How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The indicator of the Cantor set is discontinuous exactly on the Cantor set, which is null, so it is Riemann integrable with integral even though it is discontinuous at uncountably many points
Example
Let be the Cantor middle-thirds set (The Cantor middle-thirds set as the intersection of the sets obtained by removing open middle thirds) and let be its indicator, for and otherwise. Then:
- is discontinuous at every point of and continuous at every point of , so its set of discontinuities is exactly (Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point, Discontinuity of at a point of its domain, and its classification: removable discontinuity, jump discontinuity and essential discontinuity, equivalently Rudin's discontinuities of the first and of the second kind);
- is Riemann integrable on , because has measure zero (The Cantor set is compact, perfect, uncountable, nowhere dense and of measure zero, and it contains no interval of positive length, so its only nonempty connected subsets are single points, Lebesgue's criterion for Riemann integrability: a bounded on is Riemann integrable if and only if its set of discontinuities has measure zero);
- .
The point of the example is claim 2 against claim 1. The discontinuity set is uncountable (The Cantor set is compact, perfect, uncountable, nowhere dense and of measure zero, and it contains no interval of positive length, so its only nonempty connected subsets are single points, Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable), so no cardinality argument such as A bounded function on whose set of discontinuities is at most countable is Riemann integrable applies; what makes the function integrable is that can be covered by intervals of arbitrarily small total length, and nothing else.
Only the implication "measure zero integrable" of Lebesgue's criterion for Riemann integrability: a bounded on is Riemann integrable if and only if its set of discontinuities has measure zero is used, so no choice principle is involved.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Cantor set and its indicator .
is closed and bounded, has measure zero, is uncountable, and contains no interval with two distinct endpoints; in particular is nowhere dense, so the interior of is empty and every nonempty open subset of contains a point outside (The Cantor set is compact, perfect, uncountable, nowhere dense and of measure zero, and it contains no interval of positive length, so its only nonempty connected subsets are single points, The Cantor middle-thirds set as the intersection of the sets obtained by removing open middle thirds, Measure zero (a countable cover by intervals of total length below every ) and content zero (a finite such cover), Nowhere dense, meager (first category), residual, and second category subsets of , Interior, closure, boundary and exterior of a subset of , Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable).
A set is closed exactly when every point outside it has a neighbourhood missing it (Open subset of (every point has a neighbourhood inside it), closed subset (complement open), and clopen, The -neighbourhood and the punctured -neighbourhood of a point of ).
A bounded on with is Riemann integrable if and only if its set of discontinuities has measure zero; the implication from "measure zero" to "integrable" uses no choice principle (Lebesgue's criterion for Riemann integrability: a bounded on is Riemann integrable if and only if its set of discontinuities has measure zero, Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set).
For a partition of : , , , , and is a nonempty open subset of (Partition of as a finite strictly increasing list , its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions, Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length, Open subset of (every point has a neighbourhood inside it), closed subset (complement open), and clopen).
, , is the supremum of the lower sums, the infimum of the upper sums, and the integral is their common value when they agree (For bounded on and a partition : the infimum and supremum of on the -th subinterval, and the lower and upper Darboux sums and , The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded on as and , Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation ).
A set with a least element has it as its infimum; the supremum of is (Greatest lower bound (infimum), Maximum and minimum of a set, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)).
Ordered-field arithmetic: for and a real the reals and satisfy and (Maximum and minimum of a set, Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities, Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication, Ordered field, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property), The -neighbourhood and the punctured -neighbourhood of a point of , Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length). These order-arithmetic facts are stated by their sources for the strict order only; the nonstrict forms used below follow by adjoining the equality case, in which the two sides coincide.
Verification
takes only the values and , so it is bounded on and its Darboux sums and integrals are defined by [L5].
Discontinuity on . Let , so , and let a real be given. By [L8] the set is a nonempty open interval, so by [L1] it contains a point ; then , and . So the continuity condition fails at for .
Continuity off . Let with . Since is closed, [L2] gives a real with , so vanishes on and there for every .
So the set of discontinuities of in is exactly , which has measure zero by [L1]; by [L3] and , is Riemann integrable on .
Every lower sum is . Let be a partition of and . By [L4] the interval is a nonempty open subset of , so by [L1] it contains a point outside , at which takes the value ; since , the value is the least element of and by [L6]. Hence by [L5] and [L7].
The set of lower sums is , so by [L6]; and is integrable by step 2.1, so by [L5].
Remarks
-
Uncountably many discontinuities, and the integral does not notice. is uncountable (The Cantor set is compact, perfect, uncountable, nowhere dense and of measure zero, and it contains no interval of positive length, so its only nonempty connected subsets are single points), so this function is outside the reach of A bounded function on whose set of discontinuities is at most countable is Riemann integrable and is the standard demonstration that the Lebesgue criterion is strictly stronger than the countable one.
-
Every upper sum is at least the total length of the subintervals meeting , and that total goes to . The proof above does not need this, since integrability comes from the criterion and the value from the lower sums alone; but it is the reason the upper sums also converge to , and it is precisely where the Smith-Volterra-Cantor set behaves differently (The indicator of the Smith-Volterra-Cantor set is discontinuous exactly on a nowhere dense set, and is not Riemann integrable, because that set does not have measure zero).
-
The two hypotheses of claim 1 are the two properties of that matter. Closedness gives continuity off ; empty interior gives discontinuity on . A set with both is exactly a closed nowhere dense set, and any such set is the discontinuity set of its own indicator. Whether that indicator is integrable then depends only on whether the set is null, which is what FALSE: a bounded function on is Riemann integrable exactly when its set of discontinuities is nowhere dense settles in the negative for category.
Depends on
- Lebesgue's criterion for Riemann integrability: a bounded $f$ on $[a,b]$ is Riemann integrable if and only if its set of discontinuities has measure zero
- The Cantor middle-thirds set as the intersection of the sets $C_n$ obtained by removing open middle thirds
- The Cantor set is compact, perfect, uncountable, nowhere dense and of measure zero, and it contains no interval of positive length, so its only nonempty connected subsets are single points
- Measure zero (a countable cover by intervals of total length below every $\varepsilon$) and content zero (a finite such cover)
- Nowhere dense, meager (first category), residual, and second category subsets of $\mathbb{R}$
- Interior, closure, boundary and exterior of a subset of $\mathbb{R}$
- Continuity of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a point of $A$ and on $A$: the $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ condition, its agreement with $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c)$ at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point
- Discontinuity of $f$ at a point of its domain, and its classification: removable discontinuity, jump discontinuity and essential discontinuity, equivalently Rudin's discontinuities of the first and of the second kind
- For bounded $f$ on $[a,b]$ and a partition $P$: the infimum $m_i$ and supremum $M_i$ of $f$ on the $i$-th subinterval, and the lower and upper Darboux sums $L(f,P) = \sum_i m_i \Delta_i$ and $U(f,P) = \sum_i M_i \Delta_i$
- The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded $f$ on $[a,b]$ as $\sup_P L(f,P)$ and $\inf_P U(f,P)$, Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation $\int_a^b f$
- Partition of $[a,b]$ as a finite strictly increasing list $a = t_0 < t_1 < \dots < t_n = b$, its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions
- Laws of finite sums and finite products
- Finite sums and finite products, by recursion
- Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable
- Intervals of $\mathbb{R}$: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
- Open subset of $\mathbb{R}$ (every point has a neighbourhood inside it), closed subset (complement open), and clopen
- The $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood and the punctured $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood of a point of $\mathbb{R}$
- Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set
- Greatest lower bound (infimum)
- Maximum and minimum of a set
- Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)
- Ordered field
- Order is preserved by adding a constant and by adding inequalities
- Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 155 results over 26 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Cantor set (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Riemann integral (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- MAT425 Lecture Notes (Princeton University) (standard reference, not scraped)