How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Basic properties of the absolute value
Statement
Let be an ordered field (Ordered field) and let , with the absolute value (Absolute value in an ordered field). Then
and, for every , one has .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An ordered field and elements .
Absolute value: if , and if (Absolute value in an ordered field).
Ordered-field order: trichotomy holds (for each exactly one of , , ), means is positive, and sums and products of positives are positive (Ordered field).
Signs in products: and (Sign rules for products: and ).
Sign rules: a product of two elements of the same sign is positive, and a product of two elements of opposite sign is negative (Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication).
Proof
Case : by [L1] , so and ; since we get by [L1], and , so .
Case : then , so holds with and , while and .
Case : by [L1] , and [L2] gives , so and ; here by [L1], and while , so .
Case or : then , so , and one of is , whence .
Case have the same sign (both positive or both negative): by [L4] , so , while by [L3] (for this is ), hence .
Case have opposite signs (one positive, one negative): by [L4] , so , while by [L3] (namely or ), hence .
By trichotomy [L2] each lies in exactly one of the cases 1.1-1.3, and in each we verified , that , that , and that ; hence all four hold for every .
By trichotomy [L2] each pair lies in exactly one of the cases 1.4-1.6, and in each ; hence for all .
Let : if then by [step 2.1] and [L2], so ; conversely if then both and , and since equals or by [L1], we get , so .
Depends on
Used by
- A continuous real function on a compact subset of ℝ is bounded Corollary
- A monotone sequence converges if and only if it is bounded Corollary
- A series of real-valued functions converges uniformly if and only if its tails are uniformly small Corollary
- A uniform derivative bound gives a uniform Taylor remainder bound Corollary
- For n ≥ 1 every bounded sequence in ℝⁿ has a convergent subsequence Corollary
- If ∑ aₖ and ∑ bₖ both converge absolutely then their Cauchy product converges absolutely, with sum AB Corollary
- If f : [a,b] → ℝᵐ is differentiable with integrable f' then ∫ₐᵇ f' = f(b)-f(a); and a bounded derivative makes f Lipschitz Corollary
- If f is continuous on an interval I and |f'| ≤ M at every interior point, then |f(x) - f(y)| ≤ M|x-y| for all x,y ∈ I, so f is Lipschitz with constant M and uniformly continuous on I Corollary
- If f,g are integrable on [a,b] then so are | f|, f², fg, max(f,g) and min(f,g), and |∫ₐᵇ f| ≤ ∫ₐᵇ| f| Corollary
- Kummer with ζₖ = 1 recovers the ratio test Corollary
- ℝ((t⁻¹)) has the nested interval property for lengths tending to 0 Corollary
- Stolz-Cesaro, 0/0 form: if bₖ is strictly decreasing to 0, aₖ → 0, and the difference quotient converges, then aₖ/bₖ converges to the same value Corollary
- The Cesaro matrix satisfies the Silverman-Toeplitz conditions, giving a second proof of the Cesaro mean theorem Corollary
- The reverse triangle inequality Corollary
- The total-variation bound for a Riemann–Stieltjes integral Corollary
- Under dependent choice, a continuous real-valued map on a closed subspace of a normal space extends to the whole space, and a map into an open interval extends into that same open interval Corollary
- Whenever the ratio test decides, the root test decides the same way, and the converse fails Corollary
- [0,1) is neither open nor closed in ℝ Counterexample
- {0} ∪ [1,2] is closed, has an isolated point, and is not perfect Counterexample
- {q ∈ ℚ : q ≥ 0, q² < 2} is closed and bounded in ℚ and is not compact Counterexample
- ‖·‖₁ on ℝ² violates the parallelogram law, so no symmetric bilinear form induces it Counterexample
- ∑ k^-1/2 diverges and ∑ k⁻² converges, and both have root limit exactly 1 Counterexample
- ⋂ₖ (-1/k, 1/k) = {0} is not open Counterexample
- A continuous function on [0,1] can have unbounded variation Counterexample
- A sequence with limsup = +∞: the greatest subsequential limit exists only in overlineℝ Counterexample
- A summability matrix failing exactly one Silverman-Toeplitz condition and transforming a convergent sequence to a divergent one Counterexample
- aₖ = (-1)ᵏ, bₖ = k have aₖ/bₖ → 0 while the difference quotient oscillates, so Stolz-Cesaro has no converse Counterexample
- aₖ = 2^-k+(-1)ᵏ has ratio limsup 2 and liminf 1/8, so the ratio test fails, while the root test gives convergence Counterexample
- Continuous triangular spikes on [0,1] converge pointwise to zero but not uniformly when monotonicity is absent Counterexample
- f(x) = x on [0,1) with f(1) = 0 is differentiable at every point of (0,1) with f' ≡ 1, yet no c satisfies f(1) - f(0) = f'(c), so continuity on the closed interval cannot be dropped from the mean value theorem Counterexample
- For the Dirichlet function every uniform partition with rational tags gives Riemann sum 1, so the sums converge along that sequence of tagged partitions although the function is not integrable: the mesh condition of the Riemann definition quantifies over all tagged partitions and cannot be weakened to one sequence Counterexample
- In {0} ∪ [1,2] with the metric of ℝ, the closure of B(0,1) = {0} is {0} while the closed ball is {0,1} Counterexample
- On (0,∞) the metrics |x-y| and |1/x - 1/y| have the same topology and are not uniformly equivalent Counterexample
- On (0,∞) the metrics |x-y| and |1/x - 1/y| share their topology and not their Cauchy sequences Counterexample
- On a closed interval of ℚ there is a continuous unbounded function, a bounded one with no maximum, and one without the intermediate value property Counterexample
- On ℝ the metrics |x-y| and min(|x-y|,1) are uniformly but not Lipschitz equivalent Counterexample
- On the domain {0} ∪ [1,2] every real is vacuously a limit at 0 Counterexample
- On the positive integers the metrics |m-n| and |1/m - 1/n| both induce the discrete topology, and only the first is complete Counterexample
- Over ℚ there is a nonconstant differentiable function with identically zero derivative, so Rolle and the mean value theorem both fail Counterexample
- The cover {(1/k, 1)} of (0,1) has no finite subcover, so (0,1) is not compact Counterexample
…and 251 more results.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 6 results over 4 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- T. Tao, Analysis I, 3rd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)
- Purdue University analysis notes: Ordered fields and absolute value (standard reference, not scraped)