Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A series of real-valued functions converges uniformly if and only if its tails are uniformly small

Statement

Let X be a set and let fk:X→R. The function series ∑fk converges uniformly on X if and only if, for every real ε>0, there is N∈N such that

∣∑k=m+1nfk(x)∣<ε

for every n>m≥N and every x∈X.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A set X, functions fk:X→R, and partial-sum functions Sr(x)=∑k<rfk(x).

[L1]

The series ∑fk converges uniformly exactly when its partial-sum sequence (Sr) converges uniformly (A series of real-valued functions and its pointwise and uniform convergence through its partial sums).

[L2]

A sequence of real-valued functions converges uniformly exactly when it is uniformly Cauchy (A sequence of real-valued functions converges uniformly if and only if it is uniformly Cauchy).

[L3]

For n>m, ∑k=m+1nfk(x)=Sn+1(x)−Sm+1(x), and ∣−u∣=∣u∣ for every real u (A series of real-valued functions and its pointwise and uniform convergence through its partial sums, Basic properties of the absolute value).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose first that ∑fk converges uniformly, and let ε>0 be real.

L1
1.2

Conversely, suppose the displayed tail condition holds, and fix a real ε>0 and a corresponding index N.

given
2.1

By [L1] and [L2], choose K such that ∣Sp(x)−Sq(x)∣<ε for every p,q≥K and every x∈X.

step 1.1L1L2choose
2.2

Put K:=N+1. If p,q≥K and x∈X, then the difference is 0 when p=q; if p>q, set m=q−1≥N and n=p−1>m, so the tail condition and [L3] give ∣Sp(x)−Sq(x)∣<ε; the case q>p follows by symmetry of absolute value.

step 1.2L3algebra
3.1

For n>m≥K and x∈X, the indices n+1,m+1 are at least K, so [L3] and step 2.1 give ∣∑k=m+1nfk(x)∣<ε.

step 2.1L3
3.2

Thus (Sr) is uniformly Cauchy, hence converges uniformly by [L2], and therefore ∑fk converges uniformly by [L1].

step 2.2L1L2
4.1

Steps 3.1 and 3.2 prove the two implications, hence the equivalence.

step 3.1step 3.2∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources