Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion

Statement

Let a<b be reals and let f:[a,b]→R be continuous on [a,b] (Continuity of f:A→R at a point of A and on A: the ε-δ condition, its agreement with lim⁡x→cf(x)=f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point). Then f is bounded (Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set) and Riemann integrable on [a,b] (The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded f on [a,b] as sup⁡PL(f,P) and inf⁡PU(f,P), Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation ∫abf).

The proof gives more than integrability: it gives a partition that works. For every real ε>0 the uniform partition into N parts already satisfies U(f,P)−L(f,P)<ε, as soon as N is large enough that (b−a)/ι(N) is below the δ that uniform continuity supplies for ε/(2(b−a)). Uniform continuity is exactly what makes one δ serve all N subintervals at once, and it is the only place where the compactness of [a,b] is used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Reals a<b and a function f:[a,b]→R continuous on [a,b].

[L2]

A continuous real function on a compact subset of R is bounded there (A continuous real function on a compact subset of R is bounded).

[L3]

Heine-Cantor: a continuous real function on a compact subset K of R is uniformly continuous on K, that is, for every real η>0 there is a real δ>0 with ∣f(x)−f(y)∣<η for all x,y∈K with ∣x−y∣<δ (Heine-Cantor in R: a continuous real function on a compact subset of R is uniformly continuous, proved R-natively from sequential compactness, Uniform continuity of f:A→R: one δ serving every pair of points of A).

[L4]

For a partition P=(n,t) of [a,b]: Δi=ti+1−ti>0, ∑i<nΔi=b−a, and the uniform partition UN into N≥1 parts has every Δi equal to (b−a)/ι(N) (Partition of [a,b] as a finite strictly increasing list a=t0<t1<⋯<tn=b, its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions).

[L5]

U(f,P)−L(f,P)=∑i<n(Mi−mi)Δi and Mi−mi=sup⁡{∣f(x)−f(y)∣:x,y∈Ii} for bounded f (For bounded f on [a,b] and a partition P: the infimum mi and supremum Mi of f on the i-th subinterval, and the lower and upper Darboux sums L(f,P)=∑imiΔi and U(f,P)=∑iMiΔi, Laws of finite sums and finite products).

[L6]

Riemann's criterion: a bounded f is integrable if and only if for every real ε>0 there is a partition P with U(f,P)−L(f,P)<ε (Riemann's criterion: a bounded f on [a,b] is Darboux integrable if and only if for every real ε>0 there is a partition P with U(f,P)−L(f,P)<ε).

[L8]

Finite sums: scaling and monotonicity in the terms (Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products).

[L9]

Ordered-field arithmetic and the absolute value: adding a constant and multiplying by a positive quantity preserve an inequality; the order is total and transitive; x,y∈[c,d] gives ∣x−y∣≤d−c (Basic properties of the absolute value, Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities, Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication, Ordered field, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), Intervals of R: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length). These order-arithmetic facts are stated by their sources for the strict order only; the nonstrict forms used below follow by adjoining the equality case, in which the two sides coincide.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

[a,b] is compact by [L1], so f is bounded on [a,b] by [L2] and its Darboux sums and integrals are defined.

givenL1L2
1.2

Let a real ε>0 be given and put η:=ε⋅(2(b−a))−1, a positive real by [L9] since b−a>0.

givenL9
2.1

By [L3] applied to the compact set [a,b] with this η, fix a real δ>0 such that ∣f(x)−f(y)∣<η for all x,y∈[a,b] with ∣x−y∣<δ.

step 1.1step 1.2L1L3choose
3.1

By [L7] fix a natural N≥1 with 1/ι(N)<δ⋅(b−a)−1, and put P:=UN=(N,t), the uniform partition of [a,b] into N parts. Then every Δi equals (b−a)/ι(N)<δ by [L4] and [L9].

step 2.1L4L7L9choose
4.1

For each i<N and all x,y∈Ii=[ti,ti+1] one has ∣x−y∣≤Δi<δ by [L9], hence ∣f(x)−f(y)∣<η by step 2.1. So η is an upper bound of the set {∣f(x)−f(y)∣:x,y∈Ii}, and therefore Mi−mi≤η by [L5].

step 2.1step 3.1L5L9
5.1

Consequently U(f,P)−L(f,P)=∑i<N(Mi−mi)Δi≤∑i<Nη Δi=η (b−a)=ε⋅2−1<ε, using [L5], step 4.1, Δi>0, [L8], [L4] and [L9].

step 4.1L4L5L8L9
6.1

Since the real ε>0 of step 1.2 was arbitrary and step 5.1 produced a partition with U(f,P)−L(f,P)<ε, criterion [L6] applies and f is Riemann integrable on [a,b]; it is bounded by step 1.1.

step 1.1step 1.2step 5.1L6∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

…and 19 more results.

Dependency tree · two levels

64 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources