Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The sequence x1=1x_1 = 1, xk+1=2+xkx_{k+1} = \sqrt{2 + x_k} increases to 22

Example

Let (xk)k1(x_k)_{k \ge 1} be given by

x1=1,xk+1=2+xk(k1).x_1 = 1, \qquad x_{k+1} = \sqrt{2 + x_k} \qquad (k \ge 1).

Then (xk)(x_k) is strictly increasing, every term satisfies 0xk<20 \le x_k < 2, and

limkxk=2.\lim_{k} x_k = 2 .

Informally this is the value of the nested radical 2+2+2+\sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2 + \sqrt{2 + \cdots}}}, and the point of the example is that the expression means nothing until the sequence is shown to converge; only then does passing to the limit in the recursion identify the value.

Indexing. As in The Babylonian sequence x1=2x_1 = 2, xk+1=(xk+2/xk)/2x_{k+1} = (x_k + 2/x_k)/2 decreases to 2\sqrt{2}, the family indexed from 11 is realised as xk:=gk1x_k := g_{k-1} for the sequence (gj)jN(g_j)_{j \in \mathbb{N}} with g0=1g_0 = 1 and gj+1=2+gjg_{j+1} = \sqrt{2 + g_j}, and the verification works with (gj)(g_j) (Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences, Convergence depends only on the tail).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The set A:={uR:0u<2}A := \{u \in \mathbb{R} : 0 \le u < 2\}, the element 1A1 \in A, and the function f:AAf : A \to A with f(u)=2+uf(u) = \sqrt{2+u}; by the recursion theorem (The recursion theorem) the unique g:NAg : \mathbb{N} \to A with g0=1g_0 = 1 and gj+1=f(gj)g_{j+1} = f(g_j). We write xk:=gk1x_k := g_{k-1} for k1k \ge 1, so x1=1x_1 = 1 and xk+1=2+xkx_{k+1} = \sqrt{2 + x_k}.

[L1]

Recursion theorem (The recursion theorem).

[L3]

Powers and order: for a,b0a, b \ge 0, a<ba < b exactly when a2<b2a^2 < b^2, and aba \le b exactly when a2b2a^2 \le b^2 (Monotonicity of xxnx \mapsto x^n and of nann \mapsto a^n).

[L4]

Order and arithmetic: 1>01 > 0, so 2=1+1>02 = 1 + 1 > 0 and 4=224 = 2 \cdot 2; adding a constant preserves the order, and inequalities may be added (The multiplicative identity is positive, Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities, Ordered field, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)).

[L5]

A field has no zero divisors: uv=0uv = 0 forces u=0u = 0 or v=0v = 0 (A field has no zero divisors: ab=0a=0ab = 0 \Rightarrow a = 0 or b=0b = 0).

[L6]

Monotone sequences, with consecutive comparisons sufficing (Nondecreasing, increasing, nonincreasing, decreasing, monotone, and eventually monotone sequences); boundedness above of a subset of R\mathbb{R} (Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set).

[L7]

Monotone convergence: a nondecreasing sequence whose range is bounded above converges, to the supremum of its range (A nondecreasing sequence bounded above converges to the supremum of its range, and a nonincreasing sequence bounded below to the infimum, Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals).

[L8]

Algebra of limits (Algebra of limits: sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients); limits preserve non-strict inequalities (Limits preserve non-strict inequalities); a sequence and its tails have the same limits (Convergence depends only on the tail); limits are unique (A sequence has at most one limit).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The function ff does map AA into AA, so the construction is legitimate: for 0u<20 \le u < 2 we have 22+u<42 \le 2 + u < 4, hence 2+u0\sqrt{2+u} \ge 0 and (2+u)2=2+u<4=22(\sqrt{2+u})^2 = 2 + u < 4 = 2^2, which gives 2+u<2\sqrt{2+u} < 2.

givenL2L3L4
1.2

Consequently every term satisfies 0gj<20 \le g_j < 2, since gg takes its values in AA.

givenL1
2.1

The sequence is strictly increasing. Fix jj. From 0gj<20 \le g_j < 2 we get gj2<0g_j - 2 < 0 and gj+1>0g_j + 1 > 0, so (gj2)(gj+1)<0(g_j - 2)(g_j + 1) < 0, that is (gj)2gj2<0(g_j)^2 - g_j - 2 < 0, that is (gj)2<2+gj=(gj+1)2(g_j)^2 < 2 + g_j = (g_{j+1})^2. Since gj0g_j \ge 0 and gj+10g_{j+1} \ge 0, this gives gj<gj+1g_j < g_{j+1}; consecutive comparisons then give strict increase, hence also that (gj)(g_j) is nondecreasing.

step 1.2L2L3L4L6
3.1

The range of (gj)(g_j) is bounded above by 22, so by monotone convergence (gj)(g_j) converges; write LL for its limit.

step 1.2step 2.1L6L7
4.1

1L21 \le L \le 2: the inequalities 1=g0gj21 = g_0 \le g_j \le 2 hold at every index, by step 2.1 and step 1.2, and pass to the limit in their non-strict form.

step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1L8
4.2

The sequence jgj+1j \mapsto g_{j+1} is the first tail of (gj)(g_j), so it converges to LL, and therefore j(gj+1)2j \mapsto (g_{j+1})^2 converges to L2L^2 by the algebra of limits.

step 3.1L8
4.3

The same sequence satisfies (gj+1)2=2+gj(g_{j+1})^2 = 2 + g_j for every jj, and j2+gjj \mapsto 2 + g_j converges to 2+L2 + L.

step 3.1L8L2
5.1

By uniqueness of limits, L2=2+LL^2 = 2 + L, that is (L2)(L+1)=0(L-2)(L+1) = 0.

step 4.2step 4.3L8
6.1

Since L1L \ge 1 we have L+12>0L + 1 \ge 2 > 0, so L+10L + 1 \ne 0, and a field has no zero divisors, so L2=0L - 2 = 0 and L=2L = 2. Thus (gj)(g_j), and with it (xk)(x_k), is strictly increasing, lies in [0,2)[0,2), and converges to 22.

step 4.1step 5.1step 1.2step 2.1L4L5

Remarks

  • The limit is not attained. Every term is strictly below 22 and the limit is 22, which is the supremum of the range and does not belong to it. That is the ordinary situation for a strictly increasing convergent sequence, and it is why A nondecreasing sequence bounded above converges to the supremum of its range, and a nonincreasing sequence bounded below to the infimum is stated with a supremum rather than a maximum.

  • The quadratic has two roots and only one is admissible. The limit equation L2=2+LL^2 = 2 + L is solved by L=2L = 2 and by L=1L = -1. The second is excluded by step 4.1, which is why the bound L1L \ge 1 is proved rather than waved through: without it the argument would identify the limit only up to a sign, and a reader who writes down the limit equation without checking the range of LL has proved strictly less than the example claims.

  • Squaring the recursion avoids a continuity argument. Passing to the limit in gj+1=2+gjg_{j+1} = \sqrt{2 + g_j} directly would need continuity of the square root, which this library has not proved at this point. Squaring first turns the recursion into (gj+1)2=2+gj(g_{j+1})^2 = 2 + g_j, in which only the algebra of limits is required. The device is worth remembering: an identity between polynomials in the terms passes to the limit for free, whereas an identity involving a function does not.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 90 results over 26 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources