Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Continuous ff and integrable sign-changing gg with abfgf(ξ)abg\int_a^b fg \ne f(\xi)\int_a^b g for every ξ\xi

Statement refuted

False claim: if ff is continuous on [a,b][a,b] and gg is integrable on [a,b][a,b], then there is ξ[a,b]\xi \in [a,b] with abfg=f(ξ)abg\int_a^b f g = f(\xi)\int_a^b g.

That is If ff is continuous on [a,b][a,b] and gg is integrable with g0g \ge 0, there is ξ[a,b]\xi \in [a,b] with abfg=f(ξ)abg\int_a^b fg = f(\xi)\int_a^b g with the hypothesis g0g \ge 0 deleted, and it is false. On [1,1][-1,1] take

f(t)  =  t,g(t)  =  t.f(t) \;=\; t, \qquad g(t) \;=\; t .

Both are continuous, hence integrable, and gg changes sign. Then

11fg  =  11t2dt  =  2ι(3)  >  0,11g  =  11tdt  =  0,\int_{-1}^{1} f g \;=\; \int_{-1}^{1} t^{2}\,\mathrm{d}t \;=\; \frac{2}{\iota(3)} \;>\; 0, \qquad \int_{-1}^{1} g \;=\; \int_{-1}^{1} t\,\mathrm{d}t \;=\; 0 ,

so f(ξ)11g=0f(\xi)\int_{-1}^{1} g = 0 for every ξ[1,1]\xi \in [-1,1], while the left-hand side is positive. No ξ\xi works.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The functions f(t)=g(t)=tf(t) = g(t) = t on [1,1][-1,1], and ξ[1,1]\xi \in [-1,1] arbitrary.

[L3]

For n1n \ge 1 the function xxnx \mapsto x^{n} is differentiable at every real cc with derivative ι(n)cn1\iota(n)c^{\,n-1}, and a scalar multiple of a differentiable function is differentiable with the scaled derivative (For a natural n1n \ge 1 the function xxnx \mapsto x^{n} is differentiable everywhere with derivative ι(n)xn1\iota(n)\,x^{\,n-1}; for n=0n = 0 it is the constant 11, with derivative 00; for a natural n1n \ge 1 the function xxnx \mapsto x^{-n} is differentiable at every x0x \ne 0 with derivative ι(n)xn1-\iota(n)\,x^{-n-1}; consequently every polynomial function is differentiable at every real, with the derivative computed term by term, claim 2, Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: (f+g)(c)=f(c)+g(c)(f+g)'(c) = f'(c) + g'(c), (αf)(c)=αf(c)(\alpha f)'(c) = \alpha f'(c), (fg)(c)=f(c)g(c)+f(c)g(c)(fg)'(c) = f'(c)g(c) + f(c)g'(c), and (f/g)(c)=(f(c)g(c)f(c)g(c))/g(c)2(f/g)'(c) = \bigl(f'(c)g(c) - f(c)g'(c)\bigr)/g(c)^{2} when g(c)0g(c) \ne 0, claim 2, The derivative f(c)=limxcf(x)f(c)xcf'(c) = \lim_{x \to c} \frac{f(x) - f(c)}{x - c} of f:ARf : A \to \mathbb{R} at a point cAc \in A that is a limit point of AA, and differentiability on a set).

[L5]

Powers and canonical naturals: 12=11^{2} = 1, (1)2=1(-1)^{2} = 1, 13=11^{3} = 1, (1)3=1(-1)^{3} = -1, ι(2)=2>0\iota(2) = 2 > 0 and ι(3)=3>0\iota(3) = 3 > 0 (Integer powers ama^m, The canonical natural ι(n)=n1F\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F of a field, Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, Ordered field).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

ff and gg are continuous on [1,1][-1,1], hence integrable there by [L1], and fgfg, the function tt2t \mapsto t^{2}, is integrable by [L1] or [L2].

givenL1L2
1.2

The function H1(t):=t3/ι(3)H_1(t) := t^{3}/\iota(3) is differentiable at every real with H1(t)=ι(3)t2/ι(3)=t2H_1'(t) = \iota(3)t^{2}/\iota(3) = t^{2}, by [L3] and [L5].

L3L5construct
1.3

The function H2(t):=t2/ι(2)H_2(t) := t^{2}/\iota(2) is differentiable at every real with H2(t)=ι(2)t/ι(2)=tH_2'(t) = \iota(2)\,t/\iota(2) = t, by [L3] and [L5].

L3L5construct
2.1

By [L4] applied to H1H_1 on [1,1][-1,1], 11t2dt=H1(1)H1(1)=1/ι(3)(1)/ι(3)=2/ι(3)\int_{-1}^{1} t^{2}\,\mathrm{d}t = H_1(1)-H_1(-1) = 1/\iota(3) - (-1)/\iota(3) = 2/\iota(3), a positive real by [L5].

step 1.1step 1.2L4L5
2.2

By [L4] applied to H2H_2 on [1,1][-1,1], 11tdt=H2(1)H2(1)=1/ι(2)1/ι(2)=0\int_{-1}^{1} t\,\mathrm{d}t = H_2(1)-H_2(-1) = 1/\iota(2) - 1/\iota(2) = 0.

step 1.1step 1.3L4L5
3.1

For every ξ[1,1]\xi \in [-1,1], f(ξ)11g=ξ0=0f(\xi)\int_{-1}^{1} g = \xi \cdot 0 = 0 by step 2.2 and [L6], while 11fg=2/ι(3)>0\int_{-1}^{1} fg = 2/\iota(3) > 0 by step 2.1.

step 2.1step 2.2L5L6
4.1

Hence 11fgf(ξ)11g\int_{-1}^{1} fg \ne f(\xi)\int_{-1}^{1}g for every ξ[1,1]\xi \in [-1,1], and the claim fails at this pair.

step 3.1L5

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 132 results over 26 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources