Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Continuous f and integrable sign-changing g with ∫abfg≠f(ξ)∫abg for every ξ

Statement refuted

False claim: if f is continuous on [a,b] and g is integrable on [a,b], then there is ξ∈[a,b] with ∫abfg=f(ξ)∫abg.

That is If f is continuous on [a,b] and g is integrable with g≥0, there is ξ∈[a,b] with ∫abfg=f(ξ)∫abg with the hypothesis g≥0 deleted, and it is false. On [−1,1] take

f(t)  =  t,g(t)  =  t.

Both are continuous, hence integrable, and g changes sign. Then

∫−11fg  =  ∫−11t2 dt  =  2ι(3)  >  0,∫−11g  =  ∫−11t dt  =  0,

so f(ξ)∫−11g=0 for every ξ∈[−1,1], while the left-hand side is positive. No ξ works.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The functions f(t)=g(t)=t on [−1,1], and ξ∈[−1,1] arbitrary.

[L5]

Powers and canonical naturals: 12=1, (−1)2=1, 13=1, (−1)3=−1, ι(2)=2>0 and ι(3)=3>0 (Integer powers am, The canonical natural ι(n)=n⋅1F of a field, Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, Ordered field).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

f and g are continuous on [−1,1], hence integrable there by [L1], and fg, the function t↦t2, is integrable by [L1] or [L2].

givenL1L2
1.2

The function H1(t):=t3/ι(3) is differentiable at every real with H1′(t)=ι(3)t2/ι(3)=t2, by [L3] and [L5].

L3L5construct
1.3

The function H2(t):=t2/ι(2) is differentiable at every real with H2′(t)=ι(2) t/ι(2)=t, by [L3] and [L5].

L3L5construct
2.1

By [L4] applied to H1 on [−1,1], ∫−11t2 dt=H1(1)−H1(−1)=1/ι(3)−(−1)/ι(3)=2/ι(3), a positive real by [L5].

step 1.1step 1.2L4L5
2.2

By [L4] applied to H2 on [−1,1], ∫−11t dt=H2(1)−H2(−1)=1/ι(2)−1/ι(2)=0.

step 1.1step 1.3L4L5
3.1

For every ξ∈[−1,1], f(ξ)∫−11g=ξ⋅0=0 by step 2.2 and [L6], while ∫−11fg=2/ι(3)>0 by step 2.1.

step 2.1step 2.2L5L6
4.1

Hence ∫−11fg≠f(ξ)∫−11g for every ξ∈[−1,1], and the claim fails at this pair.

step 3.1L5∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

78 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources