How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The derivative of at a point that is a limit point of , and differentiability on a set
Definition
Throughout, is the complete ordered field (Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)), neighbourhoods are those of The -neighbourhood and the punctured -neighbourhood of a point of and limit points those of Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of .
Let , let and let be a limit point of . The difference quotient of at is the function
The division is legitimate at every point of the domain, since gives .
The point is a limit point of , not merely of . For every real the punctured neighbourhood omits , so
and the left-hand side is nonempty because is a limit point of . So is a function on a set having as a limit point, and is a notion that The - limit of at a limit point of defines.
is differentiable at when that limit exists, and then the derivative of at is
Two obligations are carried by that notation, and both are discharged here.
- Uniqueness. Writing treats the right-hand side as a name for a single real number. That is legitimate: is a limit point of the domain of , so at most one real can satisfy the - condition, by At a limit point of the domain a function has at most one limit applied to . Two reals both meeting the condition are therefore equal, and the symbol denotes.
- Meaningfulness. The hypothesis that is a limit point of is not decoration. At an isolated point of the punctured condition is met by no point of the domain at all, so the - formula is satisfied vacuously by every real at once; this is why The - limit of at a limit point of leaves the limit undefined there, and it is why this library defines only at a limit point of . At an isolated point of its domain a function is neither differentiable nor non-differentiable here: the question is not posed.
The limit sees only , so how the difference quotient is extended to is irrelevant. Let agree with at every point of , and let . Then if and only if . Both conditions read: for every real there is a real such that every point of the relevant domain with satisfies (The - limit of at a limit point of ). The clause removes from both quantifiers, so in both cases the points quantified over are exactly the with , at which and take the same value. The two conditions are the same condition.
Differentiability on a set. For , is differentiable on when it is differentiable at every ; implicit in that phrase is that every point of is a limit point of . is differentiable when it is differentiable on the whole of .
Restriction of the domain. Let , let and suppose is a limit point of . If is differentiable at , then so is the restriction , and
Indeed ; the displayed identity of punctured neighbourhoods above, applied to , shows that is a limit point of ; the difference quotient is the restriction of to , since ; and claim 2 of The limit at depends only on the restriction of to a punctured neighbourhood of , and passes to any subset of the domain having as a limit point carries the limit to that restriction.
Every point of a nondegenerate interval is a limit point of it. Let be order-convex (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length) with at least two elements and let . Choose with , and let a real be given. If , put ; then , and , so and order-convexity gives , while . If , the point serves in the same way. So for every real , that is, is a limit point of (Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of ).
Consequently, for defined on a nondegenerate interval , the symbol is meaningful at every , endpoints included. At an endpoint the difference quotient is taken over the points of lying on the one side that is available, so what other texts call a one-sided derivative is, here, simply the derivative of on .
Remarks
-
Notation. and denote the same real number, and this library uses the first. Neither is an operation performed on a symbol : the variable in the second is a name for the argument and nothing more.
-
Differentiability is a property of the pair at , not of alone. The restriction clause above goes in one direction only, and the converse fails. Take , , and . Then is the identity on , whose difference quotient at is constantly , so is differentiable at with derivative ; that itself is not differentiable at is is continuous everywhere and not differentiable at : the difference quotient equals on the right and on the left, so the two one-sided limits differ ↗ on the companion page. So enlarging the domain can destroy differentiability, and the phrase " is differentiable at " always carries the domain with it.
-
The relation to continuity is not definitional. Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point is a condition on near that does not mention a quotient, and it is defined at every point of , isolated points included, whereas differentiability is defined only at limit points of . That differentiability implies continuity is a theorem on this page and not a reading of the definitions.
-
No second derivative and no one-sided derivative is introduced here. Both are standard, and both are absent from this page on purpose; What is fixed here and what is not: the derivative is taken at a point of the domain that is also a limit point of it, one-sided derivatives and derivatives of order above one are not introduced at this point in the reading order, and and name the same real number records exactly what is fixed and what is left open at this point in the reading order.
Depends on
- The $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ limit $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L$ of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a limit point $c$ of $A$
- At a limit point of the domain a function has at most one limit
- Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of $\mathbb{R}$
- Intervals of $\mathbb{R}$: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
- The $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood and the punctured $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood of a point of $\mathbb{R}$
- Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)
- Continuity of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a point of $A$ and on $A$: the $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ condition, its agreement with $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c)$ at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point
- The limit at $c$ depends only on the restriction of $f$ to a punctured neighbourhood of $c$, and passes to any subset of the domain having $c$ as a limit point
Used by
- A function continuous on an interval I whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of I is constant on I; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant Corollary
- A function differentiable at c is continuous at c Corollary
- Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and ∫ₐᵇ f = G(b)-G(a) for any primitive G Corollary
- If f : [a,b] → ℝᵐ is differentiable with integrable f' then ∫ₐᵇ f' = f(b)-f(a); and a bounded derivative makes f Lipschitz Corollary
- If f is continuous on an interval I and |f'| ≤ M at every interior point, then |f(x) - f(y)| ≤ M|x-y| for all x,y ∈ I, so f is Lipschitz with constant M and uniformly continuous on I Corollary
- The limit of sin x divided by x at zero is one Corollary
- The mean value theorem, as the case g(x) = x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a < b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c ∈ (a,b) with f(b) - f(a) = f'(c)(b-a) Corollary
- A curve for which the mean value inequality is an equality, showing the constant cannot be improved Counterexample
- A function differentiable on [0,1] whose derivative is unbounded, hence not Riemann integrable Counterexample
- An invertible derivative at one point does not give a local inverse without C¹ regularity Counterexample
- Continuous f and integrable sign-changing g with ∫ₐᵇ fg ≠ f(ξ)∫ₐᵇ g for every ξ Counterexample
- Continuous fₙ → 0 pointwise on [0,1] with ∫₀¹ fₙ = 1 for every n Counterexample
- f(t) = (t², t³) on [0,1]: no ξ satisfies f(1)-f(0) = f'(ξ) Counterexample
- f(x) = x on [0,1) with f(1) = 0 is differentiable at every point of (0,1) with f' ≡ 1, yet no c satisfies f(1) - f(0) = f'(c), so continuity on the closed interval cannot be dropped from the mean value theorem Counterexample
- The identity on [0,1] attains its maximum at 1 and its minimum at 0 with derivative 1 at both, so Fermat's theorem genuinely needs the extremum to be at an interior point Counterexample
- The sign function is Riemann integrable on [-1,1] and has no primitive there Counterexample
- With f(x) = x³ and g(x) = x² on [-1,1] the quotient form f(b)-f(a)/g(b)-g(a) = f'(c)/g'(c) is meaningless because g(b) = g(a), while the product form of Cauchy's theorem still holds Counterexample
- x ↦ |x| is continuous everywhere and not differentiable at 0: the difference quotient equals 1 on the right and -1 on the left, so the two one-sided limits differ Counterexample
- x ↦ √x on (0,1] is differentiable with unbounded derivative and is not Lipschitz there, so the boundedness hypothesis in the Lipschitz corollary cannot be dropped Counterexample
- x/(1+(k+1)²x²) converges uniformly to zero on ℝ while every derivative at zero equals one Counterexample
- Higher derivatives and the classes Cᵏ and C^∞ Definition
- The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral Definition
- The left and right derivatives of a real function as one-sided limits of its difference quotient Definition
- |x| is Lipschitz and absolutely continuous but not C¹ on [-1,1] Example
- ∫₀¹ x d(x²)=2/3 Example
- ∫₀¹ xᵐ = 1/ι(m+1), computed by the fundamental theorem and checked against the definition Example
- A differentiable function whose derivative is discontinuous Example
- A function with positive derivative at 0 that is monotone on no neighbourhood of 0 Example
- A nonlinear reparametrisation leaves a Stieltjes integral unchanged Example
- For a natural n ≥ 1, the derivative of x ↦ x^1/n on (0,∞) is 1/ι(n)x^1/n - 1, obtained from the inverse rule applied to x ↦ xⁿ; in particular (√x)' = 1/(ι(2)√x) Example
- H(x) = 2√x on [0,1]: H is continuous, H' is unbounded on (0,1], and H' is therefore not Riemann integrable Example
- The chain rule applied to x ↦ (x²+1)⁵ and to x ↦ ((3x-1)²+2)³, with the Carathéodory factor written out in closed form in the first case Example
- The extension of x² sin(1/x) by zero is differentiable but its derivative is discontinuous at zero Example
- The integral test applied to ∑ 1/ι(k+1)ᵖ for rational p>0, cross-checked against the published p-series theorem Example
- The mean value theorem gives |√x - √y| ≤ 1/ι(2) |x - y| for x, y ≥ 1, so the square root is Lipschitz with constant 1/2 on [1,∞) Example
- Worked derivatives from the algebra of derivatives and the power rule: (3x⁴ - 5x + 2)' = 12x³ - 5, and the quotient rule applied to (x²+1)/(x-1) on ℝ ∖ {1} Example
- x ↦ x³ is increasing on ℝ although its derivative vanishes at 0, which is the witness for the false statement that a vanishing derivative forbids strict increase, and which makes its inverse non-differentiable at 0 Example
- FALSE: differentiability at every point of (a,b) alone yields a c ∈ (a,b) with f(b) - f(a) = f'(c)(b-a) False statement
- FALSE: for every integrable f on [a,b], the integral function F(x)=∫ₐˣ f satisfies F' = f on [a,b] False statement
- FALSE: if f'(c) = 0 then f is not increasing on any interval containing c False statement
…and 32 more results.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 35 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Derivative (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 5 (Def. 5.1) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I, §4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- T. Tao, Analysis I, 3rd ed., §10.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- T. Gantumur, Differentiation (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I, The Derivative (standard reference, not scraped)