Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

At a limit point of the domain a function has at most one limit

Statement

Let ARA \subseteq \mathbb{R}, let f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R}, let cc be a limit point of AA (Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of R\mathbb{R}) and let L,LRL, L' \in \mathbb{R}. If

limxcf(x)=Landlimxcf(x)=L\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L \qquad \text{and} \qquad \lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L'

(The ε\varepsilon-δ\delta limit limxcf(x)=L\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a limit point cc of AA), then L=LL = L'.

A function therefore has at most one limit at a limit point of its domain, which is what licenses the notation limxcf(x)\lim_{x \to c} f(x) for a single real number. This lemma is recorded in the justified_by field of The ε\varepsilon-δ\delta limit limxcf(x)=L\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a limit point cc of AA for exactly that reason.

The hypothesis that cc is a limit point is not removable. At an isolated point of the domain the same ε\varepsilon-δ\delta formula is satisfied vacuously by every real at once, which is the content of FALSE: a function has at most one limit at every point of its domain, isolated points included.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A set ARA \subseteq \mathbb{R}, a function f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R}, a limit point cc of AA, and reals L,LL, L' with limxcf(x)=L\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L and limxcf(x)=L\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L' (The ε\varepsilon-δ\delta limit limxcf(x)=L\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a limit point cc of AA, Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of R\mathbb{R}).

[L1]

The limit condition: for every real ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is a real δ>0\delta > 0 such that every xAx \in A with 0<xc<δ0 < |x - c| < \delta satisfies f(x)L<ε|f(x) - L| < \varepsilon, and likewise with LL' in place of LL (The ε\varepsilon-δ\delta limit limxcf(x)=L\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a limit point cc of AA).

[L2]

Limit point: for every real δ>0\delta > 0 there is xAx \in A with 0<xc<δ0 < |x - c| < \delta (Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of R\mathbb{R}, The ε\varepsilon-neighbourhood and the punctured ε\varepsilon-neighbourhood of a point of R\mathbb{R}).

[L3]

Triangle inequality: u+vu+v|u + v| \le |u| + |v| in R\mathbb{R} (The triangle inequality).

[L4]

Absolute value: u0|u| \ge 0; u=0|u| = 0 if and only if u=0u = 0; and u=u|-u| = |u| (Basic properties of the absolute value).

[L5]

Order arithmetic in R\mathbb{R}: trichotomy, so u0u \ne 0 together with u0|u| \ge 0 and u0|u| \ne 0 forces u>0|u| > 0, and t<tt < t is impossible; adding two strict inequalities (Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities); 0<10 < 1 (The multiplicative identity is positive), hence 2:=1+1>02 := 1 + 1 > 0 and 21>02^{-1} > 0 (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order), so η/2>0\eta/2 > 0 and (η/2)2=η(\eta/2) \cdot 2 = \eta whenever η>0\eta > 0 (Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication, Ordered field); and of two positive reals the smaller is positive, the order being total.

Proof

technique · contradiction
1.1

Suppose, for contradiction, that LLL \ne L'.

assume-contra
2.1

Then LL0L - L' \ne 0, so LL0|L - L'| \ne 0 while LL0|L - L'| \ge 0, and trichotomy gives LL>0|L - L'| > 0; hence ε:=LL/2>0\varepsilon := |L - L'|/2 > 0 and 2ε=LL2\varepsilon = |L - L'|.

step 1.1L4L5
3.1

Applying [L1] twice with this ε\varepsilon, fix reals δ1>0\delta_1 > 0 and δ2>0\delta_2 > 0 such that every xAx \in A with 0<xc<δ10 < |x - c| < \delta_1 has f(x)L<ε|f(x) - L| < \varepsilon and every xAx \in A with 0<xc<δ20 < |x - c| < \delta_2 has f(x)L<ε|f(x) - L'| < \varepsilon; put δ\delta to be the smaller of δ1\delta_1 and δ2\delta_2, so δ>0\delta > 0.

step 2.1L1L5choose
4.1

Since cc is a limit point of AA, fix xAx \in A with 0<xc<δ0 < |x - c| < \delta.

step 3.1L2choose
5.1

That xx satisfies 0<xc<δ10 < |x - c| < \delta_1 and 0<xc<δ20 < |x - c| < \delta_2, hence both f(x)L<ε|f(x) - L| < \varepsilon and f(x)L<ε|f(x) - L'| < \varepsilon.

step 3.1step 4.1L1
6.1

Therefore LL=(Lf(x))+(f(x)L)Lf(x)+f(x)L=f(x)L+f(x)L<ε+ε=2ε=LL|L - L'| = |(L - f(x)) + (f(x) - L')| \le |L - f(x)| + |f(x) - L'| = |f(x) - L| + |f(x) - L'| < \varepsilon + \varepsilon = 2\varepsilon = |L - L'|.

step 5.1L3L4L5
7.1

So LL<LL|L - L'| < |L - L'|, which trichotomy forbids; the assumption LLL \ne L' is untenable, and hence L=LL = L'.

step 6.1L5discharge-contradiction

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by The ε-δ limit lim_x → c f(x) = L of f : A → ℝ at a limit point c of A.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 32 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources