by The ε-δ limit lim_x → c f(x) = L of f : A → ℝ at a limit point c of A.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 32 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I, §3.1: Limits of functions (standard reference, not scraped)
- Limit of a function (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I, §3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)