Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)verified 2026-07-26 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Monotonicity of xxnx \mapsto x^n and of nann \mapsto a^n

Statement

Let R\mathbb{R} be an ordered field (Ordered field), let a,bRa, b \in \mathbb{R} and let nNn \in \mathbb{N}, with powers as in Integer powers ama^m.

  1. Signs. If a0a \ge 0 then an0a^n \ge 0, and if a>0a > 0 then an>0a^n > 0.
  2. Strict monotonicity in the base. If 0a<b0 \le a < b and n1n \ge 1 then an<bna^n < b^n. Consequently, for a,b0a, b \ge 0 and n1n \ge 1: a<b    an<bna < b \iff a^n < b^n and ab    anbna \le b \iff a^n \le b^n, and xxnx \mapsto x^n is injective on {xR:x0}\{x \in \mathbb{R} : x \ge 0\}.
  3. Comparison with the base. If a1a \ge 1 and n1n \ge 1 then ana1a^n \ge a \ge 1; if a>1a > 1 and n1n \ge 1 then ana>1a^n \ge a > 1; and if 0a10 \le a \le 1 then an1a^n \le 1.
  4. Monotonicity in the exponent. If a>1a > 1 then am<ana^m < a^n whenever m<nm < n in N\mathbb{N}; if a=1a = 1 then an=1a^n = 1 for all nn; and if 0<a<10 < a < 1 then am>ana^m > a^n whenever m<nm < n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An ordered field R\mathbb{R}, elements a,bRa, b \in \mathbb{R} and naturals m,nm, n.

[L1]

Definition of powers (Integer powers ama^m): a0=1a^0 = 1 and an+1=anaa^{n+1} = a^n a.

[L2]
[L3]

Sign and scaling rules: a product of positives is positive, and for c>0c > 0, x<y    cx<cyx < y \iff cx < cy (Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication); the positives are closed under addition and satisfy trichotomy (Ordered field); and 1>01 > 0 (The multiplicative identity is positive, which is where that fact is proved: neither of the two items just named states it).

[L4]

Multiplying inequalities of nonnegatives: if 0xy0 \le x \le y and 0uv0 \le u \le v then xuyvxu \le yv, and if 0<x<y0 < x < y and 0<u<v0 < u < v then xu<yvxu < yv (Multiplying inequalities of positives).

[L5]

Trichotomy and transitivity of the order: for x,yx, y exactly one of x<yx < y, x=yx = y, y<xy < x holds, and << and \le are transitive (Ordered field).

[L6]

The order on the exponents: mnm \le n holds exactly when n=m+kn = m + k for some natural kk (Order on the natural numbers), and m<nm < n holds exactly when m+1nm + 1 \le n (Discreteness: σ(n)\sigma(n) is the immediate successor); combining the two, m<nm < n holds exactly when n=m+dn = m + d for some natural d1d \ge 1.

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

Base case n=0n = 0: a0=1>0a^0 = 1 > 0, so claim 1 holds; claim 2 is vacuous at n=0n = 0; a0=11a^0 = 1 \ge 1 and a0=11a^0 = 1 \le 1, so claim 3 holds at n=0n = 0 in the nonstrict readings.

baseL1L3
1.2

Inductive hypothesis: fix nNn \in \mathbb{N} and assume, for all a,ba, b: a0an0a \ge 0 \Rightarrow a^n \ge 0 and a>0an>0a > 0 \Rightarrow a^n > 0; and 0abanbn0 \le a \le b \Rightarrow a^n \le b^n, with an<bna^n < b^n when moreover a<ba < b and n1n \ge 1.

ih
2.1

Signs at n+1n+1: if a0a \ge 0 then an+1=anaa^{n+1} = a^n a is a product of two nonnegatives, hence 0\ge 0, and if a>0a > 0 it is a product of two positives, hence >0> 0.

step 1.2L1L3L4
3.1

Strict monotonicity at n+1n+1, assuming 0a<b0 \le a < b: then b>0b > 0, and the hypothesis gives 0anbn0 \le a^n \le b^n with bn>0b^n > 0 by step 2.1; if a=0a = 0 then an+1=0<bn+1a^{n+1} = 0 < b^{n+1} since bn+1=bnb>0b^{n+1} = b^n b > 0; if a>0a > 0 then an+1=anabnaa^{n+1} = a^n a \le b^n a by multiplying anbna^n \le b^n by a>0a > 0, and bna<bnbb^n a < b^n b by multiplying a<ba < b by bn>0b^n > 0, so an+1<bn+1a^{n+1} < b^{n+1} by transitivity; and in either case 0ab0 \le a \le b gives an+1bn+1a^{n+1} \le b^{n+1} by [L4].

step 1.2step 2.1L1L3L4L5
4.1

By the induction principle, claims 1 and 2 hold for every nn, in the form: a0an0a \ge 0 \Rightarrow a^n \ge 0; a>0an>0a > 0 \Rightarrow a^n > 0; and 0a<b0 \le a < b with n1n \ge 1 gives an<bna^n < b^n.

step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1L2
5.1

The equivalences of claim 2 follow by trichotomy: for a,b0a, b \ge 0 and n1n \ge 1, if an<bna^n < b^n then neither a=ba = b (which would give an=bna^n = b^n) nor b<ab < a (which would give bn<anb^n < a^n) is possible, so a<ba < b; the \le form is the negation of the << form with aa and bb exchanged; and injectivity is the case an=bna^n = b^n, where a<ba < b and b<ab < a are both excluded.

step 4.1L5
5.2

Claim 4: for a>1a > 1 we have an+1=ana>an1=ana^{n+1} = a^n a > a^n \cdot 1 = a^n, multiplying 1<a1 < a by an>0a^n > 0, so ana^n is strictly increasing in nn, and hence am<ana^m < a^n whenever m<nm < n: writing n=m+dn = m + d with d1d \ge 1 and inducting on dd, the case d=1d = 1 is that one-step inequality and the passage from dd to d+1d+1 is am<am+d<am+d+1a^m < a^{m+d} < a^{m+d+1} by transitivity; for a=1a = 1 an induction gives 1n=11^n = 1 for all nn; and for 0<a<10 < a < 1 we have an+1=ana<an1=ana^{n+1} = a^n a < a^n \cdot 1 = a^n, so ana^n is strictly decreasing in nn and the same induction on the gap dd gives am>ana^m > a^n for m<nm < n.

step 4.1L1L2L3L5L6
6.1

Claim 3: if a1a \ge 1 and n1n \ge 1 then applying step 4.1 to 1a1 \le a gives 1=1nan1 = 1^n \le a^n, and an=an1a1a=aa^n = a^{n-1} a \ge 1 \cdot a = a since an11a^{n-1} \ge 1 by the same argument and a>0a > 0; if a>1a > 1 the same computation gives ana>1a^n \ge a > 1; and if 0a10 \le a \le 1 then an1n=1a^n \le 1^n = 1.

step 4.1step 5.1L1L3L4
7.1

All four claims are proved: signs and strict monotonicity in the base by the induction of steps 1.1 and 3.1, the order equivalences and injectivity by trichotomy, and the comparisons with the base and the behaviour in the exponent by steps 6.1 and 5.2.

step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1step 5.2discharge-induction

Depends on

Used by

…and 15 more results.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 49 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources