Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every continuous function on an interval has a primitive; two primitives differ by a constant; and abf=G(b)G(a)\int_a^b f = G(b)-G(a) for any primitive GG

Statement

Let IRI \subseteq \mathbb{R} be order-convex with at least two elements (Intervals of R\mathbb{R}: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length) and let f:IRf : I \to \mathbb{R} be continuous on II (Continuity of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a point of AA and on AA: the ε\varepsilon-δ\delta condition, its agreement with limxcf(x)=f(c)\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point). Call G:IRG : I \to \mathbb{R} a primitive of ff on II when GG is differentiable at every point of II as a function on II with G=fG' = f there (The derivative f(c)=limxcf(x)f(c)xcf'(c) = \lim_{x \to c} \frac{f(x) - f(c)}{x - c} of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a point cAc \in A that is a limit point of AA, and differentiability on a set). Then:

  1. Existence. Fix c0Ic_0 \in I. The function F:IR,F(x)  :=  c0xfF : I \to \mathbb{R}, \qquad F(x) \;:=\; \int_{c_0}^x f is defined at every xIx \in I (The integral with oriented limits: aaf:=0\int_a^a f := 0 and baf:=abf\int_b^a f := -\int_a^b f, The integral function F(x):=axfF(x) := \int_a^x f of an integrable ff) and is a primitive of ff on II.
  2. Uniqueness up to a constant. If G1G_1 and G2G_2 are primitives of ff on II then there is a real kk with G1(x)=G2(x)+kG_1(x) = G_2(x) + k for every xIx \in I.
  3. Evaluation. If a,bIa, b \in I with a<ba < b and GG is any primitive of ff on II, then abf  =  G(b)G(a).\int_a^b f \;=\; G(b) - G(a) .

The scope is exactly the continuous case, and that is not a limitation of the proof. An integrable function need not have a primitive, and a function with a primitive need not be integrable; this corollary is precisely the intersection where both fundamental theorems apply, and both witnesses are on the companion page.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An order-convex IRI \subseteq \mathbb{R} with at least two elements, a continuous f:IRf : I \to \mathbb{R}, a base point c0Ic_0 \in I, and a real ε>0\varepsilon > 0.

[L2]

Order-convexity: if p,qIp, q \in I then every real between pp and qq lies in II, so the closed interval with endpoints pp and qq is contained in II (Intervals of R\mathbb{R}: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length).

[L3]

ppu=0\int_p^p u = 0, qpu=pqu\int_q^p u = -\int_p^q u, and for uu integrable on a closed bounded interval containing p,q,rp,q,r one has pqu+qru=pru\int_p^q u + \int_q^r u = \int_p^r u (The integral with oriented limits: aaf:=0\int_a^a f := 0 and baf:=abf\int_b^a f := -\int_a^b f, For a<c<ba<c<b: ff is integrable on [a,b][a,b] if and only if it is integrable on [a,c][a,c] and on [c,b][c,b], and then abf=acf+cbf\int_a^b f = \int_a^c f + \int_c^b f; with the oriented form for arbitrary a,b,ca,b,c, claim 3).

[L4]

First fundamental theorem: if uu is integrable on [p,q][p,q] with p<qp<q and continuous at c[p,q]c \in [p,q], then xpxux \mapsto \int_p^x u has derivative u(c)u(c) at cc as a function on [p,q][p,q]; written out, for every real ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is a real δ>0\delta>0 with (pxupcu)/(xc)u(c)<ε\bigl|\bigl(\int_p^x u - \int_p^c u\bigr)/(x-c) - u(c)\bigr| < \varepsilon for every x[p,q]x \in [p,q] with 0<xc<δ0<|x-c|<\delta (The first fundamental theorem: if ff is integrable on [a,b][a,b] and continuous at cc, then F(c)=f(c)F'(c) = f(c); in particular a continuous ff has FF as a primitive, The derivative f(c)=limxcf(x)f(c)xcf'(c) = \lim_{x \to c} \frac{f(x) - f(c)}{x - c} of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a point cAc \in A that is a limit point of AA, and differentiability on a set, The ε\varepsilon-δ\delta limit limxcf(x)=L\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a limit point cc of AA).

[L5]

Second fundamental theorem: if HH is differentiable at every point of [p,q][p,q] with HH' integrable there, then pqH=H(q)H(p)\int_p^q H' = H(q)-H(p) (The second fundamental theorem: if GG is differentiable on [a,b][a,b] with G=fG' = f and ff is integrable, then abf=G(b)G(a)\int_a^b f = G(b)-G(a)).

[L6]

If uu is continuous on an order-convex II and differentiable with u=0u' = 0 at every interior point of II, then uu is constant on II (A function continuous on an interval II whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of II is constant on II; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant).

[L7]
[L8]

Ordered-field arithmetic and minima of two reals: the order is total and transitive, and min{s,t}\min\{s,t\} is a real that is \le both (Maximum and minimum of a set, Ordered field, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

FF is defined. For xIx \in I the closed interval with endpoints c0c_0 and xx lies in II by [L2], ff is continuous there, hence integrable when xc0x \ne c_0 by [L1], and c0c0f=0\int_{c_0}^{c_0} f = 0 by [L3]; so F(x)F(x) names a real for every xIx \in I.

givenL1L2L3
1.2

A closed neighbourhood inside II. Fix cIc \in I. If some element of II is <c< c, choose uIu \in I with u<cu < c; otherwise put u:=cu := c. If some element of II is >c> c, choose vIv \in I with v>cv > c; otherwise put v:=cv := c. Not both u=cu = c and v=cv = c, since II would then have cc as its only element; so u<vu < v, and [u,v]I[u,v] \subseteq I by [L2].

givenL2choose
1.3

Claim 2. Let G1,G2G_1, G_2 be primitives of ff on II and put u:=G1G2u := G_1 - G_2. Then uu is differentiable at every point of II with u=ff=0u' = f - f = 0 there, in particular at every interior point of II, and uu is continuous on II by [L7]; so [L6] gives a real kk with uku \equiv k.

L6L7
2.1

Put η:=min{cu, vc}\eta := \min\{\,c-u,\ v-c\,\} if u<cu<c and c<vc<v, η:=vc\eta := v-c if u=cu = c, and η:=cu\eta := c-u if v=cv = c; in every case η>0\eta > 0.

step 1.2L8construct
2.2

ff is integrable on [u,v][u,v] by [L1], and for x[u,v]x \in [u,v], [L3] applied to the points c0,u,xc_0, u, x inside the closed interval with endpoints min{c0,u}\min\{c_0,u\} and max{c0,v}\max\{c_0,v\}, which lies in II by [L2], gives F(x)=F(u)+uxfF(x) = F(u) + \int_u^x f.

step 1.1step 1.2L1L2L3
3.1

Every point of II within η\eta of cc lies in [u,v][u,v]. Let xIx \in I with xc<η|x-c| < \eta. If x<cx < c then II has an element below cc, so u<cu < c and ηcu\eta \le c-u, whence x>cηux > c-\eta \ge u. If x>cx > c then symmetrically x<c+ηvx < c+\eta \le v. And ucvu \le c \le v covers x=cx = c. So uxvu \le x \le v.

step 1.2step 2.1L8
3.2

Hence for x[u,v]x \in [u,v] with xcx \ne c, (F(x)F(c))/(xc)=(uxfucf)/(xc)\bigl(F(x)-F(c)\bigr)/(x-c) = \bigl(\int_u^x f - \int_u^c f\bigr)/(x-c), the constant F(u)F(u) cancelling.

step 2.2algebra
3.3

By [L4] applied on [u,v][u,v] at the point cc, fix a real δ>0\delta > 0 with (uxfucf)/(xc)f(c)<ε\bigl|\bigl(\int_u^x f - \int_u^c f\bigr)/(x-c) - f(c)\bigr| < \varepsilon for every x[u,v]x \in [u,v] with 0<xc<δ0<|x-c|<\delta, and put δ:=min{δ,η}>0\delta' := \min\{\delta,\eta\} > 0.

step 2.2givenL1L4L8choose
4.1

Every xIx \in I with 0<xc<δ0 < |x-c| < \delta' lies in [u,v][u,v] by step 3.1, so by step 3.2 and step 3.3, (F(x)F(c))/(xc)f(c)<ε\bigl|\bigl(F(x)-F(c)\bigr)/(x-c) - f(c)\bigr| < \varepsilon.

step 3.1step 3.2step 3.3
5.1

As ε>0\varepsilon > 0 was arbitrary and cc is a limit point of II by [L7], FF is differentiable at cc with F(c)=f(c)F'(c) = f(c); since cIc \in I was arbitrary, FF is a primitive of ff on II, which is claim 1.

step 1.2step 4.1L7
6.1

Claim 3. Let a<ba<b in II and let GG be a primitive of ff on II. Then [a,b]I[a,b] \subseteq I by [L2], the restriction of GG to [a,b][a,b] is differentiable at every point of [a,b][a,b] with derivative ff there by [L7], and ff is integrable on [a,b][a,b] by [L1]; so [L5] gives abf=G(b)G(a)\int_a^b f = G(b)-G(a).

L1L2L5L7

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 103 results over 21 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources