How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Interior, closure, boundary and exterior of a subset of
Definition
Let , with open and closed sets as in Open subset of (every point has a neighbourhood inside it), closed subset (complement open), and clopen.
- The interior of is the union of all open subsets of :
- The closure of is the intersection of all closed supersets of :
- The boundary of is .
- The exterior of is .
Both operators are well defined and deliver what their names claim. The family whose union defines always contains , and the family whose intersection defines always contains , so the second family is nonempty and both expressions denote subsets of without appeal to any convention about empty unions or intersections. Moreover:
- is open, being a union of open sets (Arbitrary unions and finite intersections of open subsets of are open, and dually for closed sets, claim 1), and , since every set in the family is a subset of . It is therefore the largest open subset of : any open is a member of the family and so .
- is closed, being an intersection of a nonempty family of closed sets (Arbitrary unions and finite intersections of open subsets of are open, and dually for closed sets, claim 3), and , since every set in the family contains . It is therefore the smallest closed superset of : any closed is a member of the family and so .
Pointwise description of the interior. For ,
If then, being open and containing , there is with . Conversely if then is an open subset of (Open subset of (every point has a neighbourhood inside it), closed subset (complement open), and clopen) containing , hence (The -neighbourhood and the punctured -neighbourhood of a point of ).
The corresponding pointwise description of the closure is not a definitional matter and is proved separately, as The closure equals the set together with its limit points, equals the set of points every neighbourhood of which meets it, and is the smallest closed superset; a set is closed iff it contains its limit points.
Remarks
-
The four sets partition nothing by themselves, but three of them do. For every the three sets , and are pairwise disjoint with union . This is not proved here and is not used on this page; what is used is only the definitions above and the characterisations of The closure equals the set together with its limit points, equals the set of points every neighbourhood of which meets it, and is the smallest closed superset; a set is closed iff it contains its limit points.
-
Interior and closure are dual. Complementation exchanges the two families above, since is open exactly when is closed, so and . The second identity is the reason the exterior is usually described as "the complement of the closure".
-
is open exactly when , and closed exactly when . For the first: always, and holds exactly when is one of the open subsets of , that is, exactly when is open. The closure half is the same argument read the other way, and it is recorded as a claim of The closure equals the set together with its limit points, equals the set of points every neighbourhood of which meets it, and is the smallest closed superset; a set is closed iff it contains its limit points because the rest of that theorem needs it.
-
Boundary points may or may not belong to the set. , and the two boundary points lie outside the first set and inside the second; the boundary sees only the way the set meets its complement, not which side the edge is assigned to.
Depends on
- Open subset of $\mathbb{R}$ (every point has a neighbourhood inside it), closed subset (complement open), and clopen
- The $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood and the punctured $\varepsilon$-neighbourhood of a point of $\mathbb{R}$
- Arbitrary unions and finite intersections of open subsets of $\mathbb{R}$ are open, and dually for closed sets
Used by
- A function continuous on an interval I whose derivative vanishes at every interior point of I is constant on I; consequently two such functions with the same derivative differ by a constant Corollary
- A uniformly continuous real function on a subset D ⊆ ℝ extends uniquely to a uniformly continuous function on the closure of D Corollary
- If f is continuous on an interval I and |f'| ≤ M at every interior point, then |f(x) - f(y)| ≤ M|x-y| for all x,y ∈ I, so f is Lipschitz with constant M and uniformly continuous on I Corollary
- ℚ is F_σ, meager and not G_δ, while the irrationals are G_δ, residual and not F_σ Corollary
- The connected subspaces of ℝ with its usual topology are exactly the order-convex subsets, the published characterisation transported by the identification of the two descriptions of "open in ℝ" Corollary
- ℚ ∩ [0,2] is bounded and disconnected, so being an interval of ℚ is not enough Counterexample
- ℚ is dense in ℝ and has measure zero Counterexample
- ℝ is the union of a meager set and a set of measure zero, so smallness of category and smallness of measure are independent notions Counterexample
- The Dirichlet function on [0,1] has lower Darboux integral 0 and upper Darboux integral 1, so it is bounded and not Riemann integrable Counterexample
- The identity on [0,1] attains its maximum at 1 and its minimum at 0 with derivative 1 at both, so Fermat's theorem genuinely needs the extremum to be at an interior point Counterexample
- The indicator of ℚ has a limit at no point of ℝ Counterexample
- The indicator of ℚ is continuous at no point of ℝ Counterexample
- The indicator of the Smith-Volterra-Cantor set is discontinuous exactly on a nowhere dense set, and is not Riemann integrable, because that set does not have measure zero Counterexample
- x ↦ √x on (0,1] is differentiable with unbounded derivative and is not Lipschitz there, so the boundedness hypothesis in the Lipschitz corollary cannot be dropped Counterexample
- Limit point, isolated point, adherent point, derived set, and dense subset of ℝ Definition
- Local (relative) maximum and minimum of f : A → ℝ at a point, the strict forms, and what it means for the point to be interior to A Definition
- Nowhere dense, meager (first category), residual, and second category subsets of ℝ Definition
- Separated sets, disconnection, and connected subset of ℝ Definition
- Baire category gives a third proof that ℝ is uncountable Example
- For every F_σ subset E of [0,1] of measure zero there is a bounded Riemann integrable function on [0,1] whose set of discontinuities is exactly E Example
- ℚ has closure ℝ, empty interior, and boundary ℝ Example
- The indicator of the Cantor set is discontinuous exactly on the Cantor set, which is null, so it is Riemann integrable with integral 0 even though it is discontinuous at uncountably many points Example
- The mean value theorem gives |√x - √y| ≤ 1/ι(2) |x - y| for x, y ≥ 1, so the square root is Lipschitz with constant 1/2 on [1,∞) Example
- Thomae's function is Riemann integrable on [0,1] with integral 0: it is continuous at every irrational, so its discontinuity set is countable, and every lower Darboux sum is 0 Example
- x · 1_ℚ(x) has a limit at 0 and at no other point Example
- FALSE: a bounded function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable exactly when its set of discontinuities is nowhere dense False statement
- FALSE: a nonnegative Riemann integrable function on [a,b] with ∫ₐᵇ f = 0 is identically zero False statement
- FALSE: every bounded function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable False statement
- FALSE: every subset of ℝ of measure zero is nowhere dense False statement
- FALSE: if f'(c) = 0 then f is not increasing on any interval containing c False statement
- FALSE: in the substitution theorem the continuity of f may be weakened to integrability, f∘φ still being integrable False statement
- FALSE: the image of a closed subset of ℝ under a continuous real function is closed False statement
- A point lies in the closure of A ⊆ ℝ iff some sequence in A converges to it, so a subset of ℝ is closed iff it is sequentially closed Lemma
- Baire category inside a closed bounded interval: if [a,b] with a < b is covered by a sequence of closed sets, then one of them contains a nondegenerate closed subinterval of [a,b]; no choice principle is used Lemma
- Which results on this page use the order of ℝ and therefore have no general-topological analogue Remark
- A bounded function on [a,b] that is continuous except at finitely many points is Riemann integrable Theorem
- A subset of ℝ is compact iff it is sequentially compact Theorem
- A subset of ℝ is connected if and only if it is order-convex, that is, an interval Theorem
- Baire category in ℝ, by nested intervals with canonically chosen rational endpoints: a countable intersection of dense open sets is dense, so ℝ is not a countable union of nowhere dense sets Theorem
- Baire's theorem: a Baire class one function on a closed bounded interval [a,b] is continuous at the points of a dense subset of [a,b] that is the trace of a G_δ set, so its set of discontinuities is meager Theorem
…and 8 more results.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 21 results over 8 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Interior (topology) (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Closure (topology) (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Boundary (topology) (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. K. Hunter, An Introduction to Real Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)