How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The sequence , increases to
Example
Let be given by
Then is strictly increasing, every term satisfies , and
Informally this is the value of the nested radical , and the point of the example is that the expression means nothing until the sequence is shown to converge; only then does passing to the limit in the recursion identify the value.
Indexing. As in The Babylonian sequence , decreases to , the family indexed from is realised as for the sequence with and , and the verification works with (Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences, Convergence depends only on the tail).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The set , the element , and the function with ; by the recursion theorem (The recursion theorem) the unique with and . We write for , so and .
Recursion theorem (The recursion theorem).
Square roots: every has a unique with (Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are , Integer powers ).
Powers and order: for , exactly when , and exactly when (Monotonicity of and of ).
Order and arithmetic: , so and ; adding a constant preserves the order, and inequalities may be added (The multiplicative identity is positive, Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities, Ordered field, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)).
A field has no zero divisors: forces or (A field has no zero divisors: or ).
Monotone sequences, with consecutive comparisons sufficing (Nondecreasing, increasing, nonincreasing, decreasing, monotone, and eventually monotone sequences); boundedness above of a subset of (Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set).
Monotone convergence: a nondecreasing sequence whose range is bounded above converges, to the supremum of its range (A nondecreasing sequence bounded above converges to the supremum of its range, and a nonincreasing sequence bounded below to the infimum, Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals).
Algebra of limits (Algebra of limits: sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients); limits preserve non-strict inequalities (Limits preserve non-strict inequalities); a sequence and its tails have the same limits (Convergence depends only on the tail); limits are unique (A sequence has at most one limit).
Verification
The function does map into , so the construction is legitimate: for we have , hence and , which gives .
Consequently every term satisfies , since takes its values in .
The sequence is strictly increasing. Fix . From we get and , so , that is , that is . Since and , this gives ; consecutive comparisons then give strict increase, hence also that is nondecreasing.
The range of is bounded above by , so by monotone convergence converges; write for its limit.
: the inequalities hold at every index, by step 2.1 and step 1.2, and pass to the limit in their non-strict form.
The sequence is the first tail of , so it converges to , and therefore converges to by the algebra of limits.
The same sequence satisfies for every , and converges to .
By uniqueness of limits, , that is .
Since we have , so , and a field has no zero divisors, so and . Thus , and with it , is strictly increasing, lies in , and converges to .
Remarks
-
The limit is not attained. Every term is strictly below and the limit is , which is the supremum of the range and does not belong to it. That is the ordinary situation for a strictly increasing convergent sequence, and it is why A nondecreasing sequence bounded above converges to the supremum of its range, and a nonincreasing sequence bounded below to the infimum is stated with a supremum rather than a maximum.
-
The quadratic has two roots and only one is admissible. The limit equation is solved by and by . The second is excluded by step 4.1, which is why the bound is proved rather than waved through: without it the argument would identify the limit only up to a sign, and a reader who writes down the limit equation without checking the range of has proved strictly less than the example claims.
-
Squaring the recursion avoids a continuity argument. Passing to the limit in directly would need continuity of the square root, which this library has not proved at this point. Squaring first turns the recursion into , in which only the algebra of limits is required. The device is worth remembering: an identity between polynomials in the terms passes to the limit for free, whereas an identity involving a function does not.
Depends on
- A nondecreasing sequence bounded above converges to the supremum of its range, and a nonincreasing sequence bounded below to the infimum
- Nondecreasing, increasing, nonincreasing, decreasing, monotone, and eventually monotone sequences
- Square roots exist: a unique $\sqrt{a} \ge 0$ with $(\sqrt{a})^2 = a$; the positives are $\{x^2 : x \neq 0\}$
- Algebra of limits: sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients
- Convergence depends only on the tail
- Limits preserve non-strict inequalities
- Monotonicity of $x \mapsto x^n$ and of $n \mapsto a^n$
- A sequence has at most one limit
- The recursion theorem
- Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences
- Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals
- Integer powers $a^m$
- Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set
- A field has no zero divisors: $ab = 0 \Rightarrow a = 0$ or $b = 0$
- The multiplicative identity is positive
- Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities
- Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)
- Ordered field
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 90 results over 26 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nested radical (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Monotone convergence theorem (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- T. Tao, Analysis I, 3rd ed., §6.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I, §2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)