How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The recursion theorem
Statement
Let be a Peano system (Peano system), in particular the natural numbers (The natural numbers (von Neumann)). For any set , any element , and any function , there is a unique function such that and for all .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a Peano system , a set , an element , and a function . Call a set closed when and, for all and , implies .
Induction holds in : any with that is closed under equals (axiom P3, The principle of mathematical induction).
In a Peano system (P1) and is injective (P2) (Peano system).
Proof
The set is closed, so the collection of closed subsets of is nonempty; let , which is itself closed, since if every closed contains then so does , and if then for each closed , whence for each such , so .
Let ; then since , and if with then by closure, so ; by induction , hence relates every to at least one .
Suppose with ; then still contains and is closed, since any generated pair has by P1 and so is never equal to ; this contradicts the minimality of , so is the unique second coordinate paired with .
Let ; then by step 2.2.
Assume with unique value , so and by closure; if with , then contains because , and is closed, because a generated pair with can equal only if and , but forces by injectivity, then by uniqueness at , giving , a contradiction; hence is closed and smaller than , contradicting minimality, so is the unique value at and .
By induction , so together with the totality from step 2.1 the relation is a function ; it satisfies , and closure with uniqueness gives for all .
If also satisfies and , then the set contains and is closed under , since implies , so by induction it equals , that is .
Depends on
Used by
- Addition is a well-defined total operation Corollary
- Every nondegenerate interval of ℝ is uncountable Corollary
- Multiplication is a well-defined total operation Corollary
- The a priori bound d(x^*, xₙ) ≤ qⁿ d(x₁,x₀)/(1-q) and the a posteriori bound d(x^*, xₙ₊₁) ≤ q d(xₙ₊₁,xₙ)/(1-q) Corollary
- The extended Euclidean algorithm: the same descent produces integers x, y with ax + by = gcd(a,b), so Bézout coefficients are computed and not merely shown to exist Corollary
- On a closed interval of ℚ there is a continuous unbounded function, a bounded one with no maximum, and one without the intermediate value property Counterexample
- xₖ₊₁ = xₖ + 1/xₖ from x₁ = 1 has strictly decreasing consecutive gaps and diverges, so no uniform c < 1 exists Counterexample
- Addition of natural numbers Definition
- Chebyshev polynomials of the first and second kinds by their three-term recurrences Definition
- Exponentiation of natural numbers, mⁿ, and its agreement with the integer power in ℝ Definition
- Finite sums and finite products of natural numbers, ∑_k<n aₖ and ∏_k<n aₖ in ℕ Definition
- Finite sums and finite products, by recursion Definition
- Integer powers aᵐ Definition
- Integer powers in the complex field Definition
- Multiplication of natural numbers Definition
- Partition of [a,b] as a finite strictly increasing list a = t₀ < t₁ < … < tₙ = b, its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions Definition
- Powers gⁿ: natural exponents in a monoid and integer exponents in a group, with g⁰ = e Definition
- The canonical natural ι(n) = n · 1_F of a field Definition
- The Cantor middle-thirds set as the intersection of the sets Cₙ obtained by removing open middle thirds Definition
- The factorial n! and the falling factorial n^underlinek, defined by recursion in ℕ Definition
- The product g₀ g₁ ⋯ gₙ₋₁ of a finite list in a monoid, by recursion, with the empty product (n = 0) equal to the identity Definition
- The Smith-Volterra-Cantor set: the same construction removing, at stage n ≥ 1, an open middle interval of length 4⁻ⁿ from each of the 2ⁿ⁻¹ remaining intervals Definition
- An explicit greedy rearrangement of the alternating harmonic series with sum 0, and the same recipe for any prescribed real Example
- Arens space S₂ is sequential but not Fréchet–Urysohn Example
- Consecutive Fibonacci numbers are coprime, and for every m ∈ ℕ the Euclidean algorithm on (Fₘ₊₃, Fₘ₊₂) takes exactly m+1 divisions, with quotient 1 in the first m of them and quotient 2 in the last Example
- Taking two positive terms for each negative one rearranges the alternating harmonic series to 3/2 times its sum, by the identity T₃ₙ = S₄ₙ + tfrac12 S₂ₙ Example
- The Babylonian sequence x₁ = 2, xₖ₊₁ = (xₖ + 2/xₖ)/2 decreases to √2 Example
- The block sequence 1/1; 1/2, 2/2; 1/3, 2/3, 3/3; … has subsequential limit set exactly [0,1] Example
- The period-three pattern 1, 1, -2 has partial sums in {0,1,2}, so ∑ aₖ/(k+1) converges by Dirichlet's test although the alternating series test does not apply Example
- The sequence x₁ = 1, xₖ₊₁ = √2 + xₖ increases to 2 Example
- The sequence xₖ₊₁ = (xₖ + 1)/3 is contractive with c = 1/3 and converges to 1/2 Example
- The sequential fan is Fréchet–Urysohn and not first countable Example
- FALSE: every bounded sequence converges False statement
- A countable entourage base can be replaced in ZF by a decreasing symmetric base whose next triple composite lies in the preceding member Lemma
- Cauchy completeness plus the Archimedean property imply the monotone convergence property Lemma
- Every real sequence has a monotone subsequence (the peak / rising-sun lemma) Lemma
- Every subgroup of (ℤ, +) is ⟨ n ⟩ = nℤ for exactly one natural number n Lemma
- Every subset of an at most countable set is at most countable Lemma
- In a field, the additive multiple n · 1_F is the canonical natural ι(n): the additive power of the group-power definition and the canonical natural are the same function, both being the unique one given by the recursion ι(0) = 0_F, ι(σ(n)) = ι(n) + 1_F Lemma
- Nested intervals plus the Archimedean property imply Bolzano-Weierstrass, by repeated bisection Lemma
…and 29 more results.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 18 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- T. Tao, Analysis I, 3rd ed., §2.1-2.3 (Peano axioms, recursion, arithmetic) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Peano axioms (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Aitken, MATH 378 Ch. 1: The Peano Axioms (CSU San Marcos) (standard reference, not scraped)
- B. Kaya, MATH 320 Set Theory (METU lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)