Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Weierstrass M-test gives absolute pointwise convergence and uniform convergence of a function series

Statement

Let X be a set and let fk:X→R. Suppose there is a sequence of nonnegative reals (Mk) such that

∣fk(x)∣≤Mk(k∈N, x∈X)

and the scalar series ∑Mk converges. Then ∑fk(x) converges absolutely for every x∈X, and the function series ∑fk converges uniformly on X.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Functions fk:X→R and nonnegative reals Mk with ∣fk(x)∣≤Mk for all k,x, such that ∑Mk converges.

[L2]

A convergent real series has uniformly small scalar tails: for every real ε>0 there is N such that ∣∑k=m+1nak∣<ε whenever n>m≥N (A series converges iff for every ε>0 there is N with ∣am+1+⋯+an∣<ε for all n>m≥N).

[L3]

Repeated triangle inequalities for finite sums give ∣∑k=pquk∣≤∑k=pq∣uk∣, and finite sums preserve termwise inequalities (The triangle inequality, Basic properties of the absolute value, Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix x∈X. Since 0≤∣fk(x)∣≤Mk for every k, [L1] shows that ∑∣fk(x)∣ converges.

givenL1
1.2

Let ε>0. By [L2] choose N such that ∑k=m+1nMk<ε whenever n>m≥N, the absolute value being unnecessary because the terms are nonnegative.

L2choose
2.1

For n>m≥N and x∈X, one has ∣∑k=m+1nfk(x)∣≤∑k=m+1n∣fk(x)∣≤∑k=m+1nMk<ε.

step 1.2L3
3.1

Step 1.1 gives absolute pointwise convergence, while step 2.1 and [L4] give uniform convergence of ∑fk.

step 1.1step 2.1L4∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources