Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Whenever the ratio test decides, the root test decides the same way, and the converse fails

Statement

Let (ak)(a_k) be a sequence of reals with ak0a_k \ne 0 for every kNk \in \mathbb{N}, and put

qk:=ak+1ak,ρk:=ak+11/(k+1)(kN),q_k := \frac{|a_{k+1}|}{|a_k|}, \qquad \rho_k := |a_{k+1}|^{1/(k+1)} \qquad (k \in \mathbb{N}) ,

the ratio and root families of Ratio test: lim supak+1/ak<1\limsup |a_{k+1}/a_k| < 1 gives absolute convergence and hence convergence, and lim infak+1/ak>1\liminf |a_{k+1}/a_k| > 1 gives divergence and Root test: lim supak1/k<1\limsup |a_k|^{1/k} < 1 gives absolute convergence and hence convergence, >1> 1 gives divergence, and =1= 1 decides nothing. Then, in R\overline{\mathbb{R}},

lim infkqk    lim infkρk    lim supkρk    lim supkqk,\liminf_{k} q_k \;\le\; \liminf_{k} \rho_k \;\le\; \limsup_{k} \rho_k \;\le\; \limsup_{k} q_k ,

and consequently:

  1. if lim supkqk<1\limsup_k q_k < 1, so that the ratio test gives convergence of ak\sum |a_k| and hence of ak\sum a_k, then lim supkρk<1\limsup_k \rho_k < 1 and the root test gives the same;
  2. if lim infkqk>1\liminf_k q_k > 1, so that the ratio test gives divergence of ak\sum a_k, then lim supkρk>1\limsup_k \rho_k > 1 and the root test gives it too.

The converse fails. Let (sk)(s_k) be the alternating sequence of The even and odd index maps and the alternating sequence: strictly increasing e,oe, o with N\mathbb{N} their disjoint union, and the unique (sk)(s_k) with s0=1s_0 = 1, sσ(k)=sks_{\sigma(k)} = -s_k, which satisfies sk=1|s_k| = 1, se1s \circ e \equiv 1 and so1s \circ o \equiv -1, let tk:=2t_k := 2 when sk=1s_k = 1 and tk:=1/2t_k := 1/2 when sk=1s_k = -1, and put ak:=2ktka_k := 2^{-k} t_k, the sequence usually written ak=2k+(1)ka_k = 2^{-k+(-1)^k}. For it, lim supkρk=1/2<1\limsup_k \rho_k = 1/2 < 1 while lim supkqk=2\limsup_k q_k = 2 and lim infkqk=1/8\liminf_k q_k = 1/8 (FALSE: lim supak1/k=lim supak+1/ak\limsup a_k^{1/k} = \limsup a_{k+1}/a_k for every positive sequence), so the root test gives convergence of ak\sum |a_k| and neither half of the ratio test applies. So the root test decides strictly more series than the ratio test.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A sequence (ak)(a_k) of reals with ak0a_k \ne 0 for every kk, the ratios qk=ak+1/akq_k = |a_{k+1}|/|a_k| and the roots ρk=ak+11/(k+1)\rho_k = |a_{k+1}|^{1/(k+1)} (Limit superior and limit inferior of a real sequence as infnsupknxk\inf_n \sup_{k \ge n} x_k and supninfknxk\sup_n \inf_{k \ge n} x_k in R\overline{\mathbb{R}}, The extended real line R=R{,+}\overline{\mathbb{R}} = \mathbb{R} \cup \{-\infty, +\infty\}, its order, and the arithmetic that is left undefined).

[L1]

For a sequence (bk)(b_k) of reals with bk>0b_k > 0 for every kk, writing qk=bk+1/bkq'_k = b_{k+1}/b_k and rk=bk+11/(k+1)r_k = b_{k+1}^{1/(k+1)}, one has lim infkqklim infkrklim supkrklim supkqk\liminf_k q'_k \le \liminf_k r_k \le \limsup_k r_k \le \limsup_k q'_k in R\overline{\mathbb{R}} (For ak>0a_k > 0: lim infak+1/aklim infak1/klim supak1/klim supak+1/ak\liminf a_{k+1}/a_k \le \liminf a_k^{1/k} \le \limsup a_k^{1/k} \le \limsup a_{k+1}/a_k).

[L2]

lim infkxklim supkxk\liminf_k x_k \le \limsup_k x_k for every real sequence (lim infxklim supxk\liminf x_k \le \limsup x_k for every real sequence).

[L3]

Absolute value: x0|x| \ge 0, and x=0|x| = 0 exactly when x=0x = 0 (Basic properties of the absolute value).

[L4]

The root test: for a family from 11, lim supkak+11/(k+1)<1\limsup_k |a_{k+1}|^{1/(k+1)} < 1 gives convergence of k1ak\sum_{k \ge 1}|a_k| and hence of k1ak\sum_{k \ge 1} a_k, and >1> 1 gives divergence of k1ak\sum_{k \ge 1} a_k (Root test: lim supak1/k<1\limsup |a_k|^{1/k} < 1 gives absolute convergence and hence convergence, >1> 1 gives divergence, and =1= 1 decides nothing).

[L5]

The ratio test: lim supkqk<1\limsup_k q_k < 1 gives convergence of ak\sum |a_k| and hence of ak\sum a_k, and lim infkqk>1\liminf_k q_k > 1 gives divergence of ak\sum a_k (Ratio test: lim supak+1/ak<1\limsup |a_{k+1}/a_k| < 1 gives absolute convergence and hence convergence, and lim infak+1/ak>1\liminf |a_{k+1}/a_k| > 1 gives divergence).

[L7]

For the sequence ak=2ktka_k = 2^{-k} t_k built from the alternating sequence as in the Statement: lim supkak+11/(k+1)=1/2\limsup_k |a_{k+1}|^{1/(k+1)} = 1/2, lim supkak+1/ak=2\limsup_k |a_{k+1}|/|a_k| = 2 and lim infkak+1/ak=1/8\liminf_k |a_{k+1}|/|a_k| = 1/8; and 2k>02^{-k} > 0, tk>0t_k > 0, so every term is positive and in particular nonzero (FALSE: lim supak1/k=lim supak+1/ak\limsup a_k^{1/k} = \limsup a_{k+1}/a_k for every positive sequence, The even and odd index maps and the alternating sequence: strictly increasing e,oe, o with N\mathbb{N} their disjoint union, and the unique (sk)(s_k) with s0=1s_0 = 1, sσ(k)=sks_{\sigma(k)} = -s_k, which satisfies sk=1|s_k| = 1, se1s \circ e \equiv 1 and so1s \circ o \equiv -1, Integer powers ama^m, Monotonicity of xxnx \mapsto x^n and of nann \mapsto a^n).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Put bk:=akb_k := |a_k|. Since ak0a_k \ne 0 we have bk>0b_k > 0 for every kk, so [L1] applies to (bk)(b_k).

givenL3L1
1.2

For the sequence ak=2ktka_k = 2^{-k} t_k of the Statement every term is nonzero, lim supkρk=1/2<1\limsup_k \rho_k = 1/2 < 1, and neither lim supkqk=2<1\limsup_k q_k = 2 < 1 nor lim infkqk=1/8>1\liminf_k q_k = 1/8 > 1 holds.

L7
2.1

For this (bk)(b_k) the ratio family is bk+1/bk=ak+1/ak=qkb_{k+1}/b_k = |a_{k+1}|/|a_k| = q_k and the root family is bk+11/(k+1)=ak+11/(k+1)=ρkb_{k+1}^{1/(k+1)} = |a_{k+1}|^{1/(k+1)} = \rho_k.

step 1.1
3.1

Therefore lim infkqklim infkρklim supkρklim supkqk\liminf_k q_k \le \liminf_k \rho_k \le \limsup_k \rho_k \le \limsup_k q_k, which is the displayed chain.

step 1.1step 2.1L1
4.1

Suppose lim supkqk<1\limsup_k q_k < 1. By the chain, lim supkρklim supkqk<1\limsup_k \rho_k \le \limsup_k q_k < 1, so the root test applies to the family (ak)k1(a_k)_{k \ge 1} and gives convergence of k1ak\sum_{k \ge 1}|a_k| and of k1ak\sum_{k \ge 1} a_k, hence of ak\sum |a_k| and of ak\sum a_k; the ratio test gives the same conclusions. That is claim 1.

step 3.1L4L5L6
4.2

Suppose lim infkqk>1\liminf_k q_k > 1. By the chain and [L2], lim supkρklim infkρklim infkqk>1\limsup_k \rho_k \ge \liminf_k \rho_k \ge \liminf_k q_k > 1, so the root test gives divergence of k1ak\sum_{k \ge 1} a_k, hence of ak\sum a_k; the ratio test gives the same conclusion. That is claim 2.

step 3.1L2L4L5L6
5.1

So for that sequence the root test gives convergence of k1ak\sum_{k \ge 1} |a_k| while neither half of the ratio test applies, and the converse of claims 1 and 2 fails.

step 1.2L4L5

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 133 results over 34 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources