Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A sequence of real-valued functions converges uniformly if and only if it is uniformly Cauchy

Statement

Let X be a set and let fk:X→R for every k∈N. Then (fk) converges uniformly on X to some f:X→R if and only if (fk) is uniformly Cauchy on X (Pointwise convergence, uniform convergence, and the uniformly Cauchy condition for sequences of real-valued functions).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A set X and a sequence of functions fk:X→R.

[A1]

Uniform convergence to f means that for every real ε>0 there is N such that ∣fk(x)−f(x)∣<ε for every k≥N and every x∈X (Pointwise convergence, uniform convergence, and the uniformly Cauchy condition for sequences of real-valued functions).

[A2]

Uniform Cauchyness means that for every real ε>0 there is N such that ∣fm(x)−fn(x)∣<ε for every m,n≥N and every x∈X (Pointwise convergence, uniform convergence, and the uniformly Cauchy condition for sequences of real-valued functions).

[A3]

Pointwise convergence as defined through real sequences can equivalently be tested with every positive real error (Pointwise convergence, uniform convergence, and the uniformly Cauchy condition for sequences of real-valued functions).

[L1]

For reals u,v, ∣u+v∣≤∣u∣+∣v∣ (The triangle inequality).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose first that fk→f uniformly on X, and let ε>0 be real. By [A1] choose N with ∣fj(x)−f(x)∣<ε/2 for every j≥N and x∈X. Thus, for m,n≥N and x∈X, ∣fm(x)−fn(x)∣≤∣fm(x)−f(x)∣+∣f(x)−fn(x)∣<ε. Since ε was arbitrary, (fk) is uniformly Cauchy.

A1A2L1choosealgebra
1.2

Conversely, suppose that (fk) is uniformly Cauchy on X. For each x∈X, [A2] makes (fk(x)) a Cauchy real sequence; by [L2] it has a real limit f(x). These values define a function f:X→R.

A2L2construct
1.3

Under this converse assumption, let ε>0 be real and choose N such that ∣fm(x)−fn(x)∣<ε/2 for every m,n≥N and every x∈X.

A2choose
2.1

Fix k≥N and x∈X. Pointwise convergence at x gives a threshold M such that ∣fn(x)−f(x)∣<ε/2 for n≥M. Choose n≥N,M. Then ∣fk(x)−f(x)∣≤∣fk(x)−fn(x)∣+∣fn(x)−f(x)∣<ε.

step 1.2step 1.3A3L1choose
3.1

The index N in step 1.3 is independent of k and x, so step 2.1 proves fk→f uniformly. Together with step 1.1 this proves both directions.

step 1.1step 2.1A1∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources