How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Cantor middle-thirds set as the intersection of the sets obtained by removing open middle thirds
Definition
For write
and let be
By the recursion theorem (The recursion theorem), applied to the set , the starting element (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length) and the function , there is a unique family of subsets of with
The Cantor middle-thirds set is
The first step really is the removal of the open middle third. Directly from the clauses,
the middle equality because is an order isomorphism of onto itself with inverse (Ordered field, Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication), and the last because splits, by totality of the order, into , and . The recursion then performs the same operation inside each of the two scaled copies, which is what "removing the open middle thirds" names.
Every lies in , by induction on (The principle of mathematical induction): ; and if then and , so (Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities, Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication). The same computation shows that the two halves of are disjoint, the first lying in and the second in , and (The multiplicative identity is positive).
The family is nested, for every , again by induction. For this is . And is monotone, in the sense that implies , directly from the displayed description of ; so gives . Consequently for every , and .
Powers. Here means , the integer power of Integer powers , so that , and for every (Laws of integer exponents, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)).
Remarks
-
Why the self-similar recursion rather than a description by digits. The clause is a single application of The recursion theorem to one explicitly given function on , so nothing is selected at any stage and no listing of the intervals making up has to be constructed. Every structural property below is then proved by induction on through . The description by ternary digits is a theorem about , not its definition, and it is The Cantor set is exactly the set of with every , and this gives a bijection with .
-
is not empty. for every , by induction: , and gives . Likewise , since gives . So contains at least the two endpoints; that it is in fact uncountable is The Cantor set is compact, perfect, uncountable, nowhere dense and of measure zero, and it contains no interval of positive length, so its only nonempty connected subsets are single points.
-
The construction with a different proportion. Replacing "middle third" by an interval of length removed at stage produces a set that is closed, has empty interior and is not of measure zero (The Smith-Volterra-Cantor set: the same construction removing, at stage , an open middle interval of length from each of the remaining intervals). So none of the qualitative properties of proved on this page is a consequence of its being nowhere dense, and the two constructions are kept apart deliberately.
Depends on
- Intervals of $\mathbb{R}$: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
- The recursion theorem
- The principle of mathematical induction
- Integer powers $a^m$
- Laws of integer exponents
- Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)
- Ordered field
- The multiplicative identity is positive
- Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities
- Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication
Used by
- The Cantor function is continuous on [0,1] Corollary
- 1/4 lies in the Cantor set and is the endpoint of no removed interval, so the endpoints do not exhaust it Counterexample
- The Cantor function on [0,1], defined on the Cantor set through ternary digits and extended constantly across each removed interval Definition
- The Smith-Volterra-Cantor set: the same construction removing, at stage n ≥ 1, an open middle interval of length 4⁻ⁿ from each of the 2ⁿ⁻¹ remaining intervals Definition
- [0,1] and the Cantor set are compact, by Heine-Borel and by closedness inside [0,1]; and, assuming the Axiom of Choice, so is [0,1]^ℕ, by Tychonoff Example
- ℝ ≈ P(ℕ) in ZF, by the Cantor set for one injection and by the cuts {q ∈ ℚ : q < x} for the other; so | ℝ | = 2^ℵ₀ under the Axiom of Choice Example
- The Cantor function takes the value 1/2 on all of [1/3, 2/3], and its values at 1/9, 1/4 and 7/9 Example
- The Cantor set contains no interval of positive length yet has no isolated point, so every connected subset of it is a single point Example
- The Cantor set has measure zero, yet the Cantor function maps it onto all of [0,1]: a null set can have image an interval of length 1 Example
- The Cantor set is homeomorphic to {0,1}^ℕ with the product of discrete topologies, the ternary digits being the coordinates Example
- The indicator of the Cantor set is discontinuous exactly on the Cantor set, which is null, so it is Riemann integrable with integral 0 even though it is discontinuous at uncountably many points Example
- Which points of [0,1] lie in the Cantor set, read off their ternary expansions, with 1/4 worked out Example
- FALSE: the Cantor set is countable because only countably many intervals were removed False statement
- The Cantor function is continuous and nondecreasing, climbs from 0 to 1, and is constant on every interval removed in the construction of the Cantor set, so all of its increase happens on a set of measure zero Remark
- The Cantor function is well defined, satisfies c(x) ≤ c(y) whenever x ≤ y, is surjective onto [0,1], and is constant on every interval removed from the Cantor set Theorem
- The Cantor set is compact, perfect, uncountable, nowhere dense and of measure zero, and it contains no interval of positive length, so its only nonempty connected subsets are single points Theorem
- The Cantor set is exactly the set of ∑_k ≥ 1 aₖ 3⁻ᵏ with every aₖ ∈ {0,2}, and this gives a bijection with {0,1}^ℕ Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 53 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Cantor set (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 2 (§2.44) (standard reference, not scraped)
- University of Chicago MATH 395 notes (standard reference, not scraped)